IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

Similar documents
Case: Document: Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/28/2013

Case: Document: 16 Filed: 04/23/2012 Pages: 6. Nos & IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: Document: Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/19/2012 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

Case 2:09-cv KJM-CKD Document 83 Filed 02/14/14 Page 1 of 5

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

APPENDIX F. NEW JERSEY JUDICIARY APPELLATE PRACTICE FORMS 1. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION CIVIL CASE INFORMATION STATEMENT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

UNITED STATE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH CIRCUIT

Tel: (202)

In The Supreme Court of the United States

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO.: 3D LT. CASE NO.: CA-13

[ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON APRIL 15, 2016] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. Defendants-Appellees.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Nos , ,

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2015-CA COA VICTOR BYAS AND MARY BYAS CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Cooper & Kirk, PLLC 1523 New Hampshire Avenue, NW Washington, DC Hon. William M. Skretny, Western District of New York

No IN THE United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiffs - Appellants, Defendants - Appellees.

Leave to file reply brief of up to 10,500 words.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT DEFEENDANT-APPELLEE S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. ILSA SARAVIA, et al. Plaintiffs-Appellees,

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 94 Filed: 12/15/10 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:1602

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 5:07-CV-231

Defendants hereby move for a stay of all case deadlines in the abovecaptioned. 1. At the end of the day on December 21, 2018, the appropriations act

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 2:09-cv KJM-CKD Document 35 Filed 09/26/11 Page 1 of 13

In The United States Court of Appeals For the Third Circuit

No ORAL ARGUMENT HELD JUNE 1, 2015 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPELAS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Nos , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

Case 2:17-cv JLL-JAD Document 1 Filed 08/16/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 : : : : : : : : : :

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 08/28/2018 Page 1 of 15 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

Case 0:18-cv FAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2018 Page 1 of 5

Case: Document: 26-1 Filed: 12/04/2014 Pages: 6 NO IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) )

Case 1:09-cv RMU Document 10 Filed 04/13/2009 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv DPG Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/04/2017 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 613 Filed 05/07/2009 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK WHITE PLAINS DIVISION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No AARON C. BORING and CHRISTINE BORING, husband and wife respectively, Appellants,

ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON MARCH 31, Case No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 22 Filed: 09/10/10 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:140

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FAMILY COURT Domestic Relations Branch

United States Court of Appeals

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CP APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LOWNDES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI CASE NO.

Case GMB Doc 207 Filed 12/21/13 Entered 12/21/13 14:45:36 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 2

Case No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MICHELLE FLANAGAN, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA STEVENS AUCTION COMPANY and JOHN D.

USCA No UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, SANTANA DRAPEAU, Appellant.

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEFFREY ALEXANDER STERLING, and JAMES RISEN,

[ORAL ARGUMENT NOT SCHEDULED] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT : : : : MOTION TO GOVERN

Case: Document: 6 Filed: 11/03/2016 Pages: 6 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No John Teixeira; et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants,

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. CLEAN AIR COUNCIL, et al.,

[NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

LegalFormsForTexas.Com

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

NO CV. In the Court of Appeals. For the Third Supreme Judicial District of Texas. Austin, Texas JAMES BOONE

Nos & IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. ROSALINA CUELLAR DE OSORIO; et al.

Case 2:17-cv WB Document 97 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:09-cv FJS Document 25 Filed 09/14/11 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF

[ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR FEBRUARY 16, 2012] No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNOPPOSED MOTION OF PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT CITIZEN CENTER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPENING BRIEF

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

Case 1:13-cv MMS Document 54 Filed 06/18/15 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

PETITION FOR REHEARING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 92 Filed: 12/06/10 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1591

JOINT MOTION TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 26(b) and 10th Cir. R. 27.5, the parties jointly

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROBERT F. MCDONNELL,

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 3:13-cv SC Document 39 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:12-cv GBL-IDD Document 201 Filed 04/04/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 4071

Case 1:14-cv CMH-TRJ Document 14 Filed 01/23/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 83

PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION. Case 2:15-cv MCE-DB Document 46 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 3

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 15, 2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Transcription:

Case: 12-1150 Document: 003111187849 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/07/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT Daniel J. Piszczatoski, et al., No. 12-1150 Appellants, v. The Hon. Rudolph A. Filko, et al., Appellees. PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF To: Marcia Waldron, Clerk United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 21400 United States Courthouse 601 Market Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106 Mary Beth Wood, Esq. Office of the New Jersey Attorney General R.J. Hughes Justice Complex 25 Market Street P.O. Box 112 Trenton, New Jersey 08625 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiffs-Appellants, by and through their undersigned counsel, respectfully move this Court pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 27 for leave to file a supplemental brief. This motion is based on the following: 1

Case: 12-1150 Document: 003111187849 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/07/2013 1. During the oral argument held on February 12, 2013, counsel for Defendants-Appellees offered to submit a supplemental brief. See Tr. p. 60:11-14. The Court granted Defendants request. See id. p. 60:15-17. Immediately afterwards, Judge Hardiman said, We d be happy to hear about that, and then, turning to Appellants-Plaintiffs counsel, he added, and an opportunity to talk. Id. p. 60:19-20. 2. Defendants filed their supplemental brief on February 27, 2013. This supplemental brief addresses statutory history and evidence purporting to support the constitutionality of the provision at issue in this case, includes a declaration from Lt. Joseph Genova of the New Jersey State Police. This declaration presents the number of handgun carry permits have been applied for and issued under the New Jersey law at issue from the year 2000 through the year 2011. 3. Plaintiffs filed their supplemental brief on March 4, 2013 and addressed the new issues raised by Defendants supplemental briefing. 4. Later in the day on March 4, the Clerk issued a noncompliance order directing Plaintiffs to file this motion seeking leave. By telephone the Clerk s office advised that more clarity was needed to support authorization of this brief, and that Plaintiffs ought to file this motion. 2

Case: 12-1150 Document: 003111187849 Page: 3 Date Filed: 03/07/2013 5. It is Plaintiffs understanding that Judge Hardiman s statement regarding an opportunity to talk was an indication that Plaintiffs would be afforded an opportunity to respond to Defendants supplemental briefing. 6. Moreover, principles of fairness dictate that Plaintiffs be afforded an opportunity to respond to new factual information particularly where the Court has already suggested that the facts might be material to its decision. 7. Counsel for Defendants declined to consent to this motion prior to the deadline for its filing, but suggested it might not be opposed. 8. Defendants counsel raised a concern that Defendants supplemental brief was allegedly only four pages, while Plaintiffs brief was ten pages. However, Defendants filing was eight pages long, considering the evidence laid out by the Genova Declaration. Plaintiffs response necessarily addressed this declaration. 9. Plaintiffs supplemental response brief is consistent with this Court s previous order regarding the length of supplemental briefs. Although the Court did not specify any page limits for this round of 3

Case: 12-1150 Document: 003111187849 Page: 4 Date Filed: 03/07/2013 briefing, only weeks earlier it ordered supplemental briefing limited to ten pages. 10. Plaintiffs March 4 briefing contains no material that is not directly responsive to the Court s concerns and to the Defendants February 27 arguments. The brief cannot be shortened by two pages, let alone six, without compromising Plaintiffs ability to fully inform the Court and respond to the Defendants. 11. Accordingly, Plaintiffs respectfully request that their supplemental brief of March 4, 2013 be filed. Dated: March 7, 2013 Respectfully submitted, By: s/ David D. Jensen David D. Jensen DAVID JENSEN PLLC 111 John Street, Suite 230 New York, New York 10038 (212 380-6615 tel (917 591-1318 fax david@djensenpllc.com Alan Gura Gura & Possessky, PLLC 101 N. Columbus Street, Suite 405 Alexandria, Virginia 22314 (703 835-9085 tel (703 997-7665 fax alan@gurapossessky.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Appellants 4

Case: 12-1150 Document: 003111187849 Page: 5 Date Filed: 03/07/2013 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on March 7, 2013 I electronically filed the foregoing Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Brief with the Clerk of the Court for the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit by using the CM/ECF system. I certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and that service will be accomplished by the CM/ECF system. s/ David D. Jensen