Award NASD Dispute Resolution

Similar documents
Award NASD Dispute Resolution

Award NASD Dispute Resolution

Award NASD Dispute Resolution

Award NASD Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution. Hearing Site: Miami, Florida Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. Michael R. Averett

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution. Hearing Site: New York, New York Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution. Hearing Site: New York, New York First Republic Securities Company, LLC

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Attached is the Award in Wachovia Securities v. Brucker, Case no for discussion in the Employment Break-Out Section at the Annual Meeting.

Award FiNRA Dispute Resolution

AWARD FINRA Dispute Resolution. vs. Case Number: Hearing Site: Chicago, Illinois Names of Respondents NATURE OF THE DISPUTE

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution. Santanu Bhattacharya and Gargi Dasgupta (Claimants) vs. Chicago Investment Group LLC and Mitesh Shere (Respondents)

Award NASD Dispute Resolution, Inc.

AWARD NASD Dispute Resolution REPRESENTATION OF PARTIES. CASEINFORl\1ATION

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution

RECEiVED. WELLINGTON SHIELDS & Co. LLC MEMBER NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE FEB 2 21U8

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution REPRESENTATION OF PARTIES

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution. Hearing Site: Houston, Texas Raymond, James & Associates, Inc. and UBS Financial Services Inc.

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution. Claimant Case Number: Karl Austin Pettijohn REPRESENTATION OF PARTIES

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution

PAMS ARBITRATION RULES

National Patent Board Non-Binding Arbitration Rules TABLE OF CONTENTS

NASD CODE OF ARBITRATION PROCEDURE FOR INDUSTRY DISPUTES

1. Please indicate the nature of the initial claim that was filed. Note: AP is the abbreviation for Associated Person. Member vs.

March 30, 2015 Edition. FINRA Dispute Resolution Party s Reference Guide

Investment Consulting Agreement

Wills and Trusts Arbitration RULES

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES. Claimant. Respondent. (ICSID Case No. ARB/xx/xxx) [DRAFT] PROCEDURAL ORDER NO.

Wills and Trusts Arbitration RULES

ICDR INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION ARBITRATION RULES

Initial Pre-hearing Conference Scheduling Order in the Matter of:

Regulatory Notice 17-33

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No.

Executive Summary. The SEC also approved amendments to Rule 10205(h) to conform the injunctive relief fee provision to the permanent rule.

ARBITRATION RULES. Arbitration Rules Archive. 1. Agreement of Parties

Return form to: THE FLORIDA BAR Fee Arbitration Program 651 East Jefferson Street Tallahassee, FL


December 2016 Edition. FINRA Dispute Resolution Party s Reference Guide

TRONOX TORT CLAIMS TRUST. Individual Review and Arbitration Procedures for Category A and Category D Personal Injury Claims

Construction Industry Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex Construction Disputes)

Case 0:10-cv KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/10/2010 Page 1 of 7

Filing # E-Filed 04/04/ :49:40 PM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

May 9, 2016 Edition. FINRA Dispute Resolution Party s Reference Guide Simplified Cases

Filing # E-Filed 07/11/ :27:15 PM

Updated October 1, 2018

Case 3:15-cv GNS Document 1 Filed 08/19/15 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

Case 6:05-cv ACC-DAB Document 56 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

CODE OF PROCEDURE FOR RESOLVING EMPLOYMENT DISPUTES

ARBITRATION RULES. Commercial Brokers Association

Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures

Arbitration Agreement ADR Systems File # xxxxxxxxxxx Insurance Claim # xxxxxxxxxx

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PETITIONER S INITIAL BRIEF ON THE MERITS

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) PROCEDURES

Case 2:14-cv SJO-FFM Document 27 Filed 10/14/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:773

FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS DECISION

GENERAL ARBITRATION RULES AND PROCEDURES Revised March 15, 2016 Copyright by CDRS 2016 all rights reserved

AAA Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex, Commercial Disputes)

FIJI MEDIATION CENTRE

FINANCIAL PLANNING SERVICES AGREEMENT

Rules of the Legal Fee Arbitration Board of the Massachusetts Bar Association As Amended and Effective September 1, 2012

AGREEMENT FOR POLICE SPECIAL DUTY OFFICERS (For Individuals and Private Entities)

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

MEDIATION AGREEMENT TREVERRICK HOUSE NEWQUAY CORNWALL TR8 4PP. This Mediation Agreement (the Agreement ) is made on..

IDR RETAINER AGREEMENT (Freddie Mac Initiated IDR)

DISPUTE RESOLUTION RULES

ANNUAL MINUTES MEETING OF: LLC

CODE OF PROCEDURE FOR RESOLVING BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS DISPUTES

ARIZONA SUPERIOR COURT IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIMA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION HERBERT CROWELL, On Behalf of

Dispute Resolution Around the World. Russia

THE LONDON MARITIME ARBITRATORS ASSOCIATION THE INTERMEDIATE CLAIMS PROCEDURE (2012)

Re: File No. SR-NASD Amendments to NASD Code of Arbitration Procedure Rules and 10205(h) Relating to Injunctive Relief

Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex Commercial Disputes)

Binding Mediation Agreement ADR Systems File # xxxxxxxxx Insurance Claim # xxxxxxxx

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PASCO COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOSHIBA ENTITIES AND THE STATE OF ILLINOIS REGARDING CRT ANTITRUST LITIGATION

SPECIAL DISTRICT RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY A Property and Liability Program for Public Agencies

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SAMPLE DOCUMENT. Date: Type: History Museum. Accredited: [Choose Accreditation Status] USE STATEMENT & COPYRIGHT NOTICE

Case No HO ORDER (1) APPROVING SETTLEMENT WITH SETTLING BROKERS and (2) ENTERING FINAL CLAIMS BAR ORDER AND INJUNCTION

Transcription:

In the Matter of the Arbitration Between: Award Name of the Claimant Case Number: 04-01034 Edwin Rand Names of the Respondents Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. JackB. Grubman Hearing Site: Boca Raton, FL Nature of the Dispute: Customer vs. Member and Associated Person. REPRESENTATION OF PARTIES For Edwin Rand ("Rand"), hereinafter referred to as "Claimant": Michael B. Lynch, Hooper & Weiss, LLC, Orlando, Florida and Marshall P. Richer and Joel S. Finkelstein, Esq., Finkelstein & Partners, Albany, New York. For Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. ("CGMI") and Jack B. Grubman ("Grubman"), hereinafter collectively referred to as "Respondents": Tucker H. Byrd, Esq., Greenberg Traurig, Orlando, Florida. CASE INFORMATION Statement of Claim filed on or about: February 13, 2004. Claimant signed the Uniform Submission Agreement: October 20, 2003. Statement of Answer filed by Respondents on or about: April 30, 2004. Respondent CGMI signed the Uniform Submission Agreement: March 29, 2004. Respondent Grubman signed the Uniform Submission Agreement: April 2, 2004. Memorandum in Response to Respondents' Answer filed by Claimant on or about: May 25, 2004. Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Settlements and Other Inadmissible Documents filed by Respondents on or about: May 18> 2005. Response to Motion in Limine filed by Claimant on or about: May 18, 2005. CASE SUMMARY Claimant asserted the following causes of action: omission to state material facts and conflicts of interest in violation of Section 17(A) of the Securities Act of 1933; omission to state material facts and conflicts of interest in violation of Chapter 517.301 of the Florida Securities and Investor Protection Act; omission to state material facts and conflicts of interest in violation of NASD Rule 2210(d)(l), Communications with the Public-General Standards; breach of fiduciary

Award Page 2 duty; and respondeat superior. The causes of action relate to Claimant's investment in WorldCom stock. Unless specifically admitted in their Answer, Respondents denied the allegations made in the Statement of Claim and asserted various defenses. RELIEF REQUESTED Claimant requested rescissionary damages in the amount of $ 111,970.00, punitive damages in the amount of $100,000.00, plus interest, costs, attorneys' fees and such other relief as deemed appropriate. Respondents requested that Claimant's Statement of Claim be denied in its entirety, and dismissed with prejudice, with attorneys' fees and costs assessed against Claimant. OTHER ISSUES CONSIDERED AND DECIDED On or about December 24, 2003, Claimant filed a notice with representing that Claimant had complied with the procedure for opting out of the class action filed in court, entitled In Re WorldCom Securities Litigation. By Order dated June 1, 2005, the undersigned arbitrators (the "Panel") granted Respondents' Motion in Limine with respect to settlement agreements, Articles Discussing Settlements and the WorldCom DVD and denied Respondents' Motion in Limine with regard to WorldCom Bankruptcy Examiner Reports and the SEC Amicus Brief. The parties have agreed that the Award in this matter may be executed in counterpart copies. AWARD After considering the pleadings, the testimony and evidence presented at the hearing, (and the post-hearing submissions) the Panel has decided in full and final resolution of the issues submitted for determination as follows: 1. Respondents are liable, jointly and severally, and shall pay to Claimant the sum of $111,970.00 in compensatory damages. Damages are awarded based upon the violations of Florida Statutes Sections 517.301 and 517.211. 2. Respondents are liable, jointly and severally, and shall pay to Claimant interest from June 30, 1999 until the date of payment of the Award on the sum of $88,233.00 at the Florida statutory rate. Respondents are also liable, jointly and severally, and shall pay to Claimant interest from January 14, 2000 until the date of payment of the Award on the remaining balance of $23,737.00 at the Florida statutory rate. 3. Claimant's claims for relief pursuant to Florida Statutes Chapter 517 are specifically granted. 4. Respondents are liable, jointly and severally, and shall pay to Claimant, attorney's fees in an amount to be determined by a court of competent jurisdiction. Attorney's fees are awarded pursuant to Florida Statutes Chapter 517. 5. All parties shall bear their respective costs.

Award Page 3 6. Any and all claims for relief not specifically addressed herein, including Claimant's request for punitive damages, are denied. FEES Pursuant to the NASD Code of Arbitration Procedure (the "Code"), the following fees are assessed: Filing Fees will retain or collect the non-refundable filing fees for each claim: Initial claim filing fee = $300.00 Member Fees Member fees are assessed to each member firm that is a party in these proceedings or to the member firm that employed the associated person at the time of the events giving rise to the dispute. Accordingly, Respondent CGMI is a member firm and a party. Member surcharge = $1,700.00 Pre-hearing process fee = S 750.00 Hearing process fee ~ S2.750.00 Total Member Fees = $5,200.00 Adjournment Fees Adjournments granted during these proceedings for which fees were assessed: No adjournment fees were incurred during these proceedings. Three-Day Cancellation Fees Fees apply when a hearing on the merits is postponed or settled within three business days before the start of a scheduled hearing session. No three-day cancellation fees were incurred during these proceedings. Injunctive Relief Fees Injunctive relief fees are assessed to each member or associated person who files for a temporary injunction in court. Parties in these cases are also assessed arbitrator travel expenses and costs when an arbitrator is required to travel outside his or her hearing location and additional arbitrator honoraria for the hearing for permanent injunction. These fees, except the injunctive relief surcharge, are assessed equally against each party unless otherwise directed by the panel. No injunctive relief fees were incurred during these proceedings. Forum Fees and Assessments The Panel has assessed forum fees for each session conducted. A session is any meeting between the parties and the arbitrators, including a pre-hearing conference with the arbitrators, that lasts four (4) hours or less. Fees associated with these proceedings are:

Award Page 4 One (1) Pre-hearing session with a single arbitrator @ $450.00 = $ 450.00 Pre-hearing conference: October 29, 2004 1 session One (1) Pre-hearing session with the Panel @ $1,125.00 = $1,125.00 Pre-hearing conference: July 26, 2004 1 session Two (2) Hearing sessions with the Panel @ $1,125.00 = $2,250.00 Hearing Date: June 7. 2005 2 sessions Total Forum Fees = $3,825.00 The Panel has assessed $1,912.50 of the forum fees to Claimant. The Panel has assessed $1, 912.50 of the forum fees jointly and severally to Respondents. Administrative Costs Administrative costs are expenses incurred due to a request by a party for special services beyond the normal administrative services. These include, but are not limited to, additional copies of arbitrator awards, copies of audio transcripts, retrieval of documents from archives, interpreters, and security. No administrative costs were incurred during these proceedings. Fee Summary Claimant is solely liable for: Initial Filing Fee =$ 300.00 Forum Fees =S1,912.50 Total Fees =$2,212.50 Less payments =$1.425.00 Balance Due = $ 787.50 Respondent CGMI is solely liable for: Member Fees = $5,200.00 Total Fees = $5,200.00 Less payments = $5,200.00 Balance Due = $ 0.00 Respondents are jointly and severally liable for: Forum Fees =$1,912.50 Total Fees =$1,912.50 Less payments = $ Q.QQ Balance Due = $1,912.50 All balances are payable to and are due upon receipt pursuant to Rule 10330(g)oftheCode.

Award Page 5 ARBITRATION PANEL Roy B. Gonas, Esq. -, Presiding Chairperson Mark C. Perry, Esq. - Ralph H. Emer - Non- Concurring Arbitrators 9 Signatures /s/ June 10, 2005 Roy B. Gonas, Esq., Presiding Chairperson /s/ June 10, 2005 Mark C. Perry, Esq. /s/ June 11.2005 Ralph H. Emer Non- June 13, 2005 Date of Service (For office use only)

PAGE 01 Arbitration ^o. 04-01034 Aswd Pake.5 lo.qa22 P. 1/1 ARBITRATION PANEL Roy B. Gonas, Esq. Mark C Perry. Esq. Ralph H. Etner, Presiding Chairperson Non- Concurring Arbitrators' Signatures -. V/'^" 1 --^ Roy B. porjas, Es«, Presiding Cliairperson Mark C. Pcfry, Esq. Public Arbiltrator Ralph H. Emer Non- Date of Service (For office use only)

Award Pace? I:>-C42i P. 7/7 PAGE 66 ARBITRATION PANEL RoyB. Gonas 9 Esq. Mark C, Perry, Esq. Ralph H.Emer, Presiding Chairp irson Non- CQncprt-jng Arbitrators' Signatures. Gonas,Esq,, Presiding Chairperson Signature Daft Ralph H.Emer Non- SigaatureDate Date of Service (For office use only)

12= 59PM 7 PAGE 82 Award Pam 5 ARBITRATION PANEL Roy B. GOTWS, Bsq. Mwk C. Perry, Ralph H Emcr, Prewding Ch Noji-Fublic Arbitrator RoyB Gonai, Esq., Pnsgidiiig Chairperson Murk C, Perry, Esq. Public Arbitrfttor Ralph H. Bm) Non- Signature D Date of Service (For office use only)