For An Act To Be Entitled

Similar documents
A Bill Regular Session, 2017 SENATE BILL 294

Secretary of the Senate. Chief Clerk of the Assembly. Private Secretary of the Governor

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA, ANGELO ATWELL, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) CASE NO. SC ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Respondent.

Proposition 57: Overview of the New Transfer Hearing Process

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed July 11, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, J. Hobart Darbyshire,

PAROLE BOARD HEARINGS FOR JUVENILE OFFENDERS

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Recent Caselaw 2017 Robert E. Shepherd, Jr. Juvenile Law and Education Conference University of Richmond School of Law

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONALISM VOLUME II: RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES Howard Gillman Mark A. Graber Keith E. Whittington. Supplementary Material

JURISDICTION WAIVER RECENT SENTENCING AND LEGISLATIVE ISSUES

Deadly Justice. A Statistical Portrait of the Death Penalty. Appendix B. Mitigating Circumstances State-By-State.

Death Penalty. Terry Lenamon on the. Terry Lenamon s List of State Death Penalty Mitigation Statutes (Full Text)

COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2013 COA 53

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT D E C I S I O N. Rendered on December 20, 2018

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

A Bill Regular Session, 2017 SENATE BILL 20

Written Materials for Supreme Court Review 8 th Amendment Instructor: Joel Oster

Court of Appeals of Michigan. PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff Appellee, v. Kenya Ali HYATT, Defendant Appellant.

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 1308

STATE EX REL. MORGAN V. STATE: A SMALL STEP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION FOR LOUISIANA S INCARCERATED YOUTH

Please see the attached report from the Criminal Law Section which expands upon these principles.

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2018 SESSION

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Glen P. Gifford, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

COMMISSION ON JUVENILE SENTENCING FOR HEINOUS CRIMES FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

No. 51,840-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *

CASE NO. 1D Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Glen P. Gifford, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

CASE NO. 1D Pamela Jo Bond, Attorney General, and Donna A. Gerace, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION

PRESENT: Lemons, C.J., Goodwyn, Mims, McClanahan, and Powell, JJ., and Russell and Millette, S.JJ.

1 SB By Senators Ward, Fielding, Keahey, Bedford, Whatley, Marsh, 4 Waggoner and Sanford. 5 RFD: Judiciary. 6 First Read: 14-FEB-13

No In the Supreme Court ofthe United States DESHA WN TERRELL, STATE OF OHIO, Respondent.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO

Victims of Youth: Equitable Sentencing Reform for Juvenile Offenders int he Wake of Miller v. Alabama and Jackson v. Hobbs

NO ======================================== IN THE

Arkansas Sentencing Commission

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No SENATE LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE STATEMENT TO. with committee amendments DATED: MARCH 12, 2015

REPLY BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

No. 51,338-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * * * * * * *

CRIMINAL LAW A Denial of Hope: Bear Cloud III and the Aggregate Sentencing of Juveniles; Bear Cloud v. State, 2014 WY 113, 334 P.3d 132 (Wyo.

How Long Is Too Long?: Conflicting State Responses to De Facto Life Without Parole Sentences After Graham v. Florida and Miller v.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Joshua R. Heller, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Supreme Court of Florida

No In The Supreme Court of the United States. SOPHAL PHON, Petitioner. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY Respon den t

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

A Bill Regular Session, 2015 HOUSE BILL 1684

S17A1758. VEAL v. THE STATE. Veal v. State, 298 Ga. 691 (784 SE2d 403) (2016) ( Veal I ). After a jury

CALIFORNIA YOUTH OFFENDER PAROLE HEARINGS SB 260

Appendix: Legal Boundaries Between the Juvenile and Criminal. Justice Systems in the United States. Patrick Griffin

80th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Senate Bill 1007 SUMMARY

Sentencing Factors that Limit Judicial Discretion and Influence Plea Bargaining

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. KENNETH PURDY, Respondent.

PRISON LAW OFFICE General Delivery, San Quentin CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

SCOTUS Death Penalty Review. Lisa Soronen State and Local Legal Center

The Sentencing Factors

No. 46,696-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 7035

AGENCY BILL ANALYSIS 2017 REGULAR SESSION WITHIN 24 HOURS OF BILL POSTING, ANALYSIS TO: and

Offender Population Forecasts. House Appropriations Public Safety Subcommittee January 19, 2012

Critique of the Juvenile Death Penalty in the United States: A Global Perspective

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT BRIEF HOUSE BILL NO HB 2490 would amend various statutes related to criminal sentencing.

CERTIFICATION PROCEEDING

Florida Senate SB 170 By Senator Lynn

Kristin E. Murrock *

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Determinate Sentencing: Time Served December 30, 2015

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2014

No. 51,728-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *

OPINION. Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan. FILED June 20, 2018 S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N SUPREME COURT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Incarcerated America Human Rights Watch Backgrounder April 2003

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No

Applications for Post Conviction Testing

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2007 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 1003

Electronically Filed BRIEF COVER PAGE. REPLY AMICUS OTHER [identify]: Answer to Plaintiff-Appellant s Application for Leave to Appeal

Juvenile Sentencing in Illinois: Addressing the Supreme Court Trend away from Harsh Punishments for Juvenile Offenders

2017 CO 52. No. 14SC127, Estrada-Huerta v. People Life without parole Juveniles Eighth Amendment.

2019 PA Super 64 : : : : : : : : :

Who Is In Our State Prisons? From the Office of California State Senator George Runner

(4) When the victim is under the age of twelve years. Lack of knowledge of the victim's age shall not be a defense.

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 100 1

ll1. THE SENTENCING COMMISSION

HOUSE BILL No December 14, 2005, Introduced by Rep. Condino and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

U.S. Sentencing Commission 2014 Drug Guidelines Amendment Retroactivity Data Report

United States Report Card: Youth Justice Issues. UN Human Rights Committee Review One-Year Follow-Up. May 1, 2015

Supreme Court of the United States

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2013 WY 18

IN THE MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT APPEAL FROM THE MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS Judges Kelly, Talbot and Murray REPLY BRIEF ON APPEAL APPELLANT

214 Part III Homicide and Related Issues

No. 51,811-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc. STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Respondent, ) ) v. ) No. SC93153 ) LARON HART, ) ) Appellant. )

PRESENT: Koontz, Kinser, Lemons, Goodwyn, and Millette, JJ., and Carrico and Russell, S.JJ.

Transcription:

Stricken language would be deleted from and underlined language would be added to present law. 0 0 0 State of Arkansas 0th General Assembly A Bill DRAFT BPG/BPG Regular Session, 0 HOUSE BILL By: Representative Leding By: Senator Irvin For An Act To Be Entitled AN ACT CONCERNING THE SENTENCING OF A PERSON UNDER EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE; ESTABLISHING THE FAIR SENTENCING FOR MINORS ACT OF 0; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. Subtitle CONCERNING THE SENTENCING OF A PERSON UNDER EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE; ESTABLISHING THE FAIR SENTENCING FOR MINORS ACT OF 0. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS: SECTION. DO NOT CODIFY. Title. This act may be cited as the Fair Sentencing for Minors Act of 0. SECTION. DO NOT CODIFY. Legislative intent. (a)() The General Assembly acknowledges and recognizes that minors are constitutionally different from adults and that these differences must be taken into account when minors are being sentenced for adult crimes. () As the United States Supreme Court held in Miller v. Alabama, S.Ct. (0), only a relatively small proportion of adolescents who engage in illegal activity develop entrenched patterns of problem behavior, and developments in psychology and brain science continue to show fundamental differences between juvenile and adult minds, including parts of the brain involved in behavior control. DRAFT 0--0 :0:0 BPG

0 0 0 () Minors are more vulnerable to negative influences and outside pressures, including from their family and peers, and they have limited control over their own environment and lack the ability to extricate themselves from horrific, crime-producing settings. () The United States Supreme Court has emphasized through its cases in Miller, Roper v. Simmons, U.S. (00), and Graham v. Florida, 0 U.S. (00), that the distinctive attributes of youth diminish the penological justifications for imposing the harshest sentences on juvenile offenders, even when they commit terrible crimes. () Youthfulness both lessens a juvenile s moral culpability and enhances the prospect that, as a youth matures into an adult and neurological development occurs, these individuals can become contributing members of society. (b) In the wake of these United States Supreme Court decisions and the emerging juvenile brain and behavioral development science, several states including Texas, Wyoming, Kansas, Kentucky, Montana, Alaska, West Virginia, Colorado, Hawaii, Delaware, and Massachussets have all eliminated the sentence of life without parole for minors. (c) It is the intent of the General Assembly to eliminate life without parole as a sentencing option for minors and create more age-appropriate sentencing standards when minors commit serious crimes. SECTION. Arkansas Code -0-0(c), concerning the punishment for the criminal offense of capital murder, is amended to read as follows: (c)() Capital murder is punishable as follows: (A) If the defendant was eighteen () years of age or older at the time he or she committed the capital murder: (i) Death; or (ii) Life imprisonment without parole under -- 0 --0, --0, and --0; or (B) If the defendant was younger than eighteen () years of age at the time he or she committed the capital murder: (i) Life imprisonment without parole as it is defined in --0; or (ii)(i) Life imprisonment with the possibility of parole after serving a minimum of twenty-eight () years' imprisonment. if 0--0 :0:0 BPG

0 0 0 the defendant caused or had a purpose to cause the death of a person; or (ii) Life imprisonment with the possibility of parole after serving a minimum of twenty (0) years imprisonment if the defendant did not cause and did not have a purpose to cause the death of a person. () For any purpose other than disposition under --0 - -0, --0 --0, --0 --0, --0 --0, --0 - -0, --0 --0, --0, --0, --0, --, and --, capital murder is a Class Y felony. SECTION. Arkansas Code --0(b), concerning authorized sentences for capital murder or treason, is amended to read as follows: (b) A defendant convicted of capital murder, -0-0, or treason, --0, shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment without parole in accordance with --0 --0, --0, and --0, except if the defendant was younger than eighteen () years of age at the time he or she committed the capital murder, he or she shall be sentenced to: () Life imprisonment without parole under --0; or ()() Life imprisonment with the possibility of parole after serving a minimum of twenty-eight () years' imprisonment. if the defendant caused or had a purpose to cause the death of a person; or () Life imprisonment with the possibility of parole after serving a minimum of twenty (0) years' imprisonment if the defendant did not cause and did not have a purpose to cause the death of a person. SECTION. Arkansas Code --0(), concerning trial procedure for a capital murder charge, is amended to read as follows: ()(A) If the defendant is found guilty of capital murder, the same jury shall sit again in order to: (i) Hear additional evidence as provided by subdivisions () and () of this section; and (ii) Determine the sentence in the manner provided by --0. (B) However, if the state waives the death penalty, stipulates that no aggravating circumstance exists, or stipulates that mitigating circumstances outweigh aggravating circumstances, then: 0--0 :0:0 BPG

0 0 0 (i) No A hearing under subdivision ()(A) of this section is not required; and (ii) The trial court shall sentence the defendant to life imprisonment without parole;. (C) If the defendant was younger than eighteen () years of age at the time of the offense, then: (i) A hearing under subdivision ()(A) of this section is not required; and (ii) The jury shall determine the sentence in the manner provided by --0; SECTION. Arkansas Code Title, Chapter, Subchapter, is amended to add an additional section to read as follows: --0. Findings required for defendant younger than eighteen years of age. (a) If the defendant was younger than eighteen () years of age at the time of the offense, then the jury shall impose a sentence of life imprisonment with the possibility of parole after serving a minimum of: () Twenty-eight () years' imprisonment if the jury unanimously returns written findings that the defendant caused or had a purpose to cause the death of a person; or () Twenty (0) years' imprisonment if the jury returns written findings that the defendant did not cause and did not have a purpose to cause the death of a person. (b) If the jury does not make any finding required by subsection (a) of this section, the court shall impose a sentence of life imprisonment with the possibility of parole after serving a minimum of twenty (0) years' imprisonment. SECTION. Arkansas Code --(e), concerning parole eligibility procedures for offenses that occurred after January,, is amended to read as follows: (e) For an offender serving a sentence for a felony committed on or after January,, -- governs that person's parole eligibility, unless otherwise noted and except: () If the felony is murder in the first degree, -0-0, 0--0 :0:0 BPG

0 0 0 kidnapping, if a Class Y felony, --0(b)(), aggravated robbery, - -0, rape, --0, or causing a catastrophe, --0(a), and the offense occurred after July,, -- governs that person's parole eligibility; or () If the felony is manufacturing methamphetamine, -- (a) or the former --0, or possession of drug paraphernalia with the intent to manufacture methamphetamine, the former --0(c)(), and the offense occurred after April,, -- governs that person's parole eligibility; or () If the felony was committed by a person who was a minor at the time of the offense, he or she was committed to the Department of Correction, and the offense occurred before, on, or after the effective date of this act, -- governs that person's parole eligibility. SECTION. Arkansas Code --, concerning parole eligibility for Class Y, Class A, and Class B felonies, is amended to add an additional subsection to read as follows: (c) Except as provided for in --, for an offense committed before, on, or after the effective date of this act, a person who was a minor at the time of an offense listed under subsection (a) of this section is eligible for release on parole under this section. SECTION. Arkansas Code --, concerning parole eligibility for offenses committed after January,, is amended to add an additional subsection to read as follows: (d) Except as provided for in --, for an offense committed before, on, or after the effective date of this act, a person who was a minor at the time of an offense listed under subsection (b) of this section is eligible for release on parole under this section. SECTION 0. Arkansas Code --, concerning parole eligibility for certain Class Y felony offenses and certain methamphetamine offenses and the serving of seventy percent (0%) of a person's sentence, is amended to add an additional subsection to read as follows: (f) Except as provided for in --, for an offense committed before, on, or after the effective date of this act, a person who was a minor 0--0 :0:0 BPG

0 0 0 at the time of an offense listed under subsection (a) of this section is eligible for release on parole under this section. SECTION. Arkansas Code Title, Chapter, Subchapter, is amended to add a new section to read as follows: --. Parole eligibility A person who was a minor at the time of the offense that was committed before, on, or after the effective date of this act. (a) Unless by law the person is eligible for earlier parole eligibility, a person who was convicted and sentenced to the Department of Correction for an offense that was committed before, on, or after the effective date of this act and before he or she was eighteen () years of age is eligible for release on parole as follows: () A person who committed a nonhomicide offense under -0-0 et seq., including any applicable sentence enhancements, or an offense in which he or she did not cause and did not have the purpose to cause the death of another person is eligible for release on parole no later than after his or her twentieth year of incarceration, including instances in which multiple sentences are to be served consecutively or concurrently; or () A person who committed a homicide offense under -0-0 et seq. is eligible for release on parole no later than after his or her twenty-eighth year of incarceration. (b)() The Parole Board shall ensure that the hearing to consider an inmate's parole eligibility under this section takes into account how minors are different from adult offenders and provides an inmate eligible under this section with a meaningful opportunity to be released on parole based on demonstrated maturity and rehabilitation. () During a parole eligibility hearing involving an inmate described under this section, in addition to other factors required by law to be considered by the board, the board shall take into consideration: (A) The diminished culpability of minors as compared to that of adults; (B) The hallmark features of youth; (C) Subsequent growth and increased maturity of the inmate during incarceration; (D) Age of the inmate at the time of the offense; 0--0 :0:0 BPG

0 0 0 (E) Immaturity of the inmate at the time of the offense; (F) The extent of the inmate's role in the offense and whether and to what extent an adult was involved in the offense; (G) The inmate s family and community circumstances at the time of the offense, including any history of abuse, trauma, and involvement in the child welfare system; (H) The inmate's participation in available rehabilitative and educational programs while in prison, if those programs have been made available, or use of self-study for self-improvement; and (I) Other factors the board deems relevant. 0--0 :0:0 BPG