UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Similar documents
Attorney for Plaintiff TIPSY ELVES LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, RESTITUTION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Case 3:17-cv JCS Document 1 Filed 06/15/17 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/07/17 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/05/17 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, RESTITUTION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

Case 2:18-cv JAD-CWH Document 1 Filed 12/21/18 Page 1 of 17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LANHAM ACT AND TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT

COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LANHAM ACT AND TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT

Case 1:07-cv LTS Document 1 Filed 03/15/2007 Page 1 of 20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:1

Case 1:16-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND PARTIES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 3:16-cv CRB Document 1 Filed 11/29/16 Page 1 of 22

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:13-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 1 of 16

3 James A. McDaniel (Bar No ) 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO:

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 09/24/15 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/31/17 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:1

Case 9:13-cv KLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

Case: 5:17-cv SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/21/17 1 of 19. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. Case No.

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

Case 3:14-cv DMS-DHB Document 1 Filed 06/04/14 Page 1 of 17

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT (Jury Trial Demanded)

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-381 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No.

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Case 1:13-cv WGY Document 1 Filed 10/17/13 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:14-cv PMW Document 4 Filed 01/05/15 Page 1 of 20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Case 3:17-cv JCH Document 1 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Case No.

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 10/13/2008 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv LTS Document 2 Filed 11/22/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No.

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 14

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1

Case: 4:13-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 08/01/13 Page: 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT

Case 5:14-cv Document 1 Filed 11/06/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/12/16 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:1

Case 1:16-cv KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2016 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 0:10-cv MJD-FLN Document 1 Filed 04/06/10 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Court File No.

GIBSON LOWRY BURRIS LLP

Case 3:16-cv LB Document 1 Filed 06/11/16 Page 1 of 14

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand

Case 1:14-cv RWZ Document 1 Filed 05/08/14 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Courthouse News Service

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. Civil Action No. 07-CV-571

KINSELLA WEITZMAN ISER KUMP & ALDISERT LLP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

Case 1:10-cv GMS Document 1-3 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Hells Angels Motorcycle Corporation v. Alexander McQueen Trading Limited et al Doc. 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

TRUE AUSSIE TRADE MARK LICENCE APPLICATION AUSTRALIAN USERS

Case 1:15-cv EJF Document 2 Filed 09/25/15 Page 1 of 12

Case 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/29/16 Page 1 of 16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, for its complaint, by and through its attorney, alleges that:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 2:12-cv JCM-VCF Document 1 Filed 11/13/12 Page 1 of 10

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/09/17 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1

Case 2:17-cv JFW-JC Document 1 Filed 10/13/17 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:1

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 20 Filed: 04/11/11 Page 1 of 26 PageID #:217

NO. EDMUNDS.COM, INC. IN THE DISTRICT COURT a New York Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. GALVESTON COUNTY, TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/01/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:16-cv SK Document 1 Filed 08/17/16 Page 1 of 23

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/24/ :27 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/24/2015 EXHIBIT C

Case 3:17-cv DMS-RBB Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 20

Attorneys for Plaintiff, Robin Sergi, and all others similarly situated IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Transcription:

Case :-cv-00-jfw-agr Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 JOHNSON & PHAM, LLP Christopher D. Johnson, SBN: E-mail: cjohnson@johnsonpham.com Christopher Q. Pham, SBN: 0 E-mail: cpham@johnsonpham.com Marcus F. Chaney, SBN: E-mail: mchaney@johnsonpham.com Jason R. Vener, SBN: E-mail: jvener@johnsonpham.com Topanga Canyon Boulevard, Suite Woodland Hills, California Telephone: () -0 Facsimile: () - Attorneys for Plaintiff FOREVER, INC. FOREVER, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA C LUCE, INC., a California Corporation doing business as TCEC; CORNERSTONE APPAREL, INC., a California Corporation doing business as PAPAYA; and DOES through 0, inclusive. Defendants. WESTERN DIVISION Case No.: :-cv-0 : () FEDERAL COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT () CONTRIBUTORY COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT [DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL] - -

Case :-cv-00-jfw-agr Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 COMES NOW, Plaintiff Forever, Inc. ( Forever or Plaintiff ), to hereby file its Complaint for Damages against Defendants C Luce, Inc., a California corporation doing business as TCEC; Cornerstone Apparel, Inc., a California corporation doing business as Papaya; and Does through 0, Inclusive (collectively Defendants ). PARTIES. Forever is now, and was at the time of the filing of this Complaint and at all intervening times, a Delaware corporation duly authorized and licensed to conduct business in California with its principal place of business located at 0 North Mission Road, Los Angeles, California 00.. Forever is informed and believes that Defendant C Luce, Inc., doing business as TCEC, is now, and was at the time of the filing of this Complaint and at all intervening times, a California corporation, with its principal place of business located in Los Angeles, California.. Forever is informed and believes that Defendant Cornerstone Apparel, Inc., doing business as TCEC, is now, and was at the time of the filing of this Complaint and at all intervening times, a California corporation, with its principal place of business located in Commerce, California.. Forever is informed and believes that the named Defendants, and Does -0, inclusive, sued herein by fictitious names are jointly, severally and concurrently liable and responsible with the named Defendants upon the causes of action hereinafter set forth.. Forever is informed and believes and thereon alleges that at all times mentioned herein that the named Defendants and Does -0, inclusive, and each of them, were the agents, servants and employees of every other Defendant and the acts of each Defendant, as alleged herein, were performed within the course and scope of that agency, service or employment.. The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate, - -

Case :-cv-00-jfw-agr Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 associate or otherwise, of Defendants herein named as Does -0, inclusive, are unknown to Plaintiff. Plaintiff therefore sues said Defendants by such fictitious names. When the true names and capacities of said Defendants have been ascertained, Forever will amend this pleading accordingly. JURISDICTIONAL ALLEGATIONS. This Court has Federal subject matter jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to U.S.C. and (a) and (b), in that the case arises out of claims for copyright infringement under the Copyright Act ( U.S.C. 0(a)); and this Court has supplemental jurisdiction pursuant to U.S.C. (a) and (a)(b).. Venue is proper, inter alia, pursuant to U.S.C. (b) because on information and belief, a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claims occurred in this judicial district, and has caused damages to Plaintiff in this district.. Personal jurisdiction exists over Defendants because on information and belief, Defendants conduct business in California and in this judicial district, are aware of Plaintiff s domicile in this judicial district, have competed with Plaintiff in this judicial district, have purposefully directed action to California and this district, or have otherwise availed themselves of the privileges and protections of the laws of the State of California, such that this Court s assertion of jurisdiction over Defendants does not offend traditional notions of fair play and due process. Among other things, Defendants have willfully advertised, offered to sell, sold, and distributed products embodying designs that infringe the copyrights of Plaintiff to and within this judicial district. Defendants also reside within this judicial district. / / / / / / / / / / / / - -

Case :-cv-00-jfw-agr Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION (Infringement of Copyright against all Defendants, and DOES -0, Inclusive) [ U.S.C. 0(a)] 0. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges every allegation set forth in Paragraphs -.. Forever is a widely recognized retailer of apparel, clothing and accessories and fashion accessories. Forever designs and sells innovative, fashionable clothing, clothing and accessories and accessories exclusively through its online website www.forever.com and its own Forever retail outlets throughout the United States and multiple international locations. Forever sells clothing and accessories bearing one or more of its family of registered and common law Forever trademarks and which embody designs protected by Plaintiff s copyrights.. Since at least as early as, Forever has been engaged in the development and retail sales of a wide variety of clothing and accessories identified by its registered and common law trademarks and which embody designs protected by Plaintiff s copyrights.. Forever s merchandise is made solely for Forever and is sold by Forever exclusively through its own website as well as through mall-based and stand-alone retail outlets throughout the United States, Austria, Bahrain, Belgium, Canada, China, Colombia, France, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Israel, Japan, Jordan, South Korea, Kuwait, Malaysia, Mexico, Oman, Philippines, Puerto Rico, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and Thailand.. Forever has become well-known to consumers through its hard work, innovation and substantial investment in branding. As a result of its endeavors, Forever has created and owns valuable intellectual properties in the - -

Case :-cv-00-jfw-agr Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 form of trademarks and copyrights.. Forever owns numerous copyrighted designs which it features on its clothing and accessories. Amongst these copyrighted designs is the design designated FPD (the Design ), for which Forever has sought United States Copyright Registration and has obtained registration therefore under the United States Copyright registration number VAu -- (the Copyright ). Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the Design. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of the United States Copyright certificate for VAu --. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is an example of Forever s Design featured on pants sold by Forever.. Particularly in light of the success of Forever and Forever s clothing, as well as the reputation Forever has gained, Forever and its products have become targets for unscrupulous individuals and entities who wish to unlawfully imitate Forever s copyrighted styles and designs.. Forever has became aware that Defendants were manufacturing, offering for sale, selling and/or sold clothing items which embodied designs that wholly and completely copied Forever s Design and which is protected by Forever s Copyright therein.. Plaintiff is the exclusive owner of the Copyright inured in the Design, and which protects the Design, which is original.. Defendants have and had actual notice of Forever s exclusive rights in Forever s copyrights in Forever s Design. 0. Defendants did not seek and failed to obtain consent or authorization from Plaintiff to utilize, manufacture, reproduce, copy, display, derive, commercially distribute or market in commerce or otherwise use Forever s Design which is protected by Forever s Copyright.. Without permission, Defendants intentionally and knowingly reproduced, copied, displayed, manufactured, derived, and distributed products - -

Case :-cv-00-jfw-agr Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 embodying colorable imitations of Forever s Design which is protected by Forever s Copyright in the Design. Indeed, Defendants unlawful products embody designs which copy every element of Forever s Design which is protected by Forever s Copyright in the Design.. Defendants intentionally and willfully applied their infringing designs to clothing items and other products, as well as in advertising materials, in connection with its fraudulent sales, offerings for sale, distribution, and display of their unlawful goods.. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Defendants, and each of them, if not directly liable for infringement of Plaintiff s Copyright in the Design, are vicariously liable for said infringements because they had the right and ability to supervise the infringing conduct and because they had a direct financial interest in the infringing conduct.. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleged that by reason of Defendants acts of copyright infringement as alleged above, Plaintiff has suffered and will continue to suffer substantial damages to its business in the form of diversion of trade, loss of income and profits, and dilution and destruction of the value of its rights, all in amounts which are not yet fully ascertainable but which will be proven at trial.. Due to Defendants acts of infringement, Plaintiff has also suffered general and special damages including, without limitation, damages resulting from Plaintiff having to investigate and analyze Defendants infringing conduct, and hiring counsel, all in an amount to be established at trial.. Moreover, as a direct result of the acts of infringement alleged above by the Defendants, and each of them, Defendants have obtained direct or indirect profits they would not otherwise have realized but for their infringements. Plaintiff is entitled to a disgorgement of each Defendants profits directly and indirectly attributable to said Defendants infringement of Plaintiff s Design and - -

Case :-cv-00-jfw-agr Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 Copyright.. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Defendants and each of them knowingly and intentionally copied Plaintiff s Design, making their conduct willful and intentional, subjecting Defendants and each of them, to liability thereof, including for statutory damages under Section 0(a) of the Copyright Act at Plaintiff s election within the time permitted by law.. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleged that Defendants continue to infringe Plaintiff s copyrights and that Defendants infringing conduct has and will cause Plaintiff irreparable harm unless Defendants are enjoined from continuing and engaging in future acts of infringement against Plaintiff. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION (Contributory Infringement of Copyright against all Defendants, and DOES -0, Inclusive). Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges every allegation set forth in Paragraphs -. 0. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Defendants knowingly induced, participated, and aided and abetted in, and profited from, the copying and/or subsequent selling of garments and/or fabrics featuring Forever s Design, as alleged herein above.. By reason of Defendants acts of contributory copyright infringement, Plaintiff has suffered and will continue to suffer substantial damage to its business in the form of diversion of trade, loss of income and profits, and dilution and destruction of the value of its rights, all in amounts to be established at trial.. Due to Defendants acts of contributory infringement, Plaintiff has also suffered general and special damages including, without limitation, damages resulting from Plaintiff having has to investigate and analyze Defendants infringing conduct, and hiring attorneys, all in an amount to be established at trial. - -

Case :-cv-00-jfw-agr Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0. Moreover, as a direct result of the acts of contributory copyright infringement by Defendants, Defendants, and each of them, have obtained direct and indirect profits directly and indirectly attributable to Defendants infringement of Forever s Design. Because of the wide scope and extent of the infringement of Forever s Design by Defendants, the amount of Defendants profits cannot be presently ascertained or estimated.. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Defendant and each of them knowingly and intentionally copies Forever s Design, making their conduct willful and intentional, subjecting Defendants and each of them to liability therefor, including, but not limited to, statutory damages under Section 0(c)() of the Copyright Act. Within the time permitted by law, Forever will make its election between actual damages and statutory damages. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Forever, Inc., prays for judgment against Defendant C Luce, Inc., a California corporation doing business as TCEC, Defendant Cornerstone Apparel, Inc., a California corporation doing business as Papaya, and Does through 0, inclusive, and each of them, as follows: A. For an award of Defendants profits and Plaintiff s damages in an amount to be proven at trial for copyright infringement under U.S.C. 0(a); B. In the alternative to actual damages and Defendants profits pursuant to U.S.C. 0(b), for statutory damages pursuant to U.S.C. 0(c), which election Plaintiff will make prior to the rendering of final judgment; C. For an injunction by this Court prohibiting Defendants from engaging or continuing to engage in the unlawful, unfair, or fraudulent business acts or practices described herein, including the advertising, selling, offering for sale using and/or dealing in Plaintiff s copyrighted works or other intellectual property right of Plaintiff; acts of copyright infringement; and - -

Case :-cv-00-jfw-agr Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 any other act in derogation of Plaintiff s rights; D. For an order from the Court requiring that Defendants provide complete accountings and for equitable relief, including that Defendants disgorge and return or pay their ill-gotten gains obtained from the illegal transactions entered into and or pay restitution, including the amount of monies that should have been paid if Defendants complied with their legal obligations, or as equity requires; E. For an order from the Court that an asset freeze or constructive trust be imposed over all monies and profits in Defendants possession which rightfully belong to Plaintiff; F. For destruction of the infringing articles in Defendants possession under U.S.C. 0; G. For damages in an amount to be proven at trial for unjust enrichment; H. For an award of exemplary or punitive damages in an amount to be determined by the Court; I. For Plaintiff s reasonable attorney s fees; J. For all costs of suit; and K. For such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and equitable. DATED: January, 0 / / / / / / JOHNSON & PHAM, LLP By: /s/christopher Q. Pham Christopher D. Johnson, Esq. Christopher Q. Pham, Esq. Marcus F. Chaney, Esq. Jason R. Vener, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff - -

Case :-cv-00-jfw-agr Document Filed 0// Page 0 of Page ID #:0 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff Forever, Inc. respectfully demands a trial by jury in this action pursuant to Local Rule -. 0 0 DATED: January, 0 JOHNSON & PHAM, LLP By: /s/christopher Q. Pham Christopher D. Johnson, Esq. Christopher Q. Pham, Esq. Marcus F. Chaney, Esq. Jason R. Vener, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff - 0 -

Case :-cv-00-jfw-agr Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:

Case :-cv-00-jfw-agr Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:

Case :-cv-00-jfw-agr Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:

Case :-cv-00-jfw-agr Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:

Case :-cv-00-jfw-agr Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:

Case :-cv-00-jfw-agr Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:

Case :-cv-00-jfw-agr Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: