v C;t),!<elJ I/U/:1 01 0

Similar documents
Augusta for purposes of taking a polygraph examination. The Oakland police officer

ORDER ON MOTION TO SUPPRESS

looanil~~~ Information regarding the "slug" found after trial, State's Exhibit 33, and '

DECISION POCKET NO.: CR STATE OF MAINE RUSSELL BISHOP

{/f\1- KL~J--()r//I)D!J

EN I E R E D DEC

) ) ) ORDER ON MOTION TO SUPPRESS ) ) ) )

FINDINGS. 1. On August 15, 2011 Karyn Kundishora was the occupant of an apartment located

r<t:n-jvlr1 V{~ Vo -fl1-/lt-

_v i-i /vl. 1<'!::-,v if.j/:)o! 0

0 s gw.der ON MOTION TO SUPPRESS ) ) )

1-"" c..:n ''T.J 3.:!-"' ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Defendant Chad Gurney moves to suppress all evidence obtained as a. result of two search warrants issued on May 29, 2009, and June 9,2009. Mr.

The defendant is charged with Gross Sexual Assault and Unlawful Sexual

BACKGROUND. The defendant, Catrina Lynn Seymore (Seymore), is charged with one count ofengaging

Hearing on the Defendant's motion to suppress was held on May 1, The Defendant

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO. The indictment. Defendant James Sparks-Henderson is charged with the November 21, 2014, aggravated

declaratory judgment (count II). The defendant filed an answer and a counterclaim

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 19th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA

CRIMINAL DEFENSE COURT PROCESS

ELIGIBILITY AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR SEALING OF CRIMINAL RECORDS Based upon Ohio Revised Code

Criminal Justice Process

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

Follow this and additional works at:

U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida (Jacksonville) CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:02-cr HES All Defendants

Title 15: COURT PROCEDURE -- CRIMINAL

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CHESTER COUNTY

INMATE FORM FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS INSTRUCTIONS READ CAREFULLY

CRIMINAL CASE CHECKLIST (State Court)

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF BUCKS COUNTY

APPENDIX A RULES GOVERNING PRACTICE IN THE MUNICIPAL COURTS

... : _.~.. The defendant in this case has filed three motions for relief regarding cases in

THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO ) ) ) ) ) )

ORDER ON MOTION TO SUPPRESS

303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska Fax: (907) appellate.courts.state.ak.us

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH 1 2

STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) SS.

Cross-Examination Checklist

The defendant owns a ten-lot subdivision on Route 201 in Vassalboro, Maine

STATE OF OHIO, COLUMBIANA COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT

Course Court Systems and Practices. Unit X Pre-trial

Pretrial Release and Detention: A First Look

TEXAS CRIMINAL DEFENSE FORMS ANNOTATED

Case 8:15-cr JLS Document 59 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:300 United States District Court Central District of California

Defendant in the above case has moved to dismiss, arguing that he cannot be

STATE OF OHIO ) CASE NO. CR ) Plaintiff, ) JUDGE JOHN P. O DONNELL ) vs. ) ) LOUIS BAUER ) JOURNAL ENTRY ) Defendant. )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

Felony Cases. Police Investigation. Associate Circuit Court. Felony Versus Misdemeanor

109 East Main Street SCHNITTKE & SMITH McConnelsville, Ohio South High Street, P. O. Box 542 New Lexington, Ohio 43764

RULE 509. USE OF SUMMONS OR WARRANT OF ARREST IN COURT CASES.

IN THE DISTRICT/SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT BARROW , ) ) Defendant. ) DOB: DOV: ) Case No.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT WYANDOT COUNTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO

sample obtained from the defendant on the basis that any consent given by the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS * CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHTO. The indictment

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

COURT RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 12 TABLE OF CONTENTS

In its complaint, the plaintiff Northeast Bank (Bank) seeks to foreclose on

INMATE FORM FOR CIVIL ACTIONS FILED IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA

MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLOCKS, HAROLD W. L., Judge of the Superior Court.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D09-9

The petitioner seeks judicial review of the respondent's denial of a request for

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT - CRIMINAL DIVISION

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF WAYNE ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 3:21. SENTENCE AND JUDGMENT; WITHDRAWAL OF PLEA; PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION; PROBATION

MOTION TO SUPPRESS ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Southern Division - Santa Ana) CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 8:07-cr AG-1

Courtroom Terminology

PORT ORCHARD MUNICIPAL COURT LOCAL COURT RULES

United States District Court Northern District of Illinois - CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6,1 (Chicago) CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:15-cr All Defendants

ONLINE PROGRAM Interpreting in Criminal Proceedings I Midterm Exam

Case 8:07-cr AG Document 141 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:2159. United States District Court Central District of California

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. L Trial Court No.

The Courts CHAPTER. Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 7E by Frank Schmalleger

PA Huntingdon Cty. Civ. LR 205 This document is current with amendments received through June 1, 2016

Submitted July 25, 2017 Decided August 4, Before Judges Reisner and Suter.

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : : VS. : NO. : :

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT. For plaintiff-appellee: : JOURNAL ENTRY vs. : and : OPINION KEITH RICKS : For defendant-appellant:

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. The State of New Hampshire. Thomas Auger Docket No. 01-S-388, 389 ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA No STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellant : JOURNAL ENTRY. vs.

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA OPINION AND ORDER

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):


COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REGULATORY AGENCIES. Division of Professions and Occupations. Office of Naturopathic Doctors COLORADO REGULATIONS (CCR) 749-1

CHAPTER 10. RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE FOR THE PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL COURT AND THE PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL COURT TRAFFIC DIVISION

Escambia Clerk of the Circuit Court. Escambia County Florida Clerk of the Circuit Court Courtviewer Records Search

CRIMINAL & TRAFFIC DIVISION COST SCHEDULE

OFFICE OF CIRCUIT JUDGE ELIZABETH V. KRIER COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, BUILDING L NAPLES, FLORIDA TELEPHONE:

Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendment Rights

This matter is before the court on State Tax Assessor's motion to dismiss. The

When Good Students Go Bad

2100R ST V KENDRICK D WAGNER. This information is provided as a service and is not considered an official court reco

COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT PAULDING COUNTY. v. O P I N I O N. v. O P I N I O N

Defending a Federal Criminal Case: Detention & Release. Lunchtime CLE April 3, 2015 Laine Cardarella Federal Defender, WDMO

CHAPTER 4. ADJUDICATORY HEARING

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT-CRIMINAL DIVISION

FINAL REPORT 1 PROCEDURES WHEN DEFENDANT FAILS TO APPEAR FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING

Transcription:

STATE OF MAINE KENNEBEC, SS. STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT CRIMINAL ACTION D9cket No. CR-09-942 v C;t),!<elJ I/U/:1 01 0 v. DECISION JASON H. LOMBARDO, Defendant Defendant has moved to suppress statements made by him while he was in custody and prior to being Mirandized. The evidence on State's #1, a DVD of Mr. Lombardo at the police station, reveals that for most of the pre-miranda period, neither Mr. Lombardo nor the officer booking him said anything at all. There are long, silent pauses while the officer types information into his computer. The officer did ask for addresses, an update on tattoos, marital status, occupation, and girlfriend's name and number (she was coming to pick Mr. Lombardo up), but those are obviously standard booking questions not requiring a Miranda warning. After learning what specific charges were under consideration, the officer informed Mr. Lombardo without asking him any questions. When Mr. Lombardo speculated that the charges were felonies, the officer said, "Yes." When Mr. Lombardo asked why he was being charged with conspiracy, the officer explained that he did not know, that it was not his case, and that Mr. Lombardo would have to be patient and wait for the detectives, who would answer all of Mr. Lombardo's questions. That is the opposite of an interrogation.

At one point, Mr. Lombardo started bemoaning his association with "bikers." He said he knew who the police were looking for. He said he would do the right thing as long as the police protected his daughter. The officer basically said nothing and continued to type into the computer. Once again, this is not an interrogation. Early in the booking process, the officer asked Mr. Lombardo if he was feeling okay, and Mr. Lombardo responded that he was not guilty and that he should have stayed away from bad people. Also, when Mr. Lombardo was lamenting his fate, the officer said something to the effect that you have a voice on your shoulder telling you what to do. Then he asked about tattoos. That was as close as the officer got to asking questions or making a statement designed to elicit a response. Having watched the DVD, I am satisfied that these remarks did not come close to being an interrogation. There was no need to administer the Miranda warnings until the detectives arrived. When the detectives arrived they immediately and properly informed Mr. Lombardo of his rights. The clerk will make the following docket entry by reference. Defendant Jason Lombardo's motion to suppress is denied in all respects. vl..j3~ William S. Brodrick Justice, Superior Court 2

STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT vs KENNEBEC, ss. Docket No 69 LONG COVE RD SAINT GEORGE ME 04860 DOB: OS/20/1971 Attorney: KEVIN SULLIVAN KEVIN P. SULLIVAN, ESQ P.A. 21 WESTERN AVENUE SUITE 101 AUGUSTA ME 04330-7342 APPOINTED 04/27/2010 State's Attorney: EVERT FOWLE Charge(s) 1 AGGRAVATED TRAFFICKING OF SCHEDULE W DRUG 11/23/2009 WATERVILLE Seq 11072 17-A 1105-A(1) (E) (1) Class A 2 CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY 06/25/2009 WATERVILLE Seq 8370 17-A 151 (1) (B) Class B Charged with COMPLAINT on Suppleme Docket Events: 11/30/2009 FILING DOCUMENT - CASH BAIL BOND FILED ON 11/23/2009 11/30/2009 Charge(s): 1 HEARING - INITIAL APPEARANCE SCHEDULED FOR 01/26/2010 @ 8:30 NOTICE TO PARTIES/COUNSEL 11/30/2009 BAIL BOND - $1,000.00 CASH BAIL BOND FILED ON 11/23/2009 Bail Receipt Type: CR Bail Amt: $1,000 Receipt Type: CK Prvdr Name: Rtrn Name: 12/04/2009 Party(s) : ATTORNEY - RETAINED ENTERED ON 12/04/2009 01/21/2010 Charge(s): 1,2 SUPPLEMENTAL FILING - COMPLAINT FILED ON 01/21/2010 01/21/2010 BAIL BOND - $25,000.00 UNSECURED BAIL BOND FILED ON 01/21/2010 Bail Amt: $25,000 01/21/2010 BAIL BOND - UNSECURED BAIL BOND BAIL RELEASED ON 01/21/2010 01/21/2010 BAIL BOND - UNSECURED BAIL BOND RELEASE ACKNOWLEDGED ON 01/21/2010 Page 1 of 5 Printed on: 06/11/2010

01/26/2010 BAIL BOND - CASH BAIL BOND CONTINUED AS POSTED ON 01/26/2010 DONALD H MARDEN, JUSTICE 01/26/2010 Charge (s): 1 HEARING - INITIAL APPEARANCE HELD ON 01/26/2010 DONALD H MARDEN, JUSTICE Reporter: TAMMY DROUIN 01/26/2010 Charge(s): 1,2 HEARING - STATUS CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 03/23/2010 @ 10:00 01/26/2010 Charge(s): 1,2 PLEA - NO ANSWER ENTERED BY DEFENDANT ON 01/26/2010 01/27/2010 Charge (s): 1,2 HEARING - STATUS CONFERENCE NOTICE SENT ON 01/26/2010 03/23/2010 Charge(s): 1,2 HEARING - STATUS CONFERENCE HELD ON 03/23/2010 JOHN NIVISON, JUSTICE DA: BRAD GRANT ER 03/23/2010 HEARING - STATUS CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 04/13/2010 @ 10:00 03/23/2010 MOTION - MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF CNSL FILED BY DEFENDANT ON 03/23/2010 03/24/2010 MOTION - MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF CNSL GRANTED ON 03/23/2010 COpy TO PARTIES/COUNSEL 03/24/2010 MOTION - MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF CNSL MADE ORALLY BY DEF ON 03/23/2010 03/24/2010 MOTION - MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF CNSL GRANTED ON 03/23/2010 JOHN NIVISON, JUSTICE 03/24/2010 Party(s): ATTORNEY - WITHDRAWN ORDERED ON 03/23/2010 03/24/2010 Party(s) : ATTORNEY - PARTIALLY INDIGENT ORDERED ON 03/23/2010 Attorney: JAMES BILLINGS 03/24/2010 HEARING - STATUS CONFERENCE NOTICE SENT ON 03/24/2010 03/25/2010 HEARING - STATUS CONFERENCE NOT HELD ON 03/25/2010 03/25/2010 Charge (s): 1,2 SUPPLEMENTAL FILING - INDICTMENT FILED ON 03/25/2010 03/25/2010 Charge(s): 1,2 HEARING - ARRAIGNMENT SCHEDULED FOR 04/27/2010 @ 8:30 03/25/2010 Charge(s): 1,2 Page 2 of 5 Printed on: 06/11/2010

HEARING - ARRAIGNMENT NOTICE SENT ON 04/09/2010 03/30/2010 MOTION - MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF CNSL FILED BY COUNSEL ON 03/30/2010 03/31/2010 MOTION - MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF CNSL GRANTED ON 03/31/2010 03/31/2010 Party(s): ATTORNEY - WITHDRAWN ORDERED ON 03/31/2010 Attorney: JAMES BILLINGS 03/31/2010 MOTION - MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF CNSL FILED BY DEFENDANT ON 03/31/2010 04/05/2010 Party(s): ATTORNEY - RETAINED ENTERED ON 12/04/2009 04/07/2010 MOTION - MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF CNSL FILED BY COUNSEL ON 04/06/2010 04/09/2010 MOTION - MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF CNSL GRANTED ON 04/07/2010 04/09/2010 Party(s): ATTORNEY - WITHDRAWN ORDERED ON 04/07/2010 04/09/2010 MOTION - MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF CNSL GRANTED ON 04/07/2010 04/09/2010 Party(s): ATTORNEY - APPOINTED ORDERED ON 04/07/2010 Attorney: LISA WHITTIER 04/12/2010 MOTION - MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF CNSL FILED BY COUNSEL ON 04/12/2010 04/27/2010 MOTION - MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF CNSL GRANTED ON 04/27/2010 COpy TO PARTIES/COUNSEL 04/27/2010 Party(s): ATTORNEY - WITHDRAWN ORDERED ON 04/27/2010 Attorney: LISA WHITTIER 04/27/2010 Party(s): ATTORNEY - APPOINTED ORDERED ON 04/27/2010 Attorney: KEVIN SULLIVAN 04/27/2010 Charge (s): 1,2 HEARING - ARRAIGNMENT HELD ON 04/27/2010 READING WAIVED. DEFENDANT INFORMED OF CHARGES. COPY OF INDICTMENT/INFORMATION GIVEN TO Page 3 of 5 Printed on: 06/11/2010

DEFENDANT. 21 DAYS TO FILE MOTIONS 04/27/2010 Charge(s): 1,2 PLEA - NOT GUILTY ENTERED BY DEFENDANT ON 04/27/2010 04/27/2010 Charge(s): 1,2 TRIAL - DOCKET CALL SCHEDULED FOR 06/09/2010 @ 2:00 05/18/2010 Charge(s): 1,2 MOTION - MOTION TO SUPPRESS FILED BY DEFENDANT ON 05/14/2010 05/18/2010 HEARING - MOTION TO SUPPRESS SCHEDULED FOR 06/09/2010 @ 2:00 05/18/2010 NOTICE HEARING TO - PARTIES/COUNSEL MOTION TO SUPPRESS NOTICE SENT ON 05/18/2010 05/18/2010 Charge(s): 1,2 MOTION - MOTION FOR DISCOVERY FILED BY DEFENDANT ON 05/14/2010 05/18/2010 HEARING - MOTION FOR DISCOVERY SCHEDULED FOR 06/09/2010 @ 2:00 05/18/2010 NOTICE HEARING TO - PARTIES/COUNSEL MOTION FOR DISCOVERY NOTICE SENT ON 05/18/2010 OS/27/2010 MOTION - MOTION TO SUPPRESS FILED BY DEFENDANT ON OS/26/2010 OS/27/2010 HEARING - MOTION TO SUPPRESS SCHEDULED FOR 06/09/2010 @ 2:00 06/02/2010 NOTICE TO PARTIES/COUNSEL MOTION - MOTION TO CONTINUE FILED BY DEFENDANT ON 06/02/2010 06/07/2010 MOTION - MOTION TO CONTINUE DENIED ON 06/07/2010 06/09/2010 Charge(s): 1,2 MOTION - MOTION TO DISMISS FILED BY DEFENDANT ON 06/09/2010 06/09/2010 Charge(s): HEARING - 1,2 MOTION TO DISMISS SCHEDULED FOR 06/10/2010 @ 10:00 NOTICE TO PARTIES/COUNSEL 06/10/2010 HEARING - MOTION TO SUPPRESS HELD ON 06/10/2010 Attorney: KEVIN SULLIVAN DA: JAMES MITCHELL 06/10/2010 MOTION - MOTION TO SUPPRESS UNDER ADVISEMENT ON 06/10/2010 HEARING - MOTION TO DISMISS NOT HELD ON 06/10/2010 MOTION - MOTION TO DISMISS MOOT ON 06/10/2010 Page 4 of 5 Printed on: 06/11/2010

06/10/2010 HEARING - MOTION TO SUPPRESS CONTINUED ON 06/09/2010, 06/10/2010 HEARING - MOTION FOR DISCOVERY HELD ON 06/10/2010 06/10/2010 Charge (s): 1,2 MOTION - MOTION FOR DISCOVERY MOOT ON 06/10/2010 MOTION - MOTION TO SUPPRESS UNDER ADVISEMENT ON 06/10/2010 TRIAL - DOCKET CALL HELD ON 06/09/2010 MOTION - MOTION TO CONTINUE MADE ORALLY BY DEF ON 06/10/2010 MOTION - MOTION TO CONTINUE GRANTED ON 06/10/2010 TRIAL - DOCKET CALL SCHEDULED FOR 07/07/2010 06/11/2010 06/11/2010 MOTION WILLIAM COPY TO ORDER - MOTION TO SUPPRESS DENIED ON 06/11/2010 BRODRICK, JUSTICE PARTIES/COUNSEL COURT ORDER FILED ON 06/11/2010 DEFENDANT JASON LOMBARDO'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS IS DENIED IN ALL RESPECTS A TRUE COPY ATTEST: Clerk Page 5 of 5 Printed on: 06/11/2010