UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:14-cv WBS-EFB Document 14 Filed 08/07/14 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

AS MODIFIED. Attorneys for Plaintiff, STERLING SAVINGS BANK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

DISTRICT COURT, FAMILY DIVISION CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

copy 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff CALMAT CO. dba VTJLCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, WESTERN DIVISION 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:08-cv BEN-BLM Document 3 Filed 06/17/2008 Page 1 of 2

Case 2:18-cv R-AGR Document 7 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 5:12-cv EJD Document 1134 Filed 01/27/16 Page 1 of 8

1 The parties to this action, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to. 2 the following:

TO THE HONORABLE TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, CHIEF JUSTICE, AND TO THE HONORABLE ASSOCIATE JUSTICES OF THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OMARI BOBO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

REQUEST FOR PUBLICATION OF OPINION. Andre Torigian v. WT Capital Lender Services Case No. F (Fresno County Superior Court No.

LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL D.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION } } } } } } } } } } } } } } /

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

in furtherance of and in response to its Tentative Decision dated 1/4/2010 addressing various matters

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 424 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 5

This matter came on regularly before this Court for hearings on October 7,2004 and on April

Part Description 1 5 pages 2 Proposed Order Proposed Order to Motion for Summary Judgment

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT GRANTING PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE

OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY ROCKARD J. DELGADILLO CITY ATTORNEY REPORT RE: COURT RULING

DEC 1 i1z ) FOR DEFENDANTS DEMURRER TO ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ) ) Time: 439-pm.3) C.D. Michel -

IN THE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CHURCHILL

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

CLAIM FOR MONEY OR DAMAGES r\eceiyeu WARNING liodesto CITY CLERK Be sure your claim is filed with the' -.. ment Code Section 910 et seq)

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case btb Doc 249 Entered 05/19/17 16:27:09 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA. Chapter 7

the unverified First Amended Complaint (the Complaint ) of plaintiffs MIKE SPITZER and

Case 2:09-cv DOC-RZ Document 72 Filed 08/31/10 Page 1 of 37 Page ID #:992

SAMPLE FORM F NOTICE DESIGNATING RECORD ON APPEAL

Attorneys for Defendant and Respondent CITY OF ANAHEIM SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

FAX. IN TUE SUPERIOR COURT OF TUE STATE OF caiafornia INANDFORTHLCQLNTYOELOSANELES. EAST l)i$trict

COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION 2. CALGUNS FOUNDATION INC., et al v. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO

Case 3:13-cv EMC Document 736 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiffs and Appellants, Defendants and Res ondents.

Benjamin v. Google Inc. Doc. 45

HAROLD P. STURGEON, Plaintiff and Petitioner, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants and Respondents, and

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION)

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Plaintiff{s),

Case: Document: 6 Filed: 11/03/2016 Pages: 6 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

)

No [DC# CV MJJ] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. RUSSELL ALLEN NORDYKE; et al., Plaintiffs - Appellants,

Case 2:15-cv MMD-GWF Document 50 Filed 09/19/16 Page 1 of 4

Case 1:12-cv LJO-SKO Document 10 Filed 04/16/13 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION

PREPARATION OF A TRIAL STATEMENT

DEFAULT PACKET P-1. The District Court Filing Office is located on the first floor at: 75 Court Street Reno, NV 89501

TAKE ACTION NOW TO PROTECT YOUR INTERESTS!

IIAR CONN )14)R1) toliv

Jonathan Arvizu v. City of Pasadena Request for Publication Second District Case No.: B Superior Court Case No.: BC550929

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS

Case 2:14-cv GW-AS Document 6 Filed 07/07/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:389

CIV CIV DS ORDR Order GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF

CON. KEhrlichjmbm.com. ECulleyjmbm.com. 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff CALMAT CO. dba VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, WESTERN DIVISION 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. CINDY LEE GARCIA, an individual, Case No. CV MWF (VBKx) Plaintiff,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. CINDY LEE GARCIA, an individual, Case No. CV MWF (VBKx) Plaintiff,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

vs. ) NOTICE OF RULING 14 )

Case3:11-cv WHA Document33 Filed01/06/12 Page1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Plaintiffs,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Fresno County Superior Court, Case No. 1OCECGO2 116 The Honorable Jeffrey Y. Hamilton, Judge

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

LODGED. MHY p CLERK, QS DISTRICT COL VIRAL DISTRICT OF CA i, F,, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNI A

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES NORTH CENTRAL DISTRICT (GLENDALE) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

By S. Lee, Deputy Clerk

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

EX PARTE MOTION FOR PUBLICATION OF CITATION TO APPEAR AND SHOW CAUSE FOR MINOR GUARDIANSHIP G-7

REPLY TO COUNTERCLAIM A 1. The District Court Filing Office is located on the first floor at: 75 Court Street Reno, NV

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENT

c - _: _ April 10, 2012 Re: officials whc)worktogether and combinetheir resources so that they may influence.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

2:11-cv R -JCG Document 58 Filed 01/06/12 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:699

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Petitioners, Real Parties in Interest.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS F-5. The District Court Filing Office is located on the first floor at: 75 Court Street Reno, NV 89501

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER ANSWERING A BREACH OF CONTRACT COMPLAINT

Case 3:08-cv VRW Document 9 Filed 07/23/2008 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS

Case 2:00-cv GAF-RC Document 435 Filed 05/14/13 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:1893

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

Case 2:12-cv PSG-RZ Document 1 Filed 10/10/12 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No John Teixeira; et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants,

DISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

-1- Case No 13.,.md-2452-AJB.:MDD JOINT SUBMISSION REGARDING THE PROPOSED ORGANIZATION OF SCIENCE DAY

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF KERN, NORTH KERN DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Transcription:

Case :0-cv-000-WQH-KSC Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 Joseph L. Oliva, Esq., State Bar No. Thomas E. Ladegaard, State Bar No. OLIVA & ASSOCIATES ALC 0 Bernardo Plaza Court, Suite 0 San Diego, California Telephone: ( -0 Facsimile: ( -0 Attorneys for Plaintiff FDIC as Receiver for LA JOLLA BANK LA JOLLA BANK, FSB, a Federally Chartered Savings Bank, v. Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DANNY TARKANIAN, an individual; AMY M. TARKANIAN, an individual; JERRY TARKANIAN, an individual; LOIS TARKANIAN, an individual; GEORGE TARKANIAN, an individual; ZAFRIR DIAMANT, an individual; JOSEPHINE DIAMANT, an individual; DOUGLAS R. JOHNSON, an individual; DEBRA JOHNSON, an individual; and DOES through 00, inclusive, Defendants. AND RELATED CROSS ACTION. Case No.: 0-cv-00-WQH (KSC NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO REGISTER JUDGMENT IN FOREIGN DISTRICTS AND FOR CERTIFIED JUDGMENT DATE: October, 0 TIME: :00 a.m. LOCATION: Dept. NO ORAL ARGUMENT UNLESS REQUESTED BY THE COURT The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for La Jolla Bank, FSB ( FDIC-R hereby advises the Court that its Motion to Register the Judgment in the Eastern District of California and the District of Nevada and for Certified Copies of the Judgment can be granted as unopposed. / / / CASE NO. 0-CV-00-WQH (KSC

Case :0-cv-000-WQH-KSC Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 With an October, 0 hearing date and the October th holiday, FDIC-R had Defendants Opposition calendared as due on October th. Defense counsel indicated their understanding that the Opposition was due October th, and FDIC-R s counsel responded that no objection would be made if the Opposition was filed by October th. (See Ladegaard Declaration. As of the time of this filing of this Notice, no Opposition has been filed. Local Rule..e. requires a party opposing a motion to file an opposition by the due date. Failure to comply with the briefing schedule or local rules may constitute a consent to the granting of a motion under Local Rule..f..c. Ghazali v. Moran, F.d, ( th Cir. ; United States v. Warren, 0 F.d, ( th Cir.. In light of Defendants failure to timely file an opposition to the instant motion or timely request an extension of time, FDIC-R s motion should be granted as unopposed. Dated: October 0, 0 OLIVA & ASSOCIATES, ALC By: /s/ Joseph L. Oliva /s/ Thomas E. Ladegaard Joseph L. Oliva, Esq. Thomas E. Ladegaard, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff, FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION as Receiver for LA JOLLA BANK CASE NO. 0-CV-00-WQH (KSC

Case :0-cv-000-WQH-KSC Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 DECLARATION OF THOMAS LADEGAARD I, THOMAS LADEGAARD, declare as follows:. I am an associate attorney at Oliva & Associates, ALC, counsel for FDIC-R in this matter. I am licensed to practice law in California and before the Southern District of California. I have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein and if asked to do so I would and could testify truthfully thereto in a court of law.. On October, 0, I received a call from Candace Morlan of the Flangas McMillan office. The purpose of the call was to discuss an extension of the briefing schedule in the Ninth Circuit appeal, on the basis that Mr. Flangas and Mr. Price were tending to family emergencies.. During the call I advised Ms. Morlan that my office has Defendants opposition to the Motion to Register Judgment calendared for October, 0. Ms. Morlan responded that her office has the opposition calendared for October, 0. Given the confusion created by the October th Columbus Day holiday, I advised Ms. Morlan that I would not object if Defendants filed their opposition on October th. Ms. Morlan stated that no extension would be needed because Mr. Price was returning to the office on Thursday, October th.. As of the time this Notice of Non-Opposition is filed, Defendants have not filed any opposition to the instant motion. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 0th day of October 0, at San Diego, California. /s/ Thomas E. Ladegaard CASE NO. 0-CV-00-WQH (KSC

Case :0-cv-000-WQH-KSC Document Filed 0/0/ Page of La Jolla Bank, FSB v. Danny Tarkanian, et ai, U.S.D,c. of California, Southern District, Case No, 0-cv-00-WQH (KSC I am employed in the County ofsan Diego, State ofcalifornia, I am over the age of and not a party to the within action; my business address is 0 Bernardo Plaza Court, Suitc 0, San Diego, California,. On October 0,0, I caused the following document(s described as: NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO REGISTER JUDGMENT IN FOREIGN DISTRICTS AND FOR CERTIFIED JUDGMENT 0 0 to be served on the interested parties in this action as follows: Gus W. Flangas Kim D. Price FLANGAS McMILLAN LAW GROUP S. Jones Boulcvard, Suite 0 Las Vegas, NV T: 0-0-00 F: 0-- gwf(imlapgasmcmillan,com KDP@flam>:asmcmillal].com Douglas R. Johnson Debra Johnson Calville Estates Court Henderson, NV 0 I;g] BY CM/ECF: I caused such document(s to be served electronically pursuant to the U.S. District Court's Electronic Case Filing Program to be delivered electronically to those parties who have registcred to become an E-Filer. o BY U.S. MAIL: I caused such envelope to be deposited in the mail at San Diego, California. The envelope was mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid. I am readily familiar with this firm's practice of collection and processing of correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at San Diego, California in the ordinary course ofbusiness. I am aware that on motion ofthe party served, service is presumed invalid ifpostal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. o Attorneys for Defendants, Counterclaimants and Third Party Plaintiffs In Pro Per BY U.S. MAIL ONLY (Not Registered CM/ECF Users BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE: Based on a court order or an agreement ofthe parties to accept service by electronic transmission, I caused the documents to be sent to the person(s at the electronic notification addresses listed below. I did not receive, within a reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic message or other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful. I CASE NO.IOcv00-WQH (KSC

Case :0-cv-000-WQH-KSC Document Filed 0/0/ Page of D BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY: The documents were placed in sealed, addressed packaging for overnight delivery on this date in the ordinary course ofbusiness, with all charges to be paid by my employer, to be deposited in a facility regularly maintained by the overnight delivery carrier, or delivered to a courier or driver authorized by the overnight delivery carrier to receive such packages to the person(s at the addressees set forth below. I declare under penalty ofperjury under the laws ofthe United States ofamerica that the foregoing is true and correct and that I am employed in the office ofa member ofthe bar ofthis Court at whose direction the service was made. Executed on October 0, 0, at San Diego, California. 0 Kris O'Connor 0 CASE NO.JOcv00~WQH(KSC