LOCAL STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT 2018

Similar documents
2. Challenges and Opportunities for Sheffield to 2034

Dobwalls and Trewidland Neighbourhood Development Plan: section 3. Evidence Base document - fourth draft September 2018

GCE. Edexcel GCE. Geography A (8214 / 9214) Summer Edexcel GCE. Mark Scheme (Results) Geography A (8214 / 9214)

Appendix A: Economic Development and Culture Trends in Toronto Data Analysis

Rural Wiltshire An overview

Population and Dwelling Counts

Assessment of Demographic & Community Data Updates & Revisions

How s Life in Poland?

How s Life in Portugal?

ARTICLES. Poverty and prosperity among Britain s ethnic minorities. Richard Berthoud

Statistics Update For County Cavan

How s Life in Slovenia?

How s Life in Estonia?

How s Life in the United Kingdom?

Korea s average level of current well-being: Comparative strengths and weaknesses

Residential & labour market connections of deprived neighbourhoods in Greater Manchester & Leeds City Region. Ceri Hughes & Ruth Lupton

How s Life in the Czech Republic?

EMBARGOED UNTIL THURSDAY 9/5 AT 12:01 AM

How s Life in France?

Italy s average level of current well-being: Comparative strengths and weaknesses

How s Life in Hungary?

Quality of life is. Measuring Development

How s Life in the Slovak Republic?

How s Life in Greece?

How s Life in Austria?

How s Life in Sweden?

12 Socio Economic Effects

Item No Halifax Regional Council July 19, 2016

Situational Analysis: Peterborough & the Kawarthas

How s Life in the United States?

How s Life in Canada?

ANNUAL SURVEY REPORT: REGIONAL OVERVIEW

Paper 4.1 Public Health Reform (PHR) Public Health Priorities For Scotland Public Health Oversight Board 19 th April 2018

POLICY BRIEFING. Poverty in Suburbia: Smith Institute report

Migration Statistics and Service Planning in Luton and the Potential Implications of BREXIT

How s Life in Germany?

Ward profile information packs: Ryde North East

How s Life in Finland?

Community Social Profile Cambridge and North Dumfries

How s Life in Ireland?

Background. Response Rate and Age Profile of Respondents. Community Facilities and Amenities. Transport Issues. Employment and Employment Land Issues

Black and Minority Ethnic Group communities in Hull: Health and Lifestyle Summary

How s Life in Belgium?

Social and Demographic Trends in Burnaby and Neighbouring Communities 1981 to 2006

How s Life in the Netherlands?

ndtv.com POPULATION Ann Maureen Samm-Regis

AHURI Research & Policy Bulletin

Section 1: Demographic profile

How s Life in New Zealand?

Land Use, Job Accessibility and Commuting Efficiency under the Hukou System in Urban China: A Case Study in Guangzhou

Northern Lights. Public policy and the geography of political attitudes in Britain today.

Meeting the needs of Somali residents

how neighbourhoods are changing A Neighbourhood Change Typology for Eight Canadian Metropolitan Areas,

How s Life in Australia?

Chile s average level of current well-being: Comparative strengths and weaknesses

How s Life in Iceland?

Austerity, Poverty and Social Inequalities: Contextualising Health Inequalities in Scotland

How s Life in Turkey?

How s Life in Norway?

How s Life in Denmark?

How s Life in Mexico?

Island Monitor 4. Population, Migration and Demographic Trends SAMPLE

London Measured. A summary of key London socio-economic statistics. City Intelligence. September 2018

Brexit: How should we vote? 2017 Manifesto Review

Outlook - Winter 2018

British Hospitality Association: Recommendations to Government

SACOSS ANTI-POVERTY WEEK STATEMENT

A New Sound in the Suburbs

STRENGTHENING RURAL CANADA: Fewer & Older: Population and Demographic Crossroads in Rural Saskatchewan. An Executive Summary

11. Demographic Transition in Rural China:

Table A2-1. Civilian Labor Force, Sanford/Springvale Labor Force Unemployed Unemployment Rate 5.8% 5.

Japan s average level of current well-being: Comparative strengths and weaknesses

How s Life in Switzerland?

Social and Economic Indicators

EMPLOYMENT AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN THE MISSISSIPPI DELTA. A Summary Report from the 2003 Delta Rural Poll

Skills Report Position Paper 7: Semi-Skilled Labour

Home Building Workforce Census 2017

Rural Bill of Rights

Mapping migrants: Australians wide-ranging experiences of immigration

STRENGTHENING RURAL CANADA: Fewer & Older: The Coming Population and Demographic Challenges in Rural Newfoundland & Labrador

Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health response to the Migration Advisory Committee call for evidence: Review of Tier 2

GLASGOW: TRANSFORMATION CITY DISCUSSION PAPER

Assessing change in levels of deprivation in the GoWell study areas

Regina City Priority Population Study Study #1 - Aboriginal People. August 2011 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Northern Ireland Peace Monitoring Report. Number Five. October 2018

Headline Results on Ethnicity in Hull from the 2011 Census & Hull BME Survey

NATIONAL HOUSEHOLD SURVEY: LABOUR FORCE, EMPLOYMENT, AND INCOME

OLDER INDUSTRIAL CITIES

STRENGTHENING RURAL CANADA: Summary of Rural British Columbia Community Visits

A Look Behind the Numbers: Hidden Counties in the Fourth District States

DANISH TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE. Supporting Digital Literacy Public Policies and Stakeholder Initiatives. Topic Report 2.

International Investor Perceptions and the Nation Brand - Views from Germany. Brand South Africa Research Note. By:

Rural Manitoba Profile:

Sanctuary and Solidarity in Scotland A strategy for supporting refugee and receiving communities

Future direction of the immigration system: overview. CABINET PAPER (March 2017)

Openness and Poverty Reduction in the Long and Short Run. Mark R. Rosenzweig. Harvard University. October 2003

UK notification to the European Commission to extend the compliance deadline for meeting PM 10 limit values in ambient air to 2011

Spain s average level of current well-being: Comparative strengths and weaknesses

Post-Secondary Education, Training and Labour September Profile of the New Brunswick Labour Force

8 Conclusions and recommedations

Transcription:

NORTH EAST FIFE LOCAL STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT 2018 Fife Council Research Team

1. Overview The Local Strategic Assessment provides an overview of how a Local Area is doing. It collates and updates a wide range of information to give key input for the refresh of Local Community Plans and input into the wider Fife-wide Strategic Assessment. The North East Fife Area Local Community Plan is built around 3 key priorities for the area: Supporting the Elderly Population Promotion of Business and Tourism Connectivity REPORT CONTACT: Fife Council Research Team Fife House, Glenrothes. Contact- Dr William Penrice, Research Manager William.penrice@fife.gov.uk 1

2. Local Assessment Findings Place Community Major issues for area Local Community Plan Supporting the Elderly Population Promotion of Business and Tourism Connectivity Least improvement needed Natural Space Feeling Safe Most improvement needed Work and Local Economy Influence and Sense of Control Housing and Community Traffic and Parking Funding for public services NHS / Hospitals / Healthcare Increasing elderly population Education / schools Economy Access to Housing Now seen as more of an issue for area Poverty / inequality Cost of living Local Outcomes Poorest outcomes Parts of Cupar and Tayport Better outcomes Profile North East Fife covers more than half the area of Fife and is home to 1 in 5 of Fife s people Area characterised by agriculture, fishing and tourism Reliance on public sector Education and health for employment It is one of the least deprived areas of Fife. People Horizons and strategic challenges There has been little change for people living in North East Fife Rural residents do well within the area but less well than elsewhere Students do particularly well within the area Overall population will reduce over the next 25 years, one of only two areas in Fife to show a reduction in population NEF expected to show the largest drop in people living in an area. Numbers of Children are expected to remain constant, while Working Age will decrease the most of all areas in Fife. Older people numbers, while expected to increase over next 20 years, before starting to decline, show smallest growth rate of all areas in Fife. Several transport infrastructure investment priorities are being identified, and St Andrews University s project to expand into Guardbridge town expected to help employment in the area. The V & A in Dundee is expected to increase visitors and have a positive benefit for North East Fife tourism. Uncertainty over future local economic impact of Brexit St Andrews and Strathkinness Not doing as well as expected Crail and Boarhills Elie, Colinsburgh and Largoward Newburgh 2

3. Profile POPULATION 74,674 CHILDREN WORKING AGE AREA 775.8 SQ KM 56.5% of Area of Fife 20% of Fife s population OLDER PEOPLE 10,461 48,035 31,376 North East Fife area is the largest of Fife s seven areas, and stretches from the River Tay in the North, to the Firth of Forth in the south east. St Andrews is the largest town, followed by other main settlements, including Cupar, Newburgh, Auchtermuchty, Newport and Anstruther. The area is much less reliant on manufacturing and heavy industry than other areas in Fife, and is characterised by rural, agricultural and fishing industries, together with tourism in the East Neuk and St Andrews. North East Fife is one of the least deprived areas of Fife, with only 1 of 96 datazones in the area featuring in the 20% most deprived for Scotland (SIMD 2016). Across North East Fife area, 6.7% of the total population is income deprived (compared to 12.4% for Fife), while 5.7% of the working age population is employment deprived (compared to 11.0% for Fife). HOUSEHOLDS 35,017 79.4% with at least one car/van 60.0% owner occupied 13.8% social rented 15.5% private rented 30.6% live alone Figure 3.2 Bar code chart show relative deprivation in Area (top) compared to Fife (bottom), SIMD 2016 572 median weekly income (before housing) 27.5% in fuel poverty 14.5% in poverty (before housing) 10.5% children in poverty ECONOMY 62.1% Economically active of which 54.5 % Employed Full Time 18.4 % Employed Part Time MAIN EMPLOYMENT AREAS 30.7% Education & Health 15.4% Wholesale Retail and Transport 17.4% Finance & Professional 6.7% Construction 0.8% Universal Credit 0.6% Universal Credit (16-24) 5.7% Employment deprivation Figure 3.1 Overview Profile for the Area WELFARE AND BENEFITS WELFARE REFORM CHANGES: Expected loss to local economy per year by 2020 21.8 million per year 460 per working age adult Figure 3.3 Map highlighting the 5, 10, 15 and 20% most deprived datazones within the Area, SIMD 2016 3

4. Place Place is an important element of Local Community Planning. Using the national Place Standard tool, local people were asked to consider aspects of the physical and social environment where they live and to paint a picture of the place and what needed to improve. Through comparing the results of Place Surveys in 2016 and 2018 we can get a picture of how the Area is changing, and use this snapshot as a background benchmark for any local use of the Place Standard within local communities across the Area. In the North East Fife Area in 2018, a consistent picture emerges in relation to local people s perception of place, compared to the results of the previous Place Survey in 2016. Natural Space, and Feeling Safe continue to be identified as needing the least improvement in the North East Fife Area. Work and Local Economy, Influence and Sense of Control, Housing and Community, and Traffic and Parking are identified as in need of the most improvement within the North East Fife Area. Compared to other areas of Fife, North East Fife is viewed positively across a range of aspects of place, particularly in relation to Natural Space and Feeling Safe. Aspects of spaces and facilities are also viewed positively. North East Fife Area is generally rated highly for aspects of social wellbeing including Social Interaction, and Identity and Belonging. Getting around is an area that is identified as being need of relative improvement within North East Fife Area. The same can also be said of Work and Local Economy, Housing and Community, and Influence and Sense of Control. Figure 4.1 Community perceptions of where improvement is needed in the area using the Place Standard, and how it has changed between 2016 and 2018. The outer part of the diagram (score 7) means little room for improvement, while the inner part (score 1) represents most need for improvement (Fife People s Panel, Survey 29, 2018) Note: given sampling variability and variation within each area we cannot at this stage say with any certainty if change between 2016 and 2018 has been significant. Figure 4.2 Colour shaded diagram of how different aspects of Place are viewed across Fife (Place Standard, Fife People s Panel, Survey 29, 2018) 4

5. People Simply looking at where people live only gives part of the picture. We want to understand how well different groups of people are doing compared to others in the area and throughout Scotland Students continue to do well in North East Fife, and compared to students living elsewhere in Scotland. Those living in less densely populated suburban areas are doing well in the area, and compared to similar households elsewhere in Scotland. Those living in urban areas of North East Fife continue to do relatively well, including those in retirement. Those in the constrained city type are doing least well in North East Fife, but are doing better than other similar types of people living elsewhere in Scotland. Rural residents - while doing well within the area continue to do less well compared with rural residents living in other parts of Scotland. There has been little change for people living in North East Fife as a whole, nor for different categories of communities living within the area. A number of household types show significant positive change between 2012 and 2016, compared to other similar households elsewhere in Scotland, but these tend to account for a minority of household types within the area rather than more prevalent household types. Rural households showing as improving relative to other areas include renting rural retirement, rural white collar workers and families. Multiethnic professionals, and migrant commuters and families also see improvements compared to other similar communities elsewhere in Scotland. While improvement is seen for a number of household types within the constrained city dweller category, including retired communal and independent city dwellers, the larger groups within this category within the area, such as outer city hardship and hampered aspiration, have not changed significantly between 2012 and 2016. Hard-pressed european settlers and young hard-pressed families show the greatest improvement across North East Fife Area relative to other similar households elsewhere in Scotland. Figure 5.1 How different types of people are doing within the area (based on Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation 2016 and 2011 Census Output Area Classification) Figure 5.2 How different people are doing within the area between 2012 and 2016 (based on Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation and 2011 Census Output Area Classification) RPG is Relative to Peer Group Index, zero is same, negative is less favourable, positive is better. Colours show red as poorest performing to green, best performing. Change shows direction of change from 2012 to 2016, no arrow indicates no significant change. 5

6. Community Insights into how communities are faring are a critical input when considering local places. We asked local people about a range of issues, particularly whether they saw this as a major issue, a minor issue, or not an issue in their local area. Funding for public services, NHS / Hospitals / Healthcare and increasing elderly population are seen as the major issues for both North East Fife and Fife. Education / schools, Economy and Access to suitable housing are also seen as major issues for the area. Compared to two years ago, Migration / changing population and Crime / antisocial behaviour are now seen as less of an issue, while Poverty / inequality, Funding for public services, and Cost of living are now seen as more of an issue for North East Fife area. Change Less More To what extent is this a major issue in local area? As with all areas of Fife, the majority of local people in North East Fife Area would like more involvement in decisions that the Council makes that affect their local area. 40% of people in North East Fife Area feel that they can influence decisions that affect their local area (27% for Fife). Within North East Fife Area, more than half of local people believe the Council provides high quality services, does the best it can with the money available, is good at letting people know about the services that it provides, and designs it services around the needs of those who use them. The perception is that the Council is less good at addressing the key issues affecting the quality of life in local neighbourhoods, and letting people know how well it is performing. Within the area, fewer people believe that the Council is good at listening to local people s views before it takes decisions. North East Fife Area is generally above Fife across a number of statements relating in local people s views on the Council and the services that it provides. It is below Fife for perceptions of the Council as addressing key issues affecting quality of Fife in their local neighbourhood, being good at listening to local people, and letting local people know how it is performing. Views on local Council and services it provides Figure 6.1 Community perceptions of what is a major issue in the area (Fife People s Panel, Survey 28, 2017) Figure 6.2 Views on local Council and services it provides (Fife People s Panel, Survey 30, 2018) 6

7. Local Outcomes Local community planning requires a good understanding of differences within and between neighbourhoods. The table below shows the overall pattern of outcomes for neighbourhoods in the area, and whether local neighbourhoods are improving over time. It identifies how different neighbourhoods within the area are faring in relation to key life outcomes. This includes outcomes across early years, older people, safer and stronger communities, health and wellbeing, employment and economy. The neighbourhoods with the poorest outcomes in the North East Fife Area continue to be Tayport and Cupar Central. Areas with better life outcomes include St Andrews North and Strathkinness, and St Andrews South West. Neighbourhoods showing the least improvement in life outcomes include Crail and Boarhills, Elie Colinsburgh and Largoward, and Newburgh. The greatest improvement in life outcomes can be seen across St Andrews. Dairsie Ceres and Dunino, and Crail and Boarhills have improved less than might have been expected when compared with other similar neighbourhoods, while St Andrews has improved more than expected. Kettle and Ladybank, and Tayport are doing worse than expected when compared to similar neighbourhoods elsewhere in Scotland, whilst St Andrews continues to do better than expected compared with other similar neighbourhoods. Figure 7.1 and 7.2 How different neighbourhoods are doing on key life outcomes relative to other comparable areas (Improvement Service, Community Planning Outcomes Profile Tool 2018) 7

8. Horizons It is nearly impossible to predict the future, however it is possible to identify challenges which are already on the horizon. Demography Over the next 25 years, North East Fife Area s overall population is estimated to reduce by around 2,100 (3%) to 72,500 people, and is the area showing the largest drop in overall numbers of people living in an area. The number of children is expected to remain fairly constant at around 10,400 over the 25-year period. Working age numbers are estimated to reduce by around 6,300 (13%), (the largest decrease in numbers for this age group across all areas of Fife). Older people numbers are expected to increase over the next 20 years, before starting to decline thereafter. This will mean another 4,200 older people by 2041 for North East Fife, although this is the slowest growth rate (26%) for this age group, of all the areas in Fife. Across the North East Fife Committee area all 36 primary schools are operating within capacity. Capacity pressures are expected at Cupar North and St Andrews West due to large scale housing developments and each of these sites are to provide a new primary school to support the new housing. Pupil numbers at the 3 high schools are expected to increase in association with the growth of the new housing areas and additional capacity may be required in these areas. The project to replace Madras College on a new single-site is ongoing. Economy The Tay Cities deal includes a project to develop a regional transport model to help identify transport infrastructure investment priorities, which might include the Newburgh rail halt, rail link to St Andrews, investment in A92 beyond Glenrothes, Taybridge Park and Ride. The University of St Andrews project is for Eden Campus, Guardbridge to enable the university to expand in the town, create new jobs and also develop its centre for excellence in energy and sustainability. It will help deliver local jobs in North East Fife. The opening of the V & A in Dundee in September 2018, is expected to be a significant draw for visitors to the Dundee and surrounding area, and bring positive benefits to Tourism in North East Fife. Welfare reform changes, including managed migration to universal credit, will continue to impact on local people and the local economy. 21.9 million is expected to be lost from North East Fife Area per year by 2020, as a result of both pre and post 2015 reforms. That s a loss of 460 per working age adult in the area compared to 655 for Fife. St Andrews is least affected both within the area and across Scotland. Considerable uncertainty remains about the economic impact of Brexit with impact unclear and difficult to predict until agreement is reached on fundamental issues such as trade, movement of people, or governing legislation. As Fife is heavily dominated by public sector industries, Brexit may have less of an effect compared to areas more reliant on private sector manufacturing, financial and knowledge industries. Labour supply for specific industries in Fife, such as agriculture, hospitality and lower skilled processing occupations, will experience more limited availability, as greater restrictions will be placed on EU workers that have traditionally filled these roles over the last decade (although these industries form a small part of the overall Fife workforce). It is likely that alternative funding sources will need to be secured to replace funding previously available through the EU. Environment The Fife Pilgrim Way heritage project is developing a new long distance walking route through inland Fife. Starting at Culross and North Queensferry, the 104 km/64 mile path takes in spectacular views of the Highlands, the Coast, Forth and Tay Estuaries and the Lomond Hills. It passes medieval landmarks, industrial landscapes and historic picturesque villages on its way to St. Andrews. Technology The Digital Scotland rollout programme is extending fibre broadband across Fife. North East Fife has lower superfast and fibre coverage, at 89.4%. Mobile investment is being planned for a number of areas of North East Fife. Other connectivity investments for North East Fife include Community Broadband. Changes such as the closure of physical bank branches, may have a disproportionate impact in rural areas and disadvantage segments of society less able to use online services. Figure 8.1 Projected change in population of the area over the period 2016 to 2041 (Fife Council Research) Figure 8.2 Local impact of welfare reforms (2016, CRESR, Sheffield Hallam University) 8