Appellate Practice. Hon. Harry T. Lemmon Raymond P. Ward

Similar documents
Appellate Practice. Raymond P. Ward Susan Tart

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA

THE NUTS AND BOLTS OF A NORTH CAROLINA APPEAL: A walkthrough of the appeals process and common mistakes by counsel

COURT OF APPEAL, SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA PRO SE MANUAL

COURT OF APPEAL, SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA PRO SE MANUAL

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal

Appealing Temporary Injunctive Relief In Texas. By David F. Johnson

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS

Rule 1-1. Promulgation and Effective Date of Rules; Amendments

Nuts and Bolts of a Civil Appeal

SOUTHWEST INTERTRIBAL COURT OF APPEALS RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE

Case: , 08/14/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 46-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

4.5 No Notice of Judgment or Order of Appellate Court; Effect on Time to File Certain Documents * * * * * *

CLAIMS ON APPEAL: A PRIMER ON THE APPELLATE PROCESS FOR CLAIMS PROFESSIONALS

Case: /20/2014 ID: DktEntry: 56-1 Page: 1 of 4 (1 of 13) NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON LAW CENTER TEXAS CRIMINAL APPELLATE PROCEDURE - PROFESSOR: CARMEN ROE COURSE DESCRIPTION FALL 2017

Louisiana Appellate Practice and Procedure:

Appellate v. Trial Advocacy: Tips and Traps

Case: , 04/24/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 23-1, Page 1 of 2 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: , 05/19/2016, ID: , DktEntry: 33-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Framing the Issues on Appeal Nuts and Bolts November 15, 2016

Administrative Rules for the Office of Professional Regulation Effective date: February 1, Table of Contents

Distinctions with a Difference: A Comparison of Federal and State Court Appeals

Case: , 03/23/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 38-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No. 52,034-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *

Writ of Mandate Outline 1 Richard Rothschild Western Center on Law and Poverty , ext. 24;

Appellate Review of Mixed Questions of Law and Fact: Due Deference to the Fact Finder

Initial Civil Appeals: Delaware

Case: , 12/29/2014, ID: , DktEntry: 20-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: , 02/19/2016, ID: , DktEntry: 54-1, Page 1 of 4 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 2:09-cv CAS-MAN Document 107 Filed 05/07/10 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:1464 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Initial Civil Appeals: Texas

Table of Contents. I. Introduction...1. II. Who May Appeal: Standing...3. III. What May Be Appealed...9

FIRST CIRCUIT NO CW 0073 VERSUS CONSOLIDATED WITH NO CW 0074 VERSUS. Judgment Rendered: SEP ' Appealed from the

State v. Barnes - Procedural Technicalities or Justice?

ROBERT A. CHAISSON JUDGE

LOCAL RULES OF THE COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH CIRCUIT SUPPLEMENTING AND/OR SUPERSEDING UNIFORM RULES OF LOUISIANA COURTS OF APPEAL

A The following shall be assigned to the appellate division:

REQUIREMENTS AND BEST PRACTICES FOR FILING BRIEFS IN THE GEORGIA APPELLATE COURTS

RULE CHANGE 2015(06) COLORADO APPELLATE RULES. Rules 28, 28.1, 29, 31, 32, and 34

No. 51,991-CW COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

GOING IT ALONE. A Step-by-Step Guide to Representing Yourself on Appeal in Indiana

Case: , 08/16/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 28-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA * * * Plaintiff(s), Defendant(s).

Part 3 Rules for Providing Legal Representation in Non- Capital Criminal Appeals and Non-Criminal Appeals

MICHAEL EDWARD BLAKE NO CA-0655 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL ALICIA DIMARCO BLAKE FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * * CONSOLIDATED WITH:

Case: , 12/15/2015, ID: , DktEntry: 51-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT: HOW THE APPELLATE COURTS AND JUDGES OPERATE AND STATISTICS RELEVANT TO EVALUATING YOUR INSURED S POTENTIAL APPEAL

Office Of The Clerk. State oflouisiana. www la fcca. ol 2. Notice of Judgment. June Stephen M Irving 111 Founders St Ste 700 Baton Rouge

Case: , 07/03/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 12-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2008 CA 1651 LINDA TORRES VERSUS PACKING COMPANY. Judgment Rendered

N.J.A.C. 6A:4, APPEALS TABLE OF CONTENTS

TENNESSEE RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 3 APPEAL AS OF RIGHT: AVAILABILITY; METHOD OF INITIATION

Rule 8.03 SUPREME COURT REVIEW OF COURT OF APPEALS DECISION

SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON SENATE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 2389

CHAPTER 24 APPEALS. This chapter covers some of the basic requirements for appeals, including:

Case: , 04/25/2018, ID: , DktEntry: 61-1, Page 1 of 5 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: , 10/18/2016, ID: , DktEntry: 57-1, Page 1 of 4 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

* * * * * * * APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH NO , DIVISION B Honorable Regina H. Woods, Judge

APPENDIX E ARC DISCIPLINARY POLICY

ARBITRATION RULES. Arbitration Rules Archive. 1. Agreement of Parties

CHAPTER 9 Brief Writing

Anatomy of an Appeal By Michelle May O Neil

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT BARRY GIGLIO AND MARLA GIGLIO

SUMMARY OF FILING REQUIREMENTS FOR BRIEFS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Michigan Appellate Assigned Counsel System. Knowing Your Appellate Deadlines Court Rules and Procedure

AN APPEAL FOR YOUR APPEALS (OR, I FOUGHT THE LAW AND THE LAW WON)

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR

Case: , 07/31/2018, ID: , DktEntry: 60-1, Page 1 of 5 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No. 52,304-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *

NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON RULES PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE. The New Hampshire Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Rules

FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE

MILDRED JONES NO CA-0407 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL NEXT GENERATION HOMES, LLC AND RECOVERY DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA

Case: , 04/17/2019, ID: , DktEntry: 37-1, Page 1 of 7 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

By Mary Patricia Benz and Judge Raymond W. Mitchell. Overview of the Briefing Process in the Seventh Circuit and Illinois Appellate Court

Ý»æ ïîóëëîèì ðîñïîñîðïì Üæ èçéêïìé ܵ Û² æ ìíóï Ð ¹»æ ï ±º ê øï ±º ïï NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

III. MATTERS HEARD ON APPEAL FROM FINAL DECISIONS OF CERTAIN AGENCIES

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 107,022. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, MICHAEL J. MITCHELL, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

UNDERSTANDING THE APPELLATE PROCESS IN THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV. DFW ADVISORS LTD. CO., Appellant V. JACQUELINE ERVIN, Appellee

Fall 2018 Course Description

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT

TITLE VII ESTABLISHMENT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE MISSISSIPPI BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS

Procedural Delays. Louisiana Law Review. Sam J. Friedman

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Office of the Clerk. After Opening a Case Pro Se Appellants (revised December 2012)

No. 44,915-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * Versus * * * * * * * * * * By: Leo Douglas Lawrence * * * * *

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW IN THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT. B. Small number - about 200 out of 5,000 petitions for review filed

Rules of the Court of Appeals of Virginia (not including forms)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before TYMKOVICH, HOLLOWAY, and MATHESON, Circuit Judges.

NO CA-1455 LEON A. CANNIZZARO, JR., DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE PARISH OF ORLEANS, ON BEHALF OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL

TITLE 04 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

ETHAN BROWN NO CA-1679 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

STATE OF LOUISIANA THROUGH COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2011 CA 0176 MAXINE HUGHES DICKENS VERSUS LOUISIANA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN

No. 49,278-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * MICHAEL DAVID COX Plaintiff-Appellee. Versus

OFFICE OF THE CLERK B

Fla. R. Civ. P (a) provides a party may move for a directed verdict at the close of evidence offered by the adverse party.

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 116,923 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. JERRY SELLERS, Appellant, STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee.

Transcription:

Appellate Practice Hon. Harry T. Lemmon Raymond P. Ward

Source: Annual Report 2008 of the Judicial Council of the Supreme Court of La.

Jurisdiction District court: Original jurisdiction Courts of appeal: Appellate and supervisory Supreme Court: Mostly supervisory (discretionary)

Function District courts Accept evidence Determine facts Apply law to facts Courts of appeal Correct error Supreme Court Develop the law

The game changes In the court of appeal, no retrial. Live with the record made in trial court. No new evidence. Rule 1-3. Standards of review Fact findings very deferential. Discretionary calls somewhat deferential. Questions of law de novo.

The game changes In the La. Supreme Court, not a second layer of appellate review. Same restrictions as in court of appeal Writ-grant considerations (LSC Rule 10)

Nuts and bolts Application for supervisory writ Appeal Application to La. Supreme Court for writ of review

Forms = Vampires The world changes, we do not. Conform (maybe) to obsolete, outdated rules Preserve bad legal writing

The rules La. Const. art. V Code Civ. P. arts. 2081-2201 Code Crim. P. arts. 911-923 Uniform Rules Cts. App. Local Rules Cts. App. La. S. Ct. Rules 10, 7, 8, and 9.

Where to find the rules Courts web sites Green books (in back of Rev. Stat. title 13) West La. Rules of Court book

Supervisory writs Function to obtain immediate appellate review of an interlocutory judgment.

Supervisory writs Substance Limits on supervisory jurisdiction Irreparable injury Herlitz Standards of review Fact-finding: manifest error Discretionary calls: abuse of discretion Legal questions: de novo

Supervisory writs Nuts and bolts: See Unif. R. 4-1 thru 4-8. File (in trial court) notice of intent to seek supervisory writ Get judge s signature on order setting a return date (deadline for filing in court of appeal) Assemble and file writ application in court of appeal within deadline

Supervisory writs Stay or expedited consideration: see Unif. R. 4-4. Opposition

Appeal Taking the appeal Writing the brief Oral argument

Appeal To take an appeal Make sure the judgment is appealable Perfect the appeal timely. File motion for appeal and get judge s signature on order granting appeal If a suspensive appeal, furnish security Pay estimated appeal costs

Cheaper way to appeal Record designation CCP 2128 Must be done within 3 days after taking appeal Advantage: saves $$$ Disadvantage: limits scope of appeal. (see CCP art. 2129)

Appeal Notice of lodging Triggers 15-day period for appellee to answer the appeal Triggers 30-day period to request oral argument (Unif. R. 2-11.4) Triggers briefing schedule (25 days for appellant, 45 days for appellee)

Speaking of the record Arguing about the law in the abstract is interesting and fun, but what wins cases is the lawyer s ability to marshal the facts littered over an extensive trial court record in a way that's consistent with favorable controlling authority In real-life appellate advocacy, the record plays a key role, and a lawyer s mastery of the record or lack thereof often makes the difference between winning and losing. Judge Alex Kozinski, In Praise of Moot Court Not!, 97 Colum. L. Rev. 178, 189 (1997).

Appeal brief Number of copies: Unif. R. 2-12.1 Form: Unif. R. 2-12.2 Cover: Unif. R. 2-12.3 Content: Appellant: Unif. R. 2-12.4 Appellee: Unif. R. 2-12.5 Reply: Unif. R. 2-12.6 Time to file: Unif. R. 2-12.7

Citing cases La. style

Citing cases La. style Wrong: Boudreaux v. State, 815 So. 2d 7 (La. 2002). Right: Boudreaux v. State, 2001-1329 (La. 2/26/02), 815 So. 2d 7. In La. courts of appeal, give parallel citations to U.S. Supreme Court decisions. (Unif. R. 2-12.4.)

Oral argument / Submission Request for oral argument (Unif. R. 2-11.4) Rules 2-15.1 thru 2-15.4 Time: 40 minutes total (20 per side) In La. 5 th Cir. (and lately, 1 st Cir.), 30 minutes total (15 per side)

Supplemental authorities Letter under Unif. R. 2-12.6.1. Name and citation of the authority Issue raised by that case pertinent to your case Citation to page in brief where issue raised or description of where and how issue arose during oral argument Two-page limit; no argument allowed.

Rehearing Available? Check Unif. R. 2-18.6 and 2-18.7 14-day deadline 10-page limit Not a prerequisite for writ application to La. Supreme Court Timely filing interrupts 30-day time for writ application to La. Supreme Court (30 days runs anew from decision on rehearing or denial of rehearing)

Louisiana Supreme Court

Writ-grant rates 2010 Total Civil Criminal 17% 13% 24%

Rule 10 overview Writ-grant considerations 1 General filing requirements 2 Contents civil writ app. 3 Contents criminal writ app. 4 Time for filing 5 Oppositions 6 Reply to opposition 7

Rule 10 1(a) writ-grant considerations 1. Conflicting decisions 2. Significant unresolved issue of law 3. Overruling or modifying controlling precedent 4. Erroneous interpretation or application of constitution or law, and: Material injustice, or Significantly affects public interest 5. Gross departure from proper judicial proceedings

If writ is granted You must brief every issue raised in the writ application. Any issue in the writ app. that is not briefed will be deemed abandoned. You must not brief any issue not raised in the writ application. Any issue not raised in the writ application is not properly before the Court. Reserving an issue in a writ-app footnote does not preserve it.