Case4:09-cv CW Document42 FUedi 0/07/09 Pagel of 9

Similar documents
Case 3:13-cv SV Document13 FUec101/22/14 Pagel of 7

Case4:11-cv PJH Document65 Filed08/31/12 Page1 of 8

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) Defendants. )

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Francisco) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:15-cv JD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNI A

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Francisco) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:07-cv JSW. Parties and Attorneys

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETT S CLASS ACTION JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Francisco) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:13-cv VC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Francisco) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:99-cv MMC

U.S. District Court District Of Arizona (Phoenix Division) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:04-cv SRB

U.S. District Court United States District Court for the Western District of Washington (Seattle) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:07-cv JCC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Francisco) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:02-cv-05017

Case 2:05-cv DB Document 99 Filed 07/07/2006 Page 1 of 8

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Jose) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 5:11-cv EJD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

U.S. District Court Northern District of California (San Jose) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 01-CV-20320

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Jose) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 5:14-cv EJD

U.S. District Court Central District Of California (Western Division - Los Angeles) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:04-cv PA-E

Case 2:14-cv JCC Document 16 Filed 05/20/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

U.S. District Court District of Colorado (Denver) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:11-cv JLK

Case 8:15-cv DOC-KES Document 184 Filed 04/03/19 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:4371

Case3:13-cv MMC Document95 Filed09/17/14 Page1 of 7

DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DATE FILED:21. Case 1:13-cv RMB Document 45 Filed 05/15/13 Page 1 of 6

I am an attorney duly licensed to practice before the Courts of the Commonwealth o f

U.S. District Court United States District Court for the Western District of Washington (Tacoma) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:09-cv RBL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Francisco) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:16-cv RS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SPOKANE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Attorneys for Defendants TerraForm Global, Inc. and Peter Blackmore UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Western Division - Los Angeles) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:14-cv CAS-JEM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION, LOS ANGELES

U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (Miami) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:07-cv PCH. Parties and Attorneys

U.S. District Court North Carolina Middle District (Durham) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:96-cv RCE

U.S. District Court Western District of Pennsylvania (Pittsburgh) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:03-cv DWA-ARH

United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:15-cv WB

Case 5:01-cv JF Document 361 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 1 of 7

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/15/2014 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 27 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/15/2014

U.S. District Court District of Oregon (Portland) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:03-cv HA

2:11-cv R -JCG Document 58 Filed 01/06/12 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:699

Case 4:17-cv YGR Document 19 Filed 04/26/17 Page 1 of 6

Page 1 of 13. Case 1: 05-cv-003-LY Document 23 Filed 01/2006 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION OS CV-923

U.S. District Court District of Colorado (Denver) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:05-cv LTB-MEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

LODGED. MHY p CLERK, QS DISTRICT COL VIRAL DISTRICT OF CA i, F,, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNI A

UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Plaintiff, Plaintiff,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Southern Division - Santa Ana) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 8:11-cv AG-RNB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CLASS ACTION. Attorneys for Defendants SALESFORCE.COM, INC., MARC R. BENIOFF, and STEVE CAKEBREA D UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR T

United States District Court District of Nevada (Reno) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:09-cv MMD-WGC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

West Lincoln Avenue Tel: (714) of the Long Beach Pediatric Surgery

U.S. District Court Southern District of California (San Diego) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:13-cv BEN-RBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

U.S. District Court District of Maryland (Greenbelt) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 8:00-cv DKC

U.S. District Court Southern District of California (San Diego) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:06-cv JLS-WMC

Notice of Motion and Motion to Consolidate Related Actions Against

Case4:09-cv CW Document125 Filed04/28/11 Page1 of 26

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No TODD S. GLASSEY AND MICHAEL E. MCNEIL,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 4:17-cv HSG Document 180 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 3

E-FILED on 12/11/03 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 1:09-cv JGK Document 76 Filed 05/06/2010 Page 1 of 7

5:01-cv JF Document 363 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 1 of 10

U.S. District Court Eastern District of Texas (Marshall) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:00-cv TJW

Case 4:09-cv CW Document 579 Filed 06/01/16 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

Case5:12-cv HRL Document9 Filed08/09/12 Page1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO. The Motion of Plaintiff Leonard Labow in the above-entitled action, for an

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. MDL No

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:08-cv EGS Document 19 Filed 12/12/08 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:13-cv SC Document 39 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Western Division - Los Angeles) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:11-cv JFW -PJW

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Southern Division - Santa Ana) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 8:11-cv AG-AN

Case4:12-cv JSW Document34 Filed09/19/14 Page1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Vivint Solar, Inc. (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

Case 3:11-cv JAH-WMC Document 38 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 5

Case 4:08-cv SBA Document 180 Filed 03/03/2009 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Western Division - Los Angeles) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:12-cv R-JEM

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 104 Filed 12/22/2006 Page 1 of 7

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 160 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 1 of 5

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Jose) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 5:06-cv JW

Case5:10-cv JW Document72 Filed03/11/11 Page1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ORACLE USA, INC., et al.,

Case 3:06-cr LAB Document 378 Filed 09/01/07 Page 1 of 3

Case 3:15-cv JST Document 90 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 10

U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:04-cv RO

Case 4:14-md CW Document 615 Filed 03/29/17 Page 1 of 9

Case3:11-cv WHA Document33 Filed01/06/12 Page1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Plaintiffs,

Transcription:

Case4:09-cv-03362-CW Document42 FUedi 0/07/09 Pagel of 9 1 BORIS FELDMAN, State Bar No. 1838, borisfeldman@wsgr.com 2 IGNACIO E. SALCEDA, State Bar No. 4017, isalceda@wsgr.com 3 DIANE M. WALTERS, State Bar No. 148136, dwalters@wsgr.corn 4 MOLLY ARICO, State Bar No. 0472, marico@wsgr.com 5 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 6 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 7 Telephone: (650 493-9300 Facsimile: (650 493-6811 8 9 Attorneys for Defendants Accuray Incorporated, Euan S. Thomson, Robert 10 E. McNamara, Wade B Hampton, Ted Tu, Wayne Wu, John R. Adler, Jr., and Robert S. 11 Weiss 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 OAKLAND DIVISION 17 CITY OF ANN ARBOR EMPLOYEES' CASE NO.: 09-cv-03362-CW RETIREMENT SYSTEM, on Behalf of Itself and 18 All Others Similarly Situated, STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CONSOLIDATION 19 Plaintiffs, OF SECURITIES CLASS ACTIONS AND SCHEDULE 20 v. 21 ACCURAY INCORPORATED, EUAN S. THOMSON, ROBERT E. McNAMARA, 22 WADE B. HAMPTON, TED TU, WAYNE WU, JOHN R. ADLER, JR., and ROBERT S. WEISS, 23 Defendants. 25 CAPTIONS CONTINUE ON NEXT PAGE STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE

Case4:09-cv-03362-CW Document42 Filedl 0/07/09 Page2 of 9 1 MICHAEL WHITTEN, Individually and on CASE NO.: 09-cv-03637-CW 2 Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 3 Plaintiffs, 4 v. 5 ACCURAY INCORPORATED, EUAN S. THOMSON, ROBERT E. McNAMARA, 6 WADE B. HAMPTON, TED TU, WAYNE WU, JOHN R. ADLER, JR., and ROBERT S. WEISS, 7 Defendants. 8 9 DOUG BENNINGTON, On Behalf of Himself CASE NO.: 09-cv-03813-PJH and All Others Similarly Situated, 10 Plaintiffs, 11 v. 12 ACCURAY INCORPORATED, EUAN S. 13 THOMSON, ROBERT E. McNAMARA, WADE B. HAMPTON, TED TU, WAYNE WU, 14 JOHN R. ADLER, JR., and ROBERT S. WEISS, 15 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 25 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE

Case4:09-cv-03362-CW Document42 Filedl 0/07/09 Page3 of 9 1 Pursuant to Rule (d of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Civil Local Rule 23-1(b, 2 and the Manual for Complex Litigation, Fourth 11.12, 11.21 and 31 (2004, the parties 3 stipulate, and the Court hereby orders, as follows: 4 CONSOLIDATION OF RELATED CASES 5 1. The above-captioned actions, City of Ann Arbor Employees 'Retirement System v. 6 Accuray, Inc., et al., Case No. C-09-03362-CW, Whitten v. Accuray, Inc., et al., Case No. C-09-7 03637-CW, and Bennington v. Accuray, Inc., et al., Case No. C-09-03813-PJH, are related cases 8 within the meaning of Civil Local Rule 3-12. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a, 9 these cases are hereby consolidated into Civil Action No. C-09-03362-CW for pretrial 10 proceedings before this Court. The consolidated action shall be captioned: "In re Accuray Inc. 11 Securities Litigation." 12 2. All related actions that are subsequently filed in, or transferred to, this District 13 shall be consolidated into this consolidated action for pretrial purposes. This Order shall apply to 14 every such related action, absent order of the Court. A party that objects to such consolidation, 15 or to any other provision of this Order, must file an application for relief from this Order within thirty (30 days after the date on which a copy of the order is mailed to the party's counsel, 17 pursuant to Paragraph 8, infra. 18 3. Plaintiff City of Ann Arbor Employees' Retirement System has served its 19 complaint on all defendants. Defendants agree to waive service of the Whitten and Bennington 20 complaints. 21 4. This Order is entered without prejudice to the rights of any party to apply for 22 severance of any claim or action, for good cause shown. 23 MASTER DOCKET AND CAPTION 5. The docket in Civil Action No. C-09-03362-CW shall constitute the master 25 docket for this action. 6. Every pleading filed in the consolidated action shall bear the following caption: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE -1- CASE Nos. CV 09-3362 CW, CV 09-3637 CW,

Case4:09-cv-03362-CW Document42 Filed10/07/09 Page4 of 9 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 OAKLAND DIVISION 4 IN RE ACCURAY INC. SECURITIES Master File No. C-09-03362-CW LITIGATION 5 CLASS ACTION 6 7 This Document Relates To: 8 9 10 7. The file in Civil Action No. C-09-03362-CW shall constitute a Master File for 11 every action in the consolidated action. When the document being filed pertains to all actions, 12 the phrase "All Actions" shall appear immediately after the phrase "This Document Relates To:". 13 When a pleading applies only to some, but not all, of the actions, the document shall list, 14 immediately after the phrase "This Document Relates To:", the docket number for each 15 individual action to which the document applies, along with the last name of the first-listed plaintiff in said action (e.g., "No. C-09-03362-CW (City of Ann Arbor Employees' Retirement 17 System." 18 8. The parties shall file a Notice of Related Cases pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12 19 whenever a case that should be consolidated into this action is filed in, or transferred to, this 20 District. If the Court determines that the case is related, the clerk shall: 21 a place a copy of this Order in the separate file for such action; 22 b serve on plaintiff's counsel in the new case a copy of this Order; 23 c direct that this Order be served upon defendants in the new case; and d make the appropriate entry in the Master Docket. 25 LEAD PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL 9. The Court shall designate a Lead Plaintiff and Lead Plaintiff's Counsel, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 77z-1(a(3(B and 15 U.S.C. 78u-4(a(3(B. Lead Plaintiff's Counsel shall have authority to speak for, and enter into agreements on behalf of, plaintiffs in all matters STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE -2-

Case4:09-cv-03362-CW Document42 Filedl 0/07/09 Page5 of 9 1 regarding pretrial procedures, discovery, and settlement negotiations. Lead Plaintiff's Counsel 2 shall manage the prosecution of this litigation to avoid duplicative or unproductive activities. 3 Lead Plaintiff's Counsel shall be responsible for coordination of all activities and appearances on 4 behalf of plaintiffs and for dissemination of notices and orders. Lead Plaintiff's Counsel shall be 5 responsible for communications with the Court. 6 10. Defendants' counsel may rely upon agreements made with Lead Plaintiff's 7 Counsel. Such agreements shall be binding on all plaintiffs. 8 PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS 9 11. No defendant is required to respond to the complaint in any action consolidated 10 into this action, other than a consolidated complaint or a complaint designated as the operative 11 complaint after the appointment of Lead Plaintiff and Lead Plaintiff's Counsel. 12 12. After the appointment of a Lead Plaintiff, the Lead Plaintiff shall have sixty (60 13 days to file and serve a consolidated complaint. The consolidated complaint shall be the 14 operative complaint and shall supersede all complaints filed in any of the actions consolidated 15 herein. 13. Defendants shall have sixty (60 days in which to file and serve a motion to 17 dismiss or otherwise respond to the consolidated complaint. If defendants file any motions 18 directed at the consolidated complaint, the opposition and reply briefs shall be filed within sixty 19 and thirty days, respectively, of that response, unless otherwise agreed by the parties. 20 14. Counsel for the parties shall notify their clients of their document preservation 21 obligations pursuant to the federal securities laws and the Local Rules. 22 /1/ 23 /1/ /1/ 25 /1/ /1/ /1/ /1/ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE -3-

Case4:09-cv-03362-CW Document42 Filedl 0/07/09 Page6 of 9 1 Dated: September 22, 2009 Respectfully submitted, 2 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, Professional Corporation 3 BORIS FELDMAN IGNACIO E. SALCEDA 4 DIANE M. WALTERS MOLLY ARICO 5 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304 6 Telephone: (650 493-9300 Facsimile: (650 493-6811 7 8 By: /s/ Diane M. Walters Diane M. Walters 9 Email: dwalters@wsgr.com 10 Attorneys for Defendants Accuray Incorporated, Euan 11 S. Thomson, Robert E. McNamara, Wade B. Hampton, Ted Tu, Wayne Wu, John R. Adler, Jr., and Robert S. 12 Weiss 13 Dated: September 22, 2009 COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 14 SHAWN A. WILLIAMS 100 Pine Street, Suite 00 15 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415 8-4545 Facsimile: (415 8-4534 17 COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP 18 SAMUEL H. RUDMAN EVAN J. KAUFMAN 19 58 South Service Road, Suite 200 20 Melville, NY 11747 Telephone: (631 367-7100 21 Facsimile: (631 367-1173 22 By: /s/ Shawn A. Williams 23 Shawn A. Williams Email: ShawnW@csgrr.com Attorneys for Plaintiff City of Ann Arbor Employees' 25 Retirement System STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE -4-

Case4:09-cv-03362-CW Document42 Filedl 0/07/09 Page7 of 9 1 Dated: September 22, 2009 GLANCY BINKOW & GOLDBERG LLP LIONEL Z. GLANCY 2 RICHARD MANISKAS 3 1801 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 311 Los Angeles, CA 90067 4 Telephone: (310 201-9150 Facsimile: (310 201-90 5 -and- 6 LAW OFFICES OF HOWARD G. SMITH 7 HOWARD G. SMITH 3070 Bristol Pike, Suite 112 8 Bensalem, PA 19020 Telephone: (215 638-4847 9 Facsimile: (215 638-4867 10 11 By: /s/ Richard Maniskas Richard Maniskas 12 Email: rmaniskas@glancylaw.com 13 Attorneys for Plaintiff Michael E. Whitten 14 15 Dated: September 22, 2009 GREEN WELLING, P.C. ROBERT S. GREEN 595 Market Street, Suite 50 San Francisco, CA 94105 17 Telephone: (415 477-6700 Facsimile: (415 477-6710 18 -and- 19 SHALOV STONE BONNER & Rocco LLP 20 RALPH M. STONE THOMAS G. CIARLONE. JR. 21 AMANDA C. SCUDER 485 Seventh Avenue, Suite 1000 22 New York, NY 10018 Telephone: (212 239-4340 23 Facsimile: (212 239-4310 By: /s/ Robert S. Green 25 Robert S. Green Email: cand.uscourts@classcounsel.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Doug Bennington STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE -5-

Case4:09-cv-03362-CW Document42 Filed10/07/09 Page8 of 9 1 ORDER 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 10/7/09 4 Dated: Hon. Claudia Wilken 5 United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 25 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE -6-

Case4:09-cv-03362-CW Document42 Filedl 0/07/09 Page9 of 9 1 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 2 I, Diane M. Walters, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 3 obtained from the signatories, Shawn A. Williams, Richard Maniskas and Robert S. Green. I 4 declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 5 foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 22nd day of September, 2009 at Palo Alto, 6 California. 7 8 By: /s/ Diane M. Walters Diane M. Walters 9 10 Counsel for Defendants Accuray Incorporated, Euan S. Thomson, 11 Robert E. McNamara, Wade B Hampton, Ted Tu, Wayne Wu, John R. Adler, Jr., and 12 Robert S. Weiss 13 14 15 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 25 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE -7-