The Free Movement of Persons

Similar documents
Read Barnard, 3 rd edition, Chs 8 and 9 Treaty of Maastricht 1993 created the status of Union Citizenship Arts TFEU Treaty

Free Movement of Workers

Free Movement of Workers and the European Citizenship

Citizenship of the European Union

FEANTSA Toolkit. Free Movement of EU citizens! and access to social assistance! Guidance for Homeless Service Providers

TABLE OF CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN DIRECTIVE 2004/38/EC AND CURRENT EC LEGISLATION ON FREE MOVEMENT AND RESIDENCE OF UNION CITIZENS WITHIN THE EU

Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 23 March Brian Francis Collins v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 21 February 2013 (*)

Social assistance and the right to reside at the European Court of Justice Dano v Jobcenter Leipzig

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens. Law school. European Law MARKET FREEDOMS II. Smaragda Rigakou

Session 5 Applying European Citizenship rights

1. WHY THE PROPOSAL? Improving the national enforcement of the rules on Free Movement of Workers. 1. Why this proposal? 2. What are the main elements?

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 24 October 2013 (*)

Free movement of EU citizens within the EU and equal treatment for social benefits: solidarity or benefit tourism?

Prof. dr. Herwig Verschueren University of Antwerp Berlin - 20 June Non-discrimination and social rights under Reg. 492/2011 and Dir.

Social benefits for migrating EU citizens

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ON THE FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION. Working Paper IE Law School WPLS

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 19 June 2014 (*)

Reports of Cases. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 14 June 2012 *

Acquis communautaire in the field of education

EU GUIDE. Questions and answers about the rights of EU citizens

European Union citizenship, national welfare systems and social solidarity

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL LÉGER delivered on 5 October

STATEMENT OF THE COUNCIL'S REASONS

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL Wahl delivered on 12 December 2013 (1) Case C-507/12. Jessy Saint Prix v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

EU Internal Market Law

FREE MOVEMENT OF EU CITIZENS: INCLUDING FOR THE POOR?

What are the legal implications of David Cameron s demands for EU migration reform? By Professor Damian Chalmers

Union Citezenship: Impact, Influences and Challenges to Irish Immigration Laws.

European Immigration and Asylum Law

Contents Civis Duplex Sum : Two Layers of Citizenship in a Dialogue of Equality Part I The Development of United States Citizenship

composed of A. Rosas, President of the Chamber, A. Ó Caoimh, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues (Rapporteur), U. Lõhmus and P. Lindh, Judges,

Further proposals to restrict migrants access to benefits

ARTICLES. FREE MOVEMENT OF EU CITIZENS Including for the Poor?

Remedies and Sanctions in Anti-Discrimination Law

EU Internal Market Law

The facts 4. The facts, as found by the First-tier Tribunal, supplemented with information provided in this appeal, are as follows.

Recent Developments in EU Public Law. Scottish Public Law Group Annual Summer Conference 9 June 2014

Durham Research Online

TAS-HAGEN AND TAS. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 26 October 2006*

The baseless fabric of this vision: EU Citizenship, the right to reside and EU law

Prof. Dr. Christof Kerwer. EU Labour Law. Baku State University. April 2013

Fees, Grants, Loans And Dole Cheques: Who Covers The Costs Of Migrant Education Within The EU?

Case C-163/99. Portuguese Republic v Commission of the European Communities

Options Paper. Simplification and improvement of legislation in the area of equal treatment between men and women

Collective agreements and collective bargaining: analyses of the impact of the European Court of Justice rulings on Laval & Viking

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. 3 P a g e

Enforcement against Member States

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 26 July and. The Norwegian Government, represented by the Immigration Appeals Board THE COURT,

ETUC Position on the EC proposal for the revision of Regulation 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems

1 P a g e. to the GPOW: the Genuine Prospect of Work Test - (1) as a cause of homelessness for EEA migrants. (2) arguments against the test

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL GEELHOED delivered on 19 February

EUROPEAN UNION CITIZENSHIP: THE JOURNEY GOES ON

Introduction to Gender Equality law

THE SUBSTANTIVE LAW OF THE EU

UNIO - EU Law Jounal. Vol. 1, No. 1, July 2015, pp Centre of Studies in European Union Law School of Law University of Minho

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (sitting as a full Court ) 19 October 2004 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 7 September 2004 *

Euro-Bonds The Ruiz Zambrano judgment or the Real Invention of EU Citizenship

Opinion of Advocate General Saggio delivered on 13 April Ursula Elsen v Bundesversicherungsanstalt für Angestellte

4 Sources of EU law A. Introduction

Migration and Nationality-based Discrimination. Migration and Nationalitybased Discrimination. Olivier De Schutter

Worksheets on European Competition Law

Reports of Cases OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL SHARPSTON 1. delivered on 12 December Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel v O. v S.

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL Sharpston delivered on 12 December 2013 (1) Case C-456/12. Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel v O

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL GEELHOED delivered on 28 September

The EU as an actor in International Law. Lund, 7 September 2017 Eduardo Gill-Pedro

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 23 September 2003 *

Rhiannon Morgan v Bezirksregierung Köln (C-11/06) and Iris Bucher v Landrat des Kreises Düren (C- 12/06)

Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee ( 1 ),

Scope and Application of Article 346 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU

The EU Legal Framework on Equality

Do you want to work in another EU Member State? Find out about your rights!

EUROPEAN UNION CITIZENSHIP FROM 1993 TO 2013 AND AFTER

Council of the European Union Brussels, 1 February 2019 (OR. en)

Official Journal of the European Union L 94/375

Consolidation Act on the Prohibition of Differences of Treatment in the Labour Market etc. 1)

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Civis europeus sum? Social assistance and the right to reside in EU law.

Bachelor Thesis EU citizenship and the right to family reunification Dario Vaccaro Supervisor

Council of the European Union Brussels, 24 February 2016 (OR. en)

The EU Legal Framework on Equality

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL BOT delivered on 30 May 2017 (1) Case C 165/16. Toufik Lounes v Secretary of State for the Home Department

The 'Right to Reside' and Social Security Entitlements

THE FOUNDATION DEGREE at the University of Glamorgan

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 11 July 2002 *

Free movement of workers in the European Union

The Conference of International Non-Governmental Organisations (INGOs) of the Council of Europe,

Edinburgh Research Explorer

Zambrano, Lounes and Citizenship Rights: Where Are We Now? David Blundell Landmark Chambers

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL Mengozzi delivered on 7 July 2011 (1) Case C-545/09

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL GEELHOED delivered on 27 January

Freedom of Establishment.

Judgment of the Court of Justice, Zhu and Chen, Case C-200/02 (19 October 2004)

COMMUNITY RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS THE PREMISE OF THE RIGHT OF FREE MOVEMENT AND RESIDENCE. Abstract

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Committee on Legal Affairs Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular points (a) and (b) of Article 79(2) thereof,

Transcription:

The Free Movement of Persons Workers (Art 45(1) TFEU) Self-employed (establishment)(art 49 TFEU)

Free movement of persons One of the four freedoms envisaged in 1957 Central feature of the internal market Article 45(1) TFEU Free movement of workers Article 49 TFEU freedom of establishment (self-employed persons) Article 56 TFEU freedom to provide and receive services

Article 45 TFEU Para. 1 Freedom of movement for workers shall be secured within the Union. Para 2 FM shall entail the abolition of any discrimination based on nationality between workers as regards employment, pay and work conditions Para 3 sets out the rights and limitations to the fundamental right on grounds of public policy, public security, public health Para 4 Exemption for employment in the public service

Economic nexus To fall within Article 45 TFEU (ex-39 EC) the migrant must be engaging in an economic activity they must be a worker i.e. factors of production

The Free Movement of Persons Soon became clear that this policy area, which directly benefits human beings, must have implications beyond the economic of market integration

Breaking the economic nexus This has been done incrementally, over time ECJ and the legislature began to reflect the human dimension of this field.

Breaking the economic nexus ECJ broad interpretations of Treaty provisions and secondary legislation worker Levin 53/81 services performed for and under the direction of another for remuneration. Activity must be effective and genuine and not purely marginal or ancillary Includes right to enter and remain to seek work Antonissen C-292/89

Breaking the economic nexus A range of ancillary rights in order to remove disadvantages associated with exercising FM rights Right to receive social advantages under the same terms and conditions as host-state nationals Right of entry and residence for family members of the worker. Family rights = derivative / dependent These rights fleshed out in secondary legislation

A breakthrough Residency directives early 1990s Designed to extend protection of Community law by offering residency rights to certain categories of person Directive 90/365 retired workers Directive 93/96 students Directive 90/364 all others (the playboy directive ) No need to be a worker/economically active but must be economically self-sufficient

Secondary legislation Directive 2004/38 citizens rights directive This consolidated the caselaw and provides clearer and more coherent statement of rights Right to equal treatment Article 24 Codification of exceptions in Articles 27-33 Confers rights on migrants according to their length of residence in the host state Regulation 1612/68 substantive rights and social advantages

The biggest breakthrough! EU citizenship Articles 20-25 TFEU inserted into EC Treaty by the EU Treaty (Maastricht) Complementary status to nationality of MS Raft of rights Most significant Article 21(1) TFEU Every citizen of the Union shall have the right to move and reside freely within the territory of the MS, subject to the limits and conditions laid down in this Treaty and by the measures adopted to give it effect

What potential? Mere codification of pre-existing rights or basis for rethinking free movement rights? ECJ crucial role in developing the concept of EU citizenship It has interpreted Article 21 TFEU in combination with the Article 18 TFEU principle in order to create rights for citizens when they are in other MS irrespective of any economic nexus

Some key caselaw Non-workers C-85/96 Martinez Sala right to claim social security benefit Work-seekers C-138/02 Collins right to claim social security benefit C-258/04 Ioannidis

Some key caselaw Education and rights of students C-184/99 Grzelczyk -EU Citizenship is the fundamental status of nationals of the MS C-413/99 Baumbast Concerned residence rights -Article 21(1) (ex-18(1)) is capable of having direct effect. Any limitations on exercise of Treaty rights must be compatible with the principle of proportionality C-209/03 Bidar Equality of treatment in access to maintenance grants R. Greaves 2011

Some key case law Freedom from other discriminatory or restrictive national measures C-224/02 Pusa C-406/04 De Cuyper national legislation which places MS nationals at a disadvantage simply because they have exercised their right to FM is a prima facie restriction on the freedoms conferred by Article 21(1) TFEU (ex-18(1)ec) C-192/05 Tas-Hagen Transformative power of EU citizenship C-200/02 Chen

Incremental approach to residence and equality Case law does not suggest that all migrant EU citizens have immediate right to claim all benefits in the MS on the same terms as nationals Incremental approach - also reflected in Directive 2004/38 Residence integration - solidarity