IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MADISON COUNTY, ALABAMA

Similar documents
STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE. vs.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MADISON COUNTY, ALABAMA. Plaintiffs, v. Case No.: CV15-

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY PETITION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

Case 5:17-cv Document 2 Filed in TXSD on 01/17/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION

Case3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5

CAUSE NO. JANE DOE, Individually and as IN THE DISTRICT COURT Next Friend of JOHN DOE, a Minor Child, Plaintiffs,

CAUSE NO. MALCOMB THOMAS, KORRIE HICKS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF LA TASHA MORRIS, & ROSHUNDA JOHNSON, PLAINTIFFS VS. HARRISON COUNTY, TEXAS

Case 1:19-cv PAB Document 1 Filed 01/04/19 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT, INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, AND WRONGFUL DEATH DAMAGES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY FAYETTE CIRCUIT COURT FOURTH DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 94-CI-2671

CAUSE NO. v. FALLS COUNTY, TEXAS I. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN LEVEL

Court of Appeals. Slip Opinion

Case 1:17-cv JCB Document 5 Filed 02/15/17 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL ACTION NO.

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 01/26/ :43 AM INDEX NO /2018E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/26/2018

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR AUTAUGA COUNTY, ALABAMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA BRUNSWICK DIVISION

Pursuant to Rule 50(b), Ala. R. Civ. Proc., Defendant, Mobile Infirmary Association,

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

Case 1:17-cv JCB Document 1 Filed 02/13/17 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/09/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/ :40 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016

Case: 2:14-cv ART Doc #: 56 Filed: 11/14/14 Page: 1 of 13 - Page ID#: 1100

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MADISON COUNTY. Case No.

Plaintiffs, Defendants. COMPLAINT. necessary medical care for serious medical needs by the defendants during her commitment to the

Case 3:16-cv KI Document 1 Filed 11/14/16 Page 1 of 8

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF HAMPTON ) CASE NO.: 2019-CP-25-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES WITH JURY DEMAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI`I ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT. Introduction

Case 3:14-cv BR Document 1 Filed 10/09/14 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION. Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. v.

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE

3:17-cv MGL Date Filed 06/29/18 Entry Number 55 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

CASE NO. 5:00-CV COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION ON BEHALF OF JACKQULINE STOKES

following in the above-referenced cause of action : COMMON ALLEGATIONS times material herein was a resident of Polk County, Iowa.

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

/ Court: 055

YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to Answer the Complaint, a copy of

THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION V. CAUSE NO.: COMPLAINT (JURY TRIAL DEMANDED)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

FILED. Attorneys for Plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF OCONEE C.A. NO.: 2017-CP-10- Jane Doe, Plaintiff,

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/20/ :37 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/20/2014

Case 2:17-cv GJQ-TPG ECF No. 1 filed 01/25/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/15/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2015

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 02/22/16 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 15 Filed: 01/27/14 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:29

PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION & REQUESTS FOR DISCLOSURE

Case3:09-cv WHA Document48 Filed04/05/12 Page1 of 21

EFiled: Jan :11AM EST Transaction ID Case No. S19C ESB IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL ACTION.NO.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

2:13-cv BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 06/24/13 Pg 1 of 14 Pg ID 1

Amended Complaint, Gassman v. Frischholtz et al, Docket No. 1:05-cv (Northern District of Illinois 2005)

Case 4:18-cv JAS Document 1 Filed 03/01/18 Page 1 of 45 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 3:14-cv B Document 1 Filed 06/18/14 Page 1 of 18 PageID 1

Case: 5:15-cv SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/20/15 2 of 9. PageID #: 2

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION

Case: 1:17-cv JG Doc #: 2 Filed: 09/13/17 1 of 13. PageID #: 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FL0RIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/25/12 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1

Case 2:10-cv TS Document 2 Filed 11/15/10 Page 1 of 9

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

Filing # E-Filed 06/13/ :25:39 PM

SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

Case 4:12-cv Y Document 28 Filed 08/29/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID 179

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 3:18-cv SB Document 1 Filed 09/06/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION. Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT! WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN! SOUTHERN DIVISION!

2:15-cv MAG-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 04/01/15 Pg 1 of 9 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Plaintiff, for its Complaint against the above-captioned Defendants, states and

PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION & REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE. COMES NOW, JANE DOE, Plaintiff, complaining of SEA WORLD PARKS &

Second Amended Complaint, Gassman v. Frischholtz et al, Docket No. 1:05-cv (Northern District of Illinois 2005)

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/02/17 Page 1 of 46 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Courthouse News Service

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT COUNTY OF MILWAUKEE CIVIL DIVISION

9:12-cv PMD-BHH Date Filed 09/17/12 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 8

to redress his civil and legal rights, and alleges as follows: 1. Plaintiff, Anthony Truchan, is a resident of Nutley, New Jersey.

INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 65 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/06/2018

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/19/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff, Deborah Fellner, by and through her counsel, Eichen Levinson & Crutchlow, LLP, hereby makes this claim against the Defendant as follows:

UnofficialCopyOfficeofChrisDanielDistrictClerk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NO. COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

2:14-cv RMG Date Filed 02/25/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 2:10-cv HGB-ALC Document 1 Filed 04/20/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JANET DELUCA CIVIL ACTION

1/29/2019 8:49 AM 19CV04626

Courthouse News Service

Case 1:09-cv Document 1 Filed 07/24/2009 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Transcription:

ELECTRONICALLY FILED 7/9/2012 4:32 PM CV-2012-900910.00 CIRCUIT COURT OF MADISON COUNTY, ALABAMA JANE C. SMITH, CLERK IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MADISON COUNTY, ALABAMA JO TIMMIE HOLMAN, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF NORMAN HOLMAN, JR., DECEASED, Plaintiff, versus Case No.: CV 2012 - CHARLES L. RAY, JR. an individual, and NORTHERN SEVEN CORPORATION OF ALABAMA, an Alabama corporation, d/b/a/ NELMS MEMORIAL FUNERAL HOME, Defendants. COMPLAINT COMES NOW, the plaintiff, Jo Timmie Holman, as Personal Representative of the estate of Norman Holman, Jr., deceased and would show unto this Honorable Court that: 1. Jo Timmie Holman was the mother of Norman Holman, Jr., and the Personal Representative of his estate. 2012. 2. Norman Holman, Jr., died at Huntsville Hospital on Monday, May 28, 3. Immediately after Norman Holman, Jr. s death, the defendants, operating a business known as Nelms Memorial Funeral Home, picked up his body from the hospital and took it to the funeral home. 4. On Tuesday, May 29, 2012, the parties agreed that the defendants should handle the funeral and burial. The body had to be embalmed because the family could not assemble a funeral for several days. This fact was discussed by the deceased s family and the funeral home. The family requested an open casket at the visitation and funeral.

5. Thereafter, other specific items regarding the funeral and burial were agreed upon including the funeral home providing a vehicle for the family to ride in from the home-place to the church. The times for transportation were agreed upon. The family relied upon the funeral home s promises, representations, and those things that were not said, but understood to be done under the circumstances, regarding these matters. 6. In fact, the body was never embalmed. On Friday, June 8, 2012, eleven days after his death, the funeral home s air conditioning system failed. 7. When the funeral took place as agreed on June 9, 2012, some 12 days after death, things got worse. The funeral home s vehicle was late picking up the grieving family from their home to carry them to the church. The transportation did not get to the home until 11:20 A.M. for a noon funeral. The home was roughly 30 minutes from the church. Then, the funeral home vehicle driver took the family to the wrong church causing further delay, and great anxiety for everyone involved. 8. When the family finally got to the church late, they discovered the body had obviously not been embalmed as agreed, and it smelled bad. It looked bad. The family, the friends, and other mourners were horrified by the smell, the stench that penetrated the room. Some mourners actually left the room because of the smell. His fingernails and other parts of his body were discolored. The family was humiliated. Count One Breach of Contract 9. The plaintiff realleges paragraphs 1 through 8, as if set out in full herein. 10. The defendant breached the contract with the plaintiff in that Defendants agreed to perform embalming services which were not performed, and/or; failed to exercise that degree of skill and care that is commonly exercised by other funeral directors and funeral homes in the community in regard to the above matters. Count Two Negligence or Wantonness 11. The plaintiff realleges paragraphs 1 through 8, as if set out in full herein. 12. The defendants did not conduct themselves with the degree of skill and care commonly exercised by other funeral directors or funeral homes in the community. 13. The defendants were negligent or wanton in regard to the handling of this

situation which caused or allowed the plaintiff to be injured and damaged as described herein. Count Three Outrage or Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress 14. The plaintiff realleges paragraphs 1 through 8, as if set out in full herein. 15. Defendants intentionally inflicted emotional distress upon the Plaintiff at the hour of need and as a proximate result the plaintiff was injured and damaged as described herein. Count Four Misrepresentation 16. The plaintiff realleges paragraphs 1 through 8, as if set out in full herein. 17. Defendants misrepresented material facts to the plaintiff, specifically that embalming work had been performed on the deceased, when, in fact, little or no work had been performed. The Defendants, through their agents, servants, or employees, also represented that they would take care of the transportation, when in fact they did not. These statements were made willfully to deceive, or recklessly without knowledge, and acted or relied on by Plaintiff, or of made by mistake and innocently and acted on by the plaintiff, proximately causing the plaintiff s injury and damage as described. Count Five Suppression 18. The plaintiff realleges paragraphs 1 through 8, as if set out in full herein. 19. Defendants did not disclose material facts, specifically that embalming work had not been performed on the body, when, in fact the Defendants did not disclose that little was done to make transportation arrangements. The defendants were under an obligation to communicate this information to the plaintiff due to the relationship of the parties and because of the circumstances involved. DAMAGES As a proximate cause of the defendants wrongful omissions and conduct, as set out above, separately and severally, the plaintiff was injured and damaged. Monies were spent, the benefit of the bargain was lost, and the plaintiff has and will suffer mental anguish. Further the acts of the Defendants were accompanied by

circumstances of contumely, fraud, and/or malice, for which punitive damages should be assessed. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE the plaintiff demands judgment against the defendants in a sum of to be determined by the triers of fact, including punitive damages and costs. Respectfully submitted, John A. Brinkley, Jr. BRI049 Plaintiff Demands a trial by Jury. JURY DEMAND Of Counsel OF COUNSEL: BRINKLEY & CHESNUT 307 Randolph Avenue Post Office Box 2026 Huntsville, Ala. 35804-2026 (256 533-3333

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have properly served a copy of the foregoing upon: Charles L. Ray, Jr. 2501 Carmichael Avenue Huntsville, Ala. 35816 NORTHERN SEVEN CORP. OF ALA. 2501 Carmichael Avenue Huntsville, Ala. 35816 by E-Filing the same with Alafile and/or by placement in the United States Postal Service on this the 9th day of July, 2012.