Case4:94-cv CW Document2535 Filed06/29/15 Page1 of 19

Similar documents
Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. JOHN ARMSTRONG, et al.,

Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:14-cv L-NLS Document 60 Filed 11/18/15 Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROSEN, BIEN & ASARO, LLP 5 DEFENSE FUND, INC. NIICHAEL W. BIEN LIND~KlLB GAY C. GRUNFELD

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

BY FAX --~ FacsImile: (415) IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. 3 KennethM. Walczak, BarNo

Case 4:09-cv CW Document 579 Filed 06/01/16 Page 1 of 5

Case 4:06-cv CW Document 81 Filed 03/25/2008 Page 1 of 10

Case 4:14-md CW Document 615 Filed 03/29/17 Page 1 of 9

Case3:01-cv TEH Document2826 Filed12/01/14 Page1 of 2

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

Case 5:04-cv JW Document 20 Filed 06/23/2004 Page 1 of 6 WECHSLER HARWOOD, LLP SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY, LLP

Case 4:07-cv CW Document 39 Filed 12/07/2007 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:17-cv RAJ Document 36 Filed 07/21/17 Page 1 of 5

Case 4:16-cv CW Document 75-4 Filed 08/14/18 Page 1 of 7

PRISON LAW OFFICE. General Delivery, San Quentin CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

PlainSite. Legal Document

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Francisco) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:15-cv JD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:13-cv EMC Document 276 Filed 09/16/16 Page 1 of 6

RALPH COLEMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, NO. 2:90-cv-0520 LKK DAD (PC) THREE-JUDGE COURT. EDMUND G. BROWN JR., et al., Defendants. MARCIANO PLATA, et al.

Case 3:04-cv JSW Document 192 Filed 03/09/2006 Page 1 of 8

Case4:09-cv CW Document42 FUedi 0/07/09 Pagel of 9

Case 3:17-cv WHO Document 153 Filed 08/30/17 Page 1 of 5

Case: Document: 6 Filed: 11/03/2016 Pages: 6 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:13-cv HSG Document 133 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 5

Case5:12-cv HRL Document9 Filed08/09/12 Page1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 2:05-cv LKK-JFM Document 12 Filed 02/23/06 Page 1 of 19

Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 38 EXHIBIT EE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Petitioners, Real Parties in Interest.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

smb Doc 142 Filed 06/22/17 Entered 06/22/17 20:45:06 Main Document Pg 1 of 7

scc Doc 812 Filed 02/10/12 Entered 02/10/12 16:44:16 Main Document Pg 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 5:07-CV-231

Case4:11-cv YGR Document22 Filed02/16/12 Page1 of 5

~------~-----) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No. CO? ~ V

Case 5:08-cv JF Document 13 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 1 of 4

Case 2:05-cv DRH-AKT Document 202 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 8234 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 4:10-cv CW Document 730 Filed 12/05/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

U.S. District Court California Northern District (Oakland) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 4:10-cv CW

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. JESSE HERNANDEZ et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,

Case4:10-cv CW Document68 Filed02/16/12 Page1 of 9

Case 4:16-cv HSG Document 116 Filed 08/07/17 Page 1 of 24

Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Funambol, Inc. Doc. 52

Case3:09-cv RS Document78 Filed05/03/11 Page1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:04-cv JSW Document 122 Filed 08/26/2005 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CASE NO. 16-CV RS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION)

Case 3:07-cv SI Document 25 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 2:90-cv KJM-DB Document 5949 Filed 10/12/18 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Airlines, Inc., and Transport Workers Union Local 501

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case4:09-cv CW Document417 Filed12/01/11 Page1 of 5

Case3:12-cv VC Document70 Filed06/23/15 Page1 of 3

Case4:09-cv CW Document195 Filed07/20/09 Page1 of 10

Case 3:06-cv JSW Document 122 Filed 10/30/2006 Page 1 of 15

Case 4:15-cv JSW Document 82 Filed 09/01/17 Page 1 of 7

Case 4:11-cv SBA Document 93 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 5

Case 4:16-cv CW Document 75-2 Filed 08/14/18 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

STIPULATED PROCEDURE REGARDING CLASS NOTICE; Case No. C

shl Doc 36 Filed 05/15/12 Entered 05/15/12 17:26:47 Main Document Pg 1 of 5

)

CLEARSTREAM BANKING S.A. S NOTICE OF MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OR MODIFICATION OF THE JUNE 27, 2014 ORDER

Case 3:17-cv WHO Document Filed 06/28/17 Page 1 of 6

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

ooa Efiiing Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Stipulated Protective Order and Order 09mc0110, 0111, 0112, 0113 and 0114

Case5:10-cv RMW Document207 Filed03/11/14 Page1 of 7

Case 3:07-cv SI Document Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ORACLE USA, INC., et al.,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Attorneys for Defendant and Respondent CITY OF ANAHEIM SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO. The Motion of Plaintiff Leonard Labow in the above-entitled action, for an

Case 3:13-cv SV Document13 FUec101/22/14 Pagel of 7

Case 4:07-cv CW Document 69 Filed 03/18/2008 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

Case3:15-cv VC Document25 Filed06/19/15 Page1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETT S CLASS ACTION JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Kanter v. California Administrative Office of the Courts Doc. 10 Case 3:07-cv MJJ Document 10 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 1 of 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO. The parties hereby submit to Magistrate Judge Cousins the attached Joint

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. -v- Civil No. 3:12-cv-4176

Transcription:

Case4:94-cv-02307-CW Document2535 Filed06/29/15 Page1 of 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 DONALD SPECTER 083925 REBEKAH EVENSON 207825 PRISON LAW OFFICE 1917 Fifth Street Berkeley, California 94710-1916 Telephone: (510) 280-2621 Facsimile: (510) 280-2704 LINDA D. KILB 136101 DISABILITY RIGHTS EDUCATION & DEFENSE FUND, INC. 3075 Adeline Street, Suite 201 Berkeley, California 94703 Telephone: (510) 644-2555 Facsimile: (510) 841-8645 Attorneys for Plaintiffs GEOFFREY T. HOLTZ 191370 MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP One Market, Spear Street Tower San Francisco, California 94105-1596 Telephone: (415) 442-1000 Facsimile: (415) 442-1001 MICHAEL W. BIEN 096891 ERNEST GALVAN 196065 GAY C. GRUNFELD 121944 BLAKE THOMPSON 255600 MICHAEL FREEDMAN 262850 ROSEN BIEN GALVAN & GRUNFELD LLP 315 Montgomery Street, Tenth Floor San Francisco, California 94104-1823 Telephone: (415) 433-6830 Facsimile: (415) 433-7104 12 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 JOHN ARMSTRONG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al., Defendants. Case No. C94 2307 CW [PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER CONFIRMING UNDISPUTED ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS FOR THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2015 Judge: Hon. Claudia Wilken 28 [2737977-1] C94 2307 CW [PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER CONFIRMING UNDISPUTED ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS FOR THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2015

Case4:94-cv-02307-CW Document2535 Filed06/29/15 Page2 of 19 [2737977-1] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On March 26, 1997, the District Court established procedures by which Plaintiffs are to collect periodic attorneys fees and costs in this case in connection with their work monitoring Defendants compliance with the Court s Orders and collecting fees. Pursuant to these procedures, on April 15, 2015 Plaintiffs served on Defendants their First Quarterly Statement for 2015 by overnight delivery. The parties completed their meet-and-confer process on June 17, 2015 as to the fees and costs incurred on all matters. As a result of the June 17, 2015 agreement, the parties agree to the following: The parties agree to the payment of $862,373.62 to resolve all fees and costs incurred during the First Quarter of 2015, for monitoring and/or litigation activities in the California Department of Corrections of Rehabilitation Division of Adult Operations and Adult Programs (CDCR AOAP) portion of the case. Attached hereto as Exhibit A are charts setting forth the fees and costs claimed by Plaintiffs and the amounts agreed to by the parties to settle these claims. The parties agree to the payment of $25,364.59 to resolve all fees and costs incurred during the First Quarter of 2015, for monitoring and/or litigation activities in the Board of Parole Hearings (BPH) portion of the case. Attached hereto as Exhibit B are charts setting forth the fees and costs claimed by Plaintiffs and the amounts agreed to by the parties to settle these claims. The parties agree to the payment of $189,847.67 to resolve all fees and costs incurred during the First Quarter of 2015, for monitoring and/or litigation activities in the Division of Adult Parole Operations (DAPO) portion of the case. Attached hereto as Exhibit C are charts setting forth the fees and costs claimed by Plaintiffs and the amounts agreed to by the parties to settle these claims. The parties agree to the payment of $13,132.42 to resolve all fees and costs incurred during the First Quarter of 2015, for fees on fees. Attached hereto as Exhibit D are charts setting forth the fees and costs claimed by Plaintiffs and the amounts agreed to by the parties to settle these claims. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the amounts set forth above are due and 1 C94 2307 CW [PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER CONFIRMING UNDISPUTED ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS FOR THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2015

Case4:94-cv-02307-CW Document2535 Filed06/29/15 Page3 of 19 [2737977-1] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 collectable as of forty-five days from the date of entry of this Order. Interest on these fees and costs will run from May 18, 2015, accruing at the rate provided by 28 U.S.C. 1961. DATED: 06/29/2015 APPROVED AS TO FORM: DATED: June 26, 2015 DATED: June 26, 2015 THE HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE /s/ Edward R. Fluet Edward R. Fluet Deputy Attorney General Attorney for Defendants /s/ Blake Thompson Blake Thompson Rosen Bien Galvan & Grunfeld LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs 2 C94 2307 CW [PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER CONFIRMING UNDISPUTED ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS FOR THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2015

Case4:94-cv-02307-CW Document2535 Filed06/29/15 Page4 of 19

Case4:94-cv-02307-CW Document2535 Filed06/29/15 Page5 of 19

Case4:94-cv-02307-CW Document2535 Filed06/29/15 Page6 of 19

Case4:94-cv-02307-CW Document2535 Filed06/29/15 Page7 of 19

Case4:94-cv-02307-CW Document2535 Filed06/29/15 Page8 of 19

Case4:94-cv-02307-CW Document2535 Filed06/29/15 Page9 of 19

Case4:94-cv-02307-CW Document2535 Filed06/29/15 Page10 of 19

Case4:94-cv-02307-CW Document2535 Filed06/29/15 Page11 of 19

Case4:94-cv-02307-CW Document2535 Filed06/29/15 Page12 of 19

Case4:94-cv-02307-CW Document2535 Filed06/29/15 Page13 of 19

Case4:94-cv-02307-CW Document2535 Filed06/29/15 Page14 of 19

Case4:94-cv-02307-CW Document2535 Filed06/29/15 Page15 of 19

Case4:94-cv-02307-CW Document2535 Filed06/29/15 Page16 of 19

Case4:94-cv-02307-CW Document2535 Filed06/29/15 Page17 of 19

Case4:94-cv-02307-CW Document2535 Filed06/29/15 Page18 of 19

Case4:94-cv-02307-CW Document2535 Filed06/29/15 Page19 of 19