thejasminebrand.com SO SO DEF PRODUCTIONS, INC., thejasminebrand.com

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. -v- Civil No. 3:12-cv-4176

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

Case 3:12-cv M Document 6 Filed 11/07/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID 18

Case 4:10-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/18/10 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. v. No. 1:18-cv- COMPLAINT COLLECTIVE ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CASE NO.:

Case 3:10-cv HEH Document 1 Filed 08/19/10 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/17/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

3:14-cv JFA Date Filed 10/03/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:09-cv CAP Document 1 Filed 12/21/2009 Page 1 of 14

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION AMENDED COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

2:14-cv DCN Date Filed 10/23/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10

Case 3:10-cv P-BN Document 76 Filed 07/27/11 Page 1 of 11 PageID 995

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/23/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 5:15-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 07/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT

INDIVIDUAL, COLLECTIVE, AND CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

2.1T FILED. 3; b ov 16go-J-.9s- CLERK, U. S. DISTRICT COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/27/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

Case 5:18-cv UJH-MHH Document 1 Filed 09/19/18 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:16-cv LDW-SIL Document 1 Filed 11/28/16 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 19. No. 16-cv-6584

Case 3:16-cv LB Document 1 Filed 06/11/16 Page 1 of 14

Case 1:18-cv MSK-KMT Document 1 Filed 09/18/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COLUMBIA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COLLECTIVE ACTION COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/03/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Hon.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/07/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Defendants.

Case 1:16-cv MJW Document 1 Filed 02/09/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff, Defendant.

Case 9:17-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/04/2017 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1. Plaintiffs, COMPLAINT

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/31/17 Page 1 of 14

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

similarly situated, seeks the recovery of unpaid wages and related damages for unpaid minimum wage and overtime hours worked, while employed by Bab.

Case: 1:17-cv DCN Doc #: 14 Filed: 03/02/17 1 of 19. PageID #: 69

6:15-cv MGL Date Filed 10/13/15 Entry Number 26 Page 1 of 13

1. OVERTIME COMPENSATION AND

P H I L L I P S DAYES

Case 3:16-cv GMG Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/30/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1. No.: Defendants.

Case: 3:11-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/23/11 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the putative class.

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/10/18 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/20/17 Page 1 of 13

Case 7:18-cv CS Document 15 Filed 05/31/18 Page 1 of 23

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

("FLSA"). This Court has supplemental jurisdiction over the New York state law claims, as they. (212) (212) (fax)

they are so related in this action within such original jurisdiction that they form part (212) (212) (fax)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 4:15-cv Document 1 Filed 08/24/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION. v. CASE NO. 15-CV-1588

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 15

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 03/15/17 Page 1 of 7

KUO, M.J. STATEME1IT. (hereinafter referred to as "Defendants"), to recover damages for egregious violations. Telephone: U.

Case3:15-cv Document1 Filed01/09/15 Page1 of 16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:18-cv JHE Document 1 Filed 04/24/18 Page 1 of 20

Case: 2:16-cv ALM-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/22/16 Page: 1 of 22 PAGEID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/01/17 Page 1 of 23. Plaintiff,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/27/16 Page 1 of 15

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 19

Case: 3:14-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/31/14 1 of 18. PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. Case No. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 01/20/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiffs, COLLECTIVE AND CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT v. (JURY TRIAL DEMANDED)

Case3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5

Case 2:11-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/09/11 Page 1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

ThSTS. hereby state and allege. bring this action under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.

"Defendants"), to recover damages for egregious. Plaintiffs, -against- counsel, brings this action against FIVE BROTHERS AUTO SPA AND LUBE

Case 6:17-cv EFM-GLR Document 1 Filed 12/22/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Courthouse News Service

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/04/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1

7:14-cv TMC Date Filed 10/21/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 13

Case 2:17-cv SGC Document 1 Filed 12/29/17 Page 1 of 14

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

JURISDICTION AND VENUE. 2. This Court has original federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1331

Case 8:10-cv RWT Document 77 Filed 03/09/12 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Case 1:17-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/11/2017 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 1:19-cv AJN Document 2 Filed 02/25/19 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 08/14/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs,

Case 2:14-cv JFW-AGR Document 1 Filed 06/10/14 Page 1 of 18 Page ID #:1

Case 1:19-cv BPG Document 1 Filed 01/02/19 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARLYAND

Transcription:

Case 1:14-cv-02606-SCJ Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NOTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION TADDRICK MINGO v. Plaintiff, SO SO DEF PRODUCTIONS, INC., Defendant. CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES COMES NOW Plaintiff Taddrick Mingo, by and through his undersigned counsel of record, and files this Complaint for Damages against So So Def Productions, Inc. (hereinafter, So So Def, showing the Court as follows: JUISDICTION AND VENUE 1. Plaintiff invokes this action under the Fair labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended 29 U.S.C. 201 et seq. ( FLSA to recover (1 unpaid, federally mandated overtime wages owed to Plaintiff and liquidated damages in an 1

Case 1:14-cv-02606-SCJ Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 2 of 13 amount equal to unpaid overtime wages; and (2 reasonable attorneys fees and costs. 2. Plaintiff invokes the jurisdiction of this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 on the grounds that this action arises under the Fair Labor and Standards Act (hereinafter, FLSA 29 U.S.C. 201 et. seq. In addition, Plaintiff invokes this Court s pendent jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367 with respect to Plaintiff s state law claims. 3. The venue of this action is properly placed in the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391because the activities giving rise to Plaintiff s claims transpired in this district and Defendant is a resident of this District. PARTIES 4. Plaintiff Taddrick Mingo is a citizen of the United States, a resident of the State of Georgia, and is subject to the jurisdiction of this Court. 5. 2

Case 1:14-cv-02606-SCJ Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 3 of 13 Defendant So So Def. is qualified and licensed to do business in Georgia and at all times material hereto has conducted business within this District. 6. Defendant is an employer, and Plaintiff is one of its employees. 7. Defendant maintains its principal office at 133 Peachtree Street Northeast, Suite 4070, Atlanta, Georgia 30303, and is subject to the jurisdiction of this Court. It may be served by delivering process to Willie Carter, Jr., its registered agent, at said address. STATEMENT OF FACTS 8. 9. Defendant is a music production/consultant company. 10. 3

Case 1:14-cv-02606-SCJ Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 4 of 13 Plaintiff began his employment with Defendant on approximately May 2010 as a recording engineer, road manager and personal assistant to owner and CEO of So So Def, Mr. Jermaine Dupri Mauldin, (hereinafter, Mr. Dupri. 11. In establishing the terms of his employment with Defendant, Plaintiff and Mr. Dupri agreed Plaintiff would receive an annual salary [HOW MUCH?]. 12. In reliance upon the terms of the agreement, starting on or around May 2010, Plaintiff began working an average of sixty-five hours per week for Defendant. Notwithstanding the agreement, Defendant did not compensate Plaintiff for his services. 13. Soon after his employment commenced in 2010, Plaintiff questioned Mr. Dupri as to why he had not been compensated for his services. In response, Mr. Dupri assured Plaintiff he would be paid. 14. After several more months of working without pay, Plaintiff again questioned Mr. Dupri regarding the issue of his compensation. After numerous 4

Case 1:14-cv-02606-SCJ Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 5 of 13 requests for payment to, and corresponding empty reassurances from, Mr. Dupri during the period of 2010 through 2014, Plaintiff was forced to resign. 15. Upon his resignation, Plaintiff again contacted Mr. Dupri regarding Plaintiff s pay and Mr. Dupri agreed Plaintiff was owed compensation. 16. Following this conversation, Plaintiff provided Mr. Dupri with an estimate of the monies he was owed for his services, but again Plaintiff received no compensation and no explanation. COUNT ONE FLSA VIOLATION 29 U.S.C. 207(a(1 17. 18. During the statutory period, Plaintiff was employed by Defendant. Plaintiff provided services as a recording engineer, road manager and personal assistant to Defendant and Mr. Durpi. 19. 5

Case 1:14-cv-02606-SCJ Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 6 of 13 20. Defendant s actions, policies, and/or practices described above are in violation of the FLSA s overtime requirements as they fail to adequately compensate Plaintiff for time spent on work activities as described 21. As the direct and proximate result of Defendant s willful and unlawful conduct, Plaintiff has suffered loss of income and other damages. Plaintiff is entitled to unpaid wages, additional liquidated damages, and attorneys fees and costs incurred in connection with this claim. COUNT TWO FLSA VIOLATION 29 U.S.C. 206(a(1 22. 23. During the statutory period, Plaintiff was employed by Defendant. Plaintiff provided services as a recording engineer, road manager and personal assistant to Defendant and Mr. Durpi. 24. 6

Case 1:14-cv-02606-SCJ Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 7 of 13 25. Defendant s actions, policies, and/or practices described above are in violation of the FLSA s minimum wage requirements as they fail to adequately compensate Plaintiff for time spent on work activities as described 26. As the direct and proximate result of Defendant s willful and unlawful conduct, Plaintiff has suffered loss of income and other damages. Plaintiff is entitled to unpaid wages, additional liquidated damages, and attorneys fees and costs incurred in connection with this claim. COUNT THREE BREACH OF CONTRACT 27. 28. Plaintiff and Defendant agreed to enter into an employment relationship where Plaintiff would provide services as a recording engineer, road manager and personal assistant to Defendant and Mr. Durpi and Defendant would pay Plaintiff an annual salary. 7

Case 1:14-cv-02606-SCJ Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 8 of 13 29. Defendant breached said agreement by failing to compensate Plaintiff for his services after Plaintiff had performed his obligation under the contract. 30. As the direct and proximate result of Defendant s willful and unlawful conduct, Plaintiff has suffered damages in an amount to be determined at trial. COUNT FOUR CONVERSION 31. 32. Upon performance of employment services, Plaintiff is entitled to compensation and such compensation constitutes Plaintiff s personal property. 33. Defendant has wilfully refused to compensate Plaintiff for employment services provided, compensation which Plaintiff is entitled to. 34. 8

Case 1:14-cv-02606-SCJ Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 9 of 13 Defendant has deprived Plaintiff of his employment compensation, and such an act is inconsistent with Plaintiff s possessory rights to his personal property. 35. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant s unlawful conduct, Plaintiff has suffered damages in an amount to be determined at trial. COUNT FIVE UNJUST ENRICHMENT 36. 37. Defendant induced Plaintiff to provide services as a recording engineer, road manager and personal assistant to Defendant and Mr. Durpi by promising to pay Plaintiff a salary. 38. Defendant has unjustifiably benefited from Plaintiff s services from 2010 through 2014. 39. 9

Case 1:14-cv-02606-SCJ Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 10 of 13 As a direct and proximate result of Defendant s unlawful conduct, Plaintiff has suffered damages in an amount to be determined at trial. COUNT SIX PUNITIVE DAMAGES 40. Plaintiff alleges and incorporates herein by reference each and every allegation set forth above. 41. The acts and omissions of Defendant with respect to his conversion of Plaintiff s personal property and breach of fiduciary duty at issue in this Complaint were outrageous and/or undertaken with reckless indifference to the rights and interests of Plaintiff. 42. To deter Defendant from engaging in conduct similar to that which formed the basis of this lawsuit, Plaintiff is entitled to the maximum award of punitive damages allowed by law. COUNT SEVEN ATTORNEYS FEES 43. 10

Case 1:14-cv-02606-SCJ Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 11 of 13 44. Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 216(b, Plaintiff is entitled to an award of attorneys fees and expenses of litigation on each and every cause of action alleged herein, because Defendant has acted in bad faith, been stubbornly litigious, and caused Plaintiff unnecessary trouble and expense. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully prays for: 1 Judgment against Defendant for an amount equal to Plaintiff s unpaid back wages at the applicable overtime rates for a period of approximately four years; 2 Liquidated damages in an additional amount equal to unpaid overtime wages, calculated at the applicable hourly pay rate; 3 Attorneys fees and costs of litigation pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 216(b; 4 Trial by jury as to all issues; 11

Case 1:14-cv-02606-SCJ Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 12 of 13 5 Prejudgment interest at the rate allowed by law; 6 Declaratory relief to the effect Defendant has violated Plaintiff s statutory rights; and 7 Any and all such further relief that this Court or the finder of fact deems equitable and just. Respectfully submitted this 13 th day of August, 2014. MOLDEN & HOLLEY, LLC /s/ David G. Cheng Regina S. Molden Georgia Bar No. 515454 David G. Cheng Georgia Bar No. 762468 Peachtree Center Harris Tower 233 Peachtree Street, N.E. Suite 1245 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Telephone: (404 324-4500 Facsimile: (404 324-4501 Email: rmolden@moldenholley.com Attorneys for Plaintiff 12

Case 1:14-cv-02606-SCJ Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 13 of 13 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE The undersigned counsel hereby certifies that Plaintiff s Complaint for Damages complies with the type-volume limitations set forth in Rule 5.1 of the Local Rules of the Northern District of Georgia. Counsel hereby states that Plaintiff s Complaint for Damages has been typed in Times New Roman 14 point. This 13 th day of August, 2014. /s/ David G. Cheng David G. Cheng Georgia Bar No. 762468 1