Case 3:16-md VC Document Filed 05/29/17 Page 1 of 9. Exhibit 3

Similar documents
Case 2:13-cv JPS Filed 01/18/13 Page 1 of 12 Document 1

Case 2:18-cv JPB Document 1-1 Filed 10/25/18 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 31

Case 3:17-cv BEN-BGS Document 1 Filed 07/19/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 3

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1-2 Filed: 06/14/18 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:8 CIVIL COVER SHEET

Case 6:17-cv JA-GJK Document 1 Filed 12/14/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

Case 0:09-cv DWF-SRN Document 1 Filed 10/28/09 Page 1 of 5

CASE 0:17-cv WMW-LIB Document 1 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/03/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 2:18-cv HCM-RJK Document 1 Filed 07/03/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 1

MASTER SHORT-FORM COMPLAINT FOR INDIVIDUAL CLAIMS

Case: 1:17-cv SA-DAS Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/19/17 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2017 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA HARRISONBURG DIVISION. NEXUS SERVICES, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No:

Case 1:17-cv RNS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/31/2017 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

vehicle. The Plaintiff, Oscar Willhelm Nilsson, by undersigned counsel, states as

Case 3:16-cv YY Document 1 Filed 07/10/16 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:17-cv G Document 1 Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1

Case 2:18-cv SJF-GRB Document 1 Filed 07/02/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

allege ("Plaintiffs"), on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, hereby 216(b) ("FLSA"). Accordingly, this Court has subject-matter

Case 1:16-cv JAL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2016 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 1:17-cv UU Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/22/2017 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 1:15-cv GLR Document 1 Filed 12/23/15 Page 1 of 26

Case 1:18-cv FAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/08/2018 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civil No

Case 5:16-cv BKS-DEP Document 1 Filed 11/18/16 Page 1 of 9

Case 3:18-cv TBR Document 1 Filed 01/30/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

Case 0:17-cv BB Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2017 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 8:17-cv CEH-TBM Document 1 Filed 09/28/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv FAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2017 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 1:17-cv DLH-CSM Document 1 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION. v. Civil Action No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 09/29/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1

Case 5:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/20/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 4:18-cv O Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

(collectively "Defendants") unpaid overtime wages, Plaintiff, CASE NO.:

Case 1:17-cv UU Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/27/2017 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 4:15-cv A Document 1 Filed 05/20/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID 1

Case 2:17-cv SJF-GRB Document 1 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/10/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 5:18-cv Document 1 Filed 06/11/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Case No.: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:16-cv L Document 1 Filed 11/01/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 10/24/16 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:16-cv RGA Document 1 Filed 02/17/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 3:17-cv K Document 1 Filed 07/24/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1

Billings, Montana Telephone: (406) individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Attorneys

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 10/24/16 Page 1 of 9

Case 8:17-cv RAL-TGW Document 1 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION

Case: 4:16-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/25/16 Page: 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 2:18-cv SJF-SIL Document 1 Filed 03/29/18 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 2:13-cv WJM-MF Document 1 Filed 08/01/13 Page 1 of 24 PageID: 1

Case3:15-cv Document1 Filed03/12/15 Page1 of 7

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/08/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 3:17-cv MO Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:16-cv BLW Document 1 Filed 08/12/16 Page 1 of 4

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Charlottesville Division CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT. Preliminary Statement

Case 1:11-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 08/19/11 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COLLECTIVE ACTION COMPLAINT

Case 2:17-cv CCC-MF Document 1 Filed 02/17/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : :

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Plaintiff, similarly situated, files this Complaint against Defendant, KLOPP INVESTMENT. attorneys' fees and costs.

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/02/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 2:18-cv KM-CLW Document 1 Filed 03/16/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 1

Case 1:06-cv LTB-CBS Document 1 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

For its Complaint against Defendant Adlife Marketing & Communications, Co.,

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 04/24/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:1

CASE 0:16-cv JNE-FLN Document 1 Filed 09/01/16 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Kurtis Skaar

Case 1:16-cv RC Document 1 Filed 06/22/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 8:17-cv VMC-MAP Document 1 Filed 09/28/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 5:18-cv HE Document 1 Filed 07/16/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 1:17-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/01/2017 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 1:18-cv KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/18/2018 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/08/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/09/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO ROSWELL DIVISION

Case 9:12-cv RC Document 1 Filed 08/13/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv JAL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/18/2018 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 04/10/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 1:07-cv JJF Document 1 Filed 01/18/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case: 5:17-cv JMH Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/15/17 Page: 1 of 7 - Page ID#: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

Case 8:18-cv SCB-MAP Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

EXPRESS, INC., A GEORGIA CORPORATION, D/B/A R&L GLOBAL LOGISTICS,

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/05/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1. - against - Complaint

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/30/17 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Plaintiff, CIVIL COMPLAINT

Case 0:18-cv DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/03/2018 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PILED. tjjlf1jsjtct1jf FLO.: Plaintiff, BRANDY SHAFFER ("Plaintiff"), on behalf of herself and others similarly

Case 3:17-cv DMS-RBB Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 20

Transcription:

Case 3:16-md-02741-VC Document 323-3 Filed 05/29/17 Page 1 of 9 Exhibit 3

Case 3:16-md-02741-VC Document 323-3 Filed 05/29/17 Page 2 of 9 THE MILLER FIRM, LLC 108 Railroad Avenue Orange, Virginia 22960 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Charlottesville Division Plaintiff/Complainant, vs. Civil Action No: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20004 Defendant/Respondent. COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF Complainant, THE MILLER FIRM, LLC, files this Complaint For Injunctive Relief pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(4)(B), and states as follows. I. PARTIES 1. Complainant The Miller Firm, LLC is a Virginia limited liability corporation with its principal place of business in Orange, Virginia. Complainant primarily represents people injured after exposure to mass-marketed products. 2. Respondent Environmental Protection Agency is an agency of the Executive Branch of the United States government. It is an agency within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 552(f). 1 Case 3:17-cv-00035-GEC Document 1 Filed 05/22/17 Page 1 of 6 Pageid#: 1

Case 3:16-md-02741-VC Document 323-3 Filed 05/29/17 Page 3 of 9 II. Jurisdiction and Venue 3. This Court has jurisdiction over this action, and venue is proper, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552 (4)(B) because Complainant has its principal place of business within the Western District of Virginia. III. Background 4. Complainant law firm represents more than 1000 consumers who used Roundup, a pesticide made and sold by Monsanto. 5. In recent years published science has shown repeatedly that Roundup exposure increases the risk of non Hodgkin lymphoma. 6. All of petitioner s clients have lymphoma, and some are dying quite rapidly of it. Logic dictates that more will die on an ongoing basis. 7. Petitioner submitted a FOIA request in conjunction with a subpoena served on a former EPA employee with close ties to Monsanto. His deposition took place on April 24, 2017. 8. Though the subpoena was served on or about February 13, 2017, petitioner worked in good faith with EPA employee Mark Stilp, Esq. and others to modify the document search, which targeted a handful of emails relevant to EPA regulation of Roundup and the litigation at hand (carcinogenicity of Roundup). 9. EPA treated the amended FOIA request as having been dated April 17, 2017, although the online docket shows a date of April 19, 2017 10. 2 Case 3:17-cv-00035-GEC Document 1 Filed 05/22/17 Page 2 of 6 Pageid#: 2

Case 3:16-md-02741-VC Document 323-3 Filed 05/29/17 Page 4 of 9 The FOIA request was assigned number: EPA-HQ-2017-006294. Its scope was as follows: Search Part One Custodians (i.e., search all emails sent or received by each individual): Jack Housenger Justina Fugh Francesca Grifo Search Period (i.e., email date range): 7/11/16 to 7/17/16 Subject Line Keyword(s): "FQPA" Search Part Two (as originally submitted on 4/17/17) Custodians: Bill Jordan Stephen Dapson Search Period: 5/13/16 to 5/21/16 Subject Line Keyword(s): "FQPA" OR "misconduct" 11. Regardless of date, twenty working days have passed since the request was submitted and accepted, and the Agency has gone curiously silent, despite acknowledging that responsive documents were located. 3 Case 3:17-cv-00035-GEC Document 1 Filed 05/22/17 Page 3 of 6 Pageid#: 3

Case 3:16-md-02741-VC Document 323-3 Filed 05/29/17 Page 5 of 9 12. The EPA has made no claim of privilege over any of the requested documents nor suggested that any of the information was not disclosable under the Freedom of Information Act. 13. To date, no documents responsive to the Request have been produced. IV. Standard of Review 14. When the EPA does not respond to a Freedom of Information Act request, that failure is properly reviewable by a District Court and may grant injunctive relief enjoining the Agency from withholding records. 5 U.S.C. 552. 15. The district courts are to review agency decisions, including those regarding processing of FOIA requests, 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B). V. INJUNCTION 16. Respondent has failed to comply with the Freedom of Information Act in providing a response within twenty working days. In the instant case, there was a pressing need to process the FOIA request on an expedited basis, since it was tied to a deposition subpoena. 17. The Federal Government, through a United States Attorney (Northern District of California), authorized the testimony of the deponent and agreed to make all reasonable efforts to produce the handful of requested emails in time for deposition. 18. No documents were produced, despite the Agency acknowledging that responsive emails have been located. 4 Case 3:17-cv-00035-GEC Document 1 Filed 05/22/17 Page 4 of 6 Pageid#: 4

Case 3:16-md-02741-VC Document 323-3 Filed 05/29/17 Page 6 of 9 19. An urgent need continued to exist as the parties to the cancer litigation (MDL 2741) litigated motions practice with respect to the former Agency employee. Petitioner continued to try to work with EPA in good faith but was rebuffed and no documents produced. 20. An urgent need continues today as the product Roundup poses a grave danger to life and limb, and Petitioner s clients are frequently succumbing to the disease. 21. The public, and Petitioner, have a right to know the goings-on of their government with respect to this deadly product, and there has been no claim of privilege or protection over the requested documents. 22. Though the EPA undoubtedly receives a large number of FOIA requests, the lives of many could depend on the release of these documents. 23. As Justice Brandeis noted, publicity is justly commended as a remedy for social and industrial diseases. 1 In the present circumstances, the disinfecting nature of sunlight has the potential to prevent a disease even more injurious and concrete than those social and industrial ills. VI. Prayer for Relief WHEREFORE, Complainant prays that this Court: 1. Order the EPA to disclose the requested records, in their entirety, on an expedited basis, within 10 days; 2. Award Complainant its costs and reasonable attorneys fees incurred in this action; and 1 Brandeis, Louis. Other People s Money and How Bankers Use It. (1914). 5 Case 3:17-cv-00035-GEC Document 1 Filed 05/22/17 Page 5 of 6 Pageid#: 5

Case 3:16-md-02741-VC Document 323-3 Filed 05/29/17 Page 7 of 9 3. Grant such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper. Respectfully Submitted by: /s/ Timothy Litzenburg TIMOTHY LITZENBURG JEFFREY TRAVERS The Miller Firm, LLC 108 Railroad Avenue Orange, Virginia 22960 Telephone: (540) 672-4224 Fax: (540) 672-3055 tlitzenburg@millerfirmllc.com jtravers@millerfirmllc.com 6 Case 3:17-cv-00035-GEC Document 1 Filed 05/22/17 Page 6 of 6 Pageid#: 6

JS 44 (Rev. 0 /16) Case 3:16-md-02741-VC Document 323-3 Filed 05/29/17 Page 8 of 9 CIVIL COVER SHEET The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.) I. (a) PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS The Miller Firm LLC Environmental Protection Agency (b) County of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff Orange (EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) County of Residence of First Listed Defendant (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY) NOTE: IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE THE LOCATION OF THE TRACT OF LAND INVOLVED. (c) Attorneys (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number) Attorneys (If Known) Timothy Litzenburg, The Miller Firm, LLC, 108 Railroad ave, Orange, VA 22960, 540 672 4224 II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an X in One Box Only) III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an X in One Box for Plaintiff (For Diversity Cases Only) and One Box for Defendant) 1 U.S. Government 3 Federal Question PTF DEF PTF DEF Plaintiff (U.S. Government Not a Party) Citizen of This State 1 1 Incorporated or Principal Place 4 4 of Business In This State 2 U.S. Government 4 Diversity Citizen of Another State 2 2 Incorporated and Principal Place 5 5 Defendant (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III) of Business In Another State Citizen or Subject of a 3 3 Foreign Nation 6 6 Foreign Country IV. NATURE OF SUIT (Place an X in One Box Only) CONTRACT TORTS FORFEITURE/PENALTY BANKRUPTCY OTHER STATUTES 110 Insurance PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY 625 Drug Related Seizure 422 Appeal 28 USC 158 375 False Claims Act 120 Marine 310 Airplane 365 Personal Injury - of Property 21 USC 881 423 Withdrawal 376 Qui Tam (31 USC 130 Miller Act 315 Airplane Product Product Liability 690 Other 28 USC 157 3729(a)) 140 Negotiable Instrument Liability 367 Health Care/ 400 State Reapportionment 150 Recovery of Overpayment 320 Assault, Libel & Pharmaceutical PROPERTY RIGHTS 410 Antitrust & Enforcement of Judgment Slander Personal Injury 820 Copyrights 430 Banks and Banking 151 Medicare Act 330 Federal Employers Product Liability 830 Patent 450 Commerce 152 Recovery of Defaulted Liability 368 Asbestos Personal 840 Trademark 460 Deportation Student Loans 340 Marine Injury Product 470 Racketeer Influenced and (Excludes Veterans) 345 Marine Product Liability LABOR SOCIAL SECURITY Corrupt Organizations 153 Recovery of Overpayment Liability PERSONAL PROPERTY 710 Fair Labor Standards 861 HIA (1395ff) 480 Consumer Credit of Veteran s Benefits 350 Motor Vehicle 370 Other Fraud Act 862 Black Lung (923) 490 Cable/Sat TV 160 Stockholders Suits 355 Motor Vehicle 371 Truth in Lending 720 Labor/Management 863 DIWC/DIWW (405(g)) 850 Securities/Commodities/ 190 Other Contract Product Liability 380 Other Personal Relations 864 SSID Title XVI Exchange 195 Contract Product Liability 360 Other Personal Property Damage 740 Railway Labor Act 865 RSI (405(g)) 890 Other Statutory Actions 196 Franchise Injury 385 Property Damage 751 Family and Medical 891 Agricultural Acts 362 Personal Injury - Product Liability Leave Act 893 Environmental Matters Medical Malpractice 790 Other Labor Litigation 895 Freedom of Information REAL PROPERTY CIVIL RIGHTS PRISONER PETITIONS 791 Employee Retirement FEDERAL TAX SUITS Act 210 Land Condemnation 440 Other Civil Rights Habeas Corpus: Income Security Act 870 Taxes (U.S. Plaintiff 896 Arbitration 220 Foreclosure 441 Voting 463 Alien Detainee or Defendant) 899 Administrative Procedure 230 Rent Lease & Ejectment 442 Employment 510 Motions to Vacate 871 IRS Third Party Act/Review or Appeal of 240 Torts to Land 443 Housing/ Sentence 26 USC 7609 Agency Decision 245 Tort Product Liability Accommodations 530 General 950 Constitutionality of 290 All Other Real Property 445 Amer. w/disabilities - 535 Death Penalty IMMIGRATION State Statutes Employment Other: 462 Naturalization Application 446 Amer. w/disabilities - 540 Mandamus & Other 465 Other Immigration Other 550 Civil Rights Actions 448 Education 555 Prison Condition 560 Civil Detainee - Conditions of Confinement V. ORIGIN (Place an X in One Box Only) 1 Original 2 Removed from Proceeding State Court VI. CAUSE OF ACTION VII. REQUESTED IN COMPLAINT: VIII. RELATED CASE(S) IF ANY DATE FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 3 Remanded from 4 Reinstated or 5 Transferred from 6 Appellate Court Reopened Another District (specify) Cite the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing (Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity): 5 U.S.C. 552 Brief description of cause: Action to enforce FOIA CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTION UNDER RULE 23, F.R.Cv.P. (See instructions): DEMAND $ JUDGE SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD 05/22/2017 /s/ Timothy Litzenburg Multidistrict Litigation - Transfer 8 Multidistrict Litigation - Direct File CHECK YES only if demanded in complaint: JURY DEMAND: Yes No DOCKET NUMBER Case 3:17-cv-00035-GEC Document 1-1 Filed 05/22/17 Page 1 of 2 Pageid#: 7 RECEIPT # AMOUNT APPLYING IFP JUDGE MAG. JUDGE

JS 44 Reverse (Rev. 0 /16) Case 3:16-md-02741-VC Document 323-3 Filed 05/29/17 Page 9 of 9 INSTRUCTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS COMPLETING CIVIL COVER SHEET FORM JS 44 Authority For Civil Cover Sheet The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replaces nor supplements the filings and service of pleading or other papers as required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. Consequently, a civil cover sheet is submitted to the Clerk of Court for each civil complaint filed. The attorney filing a case should complete the form as follows: I.(a) (b) (c) II. III. IV. Plaintiffs-Defendants. Enter names (last, first, middle initial) of plaintiff and defendant. If the plaintiff or defendant is a government agency, use only the full name or standard abbreviations. If the plaintiff or defendant is an official within a government agency, identify first the agency and then the official, giving both name and title. County of Residence. For each civil case filed, except U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county where the first listed plaintiff resides at the time of filing. In U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county in which the first listed defendant resides at the time of filing. (NOTE: In land condemnation cases, the county of residence of the "defendant" is the location of the tract of land involved.) Attorneys. Enter the firm name, address, telephone number, and attorney of record. If there are several attorneys, list them on an attachment, noting in this section "(see attachment)". Jurisdiction. The basis of jurisdiction is set forth under Rule 8(a), F.R.Cv.P., which requires that jurisdictions be shown in pleadings. Place an "X" in one of the boxes. If there is more than one basis of jurisdiction, precedence is given in the order shown below. United States plaintiff. (1) Jurisdiction based on 28 U.S.C. 1345 and 1348. Suits by agencies and officers of the United States are included here. United States defendant. (2) When the plaintiff is suing the United States, its officers or agencies, place an "X" in this box. Federal question. (3) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1331, where jurisdiction arises under the Constitution of the United States, an amendment to the Constitution, an act of Congress or a treaty of the United States. In cases where the U.S. is a party, the U.S. plaintiff or defendant code takes precedence, and box 1 or 2 should be marked. Diversity of citizenship. (4) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1332, where parties are citizens of different states. When Box 4 is checked, the citizenship of the different parties must be checked. (See Section III below; NOTE: federal question actions take precedence over diversity cases.) Residence (citizenship) of Principal Parties. This section of the JS 44 is to be completed if diversity of citizenship was indicated above. Mark this section for each principal party. V. Origin. Place an "X" in one of the seven boxes. Original Proceedings. (1) Cases which originate in the United States district courts. Removed from State Court. (2) Proceedings initiated in state courts may be removed to the district courts under Title 28 U.S.C., Section 1441. When the petition for removal is granted, check this box. Remanded from Appellate Court. (3) Check this box for cases remanded to the district court for further action. Use the date of remand as the filing date. Reinstated or Reopened. (4) Check this box for cases reinstated or reopened in the district court. Use the reopening date as the filing date. Transferred from Another District. (5) For cases transferred under Title 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a). Do not use this for within district transfers or multidistrict litigation transfers. Multidistrict Litigation Transfer. (6) Check this box when a multidistrict case is transferred into the district under authority of Title 28 U.S.C. Section 1407. Multidistrict Litigation Direct File. (8) Check this box when a multidistrict case is filed in the same district as the Master MDL docket. PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE IS NOT AN ORIGIN CODE 7. Origin Code 7 was used for historical records and is no longer relevant due to changes in statue. VI. VII. VIII. Cause of Action. Report the civil statute directly related to the cause of action and give a brief description of the cause. Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity. Example: U.S. Civil Statute: 47 USC 553 Brief Description: Unauthorized reception of cable service Requested in Complaint. Class Action. Place an "X" in this box if you are filing a class action under Rule 23, F.R.Cv.P. Demand. In this space enter the actual dollar amount being demanded or indicate other demand, such as a preliminary injunction. Jury Demand. Check the appropriate box to indicate whether or not a jury is being demanded. Related Cases. This section of the JS 44 is used to reference related pending cases, if any. If there are related pending cases, insert the docket numbers and the corresponding judge names for such cases. Date and Attorney Signature. Date and sign the civil cover sheet. Case 3:17-cv-00035-GEC Document 1-1 Filed 05/22/17 Page 2 of 2 Pageid#: 8