IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Similar documents
Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 42 Filed: 12/23/13 Page: 1 of 19 PAGEID #: 781

Part Description 1 10 pages 2 Exhibit Consent Decree 3 Affidavit Knedler 4 Affidavit Harris 5 Affidavit Earl 6 Affidavit Redpath

Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 130 Filed: 07/08/14 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 2883

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:08-cv SSB-TSB Document 1 Filed 06/06/2008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : VERIFIED COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION. v. Judge Michael H. Watson

Case 1:18-cv ADC Document 1 Filed 12/27/18 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case: 2:15-cv GCS-EPD Doc #: 34 Filed: 07/07/16 Page: 1 of 6 PAGEID #: 1066

Case 4:16-cv MW-CAS Document 18 Filed 10/11/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:06-cv ALM-TPK Document 12 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

In The United States District Court For The Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division. Answer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:16-cv DN Document 2 Filed 01/15/16 Page 1 of 30

Case 3:04-cv JGC Document 12-2 Filed 12/29/2004 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO, EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 2:12-cv PCE-NMK Doc #: 89 Filed: 06/11/14 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 1858

Case: 2:16-cv GCS-EPD Doc #: 15 Filed: 04/08/16 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 117

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:12-cv GCM

In The United States District Court For The Southern District Of Ohio Eastern Division : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION. JUDGE GREGORY L. FROST v. Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp OPINION AND ORDER

NOV?6 'M. CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Case No.: V S. JENNIFER -L:" BRUNER, SECRETARY OF STATE, ET AL.

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 10/07/2008 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

PLAINITFF MALC'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT

In The United States District Court For The Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION and TRO REQUESTED /

Case 3:16-cv VC Document 73 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 1:12-cv SJD Doc #: 54 Filed: 02/21/13 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 652

Case 2:08-cv GLF-NMK Document 62 Filed 12/09/09 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 5:02-cv DDD Document 121 Filed 09/15/2003 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION. No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) O R D E R

Case 1:10-cv EGS Document 44 Filed 03/15/12 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

INTRODUCTION JURISDICTION VENUE

RECENT CHANGES TO POLITICAL PARTIES IN NORTH CAROLINA

NO IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO; KEVIN KNEDLER; AARON HARRIS; CHARLIE EARL,

TOP TWO CANDIDATES OPEN PRIMARY ACT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. Jon Husted et al., : (REGULAR CALENDAR) D E C I S I O N. Rendered on September 21, 2017

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 2:06-cv ALM-TPK Doc #: 581 Filed: 03/08/16 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 17576

Case 3:16-cv CWR-FKB Document 79 Filed 01/06/17 Page 1 of 4

Case: 2:06-cv ALM-TPK Doc #: 124 Filed: 03/06/12 Page: 1 of 5 PAGEID #: 3007

Case: 2:06-cv ALM-TPK Doc #: 587 Filed: 03/11/16 Page: 1 of 10 PAGEID #: 18280

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO

2:12-cv PDB-MJH Doc # 8 Filed 08/16/12 Pg 1 of 20 Pg ID 423 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. v. No Appellee-Intervenor-Defendant.

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Case 5:16-cv EJD Document 22 Filed 12/13/16 Page 1 of 8

Case: 1:12-cv SJD Doc #: 1 Filed: 10/15/12 Page: 1 of 18 PAGEID #: 1

Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed August 19, Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Case: 2:16-cv GCS-EPD Doc #: 13 Filed: 03/11/16 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 665

Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: Filed: 03/30/15 Page: 1 of 28 PAGEID #: 7663

Case: 1:16-cv JG Doc #: 9 Filed: 06/16/16 1 of 6. PageID #: 163

Case 4:15-cv KES Document 115 Filed 12/19/17 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 1187 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 3:05-cv JGC Document Filed 01/05/2006 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION. Civil Action Number C2: JUDGE SMITH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Judge Carr

Case: 2:15-cv MHW-NMK Doc #: 19 Filed: 07/01/15 Page: 1 of 5 PAGEID #: 138

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

Armstrong & Okey, Inc., Columbus, Ohio (614)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 01/17/2008 Page 1 of 20

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA GREENSBORO DIVISION Case No.: 1:17-cv WO/JLW

2:14-cv LPZ-RSW Doc # 21 Filed 05/08/14 Pg 1 of 10 Pg ID 235 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed September 03, Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

IN THE OHIO TENTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS. Franklin County, Ohio NO. 16APE REGULAR CALENDAR LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO, Appellant, VS.

Case: 1:08-cv DCN Doc #: 7 Filed: 10/29/08 1 of 18. PageID #: 117

INTERVENOR-DEFENDANT COLORADO COMMON CAUSE S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM

CONSENT MOTION FOR A STATUS HEARING. Plaintiffs respectfully request that a status hearing be set in the abovecaptioned

Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 91 Filed: 03/25/14 Page: 1 of 26 PAGEID #: 2237

Case 2:13-cv Document 995 Filed in TXSD on 02/22/17 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:12-cv RLY-DML Document 1 Filed 11/01/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

Case: 1:10-cv SJD Doc #: 9 Filed: 09/15/10 Page: 1 of 12 PAGEID #: 117

Case 1:10-cv RFC -CSO Document 1 Filed 10/28/10 Page 1 of 29

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 09/30/15 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. NORTHEAST OHIO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Case: 3:18-cv TMR Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/16/18 Page: 1 of 4 PAGEID #: 1

Case 1:10-cv JSR Document 18 Filed 09/30/10 Page 1 of CIV 6923 (JSR) ECF Case. Plaintiffs,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 5:12-cv KHV-JWL- Document 53 Filed 05/21/12 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Honorable Michael Folmer, Chair Senate Government Affairs Committee and all of the Honorable Members of the Committee

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 2:08-cv RBS Document 15 Filed 10/06/2008 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Sincerely, Jon Husted Ohio Secretary of State

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/15/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1

Transcription:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO, et al., Plaintiffs, and ROBERT M. HART, Individually and ROBERT FITRAKIS, on behalf of THE GREEN PARTY OF OHIO, and CASE NO. 2:13-cv-00953 MAX RUSSELL ERWIN, Individually and DON SHRADER, on behalf of JUDGE MICHAEL H. WATSON THE CONSTITUTION PARTY OF OHIO, Applicants to Intervene, vs. JON HUSTED, In his Official Capacity as Ohio Secretary of State, Defendant, and THE STATE OF OHIO, Intervener-Defendant. MOTION TO INTERVENE OF ROBERT M. HART, INDIVIDUALLY AND ROBERT FITRAKIS ON BEHALF OF THE GREEN PARTY OF OHIO AND MAX RUSSELL ERWIN, INDIVIDUALLY AND DON SHRADER ON BEHALF OF THE CONSTITUTION PARTY OF OHIO Now comes Robert M. Hart, Individually and Robert Fitrakis, on behalf of the Green Party of

Ohio ( GPOHIO and Max Russell Erwin, Individually and Don Shrader on Behalf of the Constitution Party of Ohio ( CPO, by and through counsel, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 24 and for the reasons contained in the memorandum of law being submitted herewith move this Court for an order permitting them to intervene as Plaintiffs in the pending action challenging Ohio Senate Bill 193 ( S.B. 193 and participate in all future proceedings. In support of this Motion to Intervene, the putative interveners submit the following: 1. This case involves S.B. 193, which was passed by the Ohio Legislature on November 6, 2013, signed into law by the governor on the same day, and is scheduled to take effect on February 5, 2014. 2. S.B. 193 amends numerous provisions of the Ohio Revised Code, voids various directives that were previously issued by the Ohio Secretary of State, and conflicts with federal court orders prohibiting election regulations that burden access to the ballot for various minor political parties in the State of Ohio. 3. Plaintiff-intervenor-applicants are minor political parties, their candidates, and voters who wish to affiliate with these parties and support their candidates in the 2014 Ohio primary election. 4. Both GPOHIO and CPO are minor political parties, have previously participated in the electoral process, campaigned for various public offices, ran candidates in Ohio s general elections and, but for S.B. 193 will be continuing to run candidates in the 2014 primary and general elections. 5. S.B. 193 places significant burdens on the ability of GPOHIO, CPO, and their candidates to access the 2014 ballot. When S.B. 193 becomes effective on February 5, 2014, 2

Applicant-Interveners will be retroactively stripped of their status as political parties, become ineligible to participate in the 2014 primary election, and be obligated to undergo an onerous and burdensome re-qualification process for inclusion in the 2014 general election. 6. The bill also works with pre-existing Ohio laws to restrict the First and Fourteenth Amendment rights of qualified voters. Specifically, the bill will deny Ohio voters wishing to affiliate with minor political parties the ability to do so. The bill will also deny voters who would otherwise vote for minor political party candidates the opportunity to vote for the candidate of their choice. 7. S.B. 193 is not narrowly tailored and does not advance any compelling state interest in regulating Ohio s elections and the re-qualification procedure will unconstitutionally and effectively burden minor political parties, including the Applicant-Interveners from having meaningful participation in general elections and electing the candidate of their choice. 8. The pending litigation filed by the Libertarian Party of Ohio ( LPO against the Secretary of State may, if successful, address the concerns of the LPO but is not intended to and will not necessarily affect either the concerns of the Applicant-Interveners or the voters who would be inclined to support their issues. 9. The conflict in the interests of minor political parties, other than the LPO, is sufficient to authorize intervention as a matter of right on the part of the Applicant-Interveners to protect their interests and address concerns that are unique to them and their constituents. 10. The State of Ohio has previously moved and been granted leave to intervene, ostensibly to defend the constitutionality of the original lawsuit challenging O.R.C. 3503.06(1(a which prohibits certain out-of-state petition circulators from circulating certain nominating petitions and, now, to defend the constitutionality of the burdensome requirements S.B. 193 imposes on minor 3

political parties. 11. Given the obvious burdens imposed by S.B. 193 and the prior intervention by the State of Ohio, the totality of all of these circumstances strongly suggest that the Applicant- Interveners should be granted leave to intervene as a matter of right pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(a. 12. However, even if the right of the Applicant-Interveners to intervene as a matter of Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(b is questioned, permissive intervention is timely, poses no threat of prejudice to the parties involved, and raises legal and factual questions that substantially overlap with those raised by the initial parties. WHEREFORE, as a matter or right or, in the alternative, in the Court s sound discretion, the Applicants-Interveners request that the Court grant them status as party plaintiffs and leave to participate in future proceedings. Respectfully submitted, /s/ James L. Hardiman James L. Hardiman (0031043 TRIAL ATTORNEY jhardiman@acluohio.org Jennifer Martinez Atzberger (0072114 jatzberger@acluohio.org Drew S. Dennis (0089752 ddennis@acluohio.org American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio Foundation 4506 Chester Avenue Cleveland, OH 44103 (216 473-2220 Richard Saphire (0017813 saphire@udayton.edu University of Dayton, School of Law 300 College Park Dayton, Ohio 45469 (937 229-2820 4

Paul Moke (0014099 paul.moke@gmail.com Wilmington College 1252 Tyler Center Wilmington, Ohio 45177 (937 725-7501 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The foregoing Motion was filed this 27 th day of November, 2013 through the Court s Electronic Filing System. Parties will be served electronically, through the operation of the Electronic Filing System. /s/ James L. Hardiman James L. Hardiman TRIAL ATTORNEY 5