IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION COMPLAINT I. INTRODUCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION

Seizure of Bill Miller by Loveland police officers in violation of the Fourth Amendment; CCJRA request

Case 1:13-cv JTN Doc #16 Filed 03/10/14 Page 1 of 22 Page ID#81

Case: 3:17-cv GFVT Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/31/17 Page: 1 of 9 - Page ID#: 1

STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT WAUKESHA COUNTY. Case Classification Declaratory Judgment. Complaint

MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANTS STATEMENT OF FACTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON. Case No.:

Case 4:04-cv SBA Document 48-1 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 1 of 13

In the United States District Court for the District of Colorado

Marquette University Police Department

MICHAEL EUGENE JONES OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE LEROY F. MILLETTE, JR. April 15, 2010 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 3:14-cv HTW-LRA Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Case 3:11-cv JPB Document 3 Filed 01/24/11 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MONTANA. Plaintiff, Defendants. INTRODUCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA THIRD DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 115,210 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, DEZAREE JO MCQUEARY, Appellant.

Case 4:08-cv SNL Document 1 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO / OAKLAND DIVISION SECOND AMENDMENT FOURTH AMENDMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 8:16-cr EAK-MAP-1.

5 Officer Schenk also testified that, after he brought Heaven to the office, the loss prevention officer immediately returned to Heaven s shopping

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/29/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE

Case 2:10-cv HGB-ALC Document 1 Filed 04/20/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JANET DELUCA CIVIL ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 5:11-cv FPS Document 13 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 54 PageID #: 127

Case 4:08-cv RCC Document 1 Filed 02/25/08 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA TUCSON DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Case 6:05-cv GAP-KRS Document 1 Filed 06/09/2005 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION CASE NO.

IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

STATE V. GUTIERREZ, 2004-NMCA-081, 136 N.M. 18, 94 P.3d 18 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DEMETRIO DANIEL GUTIERREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS - LAW DIVISION. v. No.: COMPLAINT AT LAW

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/24/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA. Reversed and remanded.

Case 3:14-cv Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

TEXARKANA, TEXAS POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDERS MANUAL. Amended Date June 1, 2017

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 0:11-cr WJZ-1. versus

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA

Case 1:19-cv JGD Document 1 Filed 02/12/19 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:16-cv DLC Document 1 Filed 01/08/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Defendant.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Follow this and additional works at:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. 2 Opinion Number: 3 Filing Date: June 28, NO. 35,017 5 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

Case 6:05-cv GAP-KRS Document 20 Filed 08/02/2005 Page 1 of 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

Case 5:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 04/13/17 Page 1 of 11

People v. Ross, No st District, October 17, 2000

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. Plaintiff, Defendants. INTRODUCTION

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 15 Filed: 01/27/14 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:29

POLICIES, PROCEDURES, AND RULES

ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT. Policy and Procedure General Order: 1.06 Order Title: Strip and Body Cavity Searches

)(

Case 1:18-cv RBK-AMD Document 1 Filed 07/02/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

QUICK REFERENCE UOC PROCEDURE AND LAW SUMMARY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

2:13-cv SJM-LJM Doc # 1 Filed 07/25/13 Pg 1 of 15 Pg ID 1

USA v. Terrell Haywood

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 17-cv-12698

Policy 5.11 ARREST PROCEDURES

2:15-cv PDB-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 02/11/15 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

TEXARKANA, TEXAS POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDERS MANUAL. Amended Date November 1, 2015

THE LAW PROFESSOR CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ESSAY SERIES ESSAY QUESTION

CJV-S-97-H13IYBSGGH FILED AUG J)

Case 1:12-cv S-LDA Document 1 Filed 08/10/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT

Case 2:12-cv SM-JCW Document 1 Filed 07/24/12 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA * *

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

CITY OF ONALASKA POLICE DEPARTMENT

Case 3:12-cv Document 1 Filed 11/15/12 Page 1 of 17

COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for La Crosse County: RAMONA A. GONZALEZ, Judge. Affirmed.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case Case 1:07-cv RMB-JS 1:33-av Document Document Filed Filed 01/10/2007 Page Page 2 of 2 7 of 7 4. Defendants, Sergeant Gerard S

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GWINNETT COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Mental Illness Commitments

Circuit Court for Baltimore City Case No UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2018

Case 2:14-cv GAM Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:06-cv CAP Document 47 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA COMPLAINT

PETITION TO MODIFY PROTECTION FROM ABUSE ORDER INSTRUCTION SHEET

Case 1:18-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/01/2018 Page 1 of 17

Case5:14-cv PSG Document1 Filed03/10/14 Page1 of 16

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 04/11/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

Show Me Your Papers. Can Police Arrest You for Failing to Identify Yourself? Is history repeating? Can this be true in the United States?

Fennimore Police Department Evidence, Contraband and Recovered Property Issue Date: 04/11/2014. Last Updated: 12/07/2017

Case 1:19-cv Document 1 Filed 01/02/19 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

STATE OF WISCONSIN: CIRCUIT COURT: RACINE COUNTY: Defendant. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE

Case 1:12-cv JEB Document 1 Filed 01/17/12 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, v. No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case2:08-cv KSH-MAS Document 1 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Defendant.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Know Your Rights: What to do if you are stopped by the police or Immigration or there is an Immigration raid

Transcription:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION JESUS GONZALEZ Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. v. VILLAGE OF WEST MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN, CHARLES DONOVAN, PATRICK KRAFCHECK, CITY OF CHILTON, WISCONSIN, and MICHAEL YOUNG, Defendants. COMPLAINT I. INTRODUCTION 1. This action, under 42 U.S.C. 1983, seeks a declaratory judgment that the detention, search, and arrest by Defendants West Milwaukee, Donovan, and 1

Krafchek (the West Milwaukee Defendants of Plaintiff for openly carrying a firearm within a retail store violates the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Plaintiff also seeks damages against the West Milwaukee Defendants for his illegal detention and arrest and for the illegal seizure and retention of his property. He also seeks a declaration that the West Milwaukee Defendants violated the federal Privacy Act by demanding that Plaintiff disclose his social security account number ( SSN as a condition of being released from jail and without notifying Plaintiff what uses would be made of his SSN and by what statutory or other authority it was requested. Finally, Plaintiff seeks an order for the West Milwaukee Defendants to expunge his SSN from their records. Regarding Defendants Chilton and Young (the Chilton Defendants, this is an action under 42 U.S.C. 1983 for the illegal detention, search, and arrest of Plaintiff, and for the illegal seizure and retention of Plaintiff s property. II. JURISDICTION & VENUE 2. This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 28 U.S.C. 1343. 2

3. Venue is proper because Defendants all are located in this District and some are located in this Division, and Plaintiff resides in this District and in this Division. III. PARTIES 4. Plaintiff Jesus Gonzalez is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Wisconsin. 5. Defendant Village of West Milwaukee is a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Wisconsin. 6. Defendant Charles Donovan is an officer with the West Milwaukee Police Department. 7. Defendant Patrick Krafcheck is an officer with the West Milwaukee Police Department. 8. Defendant City of Chilton is a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the state of Wisconsin. 9. Defendant Michael Young is an officer with the Chilton Police Department. IV. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 10. On May 14, 2008, Plaintiff was shopping in a Menards store in the Village of West Milwaukee. Plaintiff was openly carrying a firearm in a thigh holster. 3

11. Defendants Donovan and Krafcheck were on duty at the time as officers of the West Milwaukee Police Department and were dispatched to Menards on a report of a man openly carrying a handgun. 12. Upon arrival at Menards, the Menards manager who called 911 directed Defendants Donovan and Krafcheck to Plaintiff, who was in the parking lot loading his purchases into his truck. 13. Defendant Donovan approached Plaintiff and arrested Plaintiff for disorderly conduct for openly carrying a firearm in Menards. 14. At the time of the arrest, Defendant Donovan had no reason to believe that Plaintiff had engaged in violent, abusive, indecent, profane, boisterous, unreasonably loud or otherwise disorderly conduct under circumstances in which the conduct tends to cause or provoke a disturbance. 15. Defendant Krafcheck seized Plaintiff s firearm, case, and ammunition from Plaintiff s vehicle. 16. Defendant Krafcheck transported Plaintiff to jail. During Plaintiff s processing, Defendant Donovan requested Plaintiff s SSN. 17. When Plaintiff did not respond, Defendant Krafcheck told Plaintiff that if Plaintiff did not cooperate, he would be held in custody over the weekend, 4

whereupon Plaintiff informed Defendants that his social security card was in his wallet. 18. Defendants Krafcheck and Donovan retrieved Plaintiff s social security card and obtained his SSN. 19. Defendant Village of West Milwaukee retains Plaintiff s SSN in its records, and retained Plaintiff s property for 10 months before returning it upon order of the Milwaukee County Circuit Court and without formal charges ever being filed against Plaintiff. 20. Defendants Krafcheck and Donovan released Plaintiff on his own recognizance. 21. On April 10, 2009, Plaintiff was shopping in a Wal-mart store in the City of Chilton, Wisconsin while openly carrying a firearm. 22. As Plaintiff completed his purchases, Defendant Young approached Plaintiff with his firearm pointed at Plaintiff and asked Plaintiff if Plaintiff were a law enforcement officer. 23. When Plaintiff responded that he was not, Defendant Young waited for backup and then disarmed Plaintiff, handcuffed him, searched him, and transported 5

him to the Chilton Police Department, all against Plaintiff s will and without a warrant. 24. At the time of the seizure of Plaintiff s person, Defendant Young erroneously told Plaintiff that it is illegal to carry a firearm in Wisconsin. 25. At no time did Defendant Young have reasonable articulable suspicion or probable cause that Plaintiff had committed or was about to commit a crime, or that Plaintiff was presently dangerous. 26. After a total detention of approximately two hours, Defendant Young release Plaintiff without charges being recommended. Defendant Young did, however, retain Plaintiff s firearm, including magazine and ammunition, against Plaintiff s will and without a warrant and without probable cause to believe such property was contraband or evidence of a crime. 27. Upon information and belief, Defendant City of Chilton retains possession of Plaintiff s property. Count 1 Violations of Fourteenth Amendment 28. By detaining Plaintiff, seizing his property, and arresting him for disorderly conduct solely on account of Plaintiff s openly wearing a firearm, the West Milwaukee Defendants lacked probable cause or even reasonable articulable 6

suspicion to believe that Plaintiff had committed or was about to commit a crime, and therefore violated Plaintiff s 14 th Amendment rights to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. 29. By detaining Plaintiff, seizing his property, and arresting him solely on account of Plaintiff s openly wearing a firearm, and by retaining such property, the Chilton Defendants lacked probable cause or even reasonable articulable suspicion to believe that Plaintiff had committed or was about to commit a crime, and therefore violated Plaintiff s 14 th Amendment rights to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. Count 2 Violations of the Privacy Act 30. By demanding Plaintiff s SSN on pain of weekend-long incarceration, the West Milwaukee Defendants denied Plaintiff a right, benefit, or privilege on account of Plaintiff s refusal to disclose his SSN, in violation of Section 7(a of the Privacy Act. 31. By requesting Plaintiff s SSN without disclosing to Plaintiff what uses would be made of his SSN nor by what statutory or other authority it was requested, the West Milwaukee Defendants violated Section 7(b of the Privacy Act. Prayer for Relief 7

Plaintiff demands the following relief: 32. A declaration that openly carrying a firearm in Wisconsin, without more, does not constitute the crime of disorderly conduct nor any other crime, and that Defendants violated Plaintiff s Fourteenth Amendment rights by searching and seizing his person and property without a warrant and without probable cause the Plaintiff had committed or was about to commit a crime. 33. A declaration that the West Milwaukee Defendants violated Sections 7(a and 7(b of the Privacy Act. 34. An Order requiring the West Milwaukee Defendants to expunge Plaintiff s SSN from their records. 35. An Order requiring the Chilton Defendants to return Plaintiff s seized property. 36. Damages in an amount to be determined at trial. 37. Attorney s fees and costs for bringing and maintaining this action. 38. A jury to try to this case. 39. Any other relief the Court deems proper. JOHN R. MONROE, 8

/s/ John R. Monroe John R. Monroe Attorney at Law 9640 Coleman Road Roswell, GA 30075 Telephone: (678 362-7650 Facsimile: (770 552-9318 john.monroe1@earthlink.net ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF 9