Massachusetts Office of Campaign and Political Finance

Similar documents
Massachusetts Office of Campaign and Political Finance. Ballot question committees break spending records in 2016

Massachusetts Office of Campaign and Political Finance. Ballot question committees break spending records in 2014

I. INTRODUCTION. 4. The FESA Committee is a Massachusetts ballot question committee organized pursuant to this Agreement.

Campaign Finance Activity by Political Action Committees in Massachusetts 2011 & 2012

CAMPAIGN FINANCE GUIDE

CAMPAIGN FINANCE GUIDE

Commonwealth of Massachusetts Office of Campaign and Political Finance. Statewide candidates spent $33.1 million in 2014 election cycle

CAMPAIGN FINANCE GUIDE

The Use of Public Resources for Political Purposes

Ballot question seminar

STATEMENT OF CONTRIBUTIONS & EXPENDITURES

STATEMENT OF CONTRIBUTIONS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (PAC) W.S through 109

Working Draft of Proposed Rules

By-Laws of the Cold Spring School / Swift River Elementary Parent Teacher Organization CSS/SRE PTO

Washington Statewide Survey of 603 Voters Statewide December 3-9, 2014

Student Senate Funding Application

THE SCHOOL BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA RESOLUTION

The Constitution of the HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANT TRUST (VICTORIA) INC.

2016 California State PTA Convention 1 E10 PTA & Elections

NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING AND POSSIBLE EXECUTIVE SESSION OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA CITIZENS CLEAN ELECTIONS COMMISSION

Alaska Constitution Article XI: Initiative, Referendum, and Recall Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section 5. Section 6. Section 7.

The Trustee of the Charity is the Board of Directors of the Trust acting as Corporate Trustee.

John G. Barisone Atchison, Barisone, Condotti & Kovacevich 333 Church Street Santa Cruz, CA THE INITIATIVE PROCESS AFTER PROPOSITION 218

Massachusetts Office of Campaign and Political Finance

Municipal Township Initiative and Referendum

Campaign Finance E-Filing Systems by State WHAT IS REQUIRED? WHO MUST E-FILE? Candidates (Annually, Monthly, Weekly, Daily).

ORDINANCE NO NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY OF COCOA BEACH, FLORIDA, as follows:

Campaign Finance Reports Handbook of Instructions

WHAT IS ROMNEY VICTORY?

Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board

HARDINSBURG PARENT-TEACHER ORGANIZATION Supporting. Hardinsburg Elementary School. BY-LAWS. Article I ORGANIZATION

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION Washington, DC December 19, 2003

Campaign Disclosure Manual 3

State Propositions November 8, 2016 General Election Melissa Breach The League of Women Voters of California Education Fund

Colorado Campaign and Political Finance Manual

Lobbying: 10 Answers you need to know Venable LLP

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2015 HOUSE BILL 373 RATIFIED BILL

Form 410 with original ink signature(s) Secretary of State Political Reform Division th Street, Rm 495 Sacramento, CA 95814

SECTION 1 AUTHORITY FOR RESOLUTION:

ST. JUDE HOME AND SCHOOL ASOCIATION JOHNSON ROAD SOUTH BEND, IN 46614

GOVERNANCE AND LEGISLATION COMMITTEE A G E N D A

Campaign Finance Options: Public Financing and Contribution Limits

Story County Democratic Party Constitution & Bylaws

UNIVERSITY AND COLLEGE UNION. MODEL LOCAL RULES (as adopted by Congress 2016)

This diagram shows the relationship between the NSW Electoral Commission, the Electoral Commissioner and the Parliament of NSW.

Deleted: ) Deleted: No regular member of the Board of Finance shall Deleted: Seymour Deleted: board Deleted: commission. Deleted: powers Deleted: d

CITY OF GRANBURY NOVEMBER 6, 2018 SPECIAL ELECTION CHARTER AMENDMENT PROPOSITIONS

2016 GENERAL ELECTION PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS BALLOT LANGUAGE. No. 1 Constitutional Amendment Article X, Section 29

By-laws for Marlborough Special Education Parent Advisory Council (M-SEPAC)

CHAPTER 2 INITIATIVE, REFERENDUM AND LEGISLATIVE SUBMISSION

NATIONAL SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF COVERED BRIDGES. INC.

Campaign Finance Reform Ordinance San Francisco Campaign and Governmental Conduct Code

CALIFORNIA INITIATIVE REVIEW

Bylaws and Convention Rules Libertarian Party of California

CAMPAIGN REGISTRATION STATEMENT STATE OF WISCONSIN GAB-1

Constitution of the Peterborough- Kawartha New Democratic Party Electoral District Association

Issue Committees. A major purpose of supporting or opposing any ballot issue or ballot question; and 22 P a g e

Bolts Booster Club, Inc. By-Laws

Introduction. Parties and Jurisdiction

Chapter 1: General Statement

Report on the Limited Public Financing System for Candidates for Statewide Office in the 1998 Election

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, Article XI of the Charter requires the City Commission to place the charter review committee s proposals on the ballot; and

NEW YORK STATE CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION REFERENDUM 2017 DISPELLING THE MYTHS By Peter J. Galie and Christopher Bopst Oct. 7, 2017

SUPPLEMENT FOR SAN FRANCISCO COMMITTEES PRIMARILY FORMED TO SUPPORT OR OPPOSE BALLOT MEASURES

CALLING AN ELECTION OR PLACING A MEASURE ON THE BALLOT FOR LOCAL JURISDICTIONS

amendments to the Anaheim City Charter to the qualified electors of said City at a general municipal

Special Edi tion: Campaign Fi nance Law Changes

Suncoast Disaster Healthcare Coalition Charter

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, Section 9.9 of the Charter of the City of North Lauderdale requires the

RESOLUTION NO. _. WHEREAS, the City of Council of the City of Pasadena, California, desires to

Charter and Standing Orders Ayrshire and Arran Health Board Endowment Funds

HOUSE BILL NO By Representatives Maddox, Curtis Johnson, Yokley, Ulysses Jones. Substituted for: Senate Bill No. 3530

GUIDE ON HOW AND WHEN TO CALL AN ELECTION

ORDINANCE REPEALING AND SUPERSEDING ORDINANCES 300-H AND 302-H FOR THE PURPOSE

Campaign Disclosure Manual 1

LAONA SCHOOL DISTRICT PARENT TEACHER ORGANIZATION (PTO) BYLAWS

Political Parties and Soft Money

Whittier PTA Standing Rules

PMSA PTO BYLAWS

Agenda Item No. 6B August 9, Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Laura C. Kuhn, City Manager. Michelle A. Thornbrugh, City Clerk

IACP ELECTIONS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES CHANCELLOR'S OFFICE 1102 Q STREET SACRAMENTO, CA (916) September 16, 2004

(5) Conduct constituting coordination. A communication is coordinated if made under any of the following circumstances:

The Rules of Engagement: Lobbying in Pennsylvania. Corinna Vecsey Wilson, Esq. President, Wilson500, Inc.

CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS. Description. ARTICLE 9.7 CAMPAIGN FINANCING (Operational 7/1/91)

Code of practice for the University of Wolverhampton Students Union

BYLAWS DEMOCRATIC WOMAN S CLUB OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY

2016 County Ballot Issues General Election November. Alachua County

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FCPA REFERENCE MATERIALS TABLE OF CONTENTS

MISSISSIPPI SCHOOL NURSE ASSOCIATION BYLAWS

BYLAWS OF THE SCOPO POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

2018 Election Calendar Wyoming Secretary of State s Office Election Division -

NPO Legal Guides. Practical tools for NPO Leaders. A Basic Guide to the NPO Act

Political, Pastoral Challenges Ahead

Massachusetts Constitution

CHAPTER Senate Bill No. 2308

ACT of 27 June on political parties 1. Chapter 1. General provisions

SAMPLE DOCUMENT. Date: Name of External Organization: University of Virginia Art Museum Volunteer Board

2018 Election Calendar Wyoming Secretary of State s Office Election Division -

Transcription:

Massachusetts Office of Campaign and Political Finance FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE February 25, 2019 CONTACT: Jason Tait Director of Communications 617-979-8300 Ballot question committees report $42.6 million in expenditures, the second highest total ever Seven ballot question committees spent $42.6 million on three propositions in 2018, the second highest total ever recorded, according to an OCPF review of ballot question fundraising and spending. Question 1, concerning patient-to-nurse limits, accounted for 86 percent of all statewide ballot question spending in 2018. The question failed. The Coalition to Protect Patient Safety ballot question committee, which opposed Question 1, broke the spending record for a single committee, reporting $24,733,966 in expenditures. The previous record of $21.6 million was set in 2016 by the Great Schools Massachusetts Committee concerning charter schools. OCPF s review of ballot question activity covered fundraising and spending in 2017-18 for three questions that appeared on the 2018 statewide ballot: Question 1: Patient-to-nurse limits (failed) Question 2: Commission on limiting election spending and corporate rights (passed) Question 3: Repeal of transgender bill (passed, meaning the current law remains) The two committees organized for Question 1 one in support and one in opposition reported a total of $36.9 million in receipts and $36.8 million in expenditures, in addition to $2.5 million in in-kind contributions (such as donated staff time). The Massachusetts Nurses Association (MNA) was the primary donor to the Committee to Ensure Safe Patient Care Committee, which supported the question. The MNA contributed $10,498,403, or 87 percent of the committee s total receipts in support of the question.

The committee in opposition to the question, the Coalition to Protect Patient Safety, received 99 percent of its funding from the Massachusetts Health and Hospital Association $24,573,500. The question failed, 1,858,483 to 787,511. The average spent per vote in opposition was $15.29, and $13.31 for every vote in favor. Question 2 had the least amount of financial activity in 2018. Two committees were formed, one in support and one in opposition, but only the question s supporters spent money. The People Govern, Not Money Committee reported $214,189 in receipts and $213,932 in expenditures. The opposition group, the No on Two for Freedom of Speech Committee, reported no receipts or expenditures. The question, which created a citizen s commission concerning campaign finance issues, passed 1,871,989 to 751,447. Question 3 was a referendum on an existing law concerning gender identity. A yes vote maintained the current law. The committee supporting no change, the Freedom for All Massachusetts Committee, raised $5.2 million and spent the same amount. The committee supporting repeal of the law, the Keep Massachusetts Safe Committee, raised $464,664 and spent $462,389. The question passed, 1,806,742 to 857,401. The figures in this study are based on reports filed by committees covering activity through Dec. 31, 2018, and are subject to change due to any subsequent corrections, deletions or additions made as a result of any review conducted by OCPF or amendments filed by committees. In addition to the fundraising and spending reported by ballot question committees, businesses and other entities reported a total of $115,499 in spending that was independent of any ballot question committee. Reports filed by each of the committees may be found on OCPF s website at www.ocpf.us.

A breakdown of activity for each question follows. Campaign Finance Activity for the 2018 Statewide Ballot Questions Totals include receipts and expenditures by each ballot question committee organized with OCPF for 2017 and 2018. In most instances, the committee organized during 2018. Question 1: Patient-to-nurse limits Failed Committee Receipts Expenditures In-Kind Contributions Outstanding Liabilities Committee to Ensure Safe Patient Care (95450) Support $12,044,919 $12,044,919 $374,701 -- Totals in favor $12,044,919 $12,044,919 $374,701 -- Coalition to Protect Patient Safety (95455) Oppose $24,808,566 $24,733,966* $2,114,484 $1,000,000 Totals in opposition $24,808,566 $24,733,966 $2,114,484 $1,000,000 Question 2 Totals $36,853,485 $36,778,885 $2,489,185 $1,000,000 Vote Count Yes: 787,511 (spent per vote: $15.29) No: 1,858,483 (spent per vote: $13.31) *The highest total ever reported by a single ballot question committee. The previous record was set in 2016 by Great Schools Massachusetts concerning charter schools ($21,586,407)

Question 2: Commission on limiting election spending and corporate rights Passed Committee Receipts Expenditures In-Kind Contributions Outstanding Liabilities People Govern, Not Money (95448) Support $214,189 $213,932 $116,582 $20,000 Totals in favor $214,189 $213,932 $116,582 $20,000 No on Two for Freedom of Speech (95460) Oppose $0 $0 $0 -- Totals in opposition $0 $0 $0 -- Question 2 Totals $214,189 $213,932 $116,582 $20,000 Vote Count Yes: 1,871,989 (spent per vote: 11 cents) No: 751,447 (spent per vote: 0)

Question 3: Repeal of transgender bill (a yes vote maintained the current law) Passed Committee Receipts Expenditures In-Kind Contributions Outstanding Liabilities Freedom for All Massachusetts* (95442) Support $5,197,268 $5,185,008 $887,563 -- Total expenditures in favor of retaining the law $5,197,268 $5,185,008 $887,563 -- Oppose No to 3 (95458) $685 $685 $45 -- Keep Massachusetts Safe* (95438) Total expenditures to repeal Question 3 Total $464,664 $462,389 $179,872 $465,349 $463,074 $179,917 -- $5,662,617 $5,648,082 $1,067,480 -- Vote Count Yes: 1,806,742 (spent per vote: $2.87) No: 857,401 (spent per vote: 54 cents) *This study includes activity for 2017 and 2018. However, the Keep Massachusetts Safe Committee also had minimal 2016 activity

Statewide Ballot Question Expenditures 1988 2018 Year Number of Questions Number of Committees Total spent 1988 4 18 $13,317,952 1990 6 20 $5,661,062 1992 4 8 $16,139,661 1994 9 23 $11,155,835 1996 1 3 $1,210,777 1998 3 9 $9,999,283 2000 8 16 $15,340,199 2002 3 6 $2,332,880 2006 3 6 $15,320,327 2008 3 7 $11,516,215 2010 3 9 $9,098,307 2012 3 13 $9,554,909 2014 4 13 $30,193,266 2016 4 15 $57,477,775 2018 3 7 $42,640,899 Note: There were no questions on the statewide ballot in 2004.