Case5:10-cv JF Document107 Filed01/12/12 Page1 of 7

Similar documents
Case5:10-cv JF Document72 Filed09/16/11 Page1 of 7

Case 2:15-cv LDD Document 54 Filed 12/12/16 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLfEAS p H. D H lit ui Item 4u.i CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

Case 3:14-cv PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283

Case 4:13-cv YGR Document 126 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:14-cv SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:15-md CRB Document Filed 07/26/16 Page 1 of 5. Exhibit 5 Individual Release of Claims

Case3:10-cv SI Document135 Filed07/11/12 Page1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case5:10-cv RMW Document207 Filed03/11/14 Page1 of 7

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND JUDGMENT GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSING CLAIMS

Case 4:16-cv O Document 137 Filed 02/21/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID 5982

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1

Case 2:01-cv SRC-CLW Document Filed 05/15/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID: EXHIBIT C

Case 1:14-cv JBW-LB Document 116 Filed 04/05/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: CV-1 199

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:18-cv RJC

Case 2:07-cv RAJ Document 87 Filed 03/27/2009 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

1,=-= := usns son~ 1,.!oocume?~t " LEl'TRONICALLY fl.led i!

Case 4:16-cv CW Document 75-4 Filed 08/14/18 Page 1 of 7

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF CLASS NOTICE AND SCHEDULING A FINAL FAIRNESS HEARING

nm OPOREPJYINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case 3:17-md EMC Document Filed 01/18/19 Page 1 of 6. Exhibit 5 Individual Release of Claims

Case 3:14-cv TJC-JBT Document 173 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID 6189

Case 5:12-cv SOH Document 457 Filed 04/08/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 12296

Case 1:11-cv VM Document 509 Filed 07/03/13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

If you are a current or former paying member of Angie s List, Inc., you may get a payment or benefit from a proposed Class Action Settlement.

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 82 Filed 12/20/18 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 1:07-cv SHS Document 165 Filed 12/07/12 Page 1 of 2

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

Case 2:06-cv AB-JC Document 797 Filed 10/13/17 Page 1 of 4 Page ID #:25126

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

~~_,_ ~~-~ni~i#j~rj I

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14

Case 8:15-cv JLS-KES Document 43-4 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:440 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS

Case 1:04-cv DAB Document 569 Filed 12/02/10 Page 1 of 8 SOUTHERN DISTIUCT OF NEW YORK..

Case 2:16-cv ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161

Case: 1:08-cv Document #: 679 Filed: 02/16/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:29342

Case 2:04-cv AC-MKM Document 193 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Your legal rights may be affected even if you do not act. Please read this Notice carefully. YOUR RIGHTS AND CHOICES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Case No. 12-C-884-JPS CLASS ACTION PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. 05-CV H(RBB) CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION

All. final approval a proposed settlement of this class action, which is unopposed by Defendants

SEPARATION AGREEMENT, GENERAL RELEASE AND COVENANT NOT TO SUE

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE. Gentiva Securities Litigation PO Box 3058 Portland, OR

Case 3:11-md DMS-RBB Document 108 Filed 12/18/12 Page 1 of 12

Case 1:16-cv AOR Document 50-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/12/2017 Page 2 of 34

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE DIVISION

Case 4:16-cv HSG Document 33-1 Filed 11/16/16 Page 16 of 66 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT. into between Plaintiff ARcare, Inc. ( Plaintiff or ARcare ), on behalf of itself and a class of

Case 3:13-cv HSG Document Filed 03/17/16 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 3:13-cv HSG Document 133 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:16-cv KPF Document 26 Filed 11/30/16 Page 1 of 11. : Plaintiff, : : Defendant.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CENTRAL DIVISION. Special Title (Rule 1550(b)) PROCEEDING NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IOC SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YOR. This matter came before the Court for hearing pursuant to this Court's Order Granting

Case: 1: 1 0-cv Document #: 77 Filed: 03/22/11 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:569

Case: HJB Doc #: 3155 Filed: 02/23/16 Desc: Main Document Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE : :

Case 2:06-cv AB Document Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case5:09-cv JW Document146-3 Filed08/25/11 Page1 of 13. Exhibit A-2

Case 2:16-bk BB Doc 1220 Filed 07/17/18 Entered 07/17/18 08:08:17 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

[PROPOSED] FINAL APPROVAL ORDER

AMENDED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE. This Amended Class Action Settlement Agreement and General Release ( Settlement

Case 1:09-cv PAC Document 159 Filed 07/13/15 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) )

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case KJC Doc 441 Filed 09/11/18 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS. Plaintiff, Index No.: /2006 Justice Carolyn E. Demarest

Case 1:16-cv TSE-TCB Document 114 Filed 10/06/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 1372

Case 1:12-cv RM-KMT Document 239 Filed 03/06/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

SDC SONY DOCUMENT FJCiRONICAU FILED

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 1 of 11

Attention California purchasers of Canada Dry Ginger Ale Between December 28, 2012 and June 26, 2018

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

Attorneys for Defendants AM RETAIL GROUP, INC. AND G-III APPAREL GROUP, LTD. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND

PROOF OF CLAIM FORM AND RELEASE INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

JOINT NOTICE OF ERRATA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Currently before the Court for preliminary approval is a settlement (the

Case 1:17-cv AT Document 77 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

Case 1:10-cv ER-SRF Document 844 Filed 11/19/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:11-cv LAK-JCF Document 285 Filed 01/30/15 Page 1 of 9

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-DIMITROULEAS STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

Case 1:13-cv ALC-HBP Document 29 Filed 06/26/13 Page 1 of 60 ECF CASE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

Case 3:17-cv EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15

Transcription:

Case:0-cv-0-JF Document0 Filed0// Page of 0 0 Eric H. Gibbs (State Bar No. ) ehg@girardgibbs.com Dylan Hughes (State Bar No. 0) dsh@girardgibbs.com Geoffrey A. Munroe (State Bar No. 0) gam@girardgibbs.com GIRARD GIBBS LLP 0 California Street, th Floor San Francisco, CA 0 Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () - Attorneys for Plaintiffs JONAS SUGARMAN and QUANG LE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiffs, DUCATI NORTH AMERICA, INC., Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION **E-Filed //0** Case No. :0-cv-0-JF ------------------- [PROPOSED] FINAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT CASE NO. :0-CV-0-JF

Case:0-cv-0-JF Document0 Filed0// Page of 0 0 This matter came before the Court for hearing pursuant to the Order Granting Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement dated September, 0 ( Preliminary Approval Order ), and on application of the parties for final approval of the parties Class Settlement Agreement and Release dated August, 0 ( Settlement Agreement ). The capitalized defined terms in the Settlement Agreement shall apply to this Final Order and Judgment. Due and adequate notice having been given of the proposed settlement as required by the Preliminary Approval Order, and the Court having considered all papers filed and proceedings had herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:. The Court hereby reaffirms its findings that the following previously-certified Settlement Class meets the requirements of Rule of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: All residents of the United States who, as of September, 0, own any 00-0 Ducati Monster, Multistrada, SportClassic, Streetfighter, Superbike or Hypermotard model family motorcycle manufactured with a plastic fuel tank, including but not limited to the following model and model year motorcycles (collectively, Class Vehicles ): 00-00 Monster 0, 0 dark, 0 i.e. dark, 0 i.e., M, M dark, 00, SR, SR, SR S Tricolore, SR dark, SR000, and SRS motorcycles; 00-0 Monster, +, + ABS,, ABS, 00, 00S, 00 ABS, 00 evo ABS, 00S ABS, M, M00, and M00 S motorcycles; 00-00 Multistrada 000, 000S, 000 DS, 000S DS, 00 DS, 00S DS, 0, 0 dark, MTS 000, MTS 000S, MTS 00 and MTS 00S motorcycles; 00-0 Multistrada 00, 00S Sport, 00S Touring and 00S Pikes Peak motorcycles; 00-00 SportClassic Sport 000, Paul Smart 000, Paul Smart 000 LE, GT Touring, GT 000, GT 000 Touring, GT 000 Bicolore, Sport 000S, Sport 000 Biposto and Sport 000 Monoposto motorcycles; 00-0 Streetfighter and Streetfighter S motorcycles; 00-0 Superbike, NH, Hayden Limited, evo, 0, 0S, 0 Tricolore, 0R, 0R Bayliss, R,, S, R corse SE, S corse SE and SP motorcycles; and 00-0 Hypermotard matt, red, 00, 00 evo, 00 evo SP, 00S, 00E and 00SP motorcycles. Excluded from the class are Ducati; any affiliate, parent, or subsidiary of Ducati; any entity in which Ducati has a controlling interest; any officer, director, or employee of CASE NO. :0-CV-0-JF

Case:0-cv-0-JF Document0 Filed0// Page of 0 0 Ducati; any successor or assign of Ducati; anyone employed by counsel for Plaintiffs in this action; and any Judge to whom this case is assigned as well as his or her immediate family.. The Court finds and concludes that notice has been given to all Settlement Class Members known and reasonably identifiable as of the date of the Preliminary Approval Order, and the notice given was the best notice practicable under the circumstances and fully satisfied due process and the requirements of Rule of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court further finds that notice has been given to the appropriate federal and state officials pursuant to U.S.C.. Furthermore, the Court has given the appropriate state and federal government officials the requisite ninety (0) day time period (pursuant to U.S.C. ) to comment or object to the proposed settlement before entering this Final Order and Judgment and no such objections or comments were received.. The Court finds that the terms and provisions of the Settlement Agreement, including any and all amendments and exhibits, have been entered into in good faith and are hereby fully and finally approved as fair, reasonable and adequate as to, and in the best interests of, the Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class Members, and in full compliance with all applicable requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the United States Constitution (including the Due Process Clause), and any other applicable law. In making this determination, the Court considered all of the objections submitted by class members.. The Court hereby dismisses this action with prejudice and without costs, except as might be awarded in connection with Plaintiffs application for attorneys fees, reimbursement of expenses, and service awards ( Fee Application ).. The Court shall consider the Fee Application separately from its consideration of the fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy of the Settlement Agreement. Any order or proceedings relating to the Fee Application, or any appeal from any order relating thereto or reversal or modification thereof, shall not disturb or affect this Final Order and Judgment or affect or delay the finality of this Final Order and Judgment.. Upon the Effective Date of the Settlement Agreement, in accordance with the Settlement Agreement, Plaintiffs and each Settlement Class member, individually and on behalf CASE NO. :0-CV-0-JF

Case:0-cv-0-JF Document0 Filed0// Page of 0 0 and any successors, assigns, heirs and representatives, shall be deemed to have, and by operation of this Final Order and Judgment shall have, released, waived, and discharged all Released Parties from all Released Claims, as more fully set forth in the Settlement Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, claims for personal injuries (i.e., bodily injuries) are not released.. The Released Claims include known and unknown claims. Settlement Class Members have expressly, knowingly, and voluntarily waived the provisions of Section of the California Civil Code, which provides as follows: A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR. Settlement Class Members have expressly waived and relinquished any and all rights and benefits that they may have under, or that may be conferred upon them by, the provisions of Section of the California Civil Code, or any other law of any state or territory that is similar, comparable, or equivalent to Section, to the fullest extent that they may lawfully waive such rights or benefits pertaining to the Released Claims. In connection with such waiver and relinquishment, the Settlement Class Members have acknowledged that they are aware that they or their attorneys may hereafter discover claims or facts in addition to or different from those that they now know or believe exist with respect to Released Claims, but that it is their intention to hereby fully, finally, and forever settle and release all of the Released Claims known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, that they have against the Released Parties. In furtherance of such intention, the release herein given by the Settlement Class Members to the Released Parties shall be and remain in effect as a full and complete general release notwithstanding the discovery or existence of any such additional or different claims or facts. Each of the parties expressly acknowledged that it has been advised by its attorney of the contents and effect of Section, and with knowledge, each of the parties has expressly waived whatever benefits it may have had pursuant to such section. Plaintiffs have CASE NO. :0-CV-0-JF

Case:0-cv-0-JF Document0 Filed0// Page of 0 0 acknowledged, and the Settlement Class Members shall be deemed by operation of the Final Order and Judgment to have acknowledged, that the foregoing waiver was separately bargained for and a material element of the Settlement of which this release is a part.. Attached to this Final Order and Judgment is a list setting forth the name of each person who submitted a request for exclusion from the Settlement Class in compliance with the or whose late request was approved by the Court procedures set forth in the Preliminary Approval Order The persons so identified shall be neither entitled to benefits from the settlement nor bound by this Final Order and Judgment. All whose names do not appear on this list Settlement Class members ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- who have not submitted such an exclusion request by the date set by ----------- the Court shall be bound by this Final Order and Judgment.. The Court orders that, upon the Effective Date, the Settlement Agreement shall be the exclusive remedy for any and all Released Claims of Settlement Class Members. The Court thus hereby permanently bars and enjoins Plaintiffs, all Settlement Class Members, their successors, assigns, heirs and representatives and all persons acting on behalf of such Plaintiffs or Settlement Class Members from: (a) filing, commencing, asserting, prosecuting, maintaining, pursuing, continuing, or intervening in any lawsuit or arbitration in any jurisdiction based upon or asserting any of the Released Claims; or (b) bringing a class action on behalf of Plaintiffs or Settlement Class Members, seeking to certify a class that includes Plaintiffs or Settlement Class Members, or continuing to prosecute or participate in any previously filed and/or certified class action based upon or asserting any of the Released Claims. 0. Without affecting the finality of this Final Order and Judgment in any way, the Court hereby retains exclusive and continuing jurisdiction over (a) all matters relating to the administration, consummation, validity, enforcement and interpretation of the Settlement Agreement; (b) further proceedings, if necessary, on Plaintiffs Fee Application for attorneys fees, expenses and service awards in connection with this action and its settlement; (c) the parties and the Class members for the purpose of construing, enforcing, and administering the Settlement Agreement and this Final Order and Judgment; and (d) entering such additional orders, if any, as may be necessary or appropriate to protect or effectuate this Final Order and Judgment and the Settlement Agreement (including, without limitation, orders enjoining persons CASE NO. :0-CV-0-JF

Case:0-cv-0-JF Document0 Filed0// Page of or entities from pursuing claims against Released Parties), or to ensure the fair and orderly administration of the Settlement.. Without further order of the Court, the parties may agree to reasonably necessary extensions of time to carry out any of the provisions of the Settlement Agreement.. In the event that the Effective Date does not occur, certification of the Settlement Class shall be automatically vacated and this Final Order and Judgment, and all other orders entered and releases delivered in connection herewith, shall be vacated and shall become null and void. 0 0 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:, January 0 The Honorable Jeremy Fogel United States District Judge CASE NO. :0-CV-0-JF

Case:0-cv-0-JF Document0 Filed0// Page of List of Individuals Excluded from the Settlement 0 0 Steven Phillip Ahlgrim Joseph Baribeau David P. Bojarski II Charles A. Brown Jennifer Cook Christopher R. Cooper Roger J. Cozzi Thomas James Herrick Gregory L. Hughes Kirk Jordan Lionel King Max Klare Henry Lee Tyler Littlefield Michael Okes Stephen Parker Sydney Pok Randall Poland Brooks M. Remaley Jeromy J. Schuelke Darren Lee Storey Patrick A. Tam Jeffrey H. Tour Carlo Vernieri Roger Kinney Todd Stephen Corcoran William Stevens Brad Cason CASE NO. :0-CV-0-JF