22 Criminal Cases Cases Pending //22 262 New Cases Filed in 22 687 Reopened Cases 23 Cases Available for Disposition 972 Disposed by: Withdrawn/Dismissed 33 ARD 46 Guilty Plea 455 Non-Jury Trial 5 Jury Trial 6 Inactive 7 Other 38 Total Cases Disposed 69 Cases Pending 2/3/22 282 4.8% 2.2% 65.9%.7%.9%.% 5.5% Age of Pending Cases as of 2/3/22-6 Days 8 6-2 Days 63 2-8 Days 33 8-24 Days 2 24-3 Days 3-36 Days 8 Over 36 Days 37 Total 282 38.3% 22.3%.7% 4.3% 3.9% 6.4% 3.% Cases Awaiting Sentencing 37 Data provided by CPCMS Criminal New Cases Filed, 25-22 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 25 26 27 28 29 2 2 22 Last Modified: October 2, 23 Page
22 Criminal - New Cases by Case Type Case Type Felony Misdemeanor Summary /Ungraded Total Person 65 72 37 Property 67 39 26 Drug 55 64 9 Weapon 8 3 Public Order 8 6 79 Motor Vehicle - DWI/DUI Motor Vehicle - Other 33 33 Other Total 23 474 687 3.% 69.% Data provided by CPCMS Last Modified: October 2, 23 Page 2
22 Civil Civil Action Other Total Cases Pending //22 6 Docketed Cases 6 Arbitration Appeals Transferred In Returned to Active Cases Available for Processing 322 Disposed By: Default Judgments 54 44 Cases Decided by Arbitration Board Dispositive Motions 6 5 Settlements 37 25 Moved to Inactive Status Transferred/Withdrawn Administrative Purge Other 8 5 Jury Trial Non-Jury Trial Total Cases Disposed 6 Cases Pending 2/3/22 26 3 3 435 8 5 46 29 757 98 2 62 3 87 354 57 6 Age of Pending Cases as of 2/3/22 (Civil Action Only) -6 months 5 23.% 7-2 months 49 22.7% 3-8 months 43 9.9% 9-24 months 34 5.7% 25-3 months 4 8.5% 3-36 months 37-42 months 43-48 months 49-54 months 55-6 months 6-66 months 67-72 months Over 72 months Total 26 7 Docketed Cases, 23-22 6 5 4 3 2 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 2 2 22 Note: Prior to June 2, docketed cases under the "Other" category were not reported. The inclusion of these cases starting from June 2 may contribute to an increase in docketed cases from 29 to 2. Last Modified: November, 23 Page 3
22 Civil - Docketed Cases Listed by Case Type TORT 5 7.5% (does not include mass tort) Intentional 3 Malicious Prosecution Motor Vehicle 24 Nuisance Premise Liability 6 Product Liability 3 Slander/Libel/Defamation 2 Other MASS TORT Asbestos Tobacco Toxic Tort - DES Toxic Tort - Implant Toxic Waste Other PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY Dental 5.7% Legal 2 Medical Malpractice 3 Other CONTRACT (does not include judgments) Buyer Plaintiff Debt Collection: Credit Card 99 3 53 34.% Debt Collection: Other 36 Employment Dispute: Employment Dispute:Discriminatio 2 Employment Dispute: Other Other 5 REAL PROPERTY Ejectment* 5 Eminent Domain/Condemnation 5 Ground Rent Landlord/Tenant Dispute 6 Mortgage Forclosure: Residential* 68 Commercial* Partition of Real Property* 6 Quiet Title* 9 Other* 4 CIVIL APPEALS - Administrative Agencies Board of Assessment* 6 2 5.5% Board of Elections* Dept. of Transportation* 5 Zoning Board* Statutory Appeal - Other* Other* 9 MISCELLANEOUS Common Law/ Statutory Arbitration* 6 2 5.5% Declaratory Judgment* 3 Mandamus* Non-Domestic Relations Restraining Order* Quo Warranto* Replevin* Other* TOTAL DOCKETED CASES: 29 4 35.7% % Of the Docketed Cases: Pro Se Filings: 25 8.6% Class Action Suits: MDJ Appeals: 2 7.2% * Civil Other Last Modified: November, 23 Page 4
22 Protection From Abuse Petitions Cases Pending //22 5 New Cases Filed in 22 3 Of these, Petitions Requesting Temporary Orders: 3 () Temporary Orders DENIED: (.%), Temporary Orders GRANTED: 2 (99.%) Cases Available for Processing 8 Temporary Order DENIED After Ex Parte Hearing and No Evidentiary Hearing Scheduled 6 6.% Temporary Order DISMISSED After Evidentiary Hearing and No Final Order Entered 2 2.2% Final Order DENIED After Evidentiary Hearing Before a Judge 4 4.% Final Order GRANTED After Evidentiary Hearing Before a Judge.2% Plaintiff Did Not Appear For Evidentiary Hearing 3 3.% Final Order by STIPULATION OR AGREEMENT Between the Parties 4 4.8% Petition WITHDRAWN by Plaintiff.2% TRANSFERRED to Another Jurisdiction DECEASED Party 6 6.% Other 6 6.% Cases Processed 98 Cases Pending 2/3/22 2 6 PFA New Cases Filed, 23-22 4 2 8 6 4 2 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 2 2 22 Last Modified: November, 23 Page 5
22 Spousal & Child Support Petitions Cases Pending //22 223 New Cases Filed in 22,26 Dockets Transferred In (+) 27 Dockets Transferred Out (-) 27 Cases Available for Processing,539 Judge 29 2.% Intake Officer,345 97.8% Hearing Officer Other.% Cases Processed,375 Cases Pending 2/3/22 64 2,5 Spousal & Child Support New Cases Filed, 24-22 2,,5, 5 24 25 26 27 28 29 2 2 22 Last Modified: February, 23 Page 6
22 Custody/Partial Custody/Visitation Petitions Cases Pending //22 86 New Cases Filed in 22 96 Cases Available for Processing 82 Judge 66 Non-Judicial Officer Other Cases Processed 66 Cases Pending 2/3/22 6 4% Clearance Rate, 23-22 2% 3 25 2 5 Custody/Partial Custody/Visitation New Cases Filed, 23-22 % 8% 6% 4% 2% % 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 2 2 22 Note: Clearance Rate = Cases Processed / New Cases Filed 5 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 2 2 22 Cases Pending at the End of, 23-22 6 4 2 8 6 4 2 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 2 2 22 Last Modified: November, 23 Page 7
22 Divorce Petitions Cases Pending //22 282 New Cases Filed in 22 54 Cases Available for Processing 436 Contested Before a Judge 44 2.% Contested Before a Master Uncontested 8 49.% Other 68 3.9% Cases Processed 22 Cases Pending 2/3/22 26 25 Divorce New Cases Filed, 23-22 2 5 5 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 2 2 22 Last Modified: November, 23 Page 8
22 Juvenile Dependency - Active Dependent Inventory Cases Pending //22 9 New Petitions Filed in 22 24 Other Total Petitions Available for Processing 33 Processed by: Abuse/ Neglect Adjudicated Dependent Judge 24 Master Adjudicated NOT Dependent Judge Master Withdrawn/Dismissed/Inactive 4 Other 3 Total Petitions Processed 3 Status Offenses 6 7 7 7 Total 9 3 4 3 4 3 38 Cases Pending 2/3/22 2 2 Data provided by CPCMS Abuse/Neglect and Status Offenses New Cases Filed, 23-22 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 2 2 22 Note: Dependency data for 22-2 were collected manually. Dependency data for 2 and 22 were provided by CPCMS. Last Modified: September 5, 23 Page 9
22 Juvenile Dependency - Adjudicated Dependent Inventory Abuse/ Neglect Cases Pending //22 29 New Adjudicated Dependent Cases 24 Other Total Adjudicated Dependent Cases 54 Status Offenses 7 8 Total 3 3 62 Court Supervision Terminated: Family Reunification 8 32.% 6.7% 9 29.% Adoption Placement with a Relative/Guardian 2 Aged Out 2 48.% 8.% 4 66.7% 6 2 5.6% 6.5% Other Permanency Outcomes* 2 Other** 8.% 4.% 6.7% 2 2 6.5% 6.5% Total Adjudicated Dependent Cases Terminated 25 6 3 Cases Pending 2/3/22 29 2 3 Data provided by CPCMS * Other Permanency Outcomes include: adjudicated delinquent, death due to natural causes, death due to negligence, emancipation, permanent living arrangement, and parent has come forward. ** Other includes cases where court supervision is terminated due to transfer out of jurisdiction, withdrawal and administrative closure. Last Modified: September 5, 23 Page
22 Juvenile Delinquency Cases Cases Pending //22 5 New Cases Filed in 22 5 Cases Available for Processing 65 Judge 49 Non-Judicial Officer Other Cases Processed 49 (O) Cases Pending 2/3/22 6 (O) - Overinclusive, includes consent decrees. 8% 6% Clearance Rate, 23-22 8 6 4 2 Juvenile Delinquency New Cases Filed, 23-22 8 6 4 2 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 2 2 22 4% 2% % 8% 6% 4% 2% % 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 2 2 22 Note: Clearance Rate = Cases Processed / New Cases Filed Cases Pending at the End of, 23-22 7 6 5 4 3 2 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 2 2 22 Last Modified: November, 23 Page
22 Accounts Cases Cases Pending //22 New Cases Filed in 22 Cases Available for Processing Contested before a Judge Contested before a Non-judicial Officer Uncontested Other Cases Processed Cases Pending 2/3/22 6 Accounts New Cases Filed, 23-22 5 4 3 2 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 2 2 22 Last Modified: November, 23 Page 2
22 Adoptions Cases Cases Pending //22 26 New Cases Filed in 22 23 Cases Available for Processing 49 Contested before a Judge Granted 5.3% Denied Uncontested Granted 7 89.5% Denied 5.3% Other Cases Processed 9 Cases Pending 2/3/22 3 35 Adoptions New Cases Filed, 28-22 3 25 2 5 5 28 29 2 2 22 Note: Prior to 28, each petition was counted as one new case, regardless of the number of children listed on the petition. Starting in 28, each child listed on a petition is counted as a separate case. Therefore, statistics since 28 should not be compared to statistics prior to 28. Last Modified: November, 23 Page 3
22 Relinquishments/Terminations Cases Cases Pending //22 7 New Cases Filed in 22 22 Cases Available for Processing 93 Contested before a Judge 2 9.% Uncontested 8 8.8% Other 2 9.% Cases Processed 22 Cases Pending 2/3/22 7 45 Relinquishments/Terminations New Cases Filed, 23-22 4 35 3 25 2 5 5 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 2 2 22 Last Modified: November, 23 Page 4
22 Appointment of Guardians Cases Cases Pending //22 67 New Cases Filed in 22 23 Cases Available for Processing 9 Contested before a Judge 6.7% Uncontested 2 8.% Other 2 3.3% Cases Processed 5 Cases Pending 2/3/22 75 3 Appointment of Guardians New Cases Filed, 23-22 25 2 5 5 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 2 2 22 Last Modified: November, 23 Page 5
22 Jury Yield and Utilization Jury Yield Qualification Questionnaires/Summonses Mailed: Returned Undeliverable: Not Responded to: 9 8 65 A B C 3.% 8.3% the Number of Prospective Jurors: Disqualified: Exempted: Excused: Deferred to New Term: Deferred from Previous Term: 47 7 8 D E F G H 6.3%.9%.9% Of Qualification Questionnaires/ Summonses Mailed Total Number of Qualified Jurors Available for Service: 445 I 49.4% I=A-B-C-D-E-F-G+H Jury Utilization the Number of Jurors: Reporting for Service: Told Not to Report for Service: 445 Sent to Courtroom for Jury Selection (Voir Dire): Impanelled or Sworn (jurors/alternates): 389 87.4% 24.9% Of Jurors Qualified and Available Of Jurors Reporting for Service Removed for Cause/Hardship: Removed by Peremptory Challenge: Jury Costs Total Annual Budget for Juror Operations: $38,475. Average Cost Per Juror: $42.75 K=J/A J K In mid-2, AOPC began utilizing the National Center for State Courts Jury Managers Toolbox for collecting jury data. In 22, the counties began providing additional jury data which included information about the summonsing practices in the counties. With this additional data, we can now see not only how many citizens come to our courthouses every day in anticipation of serving on a jury, but the number of citizens actually summonsed and the number of those summonsed who are exempt, excused or disqualified from service. With this wider view of the jury process, we can determine the efficiency with which our courts operate, and with the assistance of the Jury Managers Toolbox find guidance in streamlining the jury summonsing practices. Last Modified: November, 23 Page 6