Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution

Similar documents
Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award NASD Dispute Resolution

Award FiNRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award NASD Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution. Hearing Site: New York, New York Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution. Hearing Site: Miami, Florida Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. Michael R. Averett

AWARD FINRA Dispute Resolution. vs. Case Number: Hearing Site: Chicago, Illinois Names of Respondents NATURE OF THE DISPUTE

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award NASD Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution. Hearing Site: Houston, Texas Raymond, James & Associates, Inc. and UBS Financial Services Inc.

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award NASD Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution. Hearing Site: New York, New York First Republic Securities Company, LLC

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award NASD Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution. Claimant Case Number: Karl Austin Pettijohn REPRESENTATION OF PARTIES

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution. Santanu Bhattacharya and Gargi Dasgupta (Claimants) vs. Chicago Investment Group LLC and Mitesh Shere (Respondents)

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution

Attached is the Award in Wachovia Securities v. Brucker, Case no for discussion in the Employment Break-Out Section at the Annual Meeting.

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution

RECEiVED. WELLINGTON SHIELDS & Co. LLC MEMBER NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE FEB 2 21U8

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution REPRESENTATION OF PARTIES

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award NASD Dispute Resolution, Inc.

Case 3:15-cv GNS Document 1 Filed 08/19/15 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v Financial Indus. Regulatory Auth., Inc NY Slip Op 30017(U) January 5, 2016 Supreme Court, New York

AWARD NASD Dispute Resolution REPRESENTATION OF PARTIES. CASEINFORl\1ATION

Investment Consulting Agreement

Initial Pre-hearing Conference Scheduling Order in the Matter of:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No.

MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PETITION AND MOTION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD PURSUANT TO CPLR 7511


1. Please indicate the nature of the initial claim that was filed. Note: AP is the abbreviation for Associated Person. Member vs.

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES

AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE FORBEARANCE AGREEMENT

Wills and Trusts Arbitration RULES

PLAINTIFFS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 2 AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. Makovsky, and as Agent for Keith Makovsky, Kurt Makovsky, and William Makovsky, as

Case 6:05-cv ACC-DAB Document 56 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

Board Vacancies Boca Raton Airport Authority

ARBITRATION RULES FOR THE TRANSPORTATION ADR COUNCIL

May 21, By Marcia E. Asquith Office of the Corporate Secretary FINRA 1735 K Street, NW Washington, DC

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC

Supplemental reply to FINRA s response to requests for data on motions to dismiss, dated April 19, 2011: SR-FINRA

Wills and Trusts Arbitration RULES

Docket Number: 1468 WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS, INC. Thomas J. Stallings, Esquire Jack M. Stover, Esquire Charles I. Artz, Esquire CLOSED VS.

Sponsored by the International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans

NAM EMPLOYMENT RULES AND PROCEDURES DEMAND FOR ARBITRATION/ARBITRATION REQUEST FORM FOR EMPLOYEES

WELLESLEY HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION BY-LAWS OFFICES

August 30, A. Introduction

ACE of Birmingham Quarter-Year Handbook: 2019 Spring Season

PAMS ARBITRATION RULES

Construction Industry Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex Construction Disputes)

NFA Arbitration: Resolving Customer Disputes

REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION

CALCULATION AGENT AGREEMENT W I T N E S S E T H:

MEDIATION RULES, 2015 NAIROBI CENTRE FOR INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION

FINANCIAL PLANNING AGREEMENT

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS INFORMATION

Non-Discretionary IA Services Client Services Agreement

DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE

2007 PA Super 177. OPINION BY DANIELS, J.: Filed: June 11, These are Consolidated Appeals from the Order of the lower court

AON HEWITT DEFINED CONTRIBUTION NEXUS PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :24 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/08/2017

Interactive Brokers Hong Kong Agreement for Advisors Providing Services to Interactive Brokers Clients

[FORM OF FINAL DISMISSAL ORDER] UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

UK ATHLETICS LIMITED ( UKA ) DISCIPLINARY RULES AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES

NATIONAL FUTURES ASSOCIATION. Arbitration Claim

Andrew Walzer v. Muriel Siebert Co

BYLAWS GREATER BIRMINGHAM YOUTH LACROSSE ASSOCIATION, an Alabama nonprofit 501(c)3 corporation. (As Amended August, 2013)

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES

AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS OF THE SURPLUS LINE ASSOCIATION OF ARIZONA

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE. WHEREAS, MFD conducted an investigation into claims submitted by Dr. Nathan during

AGREEMENT. THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of this I st day of July, 2008, by and between

Registration Form Please Check: Boy Girl Age: Camper s Name: Address: City: State: Zip Code:

National Patent Board Non-Binding Arbitration Rules TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR DISASTER DEBRIS MANAGEMENT. THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of,

Docket Number: SHOVEL TRANSFER & STORAGE, INC. William G. Merchant, Esquire CLOSED VS.

NAM EMPLOYMENT RULES AND PROCEDURES DEMAND FOR ARBITRATION/ARBITRATION REQUEST FORM FOR EMPLOYERS

AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO THE FORBEARANCE AGREEMENT

RESEARCH SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN OHSU AND [COMPANY]

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES, AND MOBILE HOMES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE MIDDLE DIVISION

LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION LAWYER DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM RULES (Prev. Rev. 10/06/00) Effective May 1, Preamble

SunCam Course Author Agreement

REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION

CITY OF DUNNELLON, FLORIDA CITY ATTORNEY CONTRACT #AGR THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of its Effective Date, by

NOTICE OF ARBITRATION

Topsfield Water Department Invitation to Bid Potassium Hydroxide June 1, 2007

Transcription:

Award In the Matter of the Arbitration Between: Claimants Jacob Zabara and Zabara Family 2012 Irrevocable Trust UAD 12/27/12 Jacob Zabara TTEE Case Number: 15-00304 vs. Respondent FMSBonds, Inc. Hearing Site: Boca Raton, Florida vs. Third-Party Respondent Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. Nature of the Dispute: Customers vs. Member vs. Member This case was decided by an all-public panel. REPRESENTATION OF PARTIES For Claimants Jacob Zabara ( Zabara ) and Zabara Family 2012 Irrevocable Trust UAD 12/27/12 Jacob Zabara TTEE (the Zabara Trust ), hereinafter collectively referred to as Claimants : Ryon M. McCabe, Esq., McCabe Rabin, P.A., West Palm Beach, Florida, and Theodore L. Blumberg, Esq., The Blumberg Firm, New York, New York. For Respondent FMSBonds, Inc. ( FMS ): Dennis Richard, Esq. and Sydney A. Marks, Esq., Richard and Richard, P.A., Miami, Florida. For Respondent Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. ( MLPFS ): Joel M. Everest, Esq., Bressler, Amery & Ross, P.C., Birmingham, Alabama. CASE INFORMATION Statement of Claim filed on or about: February 9, 2015. Jacob Zabara signed the Submission Agreement: February 3, 2015. The Zabara Trust signed the Submission Agreement: February 3, 2015. Statement of Answer and Third-Party Claim filed by Respondent FMS on or about: May 14, 2015. FMS signed the Submission Agreement: May 13, 2015. Answer to Respondent FMS s Third-Party Claim filed by Third-Party Respondent MLPFS on or about: July 7, 2015.

Arbitration No. 15-00304 Award Page 2 of 6 MLPFS signed the Submission Agreement: June 2, 2015. Motion for More Definite Claim filed by Third-Party Respondent MLPFS on or about: July 7, 2015. Response to Motion for More Definite Claim filed by Respondent FMS on or about: July 10, 2015. Motion to Sever filed by Third-Party Respondent MLPFS on or about: July 7, 2015. Response to Motion to Sever filed by Respondent FMS on or about: July 24, 2015. Reply in Support of Motion to Sever filed by Third-Party Respondent MLPFS on or about: July 31, 2015. CASE SUMMARY In the Statement of Claim, Claimants asserted the following causes of action: breach of fiduciary duty; negligence; negligent supervision; negligent misrepresentations and omissions; mismarking of order tickets; and breach of contract. The causes of action relate to the purchase and margin trading of Puerto Rico municipal bonds in Claimants accounts. Unless specifically admitted in its Statement of Answer and Third-Party Claim, Respondent denied the allegations made in the Statement of Claim and asserted various affirmative defenses. In its Third-Party Claim, Respondent FMS asserted the cause of action of indemnification against Third-Party Respondent MLPFS. The cause of action relates to the selling of Claimants Puerto Rico municipal bonds after the transfer of Claimants accounts from Respondent FMS to Third-Party Respondent MLPFS. Unless specifically admitted in its Statement of Answer to Respondent FMS s Third-Party Claim, Third-Party Respondent MLPFS denied the allegations made in the Third-Party Claim and asserted various affirmative defenses. RELIEF REQUESTED In the Statement of Claim, Claimants requested damages between $1,700,000.00 and $2,500,000.00, including: compensatory damages and pre-judgment interest at the statutory rate; costs; and such other relief as the Panel deemed appropriate. At the close of the hearing, Claimants requested compensatory damages in the amount of $1,054,679.00. In the Statement of Answer and Third-Party Claim, Respondent FMS requested the denial of Claimants claims, attorneys fees and costs. In its Third-Party Claim, Respondent FMS requested that any liability determined against it shall be borne in whole or in part by Third-Party Respondent MLPFS. In its Answer to Third-Party Claim, Third-Party Respondent MLPFS requested the denial of Respondent FMS s Third-Party Claim.

Arbitration No. 15-00304 Award Page 3 of 6 OTHER ISSUES CONSIDERED AND DECIDED The Arbitrators acknowledge that they have each read the pleadings and other materials filed by the parties. On or about July 7, 2015, Third-Party Respondent MLPFS filed its Motion for More Definite Claim in which it asserted, among other things, that Respondent FMS had failed to specify relevant facts and remedies requested in violation of Rule 12302(a) of the Code of Arbitration Procedure (the Code ). Claimants advised that they would not file a response to the Motion. In its Response, Respondent FMS argued that such motions were disfavored in arbitration and that the allegations in the Third-Party Claim were sufficient. On or about July 7, 2015, Third-Party Respondent MLPFS filed its Motion to Sever, in which it asserted, among other things, that Respondent FMS s claim did not comply with the requirement for joinder under Rule 12312 of the Code as they were entirely separate from, and unique to, the questions of law and fact in the underlying arbitration between Claimants and Respondent FMS. Third-Party Respondent MLPFS added that litigating both claims could create confusion and that having to defend against Respondent FMS s claim for indemnification would be prejudicial as it would have to expend unnecessary time and resources although there may never be a finding of liability against Respondent FMS. Claimants advised that they would not file a response to the Motion. In its Response, Respondent FMS argued that both claims contained common questions of law and fact and that the claim for indemnification was related to the underlying arbitration as Third- Party Respondent MLPFS had recommended the sale of the Puerto Rico municipal bonds at a loss, including securities still rated investment-grade and insured for their full face value. Third-Party Respondent MLPFS replied, among other things, that Claimants had never made allegations regarding the sale of the Puerto Rico municipal bonds and that Claimants claims were solely related to the recommendation of the investments by Respondent FMS. On or about August 10, 2015, the Panel held a telephonic pre-hearing conference so the parties could present oral argument on Third-Party Respondent MLPFS s Motions for More Definite Claim and to Sever. Thereafter, the Panel issued an Order that granted the Motion to Sever Third-Party Respondent MLPFS from this proceeding and deemed the Motion for More Definite Claim moot. The parties have agreed that the Award in this matter may be executed in counterpart copies or that a handwritten, signed Award may be entered. AWARD After considering the pleadings, the testimony and evidence presented at the hearing, the Panel has decided in full and final resolution of the issues submitted for determination as follows: 1. Respondent FMS is liable for negligent supervision, breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract and shall pay to Claimant Zabara compensatory damages in the amount of $218,600.00.

Arbitration No. 15-00304 Award Page 4 of 6 2. Each party shall bear their own costs. 3. Any and all claims for relief not specifically addressed herein, including Respondent FMS s request for attorneys fees, are denied. FEES Pursuant to the Code, the following fees are assessed: Filing Fees assessed a filing fee* for each claim: Initial Claim Filing Fee =$ 2,000.00 Third-Party Filing Fee =$ 3,400.00 *The filing fee is made up of a non-refundable and a refundable portion. Member Fees Member fees are assessed to each member firm that is a party in these proceedings or to the member firm(s) that employed the associated person(s) at the time of the event(s) giving rise to the dispute. Accordingly, as parties, Respondent FMS and Third-Party Respondent MLPFS are assessed the following: For Respondent FMS: Member Surcharge =$ 3,025.00 Member Process Fee =$ 6,175.00 For Third-Party Respondent MLPFS: Member Surcharge =$ 3,025.00 Member Process Fee =$ 6,175.00 Adjournment Fees Adjournments granted during these proceedings for which fees were assessed: June 14-17, 2016, adjournment by Respondent FMS =$ 1,400.00 Total Adjournment Fee =$ 1,400.00 The Panel has assessed the total adjournment fee of $1,400.00 to Respondent FMS. Discovery-Related Motion Fees Fees apply for each decision rendered on a discovery-related motion. Three (3) Decisions on discovery-related motions on the papers with one (1) arbitrator @ $200.00 per discovery-related motion =$ 600.00

Arbitration No. 15-00304 Award Page 5 of 6 Respondent FMS submitted three (3) discovery-related motions Total Discovery-Related Motion Fees =$ 600.00 The Panel has assessed $300.00 of the discovery-related motion fees to Claimant Zabara. The Panel has assessed $300.00 of the discovery-related motion fees to Respondent FMS. Hearing Session Fees and Assessments The Panel has assessed hearing session fees for each session conducted. A session is any meeting between the parties and the arbitrator(s), including a pre-hearing conference with the arbitrator(s) that lasts four (4) hours or less. Fees associated with these proceedings are: Two (2) Pre-hearing sessions with a single arbitrator @ $450.00/session =$ 900.00 Pre-hearing conferences: May 23, 2016 1 session May 27, 2016 1 session Two (2) Pre-hearing sessions with the Panel @ $1,400.00/session =$ 2,800.00 Pre-hearing conferences: July 8, 2015 1 session August 10, 2015 1 session Nine (9) Hearing sessions with the Panel @ $1,400.00/session =$12,600.00 Hearing Dates: August 10, 2016 2 sessions August 11, 2016 3 sessions August 12, 2016 2 sessions August 13, 2016 2 sessions Total Hearing Session Fees =$16,300.00 The Panel has assessed $8,150.00 of the hearing session fees to Claimant Zabara. The Panel has assessed $8,150.00 of the hearing session fees to Respondent FMS. All balances are payable to and are due upon receipt.

AUGUST 19, 2016

AUGUST 19, 2016

Arbitration No.'15-00304 Award Paoe 6 of 6 ARBITRATION PANEL Roy B. Gonas Diane M. Perry Edward R. Niederriter Public Arbitrator, Presiding Chairperson Public Arbitrator Public Arbitrator l, the undersigned Arbitrator, do hereby affirm that I am the individual described herein and who executed this instrument which is my award. Concurri nq Arbitrators' Siq natu res Roy B. Gonas Public Arbitrator, Presiding Chairperson Signature Date Diane M. Perry Public Arbitrator Signature Date Public Arbitrator AUGUST 19, 2016 Date of Service (For FINRA Office ot Oispute