Economic Damages in IP Litigation

Similar documents
Speaker and Panelists 7/17/2013. The Honorable James L. Robart. Featured Speaker: Panelists: Moderator:

When a plaintiff believes that its trademark

Throughout the history of the United States, innovation

Case 6:16-cv PGB-KRS Document 267 Filed 04/04/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID 4066

35 U.S.C. 286 Time limitation on damages.

Prathiba M. Singh President, APAA (Indian Group)

IP Impact: Design Patents. Mike Trenholm Ali Razai Terry Tullis

US Design Patents for Graphical User Interfaces in the US. Margaret Polson Polson Intellectual Property Law, PC

FEDERAL CIRCUIT REFINES RULES FOR APPORTIONMENT OF DAMAGES IN PATENT INFRINGEMENT CASES

Intellectual Property Enforcement Ali S. Razai. OCPA Annual Educational Conference September 15, 2018

Remedies: Injunction and Damages. 1. General

Spansion v. Apple The Intersection of the Bankruptcy Code and Intellectual Property AIPLA Spring Meeting May 2, 2013

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE MEMORANDUM ORDER

Detailed Table of Contents

Damages and Remedies in Civil IP Cases An U.S. Perspective

There are three primary remedies available in patent infringement cases injunctions, lost profit damages,

IP in Bankruptcy: Addressing Licensor and Licensee Concerns

Intellectual Property Licensing Strategies

BRIEF OF THE ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK AS AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF NEITHER PARTY

PROFESSIONAL PROGRAMME UPDATES FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS: LAWS AND PRACTICES MODULE 3- ELECTIVE PAPER 9.4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION DAUBERT ORDER

GEORGETOWN LAW. Georgetown University Law Center. CIS-No.: 2005-H521-64

Patent Damages Post Festo

Frequently Asked Questions. Trade/service marks: What is a trade/service mark?

Law in the Global Marketplace: Intellectual Property and Related Issues FRAND Commitments and Obligations for Standards-Essential Patents

Survey on Trends for Commercializing IP. Australia

patents grant only the right to stop others from making, using and selling the invention

Sample Licensing Agreement

Bankruptcy and Licensing

Climbing Onto Multiple Branches of IP Protection (for Product Design Trade Dress) Will Leave You Hanging Without Constitutional Support!

FILED ORIGINAL APR JURy INSTRUCTIONS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

US-China Business Council Comments on the Draft Measures for the Compulsory Licensing of Patents

PATENTS TRADEMARKS COPYRIGHTS TRADE SECRETS ZIOLKOWSKI PATENT SOLUTIONS GROUP, SC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ATTORNEYS. Patent Process FAQs

Federal Circuit Provides Guidance on Methodologies for Calculating FRAND Royalty Rates, Vacating the Jury Award in Ericsson v.

Estimating the Value of Intellectual Property in Litigation

U.S. Design Patent Protection. Finnish Patent Office April 10, 2018

China Intellectual Properly News

Patent Portfolio Licensing

WHAT IS A PATENT AND WHAT DOES IT PROTECT?

Legal Supplement Part A to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 39, No. 120, 20th June, 2000

HUNGARY Utility Model Act Act XXXVIII OF 1991 on the protection of utility models as consolidated on April 1, 2013

Reasonable Royalties After EBay

Patent and License Overview. Kirsten Leute, Senior Associate Office of Technology Licensing, Stanford University

The Law of Marking and Notice Further Developed By The Federal Circuit: The Amsted Case by Steven C. Sereboff Copyright 1994, All Rights Reserved

Now What? Samsung v. Apple and Design Patent Damages. Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP Theodore Brown, Senior Counsel

Intellectual Property Laws Amendment Bill 2013 No., 2013

Intellectual Property. EMBL Summer Institute 2010 Dusty Gwinn WVURC

EDUCATIONAL COURSE MATERIALS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

IP LICENSING COMMITTEE MODEL LICENSING CLAUSES BULLETIN

NIGERIA Patents and Designs Act Chapter 344, December 1, 1971 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 1990

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ORDER REQUIRING AXCESS TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL EXPERT ANALYSIS

Case: 1:11-cv Document #: 585 Filed: 02/13/12 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:48996 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION

Basic Patent Information from the USPTO (Redacted) November 15, 2007

PATENT LAW. Randy Canis. Patent Searching

IDEAS ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW

196:163. Executive summary for clients regarding US patent law and practice. Client Executive Summary on U.S. Patent Law and Practice

Injunctive Relief for Standard-Essential Patents

DAMAGES. Alistair Dawson BeckRedden, L.L.P. Trial and Appellate Attorneys. Andy Tindel MT² Law Group

Can I Challenge My Competitor s Patent?

Mediation/Arbitration of

2012 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 1

Government Contract. Andrews Litigation Reporter. Intellectual Property Rights In Government Contracting. Expert Analysis

PHILIPPINES RULES & REGULATIONS ON VOLUNTARY LICENSING October 02, 1998

IP MANAGEMENT IN NIGERIA: TRADEMARKS & DESIGNS

AUSTRALIA Patents Act 1990 Compilation date: 24 February 2017 Includes amendments up to: Act No. 61, 2016 Registered: 27 February 2017

SUDAN Patents Act Act No. 58 of 1971 ENTRY INTO FORCE: October 15, 1971

(In text and on CD-ROM) 1 Some Premises and Commentary... 1 Form 1.01 Construction... 13

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

United States District Court for the Northern District of California ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) Defendant. REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO DEFENDANTS

Economic Model #1. The first model calculated damages by applying a 2 to 5 percent royalty rate to the entire cost of

Patent Act, B.E (1979) As Amended until Patent Act (No.3), B.E (1999) Translation

FTC AND DOJ ISSUE JOINT REPORT REGARDING ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

DO YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO SUE: UNDERSTANDING CONTRACT PROVISIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF LITIGATION

ETHIOPIA A PROCLAMATION CONCERNING INVENTIONS, MINOR INVENTIONS AND INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS PROCLAMATION NO. 123/1995 ENTRY INTO FORCE: May 10, 1995

Licensing & Management of IP Assets. Covenant Not to Sue

Regional Group Central America and the Caribbean

WORKSHOP 1: IP INFRINGEMENT AND INTERNATIONAL FORUM SHOPPING

An Assignment's Effect On Hypothetical Negotiation

Nominal Reasonable Royalties for Patent Infringement

Questionnaire on Exceptions and Limitations to Patent Rights. The answers to this questionnaire have been provided on behalf of:

Patent Rights Retention by the Contractor (Short Form)

Amendments in Europe and the United States

Compilation date: 24 February Includes amendments up to: Act No. 61, Registered: 27 February 2017

Intellectual Property Issue-Spotting for the General Practitioner

Intellectual Property Laws Amendment Act 2015

POTENTIAL PATENT APPLICATION QUESTIONNAIRE

Please number your answers with the same numbers used for the corresponding questions.

Recent Developments in IP Enforcement in Korea

The Where, When And What Of DTSA Appeals: Part 2

Unjust Enrichment for Patent Infringement: A Novel Idea?

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 10/13/2008 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Respecting Patent Rights: Model Behavior for Patent Owners

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs,

CORNELL STANDARD PROJECT AGREEMENT FOR STUDENT COLLABORATIONS (CSP-SC)

Israel Israël Israel. Report Q194. in the name of the Israeli Group by Tal BAND

Case 2:09-cv NBF Document 441 Filed 08/24/12 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Patent Reform Act of 2007

INTERPLAY Patent-Related Issues in the Government Contracts Universe

A Patents, Copyrights, Intellectual Property Policy

Transcription:

Economic Damages in IP Litigation September 22, 2016 HCBA, Intellectual Property Section Steven S. Oscher, CPA /ABV/CFF, CFE Oscher Consulting, P.A.

Lost Profits Reasonable Royalty * Patent Utility X X Plant X X ** Design X X Trademark X X Copyright X X Trade Secrets X X * Damages adequate to compensate for the infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty ** Total profits on the infringed article of manufacture not less than $250

The Legal and Economic Framework The starting point for estimating patent damages is 35 U.S.C. 284, which states: Upon finding for the claimant the court shall award the claimant damages adequate to compensate for the infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by the infringer, together with interest and costs as fixed by the court.

The Panduit Test - Lost Profits In order to recover lost profits from patent infringement, the patent owner must satisfy a four-part test that was put forth in Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc. and adopted by the Federal Circuit. The four-part assessment, known as the Panduit test, requires that the patent owner prove all of the following factors: 1. Demand existed for the patented product. 2. Acceptable non-infringing substitute products were not available to satisfy demand. 3. The patent owner possessed the manufacturing and marketing capability to exploit demand. 4. Lost profits can be quantified.

Income Statement INCOME COST OF SALES (INCREMENTAL) GROSS PROFIT SELLING, GENERAL & ADMIN (INCREMENTAL) LOST PROFITS

Georgia-Pacific Factors Reasonable Royalty Factor 1 The royalties received by the patentee for licensing the patent in suit, proving or tending to prove an established royalty rate. Factor 2 The rates paid by the licensee for the use of other patents comparable to the patents in suit. Factor 3 The nature and scope of the license, as exclusive or non-exclusive; or as restricted in terms of territory or with respect to whom the manufactured product may be sold.

Georgia-Pacific Factors Factor 4 The licensor s established policy and marketing program to maintain his patent monopoly by not licensing others to use the invention or by granting licenses under special conditions designed to preserve that monopoly. Factor 5 - The commercial relationship between the licensor and the licensee, such as, whether they are competitors in the same territory in the same line of business; or whether they are inventor and promoter. Factor 6 The effect of selling the patented specialty in promoting sales of other products of a licensee; the existing value of the invention to the licensor as a generator of sales of his non-patented items; and the extent of such derivative or convoyed sales.

Georgia-Pacific Factors Factor 7 The duration of the patent and the term of the license. Factor 8 The established profitability of the product made under the patent; it s commercial success; and its current popularity. Factors 9 and 10 The utility and advantages of the patented property over old modes or devices, if any, that had been used for working out similar results and the nature of the patented invention; the character of the commercial embodiment of it as owned and produced by the licensor; and the benefits to those who have used the invention.

Georgia-Pacific Factors Factor 11 The extent to which the infringer has made use of the invention; and any evidence probative of the value of that use. Factor 12 The portion of the profit or the selling price that may be customary in the particular business or in comparable businesses to allow for the use of the invention or analogous inventions.

Design Patent v. Utility Patent A matter of apportionment?

Nike v. Wal-Mart Dealt with a shoe design Court concluded: Total Profits

Apple v. Samsung Dealt with Design and Utility issues graphical interface flat-contoured front face flat...front surface

Apple v. Samsung Court concluded: Total profits of Samsung Supreme Court currently pending

Income Statement INCOME COST OF SALES (INCREMENTAL) GROSS PROFIT SELLING, GENERAL & ADMIN (INCREMENTAL) LOST PROFITS