Case 2:05-mc Document 588 Filed 05/13/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Similar documents
Courthouse News Service

UnofficialCopyOfficeofChrisDanielDistrictClerk

Case 5:15-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 07/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 3:10-cv P-BN Document 76 Filed 07/27/11 Page 1 of 11 PageID 995

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. -v- Civil No. 3:12-cv-4176

Case 4:10-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/18/10 Page 1 of 9

KUO, M.J. STATEME1IT. (hereinafter referred to as "Defendants"), to recover damages for egregious violations. Telephone: U.

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Case 0:18-cv FAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2018 Page 1 of 5

P H I L L I P S DAYES

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/01/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

Case 9:17-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/04/2017 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 5:18-cv UJH-MHH Document 1 Filed 09/19/18 Page 1 of 11

Courthouse News Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CASE NO.:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COLUMBIA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COLLECTIVE ACTION COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

Case 3:10-cv HEH Document 1 Filed 08/19/10 Page 1 of 7

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. Civil Division GD COMPLAINT

Case 1:19-cv BPG Document 1 Filed 01/02/19 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARLYAND

Case 7:17-cv MFU Document 1 Filed 02/17/17 Page 1 of 9 Pageid#: 1

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1. Plaintiffs, COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv GMG Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 08/14/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Hon.

Case 2:12-cv AB Document 1 Filed 09/12/12 Page 1 of 9

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/17/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 4:15-cv Document 1 Filed 08/24/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Judge COMPLAINT

2.1T FILED. 3; b ov 16go-J-.9s- CLERK, U. S. DISTRICT COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 01/20/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 3:07-cv SI Document 25 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:18-cv MSK-KMT Document 1 Filed 09/18/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 2:16-cv LDW-SIL Document 1 Filed 11/28/16 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 19. No. 16-cv-6584

similarly situated, seeks the recovery of unpaid wages and related damages for unpaid minimum wage and overtime hours worked, while employed by Bab.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 3:04-cv KRG Document 22 Filed 08/08/2005 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 3:12-cv M Document 6 Filed 11/07/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID 18

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

6:15-cv MGL Date Filed 10/13/15 Entry Number 26 Page 1 of 13

3:14-cv JFA Date Filed 10/03/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 9

Plaintiff, COLLECTIVE ACTION v. PURSUANT TO 29 U.S.C. 216(b)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/31/17 Page 1 of 14

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION AMENDED COMPLAINT

JURISDICTION AND VENUE. 2. This Court has original federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1331

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/26/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID #:1

Case 2:16-cv MRH Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF VENANGO COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

Case 3:07-cv SI Document Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

Case 8:10-cv RWT Document 77 Filed 03/09/12 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Case 0:16-cv JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2016 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:19-cv AJN Document 2 Filed 02/25/19 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

thejasminebrand.com SO SO DEF PRODUCTIONS, INC., thejasminebrand.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. v. No. 1:18-cv- COMPLAINT COLLECTIVE ACTION

"Defendants"), to recover damages for egregious. Plaintiffs, -against- counsel, brings this action against FIVE BROTHERS AUTO SPA AND LUBE

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/27/16 Page 1 of 15

2:17-cv DCN Date Filed 09/10/17 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 9

Case 7:18-cv CS Document 15 Filed 05/31/18 Page 1 of 23

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

COMPLAINT NATURE OF THE ACTION PARTIES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Eastern District of Texas Sherman Division

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7:14-cv TMC Date Filed 10/21/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 13

2:14-cv DCN Date Filed 10/23/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN JOSEPH BENGIS, an individual,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 5:18-cv EJD Document 31 Filed 05/03/18 Page 1 of 14

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CAUSE NO PC IN PROBATE COURT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, Plaintiff,

(212) (212) (fax) Attorneysfor Named Plaintiffand the proposed FLSA Collective Plaintiffs

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/23/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 8:04-cv SCB-TBM Document 32 Filed 10/07/2005 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case 8:17-cv VMC-MAP Document 1 Filed 03/15/17 Page 1 of 17 PageID 1 MUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO. Case No.

Case 1:17-cv TSC Document 13 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs,

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/20/17 Page 1 of 13

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/20/ :42 AM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 67 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/20/2015. Exhibit A

Case: 1:17-cv DCN Doc #: 14 Filed: 03/02/17 1 of 19. PageID #: 69

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 6:13-cv AA Document 20 Filed 03/18/13 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 132

SECOND AMENDED COLLECTIVE AND CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

COIvIMONlVEALTH OF KENTUCKY FAYETTE CIRCUIT COURT - DIVISION l CIVIL ACTION No. 10-CI-S"S"1 z. COMPLAINT * *

Case 2:06-cv SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

RECEIVED ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/27/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

8:18-cv Doc # 1 Filed: 07/18/18 Page 1 of 12 - Page ID # 1

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 02/10/16 Page 1 of 13 U.S. DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON NO.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CASE NO. 3:16-CV-285

Docket Number: 1074 DICK CORPORATION, AND DICK ENTERPRISES, INC., A JOINT VENTURE, TO THE USE OF BEAVER VALLEY BUILDER S SUPPLY, INC.

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Transcription:

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 588 Filed 05/13/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DENNIS THIERET, RONALD L. ) BUCKNER, DAVID S. BENGEL, ) DAVID D. McDONALD, MICHAEL ) CALLAHAN, MICHAEL D. DRAZICH, ) JOHN FARR, CHARLES LEGEZA, ) RONALD PERRIS, ERIC DeFAZIO, ) JOHN BRADFORD, RONALD ) LAWRENCE, DAVID M. NELSON, ) DAVE SIMPSON, FRANK CINICOLA, ) SCOTT URQUAHANT, DAVID ) CORNELIUS, DALTON MINERD, ) JEFFREY B. WHITFORD, MARK A. ) SUTHERIN, JR., RANDY DEVER, ) ROBERT THOMAS, MATTHEW ) RALSTON, PAT GOLDEN, DAVID H. ) HANEY, ERIC L. GROH, DAVID M. ) Civil Action No. STITT, ROBERT SMITH, BRIAN ) GEISER, MICHAEL SCHUBERT, ) KEVIN E. SWEENEY, CHRISTIAN ) MARINI, THOMAS L. HANDERHAN, ) MICHAEL HARTLE and ARTHUR ) GOLDBERG, on their own behalf and on ) behalf of those similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs ) ) vs. ) ) PEPSI BEVERAGES COMPANY, ) ) Defendant ) COMPLAINT I. Parties 1. Plaintiff, Dennis Thieret, is an individual residing at 411 Pointview Road, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15227.

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 588 Filed 05/13/11 Page 2 of 8 2. Plaintiff, Ronald L. Buckner, is an individual residing at 137 Broadcrest Drive, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15235. 3. Plaintiff, David S. Bengel, is an individual residing at 207 Hillpoint Drive, Jeannette, Pennsylvania 15644. 4. Plaintiff, David D. McDonald, is an individual residing at 770 Sunrise Drive, Leechburg, Pennsylvania 15656. 5. Plaintiff, Michael Callahan, is an individual residing at 3710 McWhinney Street, Munhall, Pennsylvania 15120. 6. Plaintiff, Michael D. Drazich, is an individual residing at 91 Lynn Portal Road, Avella, Pennsylvania 15310. 7. Plaintiff, John Farr, is an individual residing at 512 Parker Road, Sarver, Pennsylvania 16055. 8. Plaintiff, Charles Legeza, is an individual residing at 417 Deer Park West, Jefferson Hills, Pennsylvania 15025. 9. Plaintiff, Ronald Perris, is an individual residing at 5735 Mifflin Road, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15207. 10. Plaintiff, Eric DeFazio, is an individual residing at 100 High Meadow Road, Baden, Pennsylvania 15005. 11. Plaintiff, John Bradford, is an individual residing at 400 Baker Drive, Aliquippa, Pennsylvania 15001. 12. Plaintiff, Ronald Lawrence, is an individual residing at 126 Jenny Drive, Butler, Pennsylvania 16001. 2

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 588 Filed 05/13/11 Page 3 of 8 13. Plaintiff, David M. Nelson, is an individual residing at 194 Calhoun Road, Aliquippa, Pennsylvania 15001. 14. Plaintiff, Dave Simpson, is an individual residing at 2012 Crafton Boulevard, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15205. 15. Plaintiff, Frank Cinicola, is an individual residing at 231 St. Leonard s Lane, Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania 16066. 16. Plaintiff, Scott Urquahant, is an individual residing at 1799 Renee Drive, South Park, Pennsylvania 15129. 17. Plaintiff, David Cornelius, is an individual residing at 4198 Frew Mill Road, Portersville, Pennsylvania 16051. 18. Plaintiff, Dalton Minerd, is an individual residing at 9099 Meadow Oak Drive, Allison Park, Pennsylvania 15101. 19. Plaintiff, Jeffrey B. Whitford, is an individual residing at 1115 25 th Street, Beaver Falls, Pennsylvania 15010. 20. Plaintiff, Mark A. Sutherin, Jr., is an individual residing at 2489 Jefferson Avenue, Washington, Pennsylvania 15301. 21. Plaintiff, Randy Dever, is an individual residing at 14 Marie Road, Washington, Pennsylvania 15301. 22. Plaintiff, Robert Thomas, is an individual residing at 1011 Alpine Drive, Mars, Pennsylvania 16046. 23. Plaintiff, Matthew Ralston, is an individual residing at 529 Highview Road, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15234. 3

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 588 Filed 05/13/11 Page 4 of 8 24. Plaintiff, Pat Golden, is an individual residing at 25 Greenview Drive, Carnegie, Pennsylvania 15106. 25. Plaintiff, David H. Haney, is an individual residing at 2092 Leo Street, North Huntingdon, Pennsylvania 15642 26. Plaintiff, Eric L. Groh, is an individual residing at 651 Glowood Drive, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15227. 27. Plaintiff, David M. Stitt, is an individual residing at 436 Reynolds Avenue, Kittanning, Pennsylvania 16201. 28. Plaintiff, Robert Smith, is an individual with an address at P. O. Box 372, South Heights, Pennsylvania 15081. 29. Plaintiff, Brian Geiser, is an individual residing at 45 Allison Road, Bulger, Pennsylvania 15019. 30. Plaintiff, Michael Schubert, is an individual residing at 3809 Collins Way, Weirton, West Virginia 26062. 31. Plaintiff, Kevin E. Sweeney, is an individual residing at 413 Tivoli Road, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15239. 32. Plaintiff, Christian Marini, is an individual residing at 628 Brierly Lane, West Mifflin, Pennsylvania 15122. 33. Plaintiff, Thomas L. Handerhan, is an individual residing at 14 Lorraine Drive, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15205. 34. Plaintiff, Michael Hartle, is an individual residing at 124 Alcott Drive, Sewickley, Pennsylvania 15143. 4

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 588 Filed 05/13/11 Page 5 of 8 35. Plaintiff, Arthur Goldberg, is an individual residing at 205 Shaw Court, New Alexandria, Pennsylvania 15670. 36. Defendant, Pepsi Beverages Company, a division of Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Pepsi ), has offices located at 400 Graham Street, McKees Rocks, Pennsylvania 15136, and is an employer within the meaning of Section 3(d) of the Fair Labor Standards Act ( Act ), 29 U.S.C. 203(d). II. Jurisdiction and Venue 37. Jurisdiction of this action is conferred on this Court by Sections 3(s)(1)(A) and 16(b) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. 203(s)(1)(A) and 216(b), and by the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1337 relating to any civil action or proceeding arising under any act of Congress regulating commerce. 38. This Court is the proper venue for this action under Section 16(b) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. 216(b), and by the provisions of 29 U.S.C. 1391(b), as the actions of the defendant complained of herein either occurred within this judicial district and/or had their intended effects within this judicial district. III. Factual Averments 39. The above-named plaintiffs are employees or former employees of Pepsi and bring this action to recover unpaid overtime compensation, liquidated damages, attorney s fees and costs under the provisions of Section 16(b) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. 216(b). 40. All of the plaintiffs are or were employed by Pepsi at its McKees Rocks, Pennsylvania, facility as pre-sell merchandisers and are or were non-exempt employees within the meaning of the Act and who are or were represented by General Teamsters, Chauffeurs and Helpers Local 249 for purposes of collective bargaining. A copy of the collective bargaining 5

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 588 Filed 05/13/11 Page 6 of 8 agreement effective May 1, 2010, to April 30, 2015, covering the plaintiffs is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit 1. 41. The overtime compensation provisions set forth in Article 1, Section 3, of the collective bargaining agreement with respect to pre-sell merchandisers have been in effect for at least three years prior to the effective date of the current collective bargaining agreement. IV. Statement of Claim 29 U.S.C. 207 and 217 42. Plaintiffs hereby incorporate by reference the averments contained in paragraphs 1 through 41 as fully as though herein set forth at length. 43. Section 7 of the Act, 29 U.S.C. 207, requires that all non-exempt employees be paid at the rate of two and one-half times the regular hourly rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of forty per week. 44. Defendant has been paying plaintiffs overtime compensation in accordance with the terms set forth in the collective bargaining agreement since at least January 2007 and continuing through the present time instead of in accordance with the Act. 45. By letter dated March 4, 2011, the undersigned counsel for plaintiffs wrote a letter to John Alder, attorney for Pepsi, informing him that he was retained to represent 33 Pepsi employees to recover unpaid overtime compensation under the Act. The letter indicated that the undersigned counsel was prepared to file suit on March 14, 2011, unless the matter could be amicably resolved. A copy of said letter is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit 2. 46. In response to said letter of March 4, 2011, the undersigned counsel was contacted by Attorney Samantha Hardy of the law firm of Sheppard Mullin, of San Diego, 6

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 588 Filed 05/13/11 Page 7 of 8 California, who indicated that she represented Pepsi in this matter. Ms. Hardy requested that the undersigned delay filing suit so that Pepsi could investigate and attempt resolution of the matter. The undersigned agreed to delay filing suit upon the condition that Pepsi agreed to toll the statute of limitations as of March 14, 2011, the date that the undersigned was originally prepared to file suit. A copy of the e-mail exchange memorializing this agreement is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit 3. 47. The parties were not able to resolve the matter and it is necessary for plaintiffs to have the services of an attorney to institute and prosecute this action against defendant on their behalf and on behalf of those similarly situated who executed Consent forms. 48. Plaintiffs believe that Pepsi s violation of the Act was willful because, despite knowledge that plaintiffs were not exempt under the Motor Carriers exemption or any other exemption, and plaintiffs knowledge of the results of a similar lawsuit involving a related company, Frito-Lay, Inc., Pepsi continued to refuse and continues to pay overtime compensation in accordance with the Act. 49. Defendant has violated the overtime provisions of the Act and continues to refuse to pay overtime compensation to plaintiffs and persons similarly situated in accordance with the Act. 50. Consent forms have been signed by the plaintiffs and are attached hereto as Exhibit 4. WHEREFORE, plaintiffs respectfully pray that judgment be entered against defendant: A. For an amount that may be found due and owing to plaintiffs and those other employees similar situated who may consent to be part of this action; B. For an amount equal as liquidated damages; 7

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 588 Filed 05/13/11 Page 8 of 8 C. For interest thereon; D. For reasonable attorney s fees; E. For costs of this suit; and F. For such other and further relief as the Court may deem proper and just. JUBELIRER, PASS & INTRIERI, P.C. BY: /s/ Ernest B. Orsatti Ernest B. Orsatti, Esquire Pa. I.D. #19891 219 Fort Pitt Boulevard Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 412-281-3850 412-281-1985 (fax) ebo@jpilaw.com Attorney for Plaintiffs 8