I: INTRODUCTION. Table-2: Election Results Party Seats Contested Seats won Votes Share (percent) India National Congress

Similar documents
Table 1: Lok Sabha elections - Pre poll estimated vote share for Uttar Pradesh BJP maintains big lead over opponents. Survey-based vote estimate (%)

The turbulent rise of regional parties: A many-sided threat for Congress

Table 1: Lok Sabha elections - Pre poll estimated vote share for West Bengal TMC widens the lead over Left Front. Survey-based vote estimate (%)

Uttar Pradesh Assembly Election 2017 Dates announced by Election Commission: Get schedule. of Polling and Results of UP State elections 2017

Profile of Achieved Sample in Karnataka

Democracy in India: A Citizens' Perspective APPENDICES. Lokniti : Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS)

Opinion Polls in the context of Indian Parliamentary Democracy

Uttar Pradesh Sweep Boosts BJP and Modi. Ronojoy Sen 1

Sixteenth Assembly Elections in Uttar Pradesh

Table 1: Lok Sabha elections - Pre poll estimated vote share for Bihar BJP+ maintains very comfortable lead over opponents

ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi

LOKNITI-CSDS-TIRANGA TV-THE HINDU-DAINIK BHASKAR PRE POLL SURVEY 2019

Census 2011 (%) Scheduled Caste Scheduled Tribe Women Urban

Case studies of female political leaders in India

A tale of three cities

The Battle for Bihar. Ronojoy Sen 1

CHHATTISGARH PRE-POLL SURVEY 2013 FINDINGS

Vol. XLIV, No. 3, May/June 2004

ISAS Insights No. 71 Date: 29 May 2009

BJP s Demographic Dividend in the 2014 General Elections: An Empirical Analysis ±

Political Parties in India

CONCLUSION. Uttar Pradesh has always occupied an important position among

BIHAR STATE SPECIFIC FINDINGS

The Road Ahead for Aam Aadmi Party. Ronojoy Sen 1

MEASURING DEMOCRACY. symposium participants. a symposium on. the state of election surveys. in India 14 THE PROBLEM

CONTENTS. I: Introduction. II: Survey design. III: Details of survey team IV: ANNEXURES

Navjyot / Vol. II / Issue IV ISSN

COUNTRY FOCUS: INDIA. Modi s initiatives

BJP Landslide Victory in 2014 General Election: A Political Geographer Perspective

South Asia. India signals more justice for women

How did the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) come to power

Trans. Inst. Indian Geographers. Fig.2 : Consistency in the seats won by the BJP: (See page 66 for text)

Bahujan Ideology: Bahujan Samaj Party. Dr. Prakash R. Pawar Dept of Political Science, Shivaji University, kolhapur.

POLITICAL PARTICIPATION OF WOMEN IN INDIA: A CASE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Automation Of Election Process For District Election Officer (RO) By Election MIS Software

BYSPEED POST ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA NIRVACHAN SADAN, ASHOKA ROAD, NEW DELHI No.318/LC/OBS/2009/OPS/ Dated: 29 th December, 2009

National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme 2005: An overview of Situation in Uttar Pradesh. CDS, Trivendrum, Kerala

NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY, 1996 PRE-POLL SURVEY INTERVIEW SCHEDULE

DELHI POST POLL SURVEY 2013 QUESTIONNAIRE. F6 Type of area 1. Posh area 2. DDA colony 3. Less developed colony (unauthorised/resettlement) 4.

India's Silent Revolution

THE READJUSTMENT OF REPRESENTATION OF SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES IN PARLIAMENTARY AND ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCIES BILL, 2013

June Technical Report: India State Survey. India State Survey Research Program

Heidelberg Papers in South Asian and Comparative Politics

Who Put the BJP in Power?

International Journal of Informative & Futuristic Research ISSN (Online):

Does Political Reservation Affect Voting Behavior? Empirical Evidence from India

SPEECH BY SHRI NAVIN B.CHAWLA AS ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF INDIA

Tribal Women Experiencing Panchayati Raj Institution in India with Special Reference to Arunachal Pradesh

Online appendix for Chapter 4 of Why Regional Parties

Gujarat Technological University

Caste and Electoral Politics.

NEW PRESIDENT OF THE BJP: PM Vajpayee has his way.

Narender Kumar Professor Centre for Political Studies School of Social Sciences AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTE

Viktória Babicová 1. mail:

The caste based mosaic of Indian politics

Welfare Gains from a Redrawing of Political Boundaries: Evidence from State Reorganization in India

ISAS Insights No. 50 Date: 13 February 2009

The 2019 General Election in Odisha: BJD vs. BJP?

ISA S Insights No. 64 Date: 13 May 2009

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION. called the Scheduled Castes, is the constitutionally recognized.

CURRICULUM VITAE. High School U.P. Board 1982 First Intermediate U.P. Board 1984 First B.A. Kanpur Univ., Kanpur 1986 First 61.

INTRODUCTION I. BACKGROUND

International Journal of Informative & Futuristic Research

MAY Dilip Shitoley Technical Director & DIO

LOKNITI-CSDS-ABP NEWS MOOD OF THE NATION SURVEY, 2018

Lokniti-CSDS-ABP News Gujarat Pre-Election Tracker 2017 Round 1

Interview Mood in Karnataka Congress Upbeat. S. Rajendran Jan 1, 2018

ASSIGNMENT SOLUTIONS GUIDE ( ) B.P.S.E.-212

Chapter 6 Political Parties

ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA

Karnataka Assembly Elections 2018: An Unlikely Alliance forms the Government

Political, Economic, and Security Situation in India

How Do Electoral Quotas Influence Political Competition? Evidence from Municipal, State, and National Elections in India

I: INTRODUCTION. Table-2: Election Results Party Seats Contested Seats won Votes Share (percent) BJP Indian National

ISAS Insights No. 32 Date: 30 June 2008

Are MLAs Different than the Candidates They Defeat? Evidence from the Haryana Vidhan Sabha ( ) Adam Ziegfeld. University of Chicago 1

In re: Violation of model code of conduct by Shri Salman Khurshid, Union Minister for Law and Justice and Minorities Affairs.

Faculty Details proforma for DU Web-site

ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi

EVOLUTION OF BJP. Bharatiya Janata Party

Editor & Director Dr. R.K. Thukral. Research Editor Dr. Shafeeq Rahman

THE READJUSTMENT OF REPRESENTATION OF SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES IN PARLIAMENTARY AND ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCIES (SECOND) BILL, 2013

Now, let us see which party ruled the relevant state during the riots and who was Chief Minister in incidents where more than 100 lives were lost.

Karnataka Assembly Elections 2018: A Close Contest on the Cards

The Union of Right to Equality & Reservations in India

Strengthening People s Participation

ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA NIRVACHAN SADAN, ASHOKA ROAD, NEW DELHI K.N.BHAR UNDER SECRETARY No: 470/2007/PLN-I Date: 29 th August 2007

Coalition Politics and Role of Regional Parties in North India

TORIES ENJOY CLEAR BUT MODEST LEAD AS ELECTION LOOMS UNDERSTANDING WHERE VOTERS ARE COMING AND GOING

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD. Cri. Misc. Writ Petition No of Decided On: Appellants: Dr. Mehboob Alam Vs.

Women Empowerment in Panchayati Raj Institutions

Economic and living conditions and Government economic performance what Sierra Leoneans say

AS INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA

Can We Text Criminal Politicians Out of Office? Evidence from a Mobile Experiment in India

MADHYA PRADESH POST POLL SURVEY 2013 QUESTIONNAIRE

Pakistan-India Relations

Switching to latrines in rural South Asia: Study description

SYSTEMATIC VOTER S EDUCATION AND ELECTORAL PARTICIPATION (SVEEP) ACTIVITIES IN DISTRICT SAMBA (J&K ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS- 2014)

CHAPTER- 3 COMPOSITION AND MEMBERSHIP PATTERN OF HARYANA LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY COMPOSITION OF HARYANA LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY

Nature And Reasons For Migration: A Case Study Of Migrated Unskilled Labour To Hyderabad City

Transcription:

I: INTRODUCTION The Uttar Pradesh Assembly Elections, 2007 were held in April-May 20. The elections were conducted for 403 seats at 110 polling stations. The findings of the Indian Express/CNN-IBN/CSDS survey reported here are based on a post-poll survey conducted in 199 of the 403 assembly constituencies in Uttar Pradesh where polling was held in seven phases of assembly elections. The aim of the present post poll survey was, to understand a disposition of the electorates which laid them to cast vote to particular party. Apart from that, it also helps to find and analyze the gap in electorates opinion after pre poll survey which usually provides a vague picture of the electorates frame of mind. Besides this, due to large sample size and wide coverage, it was decided to collect information on aspects linked with governance like development, socio-cultural and economic aspects, health, performance of the government and expectation from the next government. Table -1: Background of the Assembly election in U.P, 2007 Total Number of Assembly Constituencies(AC) 403 Number of seats for General Category 314 Number of seats reserved for Scheduled Caste 89 Number of seats reserved for Scheduled Tribe 0 Total Number of Voters 11,35,49350 Voter turn out 45.95 % Source:http://www.eci.gov.in/StatisticalReports/SE_2007/StatReport_AS_2007_UTTAR_PRADESH.pdf Table-2: Election Results Party Seats Contested Seats won Votes Share (percent) India National Congress 393 22 9 (INC) Bhartiye Janta Party 405** 52 19 (BJP+)* Bahujan Samajwadi 403 206 30 Party (BSP) Samajwadi Party SP 393 97 25 Rashtiye lok Dal (RLD) 254 10 4 Others *** 4238 16 13 Source:http://www.eci.gov.in/StatisticalReports/SE_2007/StatReport_AS_2007_UTTAR_PRADESH.pdf *BJP+: BJP was in alliance with Janta Dal (United) and Apna Dal in Assembly election, 2007. **Higher number of contested seats (405) than actual number of constituency(403) is due to friendly fight for the same seat. 1

Table-3: Survey Frame Number of assembly constituencies surveyed 199 Number of polling station survey 731 Number of Respondents 11331 Type of Survey Post poll Survey Table-4: Sample Profile: Census of India vs. Survey Variables Uttar Pradesh * (percent) Survey (percent) Rural 79 84 Urban 21 16 Women 47 41 Scheduled Caste 21 20 Scheduled Tribe 0.06 --- Hindu 81 82.7 Muslim 19 15.5 Christian 0.13 0.4 Sikhs 0.41 0.5 *Census 2001, Uttar Pradesh 2

II: SURVEY DESIGN Selection of assembly constituency (AC): For the post poll survey, every alternate assembly constituency was selected out of 403 assembly constituencies (like 2, 4, 6..). One of the purposes of selection of 199 ACs which is almost 50 percent of the total ACs, was to yield representative information on political behaviour and attitudes of the electorate. Selection of Polling Stations (PS): It was predefined to have four polling stations out of each assembly constituency. In order to select the polling station from each AC, a comprehensive list of PS in each AC was prepared and a total polling stations was divided by four (a pre determined number from each AC) to arrive at the sampling constant. First Polling station was selected randomly which must be less than sampling constant thereafter, sampling constant was added to the randomly selected PS to arrive at the second PS. This process was repeated for the selection of next polling stations in an assembly constituency. It is how; different polling stations were selected in each assembly constituency. Selection of respondent: Thirty respondents were randomly selected from the voter list of each polling station. The reason for sample size was to circumvent clustering and it also has logistic and methodological concerns. For this, a list of voters at each polling station was obtained and the total number of voters (at each PS) was divided by thirty to arrive at sampling constant 1.Sampling constant was added to the first respondent number to get next respondent and so on till selection of 30 respondent has completed. Table-5: Questionnaire Design 1. Language Designed English 2. Language Translated Hindi 3. Language Administered Hindi 4. Number of Variables 115 5. Themes Opinion and attitude for political parties, Respondent s Background 1 If there are 3000 respondents of a polling station, divide 3000 by 30 that will be equal to 100. thus 100 is the sampling constant for sampling respondents for the survey. The first respondent should be less than 100 drawn from random number table. Thus, if 89 th voter is the first respondent selected then keep on adding 100, that is 89+100=189(second respondent), 189+100=289(third respondent) and so on till select 30 respondent 3

Table-6: Details of Training Workshop of Investigator: 1. Date Phase-I: 9 th April,2007 Phase-II: 13th April,2007 Phase-III: 17 th April,2007 Phase-IV: 22 nd April, 2007 Phase-V: 27 th April, 2007 Phase-VI:2 nd May,2007 Phase-VII: 8 th May,2007 2. Venue Aligarh, Kanpur, Azamgarh 3. Number of investigator 340 4. Resource person(s) A.K.Verma ( Christ Church College, Kanpur), Sudhir Kumar Mirza Asmir Beg ( Aligarh Muslim University) Praveen (CSDS) Table-7: Data Collection and Processing Details 1. Date of Field work Phase-I: 8 th -12 th April Phase-II: 14 th 17 th April Phase-III: 18 th evening -19 th April Phase-IV: 23 rd evening-26 th April Phase-V: 28 th evening -29 th April Phase-VI:3 rd evening- 6 th May Phase-VII: 9 th -12 th May 2. Date of Data checking 15 th - 20 th May 3. Venue of Checking Centre for Study of Developing Societies (CSDS) 4. Date of Data Entry 22 nd May-27 th May 5. Venue of Data Entry Centre for Study of Developing Societies (CSDS) Table-8: Details of Data Dissemination Electronic Media Name Date Time CNN-IBN 8 th May, 2007 8.00pm Print Media Name Title of Article Name of Author Date The Indian Express The Indian Express The Indian Express The Indian Express Mulayam, Maya neck and neck: BJP Trails far behind, Cong farther. Phase 1: Mulayam Puts SP ahead Advantage Maya in Phase 11 s 3-way fight Phase III: Make or break for Mulayam, Yogender Yadav,Rajeeva Karandikar 28 th, March, 2007 5 th April,2007 11 th, April, 2007 16 th, April, 2007 The Indian Express Maya emerging as, 22 nd, April, 2007 4

Jan Satta clear leader, Mulayam slips behind BJP BSPA hi rahegi pehle number par Yogender Yadav,Rajeeva Karandikar 2 nd, May, 2007,Rajeeva Karandikar, Yogender Yadav 2 nd, May, 2007 The Indian Express Maya class act has upper castes split The Indian Express UP is headed for a 2 nd, May, 2007 Mayawati Plus govt,,rajeeva Karandikar, watch this space Yogender Yadav Jan Satta Hawa to is Baar Yogender Yadav, 9 th, May,2007 BSPA Ki he Sunday Navbharat times UP Ke haathi Ne Abhay Kumar Dubbey 13 th May, 2007 Chaali Dhai Ghar ki Chal Sunday Navbharat times Mulayam ke Muslim 13 th May, 2007 vote bank me Sendh The Indian Express Why fore-cast was not Yogender Yadav, coauthor 16 rd May, 2007 fore-warned The Indian Express Poor man s rainbow Yogender Yadav, coauthor 17 rd May, 2007 over UP The Indian Express Shaken to the core Yogender Yadav, coauthor 18 rd May, 2007 The Indian Express BJP decline, Yogender Yadav, coauthor 19 rd May, 2007 Congress-style The Indian Express Present Imperfect Yogender Yadav, coauthor 22 rd May, 2007 The Indian Express Traces of a mandate Yogender Yadav, coauthor 23 rd May, 2007 Sanjay Kumar 5

III: DETAILS OF SURVEY TEAM III. Details of Survey Team of Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS) Delhi directed the survey. The fieldwork of the survey in the state was coordinated by A.K Verma (Uttar Pradesh Central) and Mirza Asmer Beg (Uttar Pradesh West) and Sudhir Kumar (Uttar Pradesh East). The Central team which designed, coordinated and analysed the survey comprised of Yogendra Yadav, Himanshu Bhattacharya, K.A.Q.A Hilal, Kanchan Malhotra, Sanjeer Alam, Praveen Rai and Vikas Gautam of CSDS and Rajeeva L.Karandikar of Cranes Software International Limited. 6

I: ANNEXURE-1 DETAILS OF SURVEY PROFILE Assembly Constituency AC No. P.S NO No. of Respondent DHARMPUR 2 7 14 82 27 232 14 Total 55 NAGINA (SC) 4 5 15 62 13 119 15 176 14 Total 57 BIJNOR 6 15 15 90 15 165 15 240 15 KANTH 8 10 15 66 15 Total 30 HASANPUR 10 5 13 45 15 85 15 125 15 Total 58 SAMBHAL 12 20 15 79 15 138 15 197 15 CHANDAUSI (SC) 14 127 15 157 15 195 15 226 15 MORADABAD WEST 16 8 15 78 15 148 15 218 15 MORADABAD RURAL 18 10 15 85 15 160 15 235 15 SUAR TANDA 20 15 15 88 15 161 15 234 14 Total 59 7

Bilaspur 22 35 15 108 15 181 15 254 15 BISAULI 24 134 15 176 15 177 15 192 15 SAHASWAN 26 18 15 93 15 168 15 215 15 BUDAUN 28 6 15 18 15 76 15 120 15 BINAWAR 30 7 15 82 15 157 15 220 15 AONLA 32 22 15 80 15 138 14 196 15 Total 59 FARIDPUR (SC) 34 11 15 86 15 167 15 223 15 BAREILLY CITY 36 12 16 67 14 122 15 177 16 Total 61 BHOJIPURA 38 13 15 88 15 169 15 238 15 BAHERI 40 19 15 86 15 153 15 220 15 BARKHERA (SC) 42 12 15 57 15 87 15 8

206 15 PURANPUR 44 21 15 84 15 147 14 210 15 Total 59 NIGOHI 46 12 15 87 15 162 15 235 15 JALALABAD 48 23 15 79 15 135 15 191 14 Total 59 SHAHJAHANPUR 50 9 15 84 15 159 15 234 15 HAIDERABAD 52 67 14 135 13 203 12 271 13 Total 52 LAKHIMPUR 54 52 12 122 8 192 14 262 14 Total 48 NIGHASAN 56 25 12 99 10 124 12 149 13 Total 47 BEHTA 58 43 7 108 9 151 10 194 11 Total 37 MAHMUDABAD 60 64 10 129 7 194 12 259 11 Total 40 LAHARPUR 62 62 10 126 11 190 12 254 12 Total 45 HARGAM (SC) 64 34 12 9

90 11 146 12 202 7 Total 42 MACHHREHTA (SC) 66 35 11 90 11 145 11 200 11 Total 44 SANDILA 68 17 13 119 13 Total 26 HARDOI 70 12 14 114 13 Total 27 PIHANI 72 23 11 127 8 Total 19 BILGRAM 74 6 10 122 9 Total 19 BANGARMAU 76 20 12 138 10 Total 22 UNNAO 78 46 8 186 12 Total 20 BHAGWANTNAGAR 80 57 10 176 8 Total 18 HASANGANJ (SC) 82 55 8 171 12 Total 20 MAHONA 84 79 16 307 12 Total 28 LUCKNOW WEST 86 35 9 197 12 Total 21 Lucknow cantonment 88 200 12 220 12 Total 24 MOHANLALGANJ (SC) 90 10 14 112 12 Total 26 TILOI 92 54 8 168 15 Total 23 SATAON 94 50 12 174 14 Total 26 DALMAU 96 27 15 10