SANCTION GUIDANCE DOCUMENT

Similar documents
NRPSI INDICATIVE SANCTIONS GUIDANCE

Guide to sanctioning

Notice of Decision of the Northern Ireland Social Care Council s Conduct Committee

Guidance for the Practice Committees including Indicative Sanctions Guidance

HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC

INDICATIVE SANCTIONS GUIDANCE DRAFT

What to do if a complaint is made about you

Teacher misconduct - the prohibition of teachers

Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Hearing

Administrative Sanctions: imposing warnings and fines

HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC

Indicative Sanctions Guidance Note

HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC

Accountancy Scheme Sanctions Guidance

Guidelines Fit and Proper Person Assessments

In accordance with Rule 41 of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004 the hearing was held in public.

Nursing and Midwifery Council:

HEARING PARTLY HEARD IN PRIVATE*

Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Meeting 23 December 2015 at 2 Stratford Place, Montfichet Road, London, E20 1EJ

Good decision making: Fitness to practise hearings and sanctions guidance

Disciplinary Panel Hearing. Case of. Mr Jason Barkworth MRICS [ ] London SE7. On Wednesday 21 November At RICS 55 Colmore Row, Birmingham

HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC

October Guideline to Disciplinary Committee for Determining Disciplinary Orders

ICMA/NCCCMA Code of Ethics: Rules of Procedure for Enforcement Adopted by the NCCCMA February 8, 2007

HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee

Non-compliance hearings guidance for medical practitioners tribunals

Nursing and Midwifery Council:

3.2 The Code to maintain patient safety and public confidence in the profession.

ICMA Code of Ethics: Rules of Procedure for Enforcement Adopted by the ICMA Executive Board and revised in September 2014

Notice of Decision of the Northern Ireland Social Care Council s Conduct Committee

PROFESSIONAL ETHICS COMMITTEE PROCEDURES MANUAL

PUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations. Medical Practitioner: Date: 03/12/2018. GMC reference number: Review - Misconduct

Indicative Sanctions Guidance

VOLUNTARY REGISTER OF DRIVING INSTRUCTORS GOVERNING POLICY

Indicative Sanctions Guidance

HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC

1. BG s Constitution, its Regulations and the various conditions of membership, registration and affiliation together require that:

Delegated powers policy

Nursing and Midwifery Council:

Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Hearing 17 December 2018

HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC

STUDENT DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE: NON-ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT

Guide to Managing Breaches of the Code of Conduct

Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Meeting Monday 17 October 2016 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE

THERE IS AN ORDER MADE PURSUANT TO S 240 LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS ACT 2006 FOR THE SUPPRESSION OF MEDICAL DETAILS.

Guidance on the RIBA Code of Practice for Chartered Practices - complaint procedures.

HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC

PUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations. Medical Practitioner: Date: 22/10/2018. GMC reference number: Medyczny. Review - Misconduct

Disciplinary Procedure for Staff

[2015] EWHC 854 (QB) 2015 WL

Before the Building Practitioners Board BPB Complaint No. C


Northern Ireland Social Care Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2016

Universiteto. That being registered under the Medical Act 1983, as amended:

PUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations Medical Practitioners Tribunal. Dates: 16/10/ /10/2017

The General Teaching Council for Scotland Fitness to Teach Rules 2017 These Rules are available in alternative formats on request

Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Meeting

Sanctions Policy (Audit Enforcement Procedure)

Disciplinary Procedures. Publication and Disclosure Policy

Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 Complaints and Discipline Process

Guidance on making referrals to Disclosure Scotland

Guidance on Complaints and Disciplinary Procedure

DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE FOR TEACHERS INCLUDING PRINCIPALS AND VICE-PRINCIPALS IN GRANT-AIDED SCHOOLS WITH FULLY DELEGATED BUDGETS

Disciplinary Procedure

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO

PENALTY DECISION. January 9, 2015, Vancouver, B.C. Counsel for the Discipline Panel: Ms. Catharine Herb Kelly Q.C. Did not appear and no counsel

08 January Procedures for the Handling of a Complaint about a Registered Teacher to the Investigating Committee of the Teaching Council

HEALTH CARE AND ASSOCIATED PROFESSIONS DOCTORS. General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules Order of Council 2004

DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE FOR TEACHERS NOTES OF GUIDANCE FOR RELEVANT BODIES

ST THOMAS A BECKET CATHOLIC COLLEGE DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE

THE CHARTERED INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTANTS

DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE FOR TEACHERS NOTES OF GUIDANCE FOR RELEVANT BODIES

California Association of School Counselors Ethics Committee Policies and Procedures Adopted November 12, 2007 Revised August 3, 2008

HEARING PARTLY HEARD IN PRIVATE

DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS

Before the Building Practitioners Board BPB Complaint No. C

That being registered under the Medical Act 1983 (as amended):

Before the Building Practitioners Board BPB Complaint No. CB Licence(s) Held: Carpentry and Site AOP 1

Education Workforce Council

Before the Building Practitioners Board BPB Complaint No. CB24832

ENGLAND GOLF DISCIPLINARY AND APPEAL REGULATIONS (Including appeals from Clubs and Counties)

Derbyshire Constabulary SIMPLE CAUTIONING OF ADULT OFFENDERS POLICY POLICY REFERENCE 06/122. This policy is suitable for Public Disclosure

PMI MEMBER ETHICAL STANDARDS MEMBER CODE OF ETHICS

ENGLAND BOXING DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE

Fair Play Policy and Procedures

THE REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ALBERTA

PUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations Medical Practitioners Tribunal. Dates: 13/11/ /11/2017 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Katy MCALLISTER

PRACTICE REVIEW OF TEACHERS REGULATION

This code is applicable to all employees of Finbond Mutual Bank, including temporary employees.

PUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations. Medical Practitioner: Dates: 15/08/ /08/2018. GMC reference number:

Re: Dr Jonathan Richard Ashton v GMC [2013] EWHC 943 Admin

Good decision making: Investigating committee meetings and outcomes guidance

HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC

UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX STUDENTS UNION DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE (SEPTEMBER 2015)

Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Hearing Date: Thursday 4 July 2013 to Friday 5 July 2013

Fitness to Practise. > Criminal convictions and fitness to practise

Health and Care Professions Tribunal Service PRACTICE NOTE. Finding that Fitness to Practise is Impaired

CARLOS EGIDO CORTES MRCVS DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE

Code of Complaints & Disciplinary Procedures

Transcription:

SANCTION GUIDANCE DOCUMENT November 2017

Introduction If a complaint is referred to the Disciplinary Committee of the Teaching Council for an inquiry, a panel of the Disciplinary Committee consisting of not less than three and not more than five persons, of whom a majority shall be registered teachers ( the Panel ) shall hold an inquiry. At the conclusion of the inquiry, the Panel may: 1. Dismiss the complaint in circumstances where the Panel: a) Makes no finding in relation to a complaint under any of the grounds set out under section 42(1)(a) to (h) of the Act, or b) is not satisfied, in respect of a complaint made under subsection (1D) of section 42, having regard to the protection of children and vulnerable persons, that there is a risk that the teacher may harm any child or vulnerable person, cause any child or vulnerable person to be harmed, put any child or vulnerable person at risk of harm, attempt to harm any child or vulnerable person, or incite another person to harm any child or vulnerable person. OR 2. Decide whether to impose a sanction on the registered teacher under section 44 of the Act, where the Panel, having completed its report and considered any submissions from the parties in relation to sanction: i. Makes a finding or findings on one or more of the grounds set out in section 42(1)(a) to (h) of the Act, or ii. Is satisfied in respect of a complaint made under subsection (1D) of section 42, having regard to the protection of children and vulnerable persons, that there is a risk that the teacher may harm any child or vulnerable person, cause any child or vulnerable person to be harmed, put any child or vulnerable person at risk of harm, attempt to harm any child or vulnerable person, or incite another person to harm any child or vulnerable person. This is a guidance document to assist panels of the Disciplinary Committee in relation to 2 above. 1. Discretion of the Panel 1.1 The Panel must always exercise its own judgment in making decisions and must consider the particular circumstances of each case. This guidance document is not designed to constrain that decision making process. This guidance document does not provide an 2

exhaustive or prescriptive list of principles and factors that are required to be considered by the Panel. 1.2 However, to ensure a general consistency and transparency of approach by the Panel, decisions should be made with due regard to this guidance. 2. Submissions 2.1 In advance of making a decision in relation to sanction, the parties, being the Director (and the Director s legal representatives) and the registered teacher (and his or her representatives) will be invited to make oral or written submissions to the Panel with regard to any sanction it may impose on the registered teacher s registration. All submissions made should be considered by the Panel. 3. Legal Assessor 3.1 A legal assessor may advise the Panel on relevant matters of law and procedure, when requested by the Panel and may intervene at any point in proceedings where he/she believes it is necessary. 3.2 The legal assessor shall not participate in the decision making processes of the Panel but may be present at the Panel s deliberations, at the Panel s request. 3.3 If the Panel requires legal advice, it should obtain it from the Panel s legal assessor. Prior to the Panel acting on that advice, the parties should be informed by the legal assessor of the advice that has been given. Both parties must then be afforded an opportunity to make submissions upon that advice. The legal assessor may then vary the advice to the Panel in light of the submissions made. 3.4 The Panel should then consider the legal advice and submissions made in private and give reasons for its decision. 4. Sanction available to the Panel under S.44 (1) (a)-(d) 4.1 Pursuant to section 44(1) of the Acts, the Panel may make a decision 3

a) that the registered teacher be removed from the register and that he or she shall not be eligible to apply to be restored to the register under section 31 before the expiration of such period, beginning with the date of removal, as may be specified by the Panel in the decision, b) that the registered teacher shall be suspended from the register for the period specified by the Panel, which period shall not exceed 2 years, c) that the registered teacher be retained on the register subject to all or any of the following conditions: a) that the teacher seek the assistance of such service relating to teacher health and welfare as may be available; ii) That the teacher attend a specified professional development course or such other course as the Panel considers appropriate; iii) The period within which the teacher shall comply with the conditions of the retention; iv) Such other conditions as the Panel thinks fit. d) to advise, admonish or censure the registered teacher in writing. 4.2 When considering sanction, the Panel should consider all of the options that are available pursuant to section 44 (1) (a)-(d) of the Acts and commence their consideration with the least onerous sanction. 5. Finding(s) of the Panel 5.1 When considering sanction, the Panel will not revisit its finding(s) regarding the allegations, which will be contained in the Panel s report prepared at the conclusion of the inquiry. 6. The Purpose of Sanction 6.1 The primary aim of sanction is to protect the public rather than punishing a registered teacher. 6.2 In addition, consideration may be given by the Panel to the following: Rehabilitating the registered teacher and deterring the registered teacher from engaging in conduct the subject of the complaint in the future; 4

The maintenance of the public s confidence in teachers, teaching standards and in the integrity of the teaching profession; The interests of the registered teacher, including any mitigating factor that he or she may have submitted. 7. Factors to be considered when imposing sanction 7.1 The decision of the Panel should be based on the finding(s) from the inquiry. 7.2 While remembering that the purpose of decisions by the Panel is primarily to protect the public, the Panel will take the following matters into account when imposing sanction: a) Proportionality In deciding what sanctions to impose the Panel will apply the principle of proportionality, balancing the maintenance of the standards of professional conduct of teachers and the interests of the public against those of the registered teacher. b) Mitigation In any case before them, the Panel will have due regard to any evidence presented by way of mitigation by or on behalf of the registered teacher. This may include: character evidence or references; time lapsed since the incident/s; any apologies to the complainant/person in question; disability; illness; inexperience/vulnerability/duress/provocation; surrounding circumstances to include the circumstances leading up to the incident/s in question; efforts to avoid such behaviour/actions reocurring. In considering character evidence or references submitted in mitigation by the registered teacher, the Panel should consider how recent they are, the nature of the providers, whether the providers were aware of the allegation(s) against the teacher and provided the reference or testimonial knowing that it would be used within the context of fitness to teach proceedings. The extent, to which mitigation should influence the Panel s decision, is dependent on the individual circumstances of the case and is at the discretion of the Panel. 5

c) Insight The expectation that a teacher will accept that, with hindsight, he/she should have behaved differently and has taken steps to prevent a reoccurrence, is a factor for consideration by the Panel. Insight may be demonstrated by an apology by the registrant, by steps that have been taken to ensure that an event such as the one complained of will not occur again or by admissions by the registrant. The Panel will be mindful that a registered teacher may, for external reasons, not be in a position to offer an apology or may receive advice not to offer an apology. d) Outcome/Implications The outcome/implications of the registered teacher s behaviour for other persons involved may be relevant in considering the gravity of the act or omission by the registered teacher. However, it may be that a serious error may result in no adverse consequences for others, whereas a minor error might have serious consequences. Therefore, while outcome or implications may be relevant, it is not the most important consideration. The most important consideration is the protection of the public. e) Aggravating factors The Panel may also consider any aggravating factors in respect of the conduct of the registered teacher such as: The seriousness of the matters at issue; Whether there has been an abuse of a position of trust and/or harm caused to a child/pupil; Whether there is an indication of a pattern of behaviour as opposed to an isolated event; The extent to which the behaviour or act was deliberate and intended; The character and previous history of the registered teacher. f) Previous sanctions After all of the evidence has been heard at an inquiry and after the Panel has completed its report containing its findings, the Panel may be informed of previous findings in relation to a registered teacher for the purpose of deciding on a suitable sanction. The Panel should take advice from its legal assessor when considering the weight to be attached to such previous findings. 6

8. Decision to impose no sanction 8.1 Where a finding or findings has been made by a Panel, it may, but is not obliged to, impose a sanction on a registered teacher. The Panel may decide that it is not appropriate, in the circumstances to impose any sanction on the registered teacher, having considered this guidance including the factors listed at 7.2 above 9. Advice, admonishment, or censure in writing 9.1 Section 44 of the Acts provides that a Panel may decide to impose one of the sliding scale of the sanctions of advice, admonishment or censure in writing. This may be appropriate in circumstances where the findings are less serious. Advice is the least onerous of these sanctions, followed by admonishment, and then censure in writing. 9.2 These sanctions, although not defined in the Acts, can in broad terms be defined as follows: a. Advice to advise the teacher in relation to his or her future conduct b. Admonish - to reprimand firmly c. Censure - to express severe disapproval 9.3 These sanctions are the least restrictive sanctions that may be imposed and do not restrict the registered teacher s ability to teach. These sanctions demonstrate the disapproval of the Teaching Council regarding the allegations which have been proven and are a warning that this conduct should not occur again. 9.4 The panel should consider whether it is sufficient to impose a sanction of advice, admonishment or censure in writing, having considered this guidance including the factors listed at 7.2 above. If not, then the Panel will consider attaching conditions to the registered teacher s registration. 10. The application of conditions 10.1 Section 44 of the Act states that a registered teacher may be retained on the register subject to all or any of the following conditions: a) that the teacher seek the assistance of such service relating to teacher health and welfare as may be available; b) that the teacher attend a specified professional development course or such other course as the Panel considers appropriate; 7

c) the period within which the registered teacher shall comply with the conditions; d) such other conditions as the Panel thinks fit. 10.2 Conditional registration is a means of restricting the registered teacher with a view to ensuring that any corrective action which is appropriate in the circumstances, is taken. 10.3 Conditional registration may be the appropriate sanction to impose in circumstances including where:- It is possible to identify specific areas of the registered teacher s conduct or competence that is at issue that could be effectively, appropriately and practically controlled/improved by imposing conditions; Conditional registration will adequately protect the public (including children and young people, as well as colleagues) from risk of harm. Alternatively there may be no risk of harm present; The registered teacher shows the potential and willingness to respond positively to the imposition of conditions on his/her registration. That appropriate conditions can be formulated and are capable of being complied with by the registered teacher. 10.4 If conditional registration is decided upon, in considering what conditions to impose, the Panel should be mindful that conditions must be clear, effective, appropriate, practical, time defined and measureable. 10.5 Any conditions should not have the effect, intended or otherwise, of prohibiting the registered teacher from teaching. 10.6 The Panel should consider whether it is sufficient to impose conditions, having considered this guidance including the factors listed at 7.2 above. If not, then the Panel will consider suspending the teacher from the register. 11. Suspension from the Register 11.1 Suspension from the register has a punitive effect, in that it prevents the registered teacher from teaching in a state funded school (and therefore, potentially from earning a living as a teacher during the period of suspension). 8

11.2 Suspension will arise where serious matters were found proven which are not so serious as to justify removal from the register (for example where there may have been acknowledgement of fault and where the Panel is satisfied that the behaviour or incident is unlikely to be repeated). 11.3 Suspension from the register may be appropriate where the Panel is satisfied that: a) the finding or findings against the registered teacher are not fundamentally incompatible with continuing to be a registered teacher in the future, in that the public interest can be satisfied by a less severe outcome than removal from the register; b) that the registered teacher has shown evidence of insight and does not pose a significant risk of repeating the behaviour which was the subject of the inquiry. 11.4 The period of suspension from the register is a matter for the Panel s discretion, depending on the gravity of the particular case and the period may not exceed two years. 11.5 The Panel should consider whether it is sufficient to impose suspension, having considered this guidance including the factors listed at 7.2 above. If not, then the Panel will consider whether the registered teacher should be removed from the register. 12. Removal of a Registered Teacher from the Register 12.1 Removal from the register is appropriate where: a) it is the only means of protecting the public, in particular students and teachers, and of maintaining public confidence in the teaching profession; b) the finding or findings are fundamentally incompatible with continuing to be a registered teacher; c) there was evidence of harmful deep-seated personality or attitudinal problems. 12.2 When a registered teacher s name is removed from the register, he or she may not be eligible to apply to be restored to the register before the expiration of a specified period, as determined by the Panel. 12.3 Whether removal is appropriate will depend on the particular facts of each case. The Panel should consider this guidance, including the factors listed at 7.2 above when deciding whether it is sufficient to remove a teacher from the register. 9

13. Report of the Panel 13.1 Once the Panel has considered any submissions, it will prepare a report setting out the material before the Panel when considering sanction, noting the oral and/or written submissions made (if any), and noting the Panel s decision as regards any sanction(s) to be imposed. 13.2 The Panel will give reasons for the decision to impose any sanction(s). 13.3 If the inquiry is completed by way of the provision of an undertaking and/or consent by the registered teacher in accordance with section 43(6) and 43(7) of the Acts, the report of the Panel shall confirm those measures. 14. Notice from the Disciplinary Committee after the Panel has decided on sanction 14.1 The Disciplinary Committee shall by notice in writing, within 21 days of the making of a decision in relation to sanction by the Panel in accordance with section 44 of the Acts, provide a copy of the decision and the reasons for the decision to the following: a) the complainant; b) the registered teacher and his/her representatives; c) where the registered teacher is employed as a teacher, his or her employer and; d) the Minister. 14.2 The registered teacher will be informed that he/she may, within 21 days of service of the notice, apply to the High Court for annulment of the decision pursuant to section 44(3) of the Act. 15. Compliance with conditions of retention on the register 15.1 Where a registered teacher is retained on the register subject to conditions, including a condition as to the period within which those conditions shall be complied with, the teacher may apply in writing to the Disciplinary Committee, within the period specified, for an extension of that period. Any extension of the specified period shall be at the discretion of the Committee. The Committee will inform the registered teacher in writing as soon as 10

practicable of its decision in relation to the application. The Committee will give reasons for its decision. 15.2 The Committee will ensure that it receives reports from the secretariat to the Committee in relation to non-compliance, within the specified period or any extension of that period, by persons with conditions attached to their registration. 15.3 Where a person fails to comply with the conditions attached to his/her registration within the specified period or any extension of that period, he or she shall be removed from the register. The removal of the register shall proceed in the manner as set out in section 44 of the Act. 11