RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

Similar documents
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS HEARINGS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS HEARINGS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS HEARINGS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS HEARINGS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS HEARINGS DIVISION

PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

May 22, 2002 OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO

PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

FINAL ORDER FINDINGS OF FACT

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS HEARINGS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL AND GAS DIVISION FINAL ORDER FINDINGS OF FACT

April 14, 2006 PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS LEGAL DIVISION OIL AND GAS SECTION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL OIL AND GAS SECTION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS LEGAL DIVISION OIL AND GAS SECTION FINAL ORDER FINDINGS OF FACT

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS LEGAL DIVISION OIL AND GAS SECTION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS

OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS FINAL ORDER FINDINGS OF FACT

TITLE 58. WATERS AND WATER SUPPLY CHAPTER 10B. HAZARDOUS DISCHARGE SITE REMEDIATION

Sewage Disposal ARTICLE II SEWAGE RETAINING TANKS

OFFICIAL MINUTES RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS FORMAL COMMISSION ACTION JANUARY 23, 2004

Case Document 664 Filed in TXSB on 12/07/17 Page 1 of 12

Article 7. Department of Environmental Quality. Part 1. General Provisions.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS

The City of Florence shall administer, implement, and enforce the provisions of these regulations. Any powers granted or

G.S Page 1

REVISED PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY. John Chakales, Hearings Examiner Danny Bivens, Technical Examiner

The Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside, State of California, ordains that this Ordinance is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

FIRST READING: SECOND READING: PUBLISHED: PASSED: TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF WASTEWATER BY LAND APPLICATION

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

PENN TOWNSHIP CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORDINANCE NUMBER HOLDING TANKS

TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. Protecting Texas by Reducing and Preventing Pollution. October 31, 2008

Session of HOUSE BILL No. 2672

FPL FARMING, LTD. V. ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESSING SYSTEMS, L.C.: SUBSURFACE TRESPASS IN TEXAS

POLLUTION PREVENTION AND CLEAN-UP BYLAW NO. 8475

Chapter 3 Gaining Entry to Inspect Sites For Actual or Suspected Pollution

March 8, Re: DOCKET REFERENCE NO

WATER CODE CHAPTER 7. ENFORCEMENT

CHAPTER 4 Common Law Claims NEGLIGENCE PER SE & STRICT LIABILITY

GUIDE FOR SUBMISSIONS PURSUANT TO THE TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH, AND SAFETY AUDIT PRIVILEGE ACT

ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

POLICE, FIRE AND EMERGENCIES

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT

The Environmental Crimes Division

SECTION 2. BOARD: RULE 2.1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS AND TAXING AUTHORITY RULE 2.2 BOARD STRUCTURE, OFFICERS... 11

LIMITED ENVIRONMENTAL INDEMNITY AGREEMENT

CHAPTER 32 WELL ABANDONMENT AND WELL OPERATION PERMIT

CHAPTER IV SMALL ON-SITE WASTEWATER SYSTEMS. 4.1 Purpose: The regulations in this chapter are enacted for the purpose of regulating

AMENDED AND RESTATED CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT. by and between ANTERO RESOURCES CORPORATION. and ANTERO MIDSTREAM PARTNERS LP TABLE OF CONTENTS

Citizens Suit Remedies Can Expand Contaminated Site

FINAL ORDER. Findings. Facts. Counties, A list of the wells at ( Wells ) is. ownership of the rights below a horizontal to permit

1.11 This ordinance shall be known and referenced as the Mille Lacs County Cleanup of Clandestine Drug Lab and Chemical Dump Sites Ordinance.

CLEANUP OF CLANDESTINE DRUG LAB SITES ORDINANCE. Fillmore County

ORDINANCE NO Charter to adopt and implement necessary and reasonable ordinances in the

Case 7:10-cv ART Document 1 Filed 03/10/10 Page 1 of 12

BYLAW #797A OF THE TOWN OF KILLAM IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA

HENRY COUNTY PRIVATE SEWAGE DISPOSAL ORDINANCE

ENVIRONMENTAL CODE SUMNER COUNTY, KANSAS CHAPTER 2 ON-SITE WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT

TOWN OF PELHAM Office of the Selectmen

OTTER TAIL COUNTY ORDINANCE CLEANUP OF CLANDESTINE DRUG LAB SITES ORDINANCE

3/12/14. TERMS AND CONDITIONS TO SUPPLY and SALES AGREEMENTS

LEGISLATIVE COUNSELʹS DIGEST

BY-LAWS KAY POINTE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Harris-Galveston Subsidence District. Rules

NEW YORK STATE: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION In the Matter of Alleged

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 208th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED MAY 17, 1999

RULES GOVERNING THE CONSTRUCTION, USE, OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE OF DISPOSAL SYSTEMS WITHIN ANY AREA OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, IOWA

F) Department shall mean the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health. G) Department s Manual shall mean the technical document identifying

CONTRIBUTION, CONVEYANCE AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT. by and among PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY PHILLIPS 66 GULF COAST PIPELINE LLC

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CONSENT ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER

The Middleby Corporation and Viking Range LLC, Provisional Acceptance of a Settlement

STATE OF VERMONT DECISION ON THE MERITS. Agency of Natural Resources, Petitioner. Wesco, Inc., Respondent

CHAPTER 30 POLICE DEPARTMENT

Casteel Custom Bottling

The Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside Ordains as Follows:

CITY OF KALAMAZOO ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE TO CREATE APPENDIX A: CHAPTER 3, SECTION 3.5, WELLHEAD PROTECTION OVERLAY

SOLID WASTE CODE APACHE TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA

When New Data Give Way to Claims Over Old Contamination

BOARD OF PORT COMMISSIONERS

Appomattox River Water Authority

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONROE COUNTY FORTY-THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

General Principles of Environmental Enforcement

MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2013 COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 719

Environmental Questionnaire

STORMWATER TREATMENT DEVICE AND LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT STRUCTURE ACCESS AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT

Transcription:

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION ENFORCEMENT ACTION FOR ALLEGED VIOLATIONS COMMITTED BY DISCOVERY PETROLEUM, L.L.C. (220861), AS TO THE THEO C ROGERS (14015) LEASE, WELL NO. 5 AND TANK BATTERY, KYOTE FIELD, ATASCOSA COUNTY, TEXAS FINAL ORDER The Commission finds that after statutory notice the captioned enforcement proceeding was heard by the examiner on April 4, 2013, and that the respondent, Discovery Petroleum, L.L.C. (220861), failed to appear or respond to the Notice of Hearing. Pursuant to 1.49 of the Commission's General Rules of Practice and Procedure [Tex. R. R. Comm'n, 16 TEX. ADMIN. CODE 1.49] and after being duly submitted to the Railroad Commission of Texas at conference held in its offices in Austin, Texas, the Commission makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Discovery Petroleum, L.L.C. (220861) ( Respondent") was given Notice of Hearing by certified mail, addressed to the most recent P-5 address on the Form P-5 Organization Report, which was returned to the Commission marked unclaimed. 2. The returned certified receipt attached to Amended Original Complaint and the Notice of Hearing mailed to Respondents, most recent P-5 address, was returned to the Commission on March 22, 2013, marked unclaimed. The certified receipt has been on file with the Commission for 15 days, exclusive of the day of receipt and day of issuance. 3. On July 24, 2012, Respondent, filed an Organization Report (Form P-5) with the Commission reporting that its members consisted of the following individual(s): Noel Joseph Singer, Member. 4. Noel Joseph Singer, was a person in a position of ownership or control of respondent, as defined by Texas Natural Resources Code Section 91.114, during the time period of the violations of Commission rules committed by respondent. 5. The violations of Commission rules committed by respondent are related to safety and the control of pollution.

6. Respondent designated itself to the Commission as the operator of Well No. 5 and Tank Battery on the Theo C Rogers (14015) Lease ( subject well / subject lease ) by filing a Form P-4 (Producers Transportation Authority and Certificate of Compliance) with the Commission on June 1, 2009. 7. According to Commission records the Respondent s Form P-5 (Organization Report) is active. Respondent has $50,000.00 cash as its financial assurance. 8. Commission District inspections were conducted on May 7, 2012, April 20, 2012 and April 18, 2012 for the Theo C Rogers (14015) Lease. Well No. 5 indicated that Respondent caused or allowed an unauthorized discharge of oil of an undetermined amount to leak inside the firewall. Futhermore, Commission District inspections conducted between December 9, 2009 and March 31, 2011 indicated that the subject well has a history of unauthorized discharges of oil. 9. No permit has been issued to Respondent for the discharge of oil and gas wastes on or from the subject lease. 10. The unpermitted discharges of oil and gas wastes or other substances or materials on the subject lease constitute a hazard to public health and safety because of leaks and spills of oil and produced waters onto soils can migrate into surface water bodies causing contamination or can leach into the ground and percolate through soils into groundwater supplies. 11. Commission District inspections were conducted on May 7, 2012, April 20, 2012 and April 18, 2012 for the Theo C Rogers (14015) Lease, Well No. 5. Respondent was using and maintaining an unauthorized pit measuring approximately 15' x 10' x 8'. 12. Unfilled pits constitute a hazard to public health and safety because of the potential for illegal dumping in the pits and the potential for surface run-off to collect in the pit and seep into subsurface waters. 13. The subject well ceased production on or before June 2010. 14. The subject well has not been properly plugged in accordance with, and is not otherwise in compliance with, Statewide Rule 14. 15. The Statewide 14b2 plugging extension for Well No. 5 on the Theo C Rogers (14015) Lease was denied on April 30, 2013 for failure to file an H-15 test. 16. Usable quality groundwater in the area is likely to be contaminated by migrations or discharges of saltwater and other oil and gas wastes from the subject well. Unplugged wellbores constitute a cognizable threat to the public health and safety because of the probability of pollution. 17. The total estimated cost to the State of plugging the subject well is $31,100.96.

18. The Respondent has not demonstrated good faith since it failed to plug or timely place the subject lease and subject well in compliance after being notified of the violations by the District Office and failed to appear at the hearing to explain its inaction. 19. Respondent is the person responsible for cleaning up the discharges on the subject lease under TEX. NAT. RES. CODE ANN. 91.113(b), and the Commission may recover from Respondent all costs incurred in cleaning up the subject lease pursuant to TEX. NAT. RES. CODE ANN. 91.113(f). 20. The Respondent has a prior history of Commission rule violations including the following docket(s): Docket No. 02-0260214; Agreed Order signed: November 24, 2009; and Docket No. 02-0264458; Agreed Order signed: March 22, 2011. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Proper notice was issued by the Railroad Commission to respondent and to all other appropriate persons legally entitled to notice. 2. All things necessary to the Commission attaining jurisdiction over the subject matter and the parties in this hearing have been performed or have occurred. 3. Respondent is in violation of Commission Statewide Rules 8(d)(1), 8(d)(2) and 14(b)(2). 4. Respondent is responsible for maintaining the subject lease in compliance with Statewide Rule 8(d)(1), which prohibits the discharge of oil and gas wastes without a permit. 5. Respondent is responsible for maintaining the subject lease in compliance with Statewide Rule 8(d)(2), which prohibits a person from maintaining or using any pit for storage of oilfield fluids without a permit. 6. Respondent is responsible for maintaining the subject lease and subject well in compliance with all applicable Commission rules according to Statewide Rules 14, 58, and 79 and Chapters 89 and 91 of the Texas Natural Resources Code. 7. The documented violations committed by the respondent constitute acts deemed serious, a hazard to the public health, and demonstrate a lack of good faith pursuant to TEX. NAT. RES. CODE ANN. 81.0531.

8. As a person in a position of ownership or control of respondent at the time respondent violated Commission rules related to safety and the control of pollution, Noel Joseph Singer, and any other organization in which he may hold a position of ownership or control, shall be subject to the restrictions of Texas Natural Resource Code Section 91.114(a)(2) for a period of no more than seven years from the date the order entered in this matter becomes final, or until the conditions that constituted the violations herein are corrected or are being corrected in accordance with a schedule to which the Commission and the organization have agreed; and all administrative, civil, and criminal penalties and all cleanup and plugging costs incurred by the State relating to those conditions are paid or are being paid in accordance with a schedule to which the Commission and the organization have agreed, whichever is earlier. IT IS ORDERED THAT within 30 days from the day immediately following the date this order becomes final: 1. Discovery Petroleum, L.L.C. (220861), shall plug or otherwise place the Theo C Rogers (14015) Lease, Well No. 5 and Tank Battery, Kyote Field, Fisher County, Texas in compliance with applicable Commission rules and regulations; and 2. Discovery Petroleum, L.L.C. (220861), shall pay to the Railroad Commission of Texas, for disposition as provided by law, an administrative penalty in the amount of TEN THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED TWENTY THREE DOLLARS ($10,723.00) and REIMBURSE State funds in the amount of THREE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED NINETY ONE DOLLARS and FORTY TWO CENTS ($3,991.42). It is further ORDERED by the Commission that this order shall not be final and effective until 20 days after a party is notified of the Commission s order. A party is presumed to have been notified of the Commission s order three days after the date on which the notice is actually mailed. If a timely motion for rehearing is filed by any party at interest, this order shall not become final and effective until such motion is overruled, or if such motion is granted, this order shall be subject to further action by the Commission. Pursuant to TEX. GOV'T CODE 2001.146(e), the time allotted for Commission action on a motion for rehearing in this case prior to its being overruled by operation of law, is hereby extended until 90 days from the date the parties are notified of the order. All requested findings of fact and conclusions of law which are not expressly adopted herein are denied. All pending motions and requests for relief not previously granted or granted herein are denied.

Noncompliance with the provisions of this order is subject to enforcement by the Attorney General and subject to civil penalties of up to $10,000.00 per day per violation. Done this 10 th day of September 2013. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS MFE (Signatures affixed by Default Master Order dated September 10, 2013)