IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF LUCAS COUNTY, OHIO. Case No.: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Similar documents
IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FULTON COUNTY, OHIO. Judge

THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY

Standard Interrogatories Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j)

STATE OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT. Plaintiff, Defendants.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, LIBERTY, MISSOURI. Case No. Division

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

Case 1:13-cv RJJ Doc #1 Filed 12/27/13 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

F 3.201(2)(A) IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS ) JOHN D. DOE, ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) THOMAS M. SMITH, ) ) Defendant.

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY., Counsel of Record. The following interrogatories are pattern interrogatories, which the undersigned

The Honorable Chainnan and Members ofthe Board ofcounty Commissioners. William M. Davis, Interim Director, Risk Management

APPENDIX II. INTERROGATORY FORMS. Form A. Uniform Interrogatories to be Answered by Plaintiff in All Personal Injury

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY., Counsel of Record. The following interrogatories are pattern interrogatories, which the undersigned

APPENDIX II. INTERROGATORY FORMS. Form A. Uniform Interrogatories to be Answered by Plaintiff in All Personal Injury

CAUSE NO. COME NOW, Raymond Gilbert (REDACTED) and Daniela (REDACTED), Individually, and

INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT. 1. State your full name, your present address, and date of birth.

YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to Answer the Complaint, a copy of

State your full name, social security number, date of birth, residence address, and telephone number.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES WITH JURY DEMAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

Second, you must not be influenced by sympathy, passion or prejudice in favor of any party or against any of the parties.

DC PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL PETITION COME NOW, PLAINTIFFS DEE VOIGT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS

Standard Interrogatories. Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j)

4. Plaintiff, Valerie Battle-Dugger, is an adult individual, residing at all times relevant

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF GILES COUNTY, TENNESSEE

THE COURTS. Title 252 ALLEGHENY COUNTY RULES. Title 231 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Title 249 PHILADELPHIA RULES

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT LEE COUNTY, ILLINOIS COMPLAINT

Interrogatories. As I have previously written, interrogatories are one. The building blocks of your client s case. Discovery. by Thomas J.

CAUSE NO. JANE DOE, Individually and as IN THE DISTRICT COURT Next Friend of JOHN DOE, a Minor Child, Plaintiffs,

The Civil Action Part 1 of a 4 part series

JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT DIVISION JUDGE. -Filed Electronically- A.A., a minor by and through her mother and next friend, MARY AMES

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/09/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2015

IN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE * * * *

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2015-CA-00903

CAUSE NUMBER DC H. DEBORAH BROCK AND IN THE DISTRICT COURT CHRIS BROCK Plaintiffs

Chapter 2. Initial Pleadings

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT S FIRST INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF

Standard Interrogatories. Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j)

COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

ORDINANCE NO. 205 ARTICLE II. TAXICAB LICENSES AND REGULATIONS

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY. COMES NOW Plaintiff against the above-named defendants, and states and alleges

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 05/25/ /09/ :37 12:27 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/25/2016

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GREENE COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF OCONEE C.A. NO.: 2017-CP-10- Jane Doe, Plaintiff,

Case 3:15-cv GAG Document 1 Filed 08/17/15 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

IN THE STATE COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY PETITION

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF HAMPTON ) CASE NO.: 2019-CP-25-

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE. vs.

Pursuant to Rule 50(b), Ala. R. Civ. Proc., Defendant, Mobile Infirmary Association,

Courthouse News Service

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 11/03/ :59 PM INDEX NO /2016E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 18 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/03/2016

IN THE STATE COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

Filing # E-Filed 12/22/ :53:20 PM

IN THE STATE COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

Complaint - Walmart Substance on Floor in Frozen Food Dept.

PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED PETITION FOR DAMAGES

As Introduced. Regular Session H. B. No

MODEL MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE CHARGE AND VERDICT SHEET. MOTOR VEHICLE VOLUME REPLACEMENT JUNE

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 12/21/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2015E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/21/2015

OCCUPATIONAL DRIVERS LICENSE INFORMATION PACKET

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, DEANNA HALLIDAY, by and through her undersigned counsel, brings this

Case 1:19-cv PAB Document 1 Filed 01/04/19 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

1:15-cv JMC Date Filed 04/06/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

Case 2:17-at Document 1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 1 of 9

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 02/22/16 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

CAUSE NO. MALCOMB THOMAS, KORRIE HICKS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF LA TASHA MORRIS, & ROSHUNDA JOHNSON, PLAINTIFFS VS. HARRISON COUNTY, TEXAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CAUSE NO. V. JUDICIAL DISTRICT DEFENDANTS. TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION NOW COMES SHERRY REYNOLDS, BRANDON REYNOLDS, KATY

Case 7:14-cv SLB Document 1 Filed 07/22/14 Page 1 of 13

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 06/20/16 Page 1 of 9 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CV CMCO 01/06/ :18:35 PM OLDFIELD, JOY M Page 1 of 8 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS SUMMIT COUNTY, OHIO CASE NO.:

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION. Case No.

19-CV-0222 CAUSE NO. Plaintiff, v. GALVESTON COUNTY, TEXAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NO. COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

MARR V. NAGEL, 1954-NMSC-071, 58 N.M. 479, 272 P.2d 681 (S. Ct. 1954) MARR vs. NAGEL

CAUSE NO. THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF [INSERT PROPERTY] JUDICIAL DISTRICT

Function of the Jury Burden of Proof and Greater Weight of the Evidence Credibility of Witness Weight of the Evidence

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF SHANNON COUNTY, MISSOURI

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 07/31/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2013

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Case 5:09-cv JMH Document 1 Filed 10/26/2009 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

FACTS COMMON TO ALL COUNTS

JURISDICTIONAL BASIS AND VENUE

Information or instructions: Plea in abatement motion & Order to quash service Alternate Form

GENERAL ORDER FOR LUCAS COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION. damages for alleged exposure to asbestos or asbestos-containing products; that many of the

Notice Of Interrogatories

Board of Claims -- Limitation on damage awards -- Hearing officers -- Asbestos related claims. (1) A Board of Claims, composed of the members

DC NO. PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL PETITION AND REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

SAMPLE. Dear Member: CONSULTATION SERVICES

TEXAS DISCOVERY. Brock C. Akers CHAPTER 1 LAW REVISIONS TO TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE GOVERNING DISCOVERY

AN ACT. (H. B. 2964) (Conference) (No ) (Approved July 4, 2016)

CASE 0:12-cv PJS-TNL Document 15 Filed 08/14/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

PLAINTIFF RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT LINDA LAJOIE FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION

PLAINTIFF DEMANDS A TRIAL BY JURY IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ARCADIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION

Case: 5:15-cv SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/20/15 2 of 9. PageID #: 2

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

Transcription:

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF LUCAS COUNTY, OHIO KENNETH E. EGELAND 6022 321st Street Toledo, OH 43611 and JOAN EGELAND 6022 321st Street Toledo, OH 43611 vs. Plaintiffs, ANGELICA LEAL 4806 Bowen Road Toledo, Ohio 43613 and Case No.: Judge COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND Michael A. Bruno (0033780 Charles E. Boyk (0000494 Charles E. Boyk Law Offices, LLC 405 Madison Avenue Suite 1200 Toledo, Ohio 43604 Telephone: (419 241 1395 Facsimile: (419 241 8731 mbruno@charlesboyk law.com Attorney for Plaintiffs CELINA INSURANCE GROUP 1 Insurance Square Celina, OH 45822 Defendants.

Now come the Plaintiffs, by and through counsel, and for their Complaint state as follows: FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION 1. Plaintiffs, are residents of Toledo, Lucas County, Ohio. 2. Defendant, Angelica Leal, is a resident of Toledo, Lucas County, Ohio. 3. On or about December 1, 2007, Plaintiff, Kenneth Egeland was traveling northbound on Ottawa River Road, Toledo, Lucas County, Ohio when the Defendant, heading southbound on Ottawa River Road, spun out of control and slid into the center of the road, causing a collision. 4. Defendant, Angelica Leal, is under a duty to operate her vehicle in a safe and prudent manner. 5. Defendant, Angelica Leal, breached that duty of care by operating her car in a negligent manner and colliding into the Plaintiff s vehicle while sliding in the center of the road. 6. Defendant, Angelia Leal, had the duty of care to Plaintiff to operate her car in such a way so as not to harm the Plaintiff. 7. Defendant, Angelia Leal, breached that duty of care by operating a motor vehicle in a dangerous and negligent way so as to injure the Plaintiff. 8. As a direct and proximate result of the negligence of Defendant, Angelica Leal, the Plaintiff sustained serious permanent personal injuries.

9. As a direct result of the Defendant, Angelica Leal s negligence, the Plaintiff, Kenneth Egeland, sustained injury to his head, neck, right knee, numbness to his fingers, as well as injury to other body parts. The Plaintiff was required to undergo medical care, incurred medical care costs; suffered great pain and suffering, and severe mental anguish and emotional distress. Further, the Plaintiff believes that his injuries are permanent in nature and will require future medical care; future medical care costs, and he will continue to endure great pain, suffering, mental anguish and emotional distress. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION For the second claim of relief against the Defendant, Angelica Leal, the Plaintiffs state: 10. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs one through nine as though fully restated herein. 11. At all times relevant herein, Plaintiff Joan Egeland has been the wife of Plaintiff Kenneth Egeland. 12. As a direct and proximate result of the negligence of Defendan, Angelica Leal, as set forth above, Joan Egeland has lost the services, society, companionship, comfort, sexual relations, love and solace of Plaintiff,

Kenneth Egeland, and will continue to lose same in the future due to the permanent nature of his injuries. THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION For the third cause against the Defendants, the Plaintiffs state: 13. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs one through twelve as though fully restated herein. 14. At all times relevant, Defendant Celina Group, was and is an insurance company doing business in the State of Ohio and had a contractual duty to Plaintiffs under Policy No. 4684678 0 to provide under insurance coverage and medical payments coverage. 15. Defendant Celina Insurance Group is contractually liable, up to Plaintiffs policy limits, for damages caused by the aforementioned accident involving Plaintiff. A copy of said policy is attached as Plaintiff s Exhibit 1 and incorporated herein as if fully referenced. 16. Plaintiffs damages in this case may exceed monies available to be paid by all tortfeasor s liability carriers, therefore requiring payment by Defendant Celina Insurance Group under their contractual obligation to Plaintiffs.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully requests judgment against Defendant Angelica Leal and Defendant Celina in an amount in excess of twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000.00 together with costs, interest and reasonable attorney s fees; Respectfully submitted, Michael A. Bruno Attorney for Plaintiffs JURY DEMAND Now come the plaintiffs by and through counsel and hereby demand a jury trial on all issues triable by right herein. Michael A. Bruno Attorney for Plaintiffs

TO THE DEFENDANT ANGELICA LEAL: The following Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents are submitted herewith to you to be answered in writing within 28 days after the date of service thereof upon you. INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESPONDING 1. All information is to be divulged which is in your possession or control or within the possession and control of your attorneys, investigators, agents, employees or other representatives of you or your insurance company. 2. Where the word incident is used, it refers to the incident which is the basis of this lawsuit unless otherwise specified. 3. Where an interrogatory calls for an answer in more than one part, each part should be separated in the answer so that the answer is clearly understandable. 4. Medical Practitioner as used herein includes any medial doctor, osteopathic physician, chiropractor or any other person who performs a type of healing art. 5. You are reminded that all answers must be made separately and fully and that an incomplete or evasive answer is a failure to answer.

6. You are under a continuing duty to reasonably supplement your response with respect to any question directly addressed to the identity and location of persons having knowledge of discoverable matters, the identity of any person expected to be called as an expert witness at trial, and the subject matter on which he or she is expected to testify, and to correct any response which you know or later learn is incorrect. REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO: 1. A certified copy of any/all applicable liability insurance policies of any kind including the face sheet which lists specific policy limits, as requested in Interrogatories numbered six and seven. REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO: 2. Copies of any/all documents, witness statements obtained by the defendant or any of his agents concerning the subject matter of this complaint.

REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO: 3. A list of names, addresses, and phone numbers of any witnesses that may have seen the incident which is the subject matter of this complaint. REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO: 4. A copy of any and all reports, notes, and/or memoranda that any expert witness may have produced or authored. REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO.: 5. A duplicate of any/all photographs depicting the damage and copies of any repair estimates for the damage sustained to all vehicles involved in this accident.

1. State your full name, birth date, address, and Social Security number, business address and occupation or title and if the defendant is a corporation the office you hold with the defendant. 2. If it is the defendantʹs contention that the plaintiff s injuries were caused by some person, firm or corporation other than the defendant or any agent or employee of the defendant, please identify each such person, firm corporation fully, giving name, occupation, address, and a complete description of the way in which each such person, firm or corporation caused or contributed to the plaintiffs injuries.

3. Please state the identity and location of each person other than your attorney who has knowledge of discoverable matters relating in any way to the accident asserted by the plaintiffs complaint. 4. Please completely identify each person the defendant expects to call as a witness or expert witness at trial, and state for each such person: the name, address and occupation, the subject matter the person is expected to testify about, the substance of all facts and opinions to which the person is expected to testify, a summary of the grounds for each such opinion, experiences in the area of similar or comparable products and a list of books, treatises, articles and other works which the person regards as authoritative on the subject on which he/she is expected to testify.

5. With respect to the vehicle you occupied at the time of the accident state the name and address of the registered owner and who was driving said vehicle. If you were not driving please state the name, address and phone number of said driver. 6. On the date of said accident, was the vehicle you were driving and/or owned, covered under a liability insurance policy? If so, please state the following : a. name of insurance company; b. named insured; c. dates of coverage; d. policy number; e. limits of liability coverage; f. is the insurance company named above defending you under a reservation of rights?

7. With respect to the subject accident, were you covered by any other policies of liability insurance or a financial responsibility bond? If so, please state the following: a. name of insurance company; b. names insured; c. dates coverage; d. policy number; e. limits of liability coverage; f. is the insurance company named above defending you under a reservation of rights?ʺ 8. State whether you were acting for, or on the behalf of, any other person or entity at the time of the accident.

9. If the answer to No. 8 was affirmative, state the name and address of the person or entity and the purpose for which you were operating the automobile. 10. State whether you had consumed any alcoholic beverages prior to the accident. 11. If the answer to No. 10 is affirmative, state: The time such beverages were consumed; the place such beverages were consumed; the quantity or amount of the beverage consumed.

12. State whether you had taken any medication or other drug within twentyfour hours (24 immediately preceding the accident. 13. If the answer to No. 12 is affirmative, state: The name of each such medication and the time such medication was taken; the quantity of medication taken; the name of the person if any prescribing the medication. 14. State whether you were made a defendant in any criminal or traffic case as a result of the accident.

15. If the answer to number 14 is affirmative, state: The Court and the case number involved; the charge or charges against you; whether you pleaded guilty thereto; and the ultimate disposition of the case. 15. State the full name and address of your employer and state whether you were employed at the time of the accident. Michael A. Bruno Attorney for Plaintiffs