Plaintiffs, v. No. D-101-CV Plaintiffs, v. No. D-101-CV FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER

Similar documents
Armijo & Armijo, P. C. (Margaret P. Armijo, Esq.); and the Court having received evidence, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS, ADJUDGES AND DECREES as follows:

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF CLASS NOTICE AND SCHEDULING A FINAL FAIRNESS HEARING

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

PLAINTIFFS EMERGENCY MOTION FOR EXPEDITED HEARING AND TRIAL

STIPULATED ORDER. filed a Complaint for Injunctive Relief on January 29, On May 3, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a

Case 1:12-cv RLW Document 48 Filed 09/04/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FILED IN MY OFFICE DISTRICT COURT CLERK 7/2/2013 3:21:42 AM STEPHEN T. PACHECO FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF SANTA FE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

CITYOFELPASO, TEXAS' MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO.4

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Monk's Inc., d/b/a International House of Pancakes, Defendant.

Case 1:12-cv RLW Document 47-1 Filed 08/31/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:11-cv RHS-WDS Document 5 Filed 11/10/11 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Honorable James J. Wechler v. San Juan River Adjudication. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., Claims of Navajo Nation CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. ) Defendant. )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. v. NO. 33,903. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF VALENCIA COUNTY Valerie A. Huling, District Judge

5i#j. !!!!! I i : \ y. ' o == Eric Garcetti

Case 1:12-cv HH-BB-WJ Document 41 Filed 02/23/12 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 5:13-cv EFM-TJJ Document 190 Filed 04/21/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. and No. 1:12-CV-00140

v. No. D-1113-CV DEFENDANTS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF S APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Case 5:13-cv EFM-TJJ Document 158 Filed 03/27/14 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 8:15-cv DOC-KES Document 184 Filed 04/03/19 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:4371

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. v. NO. 29,040. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY James A. Hall, District Judge

City of Hobbs/Hobbs Express Title VI/ADA Complaint Procedures

v. No. D-101-CV-2014-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

Instructions to Submit a Complaint Against a Guardian Contracting with DDPC Office of Guardianship

COMES NOW, Plaintiffs Patrick Brenner, through undersigned counsel Western

Case 5:17-cv OLG Document 58 Filed 06/19/17 Page 1 of 6

Case 3:15-cr BAS Document 166 Filed 03/02/17 PageID.752 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:17-cv TCB-WSD-BBM Document 44 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 8

Charles Edward Lincoln, pro se 603 Elmwood Place, Suite #6 Austin, Texas Tel:

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Case 1:15-cv SCY-KBM Document 2 Filed 01/21/15 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Case4:10-cv CW Document205 Filed11/02/12 Page1 of 6

HOW TO CHANGE A YOUR NAME

Case 1:12-cv JCH-RHS Document 1 Filed 12/06/12 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 218 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 4

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. v. NO. 29,675. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CURRY COUNTY Stephen K. Quinn, District Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 5:11-cv Document 1 Filed 06/17/11 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION NOTICE OF APPEAL

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE TO SPS CUSTOMERS

Case 2:07-cv TJH-CT Document 56 Filed 11/29/2007 Page 1 of 6

Plaintiff. The State Board of the Great Outdoors Colorado Trust Fund, Defendant. COURT USE ONLY Case No.

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Francisco) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:15-cv JD

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Jose) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 5:06-cv JF

Honorable James J. Wechler. Richard T. C. Tully, Esq., hereby certifies the original of this Certificate of Service TULLY LAW FIRM, P. A.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. v. NO. 31,058

COUNSEL JUDGES OPINION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:11-cv NLH -AMD Document 61 Filed 01/24/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 211 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA HARRISBURG DIVISION : MDL DOCKET NO : : : :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Live Database U.S. District Court - Eastern District of Tennessee (Chattanooga) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:16-cv TWP-CHS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Western Division - Los Angeles) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:08-cv VBF-PLA

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. v. No. 34,707

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. 2 Opinion Number: 3 Filing Date: July 6, NO. 32,648 5 VILLAGE OF LOGAN,

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

Case 1:09-cv RB-RHS Document 139 Filed 11/01/13 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. Plaintiffs, 1:16-cv PJK/SMV

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO.: Civ-Martinez

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. v. NO. A-1-CA-37056

No. S IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA. KRISTIN M. PERRY et ai., Plaintiffs and Respondents,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) Plaintiff,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Southern Division - Santa Ana) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 8:11-cv AG-RNB

PLAINITFF MALC'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT

Case 5:15-cv RGK-SP Document 99 Filed 10/11/16 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:1395 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SANTA FE COUNTY CLASS ACTION STRIP SEARCH CASE

Case 1:16-cv DPG Document 509 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2018 Page 1 of 9

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. vs. No. 33,274

Case 3:15-cv HEH Document 64 Filed 09/18/15 Page 1 of 4 PageID# 445

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION NOTICE. 1. Pursuant to NMSA 1978, , and Commission Rule

Case 1:13-cv TSC-DAR Document 104 Filed 06/24/15 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. 2 Opinion Number: 3 Filing Date: July 12, NO. 34,653 5 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

No. 137, Original STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF WYOMING. and. STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA Defendants.

mg Doc Filed 10/01/18 Entered 10/01/18 15:54:35 Main Document Pg 1 of 7

02 DEC 20 Nt I;: 28 rt""-

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

Case 5:15-cv DDC-KGS Document 44 Filed 06/02/15 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 2:08-cv R-E Document 179 Filed 09/20/13 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:3675 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. 2 Opinion Number: 3 Filing Date: April 5, No. A-1-CA STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

Case 2:17-cv JAR-JPO Document 94 Filed 11/27/17 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 3:08-cv CRB Document 1 Filed 09/02/2008 Page 1 of 1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. v. No. 35,281. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY Clay Campbell, District Judge

[QIJ$&J ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Transcription:

STATE OF NEW MEXICO COUNTY OF SANTA FE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT FILED 1st JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT Santa Fe County 2/14/2019 7:35 AM STEPHEN T. PACHECO CLERK OF THE COURT Leah Martinez LOUISE MARTINEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. D-101-CV-2014-00793 THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, et al., Consolidated with Defendants. WILHELMINA YAZZIE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. D-101-CV-2014-02224 THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, et al., Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER Following a bench trial which extended from June 12 through August 4, 2017, the parties presented written closing arguments and responses which were completed on February 8, 2018. Thereafter the Court entered its Decision and Order on July 20, 2018. After Defendants informed the Court of their intention to file a notice of appeal, the parties filed their proposed findings and conclusions and the Court issued its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law 1

on December 28, 2018. The decision and the findings of fact and conclusions of law are incorporated in and made a part of the judgment. See Luna v. Cerrillos Coal R. Co., 1923-NMSC-073, 2, 29 N.M. 161, 218 P. 435, 436 It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 1. Final judgment in this case is entered in favor of the Martinez and Yazzie Plaintiffs and against the Defendants in accordance with the Court s July 20, 2018 Decision and Order and the Court s December 20, 2018 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. 2. As set forth in the Decision and Order and Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the Court declares as follows: a. The Court declares that Defendants have violated the Education Clause, and the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the New Mexico Constitution. 7/20/18 Decision and Order at 70. (FF&CL 3185) b. Defendants have violated the rights of at-risk students by failing to provide them with a uniform statewide system of free public schools sufficient for their education. 7/20/18 Decision and Order at 70. (FF&CL 3186) For purposes of this case, at-risk students include children who come from economically disadvantaged homes, children who are English Language Learners, children who 2

are Native American, and children with a disability. (FF&CL 520) c. Defendants have failed to provide at-risk students with programs and services necessary to make them college or career ready. 7/20/18 Decision and Order at 70. (FF&CL 3187). d. The funding provided has not been sufficient for all districts to provide the programs and services required by the Constitution. 7/20/18 Decision and Order at 70. (FF&CL 3188) e. The Public Education Department has failed to meet its supervisory and audit functions to assure that the money that is provided has been spent so as to most efficiently achieve the needs of providing at-risk students with the programs and services needed for them to obtain an adequate education, including not having appropriately exercised its statutory authority to ensure that districts are properly prioritizing and funding programs and services for atrisk students through district allocation. 7/20/18 Decision and Order at 70-71. (FF&CL 3189) 3. As set forth in the Decision and Order and Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Defendants are hereby enjoined as follows: a. An injunction is hereby issued enjoining the Defendants to take immediate steps, by no later than April 15, 2019, to ensure that New 3

Mexico schools have the resources necessary to give at-risk students the opportunity to obtain a uniform and sufficient education that prepares them for college and career. 7/20/18 Decision and Order at 74. (FF&CL 3206) b. It is the State s duty to provide a constitutionally adequate system regardless of whether an injunction is entered. 7/20/18 Decision and Order at 74. (FF&CL 3207) c. The school children who are now caught in an inadequate system and who will remain there if an injunction is not entered will be irreparably harmed if better programs are not instituted. 7/20/18 Decision and Order at 74. (FF&CL 3208) d. The Defendants must comply with their duty to provide an adequate education and may not conserve financial resources at the expense of our constitutional resources. 7/20/18 Decision and Order at 74. (FF&CL 3209) e. Reforms to the current system of financing public education and managing schools should address the shortcomings of the current system by ensuring, as a part of that process, that as soon as practicable every public school in New Mexico would have the resources, including instructional materials, properly trained staff, 4

and curricular offerings, necessary for providing the opportunity for a sufficient education for all at-risk students. 7/20/18 Decision and Order at 74-75. (FF&CL 3210) f. The new scheme should include a system of accountability to measure whether the programs and services actually provide the opportunity for a sound basic education and to assure that the local districts are spending the funds provided in a way that efficiently and effectively meets the needs of at-risk students. 7/20/18 Decision and Order at 75. (FF&CL 3211) 4. Within 15 days of the entry of this Final Judgment and Order, the Martinez Plaintiffs and the Yazzie Plaintiffs shall separately file their bill of costs as provided in Rule 1-054(D), NMRA. 5. Within 15 days of the entry of this Final Judgment and Order, Plaintiffs may submit any motions for attorneys fees as provided in Rule 1-054(E), NMRA, and must include within their request a justification based on statute, rule, or other comparable authority for an award of attorneys fees in this type of case. 6. The Court retains jurisdiction over this matter to issue such orders and take such further actions as may be necessary to timely remedy the determinations set forth in the Decision and Order and Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law issued by this Court and to effectuate all relief granted in this case. Because there 5

is no just reason for delay as to the finality of this Court s rulings on the merits of this case, this Final Judgment and Order is a final order under Rule 1-054 and the time for appeal shall run from the date of the entry of this Order. In order to assure that any notice of appeal that is filed is timely, the notice should be filed within 30 days of the entry of this judgment; however, if a party needs more time to consider whether to appeal, a motion for extension of time for an additional 30 days will be considered expeditiously. Any party of objecting to such an extension will file its opposition thereto within three days of the service of the motion for extension. 7. Any discovery needed in aid of enforcing this judgment shall be conducted pursuant to the Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 1-069(B). After April 15, 2019, any party may file with the Court a report about whether it believes Defendants are in compliance with this Court s Orders. Upon receipt of any such report, the Court will issue an order setting forth the process by which it will address any issues raised by such report. IT IS SO ORDERED. Sarah M. Singleton, Judge Pro Tem Sitting by Designation This Judgment was entered after review of Plaintiffs proposed judgment and Defendants objections thereto. 6

Submitted, NM CENTER ON LAW AND POVERTY By: /s/ Gail Evans Gail Evans, Preston Sanchez, Lauren Winkler, and Christopher Sanchez NM Center on Law and Poverty 924 Park Ave SW, Suite C Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 Phone: (505) 255-2840 Fax: (505) 255-2778 Attorneys for Yazzie plaintiffs DANIEL YOHALEM By: /s/ Daniel Yohalem Attorney at Law 1121 Paseo de Peralta Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501 Phone: (505) 983-9433 Fax: (505) 989-4844 Attorney for all Yazzie family plaintiffs MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. By: /s/ Ernest Herrera Ernest Herrera (NM State Bar No. 144619) Jack Salmon (NM State Bar No. 144619) Alejandra Avila 110 Broadway, Suite 300 San Antonio, Texas 78205 (210) 224-5476 (210) 224-5382 Fax Attorneys for Martinez plaintiffs MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP By: /s/ E. Martin Estrada *E. Martin Estrada (CA State Bar No. 223802) *Jessica R. Baril (CA State Bar No. 302135) 350 South Grand Ave., 50 th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90072-3426 (213) 683-9100 7

(213) 687-3702 (Fax) Attorneys for Martinez plaintiffs Approved as to Form Only: MONTGOMERY & ANDREWS, P.A. By: /s/ Jeffrey J. Wechsler Jeffrey J. Wechsler Stephen S. Hamilton Seth C. McMillan Post Office Box 2307 Santa Fe, New Mexico 87504-2307 (505) 982-3873 jwechsler@montand.com shamilton@montand.com smcmillan@montand.com STINSON LEONARD STREET LLP John R. Munich Jamie L. Boyer Nicci J. Warr 7700 Forsyth Blvd., Suite 1100 St. Louis, MO 63105-1821 314-863-0800 john.munich@stinsonleonard.com Jamie.boyer@stinsonleonard.com Nicci.warr@stinsonleonard.com Attorneys for Defendants 8