RECLAIMING GOVERNMENT FOR AMERICA S FUTURE

Similar documents
%: Will grow the economy vs. 39%: Will grow the economy.

2017 State of the State Courts Survey Analysis

MEMORANDUM. To: Each American Dream From: Frank Luntz Date: January 28, 2014 Re: Taxation and Income Inequality: Initial Survey Results OVERVIEW

APTA Local Priority Message Testing Results. October 30, 2013

CHAPTER 1 PROLOGUE: VALUES AND PERSPECTIVES

THE ABCs of CITIZEN ADVOCACY

Increasing the Participation of Refugee Seniors in the Civic Life of Their Communities: A Guide for Community-Based Organizations

Race-Class Narrative. Ohio. Findings and recommendations from an online survey of adults in Ohio

CHAPTER 1 PROLOGUE: VALUES AND PERSPECTIVES

Seven Steps to becoming a Citizen Activist By Nick Licata. First

Nonvoters in America 2012

PPIC Statewide Survey: Californians and Their Government

Introduction. Changing Attitudes

Chapter Six: Public Opinion and Political Socialization

Politically alienated or apathetic? Young people s attitudes towards party politics in Britain

Executive Summary Don t Always Stay on Message: Using Strategic Framing to Move the Public Discourse On Immigration

HOSTING A REFUGEE RATION MEAL

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, July, 2016, 2016 Campaign: Strong Interest, Widespread Dissatisfaction

EMPLOYER TO EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT STUDY. An Analysis of Employee Voters and Employee Advocates

Who Votes for Libraries?

Seoul G20 Summit: Priorities and Challenges

Race-Class Narrative. California. Findings and recommendations from an online survey of adults in California

MASA/MSBO Conference February 26 th, 2018

2001 Visitor Survey. December 2001 (November 30 December 13, 2001) Cincinnatus Minneapolis, Minnesota

Tackling Wicked Problems through Deliberative Engagement

Central Florida Puerto Ricans Findings from 403 Telephone interviews conducted in June / July 2017.

FAITH AND CITIZENSHIP

September Tax Reform Research

ADVOCACY HANDBOOK FOR SOCIAL WORKERS

Views of Non-Formal Education among Syrian Refugees in Lebanon

Effective Communication with Legislators

Section One Issues for Canadians: Governance and Rights

Jürgen Kohl March 2011

Improving democracy in spite of political rhetoric

Prosperity Brings Satisfaction and Hope CHINA S OPTIMISM

Federal Elections, Union Publications. and. Union Websites

A Kit for Community Groups to Demystify Voting

What you should know about. Influencing Legislation

How to Talk About Money in Politics

Grassroots Policy Project

Using the Onion as a Tool of Analysis

PROPOSAL. Program on the Practice of Democratic Citizenship

Climate Change & Communities of Color. Key Poll Findings and Top Lines

Results of survey of civil society organizations

The most important results of the Civic Empowerment Index research of 2014 are summarized in the upcoming pages.

Newcomers new challenges and new audiences

EOC - Review. The following slides contain vocabulary that will be important to know to succeed on the EOC exam.

Stan Greenberg and James Carville, Democracy Corps. Mark Feierstein and Al Quinlan, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner

Why your members aren t voting. A GUIDE TO INCREASING VOTER TURNOUT AND PARTICIPATION

DRAFT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY WASHTENAW COUNTY SURVEY, Survey Methodology

SOCIO-EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT OPPORTUNITIES FOR YOUNG JOB EMIGRANTS IN THE CONTEXT OF ANOTHER CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT

FINAL REPORT. Public Opinion Survey at the 39th General Election. Elections Canada. Prepared for: May MacLaren Street Ottawa, ON K2P 0M6

Great comments! (A lot of them could be germs of term papers )

The United States & Latin America: After The Washington Consensus Dan Restrepo, Director, The Americas Program, Center for American Progress

National Survey: Super PACs, Corruption, and Democracy

This response discusses the arguments and

DATA PROTECTION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PPIC Statewide Survey: Special Survey on Campaign Ethics

Kicking Butts Online. March 13, PM EST

Life in our villages. Summary. 1 Social typology of the countryside

ImmigrationWorks USA Results of Quantitative Poll

BACKGROUNDER The Making of Citizens: A National Survey of Canadians

The European Elections. The Public Opinion Context

Americans on the Middle East

Not in Our Name! Massage Therapists Against Sex Trafficking. Action Items & Powerful Tools for Ending Sexual Exploitation 2012

Supporter Guide to the General Election

CITIZEN UPRISING TOOLKIT. Ballot Access Guide

COMMUNITY PERCEPTIONS OF MIGRANTS AND IMMIGRATION

President Obama Scores With Middle Class Message

NEGOTIATIONS WITH IRAN: Views from a Red State, a Blue State and a Swing State

BACKGROUNDER The Common Good: Who Decides? A National Survey of Canadians

This report is formatted for double-sided printing.

The sustained negative mood of the country drove voter attitudes.

ANNUAL SURVEY REPORT: ARMENIA

U.S. GLOBAL HEALTH POLICY

AJISS-Commentary. The Association of Japanese Institutes of Strategic Studies IIPS RIPS THE FUKUDA DOCTRINE REVISITED.

Political Beliefs and Behaviors

NATIONAL: TRUMP VOTERS NOT BOTHERED BY OVERTURES TO DEMOCRATS

FOURTH ANNUAL IDAHO PUBLIC POLICY SURVEY 2019

Rule of Law: Economic Prosperity Requires the Rule of Law By J. Kenneth Blackwell

During this session we will cover all the learning objectives mentioned above.

Lecture to the New York Telephone Company December 1933

Corruption's Effect on Socioeconomic Factors

The City of Cape Coral, Florida

FOR RELEASE APRIL 26, 2018

Becoming an activist is one of the most powerful ways to support Public Citizen and the movement for affordable medicines.

Campaign Skills Handbook. Module 6 Message Development Creating Powerful and Persuasive Messages

The Future of Health Care after Repeal and Replace is Pulled: Millennials Speak Out about Health Care

NEGOTIATIONS WITH IRAN: Views from a Red State, a Blue State and a Swing State

The Cook Political Report / LSU Manship School Midterm Election Poll

SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONDITIONS OF FORCIBLY DISPLACED PERSONS

Lived Poverty in Africa: Desperation, Hope and Patience

Why Migrate? Exploring The Migration Series Brewer Elementary School, San Antonio, Texas

6.0 PSST! CANADA, CAN WE TALK?

Running Head: POLICY MAKING PROCESS. The Policy Making Process: A Critical Review Mary B. Pennock PAPA 6214 Final Paper

Survey of Jordanian Public Opinion. National Poll #15 May 22-25, 2017

TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF STUDENT COUNCILS RESOURCE GUIDE SECTION 3: EVERYDAY COUNCIL MANAGEMENT

Introducing Government in America. Chapter 1

President Obama s Political Project

Progress Summit 2017: Progress in the Age of Trump

Transcription:

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Almost every high-profile public debate today is, to some degree, a referendum on the role of government. Whether it is a tax debate, an effort to strengthen environmental regulations, or an attempt to improve public schools, the role and scope of the public in our everyday lives is in question. Yet, our shared common sense about government that it is too big, intrusive, untrustworthy, and controlled by powerful elites has resulted in Americans dismissal of government as a tool for the common good. Find out more about Reclaiming Government for America s Future at: ReclaimingGovernment.Topospartnership.com Reclaiming Government for America s Future is a set of research findings and recommendations that aims to help people recognize that, for better or worse, government plays an essential role in our society and that we help ourselves not by dismissing it or tearing it down, but by engaging with it and making it better. With this research we hope to help advocates, policymakers, community leaders, public employees and others to communicate more effectively with their audiences, thus creating a better, more constructive understanding of government that also presents a clearer call to action and engagement with government. Password: byus4us

WE ARE SUBJECTS, NOT CITIZENS Not surprisingly, the research affirms that Americans overwhelmingly hold negative views of government related to bickering, inefficiency, bureaucracy and so forth. However, the most compelling and fundamental pattern emerging across the research points to a much more profound problem. Americans feel more like subjects than citizens and living in 21st century America feels like living in another kind of country altogether, not the democratic society we are supposed to be. Specific complaints and attitudes about government vary widely across demographic and political lines. But, this sense of disconnection from government is now part of the cultural common sense. This critical pattern, and the language that accompanies it, is consistent across the political spectrum and demographic and geographic groups. At both a conscious and implicit level, people experience government as something other than the type of democratic and representative institution the Founders intended. Americans have come to believe at a gut level that government is not in our hands, in any sense. The public has internalized a picture of government that is of, by and for them (elites and politicians), not us. This viewpoint is borne out by several widely held beliefs and perceptions. Government is them. People in power are others. The most top-of-mind functions of government have to do with order, control and authority activities that any government, democratic or otherwise, would be expected to fulfill. Much of what government does has to do with making the rich richer, including politicians themselves. We have little sense that we and our fellow Americans can shape the course of our society or that we are unified with one another. We resent paying taxes, seeing it as money the government exacts from us. Government is often out of sight and out of mind, and we are fine with that. Various research results demonstrate that government is not seen as of, by, nor for us. Reclaiming Government for America s Future was conducted by the Topos Partnership, commissioned by a national nonprofit, Indivisible (previously Public Works) and supported by partner organizations in AR, CO, NE, NC, OR, and MI. Between 2014-2016, Topos conducted two nationally representative surveys; interviewed regular Americans in communities across 9 states; reviewed and analyzed over 200 relevant pieces in the media; conducted online testing including a protracted virtual community forum, while oversampling the opinions of people of color and Americans under the age of 30. Relying upon these various methods, the research team tried 100s of different ways to talking to people about government, looking for what ideas stuck with people and determining what led to more engaged conversations. In total, nearly 4000 Americans participated in the research. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 2

GOVERNMENT IS NOT US The most basic dimension of the problem is that government is perceived as other not us but them. This pattern is reflected in a question from the 2015 survey that asks Americans the question directly. Overwhelmingly, people choose language that distances us from government; THE government, over language that demonstrates a sense of connection to, or ownership of, government. CONNECTION TO GOVERNMENT Do you tend to think of it as "THE government", more as "OUR" or as "WE". we are government"? GOVERNMENT IS NOT BY US. In qualitative data, research subjects rarely talk about how regular people can affect the course of our society, or the choices of government. And, when asked in the 2015 survey about how they might make a difference in problems they see, people were more likely to believe they can make a difference by working with friends and neighbors, their place of worship or nonprofit organizations than with elected leaders. Furthermore, when asked about how they can influence government, few are confident that this can be done, particularly in ways other than voting. Strikingly, it is as though the picture of what participation in a democratic society means has been reduced narrowly to the occasional act of voting. THE GOVERNMENT OUR GOVERNMENT 16% 75% EFFECTIVENESS OF GROUPS IN MAKING A DIFFERENCE To make a difference on problems you see in your community or state, how effective is it to work with each of the following groups: WE ARE GOVERNMENT 9% FRIENDS AND NEIGHBORS 18% 36% 38% 6% YOUR PLACE OF WORSHIP 16% 29% 37% 17% NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS 10% 30% 48% 11% ELECTED LEADERS 11% 22% 47% 20% EXTREMELY EFFECTIVE VERY EFFECTIVE SOMEWHAT EFFECTIVE NOT EFFECTIVE SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 3

GOVERNMENT IS NOT FOR US. IT IS FOR ELITES. Not long ago, many Americans central concern was whether government had gotten too big. Now, that question seems less relevant as people focus more on the question of whom government serves. Most Americans believe government actions benefit politicians, the wealthy, large corporations, and to a lesser extent, special interest groups. In other words, Americans believe that government actions are primarily intended to benefit the leaders making the decisions, e.g. by making them richer. Far fewer believe government actions benefit any other category or class of people. Communicators must address this resentment about who runs government and who benefits from it if we are to achieve the shift in cultural common sense we seek. 73% AGREE, 24% DISAGREE It is not the size of government that matters. It s who government works for that matters. HOW OFTEN GOVERNMENT ACTIONS BENEFIT Rate how often government actions benefit each of the following groups: Politicians 58 26 9 The Wealthy 51 25 14 Large Corporations 46 28 17 Special Interest Groups 28 28 30 Whites 16 29 35 Blacks 15 24 40 Immigrants 15 20 40 Minorities 13 20 44 Hispanics 12 21 46 The Poor 9 17 35 Children 6 20 58 The Middle Class 6 12 48 Urban People 5 21 51 Youth 4 14 56 The American Public 4 13 60 Small Business 3 15 51 Rural People 3 9 50 Usually Often Sometimes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 4

HAVING OUR SAY: CREATING A GOVERNMENT FOR ALL OF US To build a new cultural common sense of government and to engage Americans in a hopeful, constructive understanding of government, we must address these problematic dynamics. The research for this effort identified a positive way forward that helps to create this shift in thinking both by priming a meaningful and positive dialog about what we can achieve through government and also by helping people to imagine what a more engaged relationship with government is like. There are two essential components of this approach: FOR THE PEOPLE Maintain a focus on how public institutions and policies are collective achievements that benefit us all, in order to inoculate against a focus on government as politicians. BY THE PEOPLE Offer a vivid sense of how active democratic participation can work, and how it can help (essentially, an experiential rather than theoretical, model of democracy) while first acknowledging that most of us currently don t feel we have a say. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 5

FOR THE PEOPLE Americans default perception of government focuses on the politicians in office the people who, for better or worse, run our communities, states and country and whose actions affect us their metaphorical subjects as a kind of external force. It is critical to change the focus of communications to the ways that our public systems and structures benefit us all. To do this, the research consistently finds that it is helpful to remind people of how the laws and investments we make through government are the foundations of our quality of life. We must find ways to explain how we help to create these structures and systems that make our societies work. The key is to convey an understanding of government as beneficial systems, structures and programs that are collective achievements on the part of all of us, rather than gifts from a benevolent group of leaders. SAMPLE LANGUAGE The real story of government of, by and for the people, is a story about working together in ways that benefit all of us from railways and highways to the Internet; from world class colleges to libraries in every community. We sometimes forget that governing isn t really about capitol buildings and politicians. It s about the laws and investments we make to benefit all of us and to create thriving communities. When we re using government well, we create prosperity by building modern transportation and communications grids, good colleges and court systems, and we make laws about clean air, food and safe workplaces. There are many ways to express these ideas and to embed them in discussions of other topics, such as democratic engagement. There are several keys to doing this: Pivot away from politicians. Focus on collective benefits of our public systems and structures. Explain how government helps create thriving communities a phrase that calls to mind positive and relevant images. Avoid implying that we (currently) all benefit equally. (Many feel we don t but can still have a constructive conversation about what the system is supposed to accomplish.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 6

BY THE PEOPLE For conversations about government to feel meaningful and real, they must address Americans central concern that they do not have a say. (This phrase is the most natural way of referring to the issue for non-experts, and is a helpful anchor to keep conversations grounded in a focus that is meaningful and important to people.) Many communicators feel, and the research reinforces, that it is critical both to acknowledge people s current frustration, and to remind them that part of the definition of the American way is supposed to include the people being in charge. Just as importantly, communications should help audiences begin to experience what active democratic engagement actually feels like. Conveying a new idea about how effective democracy works is essential to our communications. We need to help our audiences see that real change happens we take steps beyond voting. This can be described as voting plus one or going a step or two beyond voting, for instance. This idea proves clarifying, engaging and very sticky people remember and discuss it as a new understanding about how democracy really works, and about how they themselves can take on a new, more active and impactful role. First, it is important to acknowledge that we don t seem to, but are supposed, to have a say. Regular Americans don t have a day-to-day experience with influencing government and making their voices heard. To initially suggest they can do more than vote feels like a hollow suggestion. So, our communications should start by recognizing that most Americans feel like they don t have a say. SAMPLE LANGUAGE Some groups are working on the idea of Voting Plus One or Beyond Voting. This is the idea that everyone should vote, but everyone also has to take a step or two beyond that. Going beyond voting is the only way we are going to get a say in how things are run in our communities and our state. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 7

Painting a vivid picture of the experience of democratic action is important. This picture can include several different elements: Success stories One of the most effective ways to change people s stance towards government is through brief stories of others who have worked with government to achieve positive change. Starter kits Since the majority of Americans have so little experience feeling and acting like pro- active citizens, they like the idea that there could be starter kits with simple suggetions for how to go beyond voting. All of these approaches are helpful because they offer what amounts to second hand experience of how meaningful democratic engagement works and they therefore help people understand and believe that government can be a tool that serves their own interests and benefits all of us. At the same time, they offer examples, however modest, of blueprints for change. And even for groups that have no intention of beginning new engagement efforts, simply telling the stories of how we can have a say is a way of creating positive attention and energy, and a different stance towards government. Process improvements Similar to the idea of starter kits, people appreciate hearing about simple, concrete steps governments could take from establishing more regular community meetings to making information about upcoming decisions easier to access online to make it easier for people to stay informed and make their views known. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 8

CONCLUSION Americans are deeply cynical about the value of government and have very little sense that there is anything they can do, other than voting, that will make a difference. Though they recognize that they live in a democratic nation, their day-to-day lived experience is that they feel like subjects, not citizens. This research provides a hopeful blueprint for progress. Communicators must acknowledge that people don t believe they have a say in how things are run. Moreover, we must remind Americans that government is supposed to be not only FOR, but also BY, the people. We have to help people connect the dots between what government does (schools, roads, public health, etc.) and how those things make up the foundations of thriving communities. We also have to give people a new idea of how democracy could work it works when we all go a bit beyond voting. We also need to give people a sense of the experience of effective, engaged democracy by: 1) incorporating success stories of citizens coming together to make change through government; 2) offering tips and suggestions for how to be involved that could be grouped into Voting Plus One starter kits ; and 3) reminding them of the mechanisms currently in place, and that could be in place, to allow them to have a say. Overcoming the negative views and the disengaged lived experiences of Americans will not happen overnight but it is fundamental to building support for, and persuading people to take action on behalf of, positive change. We need look no further than the current political discourse to see that we have no time to waste when it comes to engaging our fellow Americans in hopeful and constructive conversations about our government. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 9