Keynote Speech by Federal Minister of Defence. Dr Ursula von der Leyen. Opening the. 55th Munich Security Conference. on 15 February 2019

Similar documents
Address given by Indulis Berzins on Latvia and Europe (London, 24 January 2000)

Speech on the 41th Munich Conference on Security Policy 02/12/2005

DECLARATION ON TRANSATLANTIC RELATIONS *

WORKING DOCUMENT. EN United in diversity EN

Europe s Role in Strengthening Transatlantic Security and Defense

My other good colleague here tonight is Colonel Glen Dickenson who is the Garrison Commander of our installation here in Stuttgart.

The EU in a world of rising powers

Foreign and Security Policy Strategy

THE HOMELAND UNION-LITHUANIAN CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATS DECLARATION WE BELIEVE IN EUROPE. 12 May 2018 Vilnius

Warm ups *What is a key cultural difference between Ireland and Northern Ireland? *What is a key political difference between the two?

château béla Central European Strategic Forum 29 November - 1 December 2013 FINAL REPORT

Transatlantic and Global Trade, and Security

THE PRIME MINISTER'S LUNCHEON FOR

NATO and the United States

Involvement or restraint?

The Political Adaptation of the Alliance

What Flanders can gain from TTIP and EU Trade Policy in general?

8th German-Nordic Baltic Forum

Nato s continuing non-proliferation role

Presidency Summary. Session I: Why Europe matters? Europe in the global context

What Future for NATO?

RT HON SIR ALAN DUNCAN MP

Statement of Government Policy

European Foreign and Security Policy and the New Global Challenges

Core Groups: The Way to Real European Defence

NATO After Libya. july/ august2o11. Anders Fogh Rasmussen. The Atlantic Alliance in Austere Times. Volume 9o Number 4

The BRICs at the UN General Assembly and the Consequences for EU Diplomacy

Preparing for NATO s 2014 Summit Under the Spell of the Ukraine Crisis

Speech by Minister of Defense Inada at IRSEM (The Institute for Strategic Research)

Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. Speech by Federal Foreign Minister Dr. Frank-Walter Steinmeier. Strasbourg 13 October 2016

THE ANDREW MARR SHOW INTERVIEW: PHILIP HAMMOND, MP FOREIGN SECRETARY MARCH 30 th 2014

CEUMC Points at the Annual Baltic Conference on Defence Panel II: "Resources and Political Will-It takes two to tango"

Oral Statement of General James L. Jones, USMC, Supreme Allied Commander, Europe, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee 21 Sep 06

The Bratislava Declaration, the Malta and Rome Summits, and the Future of European Integration: A View from Berlin

Conference of Speakers of the European Union Parliaments

Transatlantic Security Challenges The View from Washington. SOME THOUGHTS ON US and EUROPEAN SECURITY

President Bush Meets with Spanish President Jose Maria Aznar 11:44 A.M. CST

Democracy, Sovereignty and Security in Europe

Europe and Russia on the eve of the 21st century

The Ukraine Crisis Much More than Natural Gas at Stake

Transforming Trade Berlin, Germany, 15 October 2018

Back to Basics? NATO s Summit in Warsaw. Report

Background on International Organizations

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

Secretary-General s address at the Opening Ceremony of the Munich Security Conference [as delivered]

17TH ASIA SECURITY SUMMIT THE IISS SHANGRI-LA DIALOGUE FIRST PLENARY SESSION US LEADERSHIP AND THE CHALLENGES OF INDO- PACIFIC SECURITY

Takashi Shiraishi Professor, Center for Southeast Asian Studies, Kyoto University. There are various kinds of meanings in saying "Japan in Asia".

JOINT STATEMENT PRIME MINISTERS COUNCIL OF THE BALTIC COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

The Role of National Human Rights Institutions (NHRI) in Promoting and Protecting Human Rights in the OSCE Area OSCE Human Dimension Seminar

Meeting of ambassadors and permanent representatives of Ru...

Joint Committee on Foreign Affairs and Trade, and Defence 13 December Developments at the Foreign Affairs Council

World s recent decision, Parasites Should leave Syria

FINNISH INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS INAUGURATION 7 February 2008 Speaker of the Parliament Sauli Niinistö

NATO Membership Action Plan: A Chance for Ukraine and Georgia

ASEAN: An Economic Pillar of Asia

Chapter 5: National Interest and Foreign Policy. domestic policy

Strategic priority areas in the Foreign Service

Introductory Remarks. Michael Schaefer, Chairman of the Board, BMW Foundation. Check against delivery!

PONARS Eurasia Policy Conference

THE ANDREW MARR SHOW INTERVIEW: MICHAEL FALLON, MP DEFENCE SECRETARY OCTOBER 26 th 2014

Leangkollen Conference, 3 February, 2014 Speech by Foreign Minister Børge Brende

These are just a few figures to demonstrate to you the significance of EU-Australian relations.

Speech by Michel Barnier at the 28th Congress of the International Federation for European Law (FIDE)

Rethinking Future Elements of National and International Power Seminar Series 21 May 2008 Dr. Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall

Counterterrorism strategies from an international law. and policy perspective

BENEFITS OF THE CANADA-EU STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT (SPA)

Strengthening Competitiveness and Growth in Europe

Brexit: A Negotiation Update. Testimony by Dr. Thomas Wright Director, Center for the U.S. and Europe, and Senior Fellow The Brookings Institution

Position Papers MiniMUN UNSC

Post Referendum Scenarios. The impact of the UK referendum on EU membership

On behalf of people of Afghanistan, it is my pleasure and privilege to. welcome you to this milestone conference, marking a new phase in the

NATO Solidarity? Trump s Criticisms. POLICY BRIEF NO. 32 May

Russia s New Euro- Atlanticism

LITHUANIA S NEW FOREIGN POLICY *

Draft Conclusions. Inter-Parliamentary Conference for the Common Foreign and Security Policy and the Common Security and Defence Policy

Brussels Conference on Afghanistan Main Event - Closing Speech by H.E. Dr. Abdullah Abdullah Chief Executive of the I.R.

KEYNOTE ADDRESS BY PRESIDENT RAMAPHOSA AT THE 38TH SADC SUMMIT 17 AUGUST 2018 WINDHOEK, NAMIBIA

NATIONAL DEFENCE AND SECURITY

Mark Scheme (Results) January GCE Government & Politics 6GP03 3D GLOBAL POLITICS

Address by the President of the Republic of Estonia Toomas Hendrik Ilves at the General Debate of the 69th United Nations General Assembly

Policy Recommendations and Observations KONRAD-ADENAUER-STIFTUNG REGIONAL PROGRAM POLITICAL DIALOGUE SOUTH CAUCASUS

Mr Speaker, Mr Deputy Prime Minister, Madam Special Representative, dear Miroslav, Members of Parliament, General, Ladies and Gentlemen;

Visegrad Experience: Security and Defence Cooperation in the Western Balkans

Mr. Petteri Orpo Minister of Finance of Finland Leader of Kokoomus, the National Coalition Party

International Relations MA Thesis topic proposal. Department of International Relations 2018/2019. Dr. István Csejtei.

Priorities of the Portuguese Presidency of the EU Council (July December 2007)

The Goals and Tactics of the Lesser Allies Introduction

Speech by President Barroso on the June European Council

The UK and NATO Warsaw Summit 2016: Redefining UK s Role in European Security

Dr Andreas Dombret Member of the Executive Board of the Deutsche Bundesbank. Where do we go from here? The future of US-EU financial relations

TESTIMONY FOR MS. MARY BETH LONG PRINCIPAL DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR INTERNATIONAL SECURITY AFFAIRS U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Delegations will find in the Annex the Council conclusions on Iraq, adopted by the Council at its 3591st meeting held on 22 January 2018.

CONCLUSIONS. of the. Meeting of the Foreign Affairs Committees of the Parliaments of the Visegrad Group Countries February 2019

The Western Confrontation with Russia: Scenario Planning in the Area from the Baltic Sea to the Wider Black Sea

Statement by. President of the Republic of Latvia

Closed for Repairs? Rebuilding the Transatlantic Bridge. by Richard Cohen

DENMARK - Mise à jour 2

Remarks by Irina Bokova, Director-General of UNESCO to the Lakshman Kadirgamar Institute for International Relations and Strategic Studies

EU Global Strategy: Empty Wishes, No Real Plan

Revising NATO s nuclear deterrence posture: prospects for change

Transcription:

Keynote Speech by Federal Minister of Defence Dr Ursula von der Leyen Opening the 55th Munich Security Conference on 15 February 2019 Check against delivery! 1

Ambassador Ischinger, once more, you have put together an impressive agenda this year. The MSC continues to be a unique forum because it connects tradition with the future. Ladies and Gentlemen, please allow me to switch to English to say that it is my distinct pleasure to inaugurate this year s conference with my colleague from the United Kingdom, Gavin Williamson. There is no better place, no better time, to underline the friendship between our two countries. Germany and the UK stand together, shoulder to shoulder, as our soldiers do every day on their missions. We have agreed to deepen our partnership even further especially in the context of Brexit. We signed our Joint Vision Statement in Germany in October. Our Typhoons and Eurofighters are patrolling the Baltic skies, wing to wing. And I am looking forward to our meeting in Oxford next week. Ladies and Gentlemen! It is important to have partners in this world that we live in. We are currently experiencing powerful dynamics in technological progress, in climate change, in wealth distribution, and in the global balance of power. While these changes bring uncertainty, they also provide opportunities. All nations strive to find partners to help them harness these opportunities and protect their citizens from the risks they entail. No nation can successfully do this solely at national level. We need and seek cooperation all of us. China, for example, is developing the New Silk Road project. Russia is pushing the Eurasian Union. And Germany is determined to strengthen NATO and the EU. But our approaches differ fundamentally. In NATO and the EU we seek true partnership. Our partnerships are not built on domination. They do not create political and economic dependencies. 2

Our partnerships make us stronger by strengthening our sovereignty. For in our partnerships, interests and values are aligned. While to some, the world is a zero-sum game, we see the opportunity for growing together and prospering together. This is why NATO remains our first choice when it comes to security. For NATO members are more than partners. We are Allies. Because every single one of us stands by the commitment laid down in Article 5. Because we stand by the weakest among our Allies just as we stood by the strongest by invoking Article 5 for the first and so far only time after 9/11. And because NATO is more than just a military alliance. It is a political alliance. And as a political alliance, we are faced with what is a prominent feature of the new security situation: the return of great power competition. Our American friends recognised that early on. We, too, understand this now and we realise: Whether we want to or not, Germany and Europe are a part of this competition. We are not neutral. We side with freedom and human dignity. We side with democracy and the rule of law. This is what NATO has stood for in the past 70 years. NATO provides reliability in an unreliable world. Allow me to make three statements on the future of NATO. 1. We Europeans must carry more weight. The American call for fairer burden-sharing we have been hearing it for years, it is justified. It took Russia s aggression against Ukraine for us to change our course. Since then, all European Allies have increased their defence spending. The German defence budget has increased by 36% since 2014 in accordance with NATO criteria. 3

And we have a clear plan: The White Paper and the Capability Profile both detail how the Bundeswehr will modernise its equipment by 2024. Our budget will thus have increased by 80%, ten years after Wales. Facing the facts, we know that we must do more. Especially Germany. We are committed to the 2% target. The German government has just confirmed this to NATO and it has been laid down in our coalition agreement. Europe, too, is doing more. We have set a course towards a European Defence Union. We have finally found ways and means to overcome our fragmentation. We are harmonising planning, procurement and operational readiness. This creates new, common European capabilities. NATO directly and immediately benefits from these capabilities as well. They enable us Europeans to act in times of crisis. This, too, is transatlantic burdensharing. In order to be able to carry more weight, however, we must resolve some contradictions. Germany is in favour of adopting the majority principle in European foreign policy decisions. Given that, we must accept that German maximum positions will not win a majority. Our external economic policy should be coordinated within Europe. Only then will it be consistent. Also, it is imperative that we achieve clarity concerning armaments exports. We Germans should not claim that we have better morals than France, or a more insightful human rights policy than the United Kingdom. We have to muster the political strength to adopt a reliable, common approach, which combines our security interests and our humanitarian principles. Just like our European partners do. 2. We must uphold the principle of fairness in our transatlantic friendship. Fairness is a principle in military burden-sharing, and fairness is a principle in political decision-making. 4

Our military missions are based on the rule: Go in together, come out together. It applies to Afghanistan, to Resolute Support. This week, the German cabinet has extended the Bundeswehr mandate for another year. This is a very clear sign that we stand by our responsibilities. The Afghan security forces need more advice and training in order to be able to keep the Taliban at bay on their own. It is a good thing that we agreed in Europe that every development of the military mission is tied to the progress of the peace talks. And decisions will be discussed and made in the Alliance in light of that progress. We know that only an Afghan peace can be a true peace. This also means that the results of talks with the Taliban must be supported by the Afghan government and society. Taking decisions together this must also apply to Syria, where almost all NATO members are joined in the fight against ISIL. This morning, we discussed further steps in the Defeat ISIL core group together. Our mission continues because ISIL has not yet been completely defeated and because it is changing its character into an underground network. Therefor our emphasis is shifting from the military component towards stabilization. A new government has been formed in Iraq. That is a good thing! We should support it, so that all groups Shia, Sunni, Kurds, who fought so bravely with us, and all other groups can participate equally in reconstruction. The INF Treaty is another example of the fact that a common approach makes us stronger. It is right that - we as NATO condemn the Russian breach of the Treaty. - we will do everything in our power to preserve the substance of the Treaty. - we make it clear that we must respond to the increased risk posed by Russian arms, especially to us in Europe. 5

- we conduct an analysis to find a smart mix of measures to take in the event that Russia does not relent. The tit-for-tat strategy practiced in the 1980s is not going to help us here. It is also certain that arms control initiatives will be an important but by no means sufficient part of the measures. The most important thing is that we, as Allies, follow a common approach. That way all of us gain in credibility and legitimacy. 3. As NATO Allies, we must always be guided by both interests and values. Especially since we are living in times in which politics is increasingly driven by emotions. Especially since we see people manipulate fears to gain power and playing fast and loose with the truth, poisoning our discourse. This is precisely why it is so important that our actions as Atlantic Allies are determined by interests and values. The truth is: We are not always successful in doing that. But unlike others, we want our success to be measured by whether we meet this standard. Of course, NATO is about cash, capabilities and contributions. But it is also about dignity, decency and dependability. Only if we can combine these elements will NATO maintain its unity and inner strength. Thank you. 6