Case 3:07-cv SI Document Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 7

Similar documents
Case 3:07-cv SI Document 25 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:17-cv TSC Document 13 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:14-cv APM Document 24 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

FILED SEP NANCY MAYER WHITTINGTON, CLERK. Case 1:07-cv RBW Document 1 Filed 09/27/07 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:11-cv JDB Document 3 Filed 02/17/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:06-cv CKK Document 31 Filed 05/18/09 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv RC Document 8 Filed 09/25/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case3:10-cv SI Document25 Filed02/25/10 Page1 of 8

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/31/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:13-cv AT Document 18 Filed 03/03/14 Page 1 of 8 ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendant.

Case 1:15-cv CKK Document 8 Filed 07/02/15 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:10-cv RMC Document 46 Filed 11/21/12 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case3:13-cv JSW Document88 Filed03/10/14 Page1 of 4

Case 1:14-cv KMW Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/08/2014 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case4:11-cv YGR Document22 Filed02/16/12 Page1 of 5

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/10/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) )

Case 4:09-cv CW Document 579 Filed 06/01/16 Page 1 of 5

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 345 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/18/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:10-cv HEH Document 1 Filed 08/19/10 Page 1 of 7

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF [COUNTY NAME]

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:13-cv JRG-RSP Document 12 Filed 07/10/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 104

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/28/17 Page 1 of 7 SAN FRANCISCO

Case 2:08-cv CW-DBP Document 7 Filed 11/11/08 Page 1 of 14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

INTRODUCTION JURISDICTION VENUE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:18-cv BAJ-RLB Document 1 08/17/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 4:17-cv HSG Document 180 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 20 Filed: 04/11/11 Page 1 of 26 PageID #:217

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 9

Case5:09-cv JW Document106 Filed04/22/10 Page1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/05/18 Page 1 of 5 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Case No.

Case 1:16-cv JEB Document 1 Filed 01/01/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COMPLAINT

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/26/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:16-cv MEJ Document 1 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv RBW Document 117 Filed 12/19/16 Page 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANSWER

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 06/06/16 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Charlottesville Division : : : : : : : : : : :

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:15-cv ARR-RLM Document 1 Filed 12/11/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION,

Case 1:04-cv HHK Document 48 Filed 02/14/2006 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT THE PARTIES

Case bjh Doc 22 Filed 12/30/11 Entered 12/30/11 19:33:15 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 70

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/07/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

United States District Court

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 613 Filed 05/07/2009 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv APM Document 1 Filed 07/07/17 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/26/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ANSWER

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/08/ :26 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 117 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/08/2016

Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 07/03/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 5:17-cv JLV Document 16 Filed 11/28/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 49 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA

Case 5:15-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 07/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case: 5:09-cv DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

I. ANSWER. COMES NOW Defendant IMPULSE MEDIA GROUP, INC. in the above-captioned

Case 1:17-cv JEB Document 1 Filed 06/29/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 07/18/12 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case3:08-cv JSW Document80 Filed05/12/09 Page1 of 8

Case 1:18-cv LY Document 43 Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:16-cv REP Document 24 Filed 07/01/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID# 447

Attorneys for Defendants Watson Laboratories, Inc. and Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/03/17 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 6:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:06-cv GK Document 37 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 0:10-cv KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/10/2010 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT

Case 1:16-cv EGS Document 14 Filed 07/12/16 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Plaintiff,

Case4:08-cv JSW Document320 Filed01/28/15 Page1 of 3

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

CASE NO.:12-CV-1984 OF EVIDENCE RELATED TO OBAMA S BIRTH. Plaintiff, Montgomery Blair Sibley ( Sibley ), pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(b)(11), moves this

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/02/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:11-cv NLH-KMW Document 19 Filed 06/01/12 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 196 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 1:04-cv EGS Document 7 Filed 11/19/2004 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Defendants. INTRODUCTION

Transcription:

Case 3:07-cv-05278-SI Document 25 25 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 7 1 JEFFREY S. BUCHOLTZ Acting Assistant Attorney General 2 CARL J. NICHOLS Deputy Assistant Attorney General 3 SCOTT N. SCHOOLS United States Attorney 4 ELIZABETH J. SHAPIRO Assistant Director, Federal Programs Branch 5 ANDREW I. WARDEN (IN Bar No. 23840-49 Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice 6 Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch 20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., Room 6120 7 Washington, D.C. 20530 Telephone: (202 616-5084 8 Facsimile: (202 616-8460 Andrew.Warden@usdoj.gov. 9 Attorneys for Defendant Office Ofice of the 10 Director of National Intelligence 11 12 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION, Civil Action No. 3:07-5278 (SI 16 Plaintiff, DEFENDANT S DEFENDANT'S ANSWER TO 17 PLAINTIFF S PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT v. FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 18 OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL 19 INTELLIGENCE, 20 Defendant. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

1 Defendant, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, by and through 2 undersigned counsel, hereby answers plaintiff s plaintiff's complaint in the above-captioned matter as 3 follows: Case 3:07-cv-05278-SI Document 25 25 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 2 of 7 4 First Affirmative Defense 5 Plaintiff s Plaintiff's complaint fails to to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 6 Second Affirmative Defense 7 The Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over plaintiff s plaintiffs complaint because defendant 8 has not improperly withheld information within the meaning of the Freedom of Information Act 9 ( FOIA, ("FOIA", 5 U.S.C. 552. 10 Third Affirmative Affrmative Defense 11 The FOIA request that is the subject of this lawsuit may implicate certain information 12 that is protected from disclosure by one or more statutory exemptions. Disclosure of such 13 information is not required or permitted. 14 Fourth Affirmative Defense 15 Defendant denies each and every allegation contained in the complaint except as 16 hereinafter may be expressly admitted. 17 In response to the numbered paragraphs and sentences of the complaint, defendant 18 admits, denies, or otherwise responds as follows: 19 1. The allegations contained in first frst two sentences of this paragraph consist of 20 plaintiff's plaintiff s characterization of its complaint, to which no response by defendant is required. To 21 the extent a response is deemed required, defendant admits that this action arises under the FOIA 22 and that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence is is the named defendant, but denies the 23 remainder of the allegations contained in these sentences. The third and fourth sentences of this 24 paragraph consist of plaintiff s plaintiffs conclusions of law and characterization of the nature of 25 plaintiff's plaintiff s action, to to which no no response is is required. To To the the extent a a response is deemed required, 26 defendant denies the allegations. 27 2. Defendant lacks knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the 28 allegations of this paragraph. Civil Action No. 3:07-5278 (SI - Defendant's Defendant s Answer To Plaintiff s Plaintiffs Complaint For Injunctive Relief 1

Case 3:07-cv-05278-SI Document 25 25 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 3 of 7 1 3. Admitted. 2 4. The allegations contained in this paragraph consist of legal conclusions regarding 3 the scope and extent of the Court s Court's jurisdiction, to which no response from defendant is required. 4 To the extent a response is deemed required, the allegations are denied. 5 5. The allegations contained in this paragraph consist of legal conclusions regarding 6 the venue of this action, to which no response from defendant is required. To the extent a 7 response is deemed required, the allegations are denied. 8 6. The allegations contained in this paragraph consist of legal conclusions regarding 9 the scope and extent of the Court s Court's jurisdiction, to which no response from defendant is required. 10 To the extent a response is deemed required, the allegations are denied. 11 7. The allegations contained in this paragraph constitute plaintiff s plaintiff's characterization 12 of matters contained in published news reports, to which no response by defendant is required. 13 To the extent a response is deemed required, with respect to the allegations contained in the first 14 sentence, this sentence quotes a portion of a December 15, 2005 article in in the NEW YORK TIMES, 15 to which the Court is respectfully referred for a full and accurate statement of its contents. With 16 respect to the allegations in the second sentence, defendant admits that, in a radio address made 17 on December 17, 2005, the President of the United States described certain activities of the NSA 18 which he authorized following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. The Court is 19 respectfully referred to the transcript of that radio address, available at 20 http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/12/20051217.html, for a full and accurate 21 description of the President's President s statement. 22 8. The allegations contained in this paragraph constitute plaintiff s plaintiff's characterization 23 of matters contained in published news reports, to which no response by defendant is required. 24 To the extent a response is deemed required, this paragraph quotes a portion of a December 24, 25 2005 article in the NEW YORK TIMES, to to which the Court is is respectfully referred for a full and 26 accurate statement of its contents. 27 9. The allegations contained in this paragraph constitute plaintiff s plaintiff's characterization 28 of matters contained in published news reports, to which no response by defendant is required. Civil Action No. 3:07-5278 (SI - Defendant's Defendant s Answer To Plaintiff s Plaintiffs Complaint For Injunctive Relief 2

1 To the extent a response is deemed required, this paragraph quotes a portion of a February 6, 2 2006 article in USA TODAY, to which the Court is respectfully referred for a full and accurate 3 statement of its contents. 4 10. The allegations contained in this paragraph constitute plaintiff s plaintiff's characterization 5 of various lawsuits related to certain activities of the NSA following the terrorist attacks of 6 September 11, 2001, to which no response by defendant is required. To the extent a response is 7 deemed required, defendant admits that various lawsuits have been filed throughout the United 8 States related to certain activities of the NSA, but denies plaintiff s plaintiff's characterization of these 9 lawsuits. Case 3:07-cv-05278-SI Document 25 25 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 4 of 7 10 11. The allegations contained in this paragraph constitute plaintiff s plaintiff's 11 characterization of the Protect America Act of 2007, to which no response by defendant is 12 required. To the extent a response is deemed required, defendant denies plaintiff s plaintiff's 13 characterization of the Act except to admit that the President of the United States signed the 14 Protect America Act of 2007 into law on August 5, 2007. The Court is respectfully referred to 15 the Act for a full and accurate statement of its contents. See Protect America Act of 2007, Pub. 16 L. No. 110-55, 121 Stat. 552. 17 12. The allegations contained in this paragraph constitute plaintiff s plaintiff's characterization 18 of matters contained in published news reports, to which no response by defendant is required. 19 To the extent a response is deemed required, this paragraph quotes a portion of a August 5, 2007 20 article in the NEW YORK TIMES, to to which the Court is is respectfully referred for a full and accurate 21 statement of its contents. 22 13. The allegations contained in this paragraph constitute plaintiff s plaintiff's characterization 23 of a public statement by the President of the United States concerning the Protect America Act of 24 2007, to which no response by defendant is required. To the extent a response is deemed 25 required, the Court is respectfully referred to the entire statement for a full and accurate 26 statement of its contents. See 27 http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/08/20070805.html. 28 14. The allegations contained in this paragraph constitute plaintiff s plaintiff's characterization Civil Action No. 3:07-5278 (SI - Defendant's Defendant s Answer To Plaintiff s Plaintiffs Complaint For Injunctive Relief 3

Case 3:07-cv-05278-SI Document 25 25 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 5 of 7 1 of matters contained in published news reports, to which no response by defendant is required. 2 To the extent a response is deemed required, this paragraph quotes a portion of a August 22, 3 2007 article in the EL PASO TIMES, to to which the Court is is respectfully referred for a full and 4 accurate statement of its contents. 5 15. The allegations contained in this paragraph constitute plaintiff s plaintiff's characterization 6 of matters contained in published news reports, to which no response by defendant is required. 7 To the extent a response is deemed required, this paragraph quotes a portion of a September 20, 8 2007 article in NEWSWEEK, to to which the Court is respectfully referred for a full and accurate 9 statement of its contents. 10 16. Defendant admits that it received two facsimiles from plaintiff on August 31, 11 2007, but defendant otherwise denies plaintiff s plaintiff's characterization and description of the contents 12 of those facsimiles. For a full and accurate statement of the contents of the facsimiles, the Court 13 is respectfully referred to Exhibits K & L of the Declaration of Marcia Hoffman, filed in support 14 of plaintiff s plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction. 15 17. Admitted. 16 18. Admitted. 17 19. Defendant denies the allegations in this paragraph, except to aver that defendant 18 is continuing to process Plaintiff s Plaintiff's FOIA requests and, as explained in the declaration of John F. 19 Hackett, filed in support of defendant s defendant's opposition to to plaintiff s plaintiff's motion for preliminary 20 injunction, defendant anticipates providing plaintiff with an interim response to the FOIA 21 requests on or before November 30, 2007, and a final response on or before December 31, 2007. 22 20. The allegations contained in this paragraph constitute conclusions of law to which 23 no response by defendant is required. To the extent a response is deemed required, the 24 allegations are denied. 25 21. The allegations contained in this paragraph constitute conclusions of law to which 26 no response by defendant is required. To the extent a response is deemed required, the 27 allegations are denied. 28 22. The allegations contained in this paragraph constitute conclusions of law to which Civil Action No. 3:07-5278 (SI - Defendant's Defendant s Answer To Plaintiff s Plaintiffs Complaint For Injunctive Relief 4

1 no response by defendant is required. To the extent a response is deemed required, the 2 allegations are denied. 3 23. Defendant repeats and realleges the responses made in paragraphs 1-22. 4 24. The allegations contained in this paragraph constitute conclusions of law to which 5 no response by defendant is required. To the extent a response is deemed required, the 6 allegations are denied. 7 25. The allegations contained in this paragraph constitute conclusions of law to which 8 no response by defendant is required. To the extent a response is deemed required, the 9 allegations are denied. 10 26. The allegations contained in this paragraph constitute conclusions of law to which 11 no response by defendant is required. To the extent a response is deemed required, the 12 allegations are denied. 13 WHEREFORE, having fully answered plaintiff s plaintiff's complaint, defendant prays for a 14 judgment dismissing the complaint with prejudice and for such further relief as the Court may 15 deem just. 16 Case 3:07-cv-05278-SI Document 25 25 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 6 of 7 17 Dated: November 26, 2007 Respectfully submitted, 18 JEFFREY S. BUCHOLTZ Acting Assistant Attorney General 19 CARL J. NICHOLS 20 Deputy Assistant Attorney General 21 SCOTT N. SCHOOLS United States Attorney 22 ELIZABETH J. SHAPIRO 23 Assistant Director, Federal Programs Branch 24 /S/Andrew I. Warden 25 ANDREW I. WARDEN (IN Bar No. 23840-49 Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice 26 Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch 20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., Room 6120 27 Washington, D.C. 20530 Telephone: (202 616-5084 28 Facsimile: (202 616-8460 E-mail: Andrew.Warden@usdoj.gov Civil Action No. 3:07-5278 (SI - Defendant's Defendant s Answer To Plaintiff s Plaintiffs Complaint For Injunctive Relief 5

1 Attorneys for Defendant Office Ofice of the Director of National Intelligence 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case 3:07-cv-05278-SI Document 25 25 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 7 of 7 Civil Action No. 3:07-5278 (SI - Defendant's Defendant s Answer To Plaintiff's Plaintiff s Complaint For Injunctive Relief 6