Billings, Montana Telephone: (406) individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Attorneys

Similar documents
Case 2:13-cv JPS Filed 01/18/13 Page 1 of 12 Document 1

Case 2:18-cv JPB Document 1-1 Filed 10/25/18 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 31

Case 3:17-cv BEN-BGS Document 1 Filed 07/19/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 3

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/03/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1-2 Filed: 06/14/18 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:8 CIVIL COVER SHEET

Case 0:09-cv DWF-SRN Document 1 Filed 10/28/09 Page 1 of 5

Case 6:17-cv JA-GJK Document 1 Filed 12/14/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

CASE 0:17-cv WMW-LIB Document 1 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 1:17-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2017 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 3:16-cv YY Document 1 Filed 07/10/16 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:18-cv SJF-GRB Document 1 Filed 07/02/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

MASTER SHORT-FORM COMPLAINT FOR INDIVIDUAL CLAIMS

Case: 1:17-cv SA-DAS Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/19/17 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA HARRISONBURG DIVISION. NEXUS SERVICES, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No:

Case 1:17-cv RNS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/31/2017 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 3:18-cv TBR Document 1 Filed 01/30/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 2:18-cv HCM-RJK Document 1 Filed 07/03/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 1

Case 4:18-cv O Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv JAL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2016 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 3:17-cv G Document 1 Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1

vehicle. The Plaintiff, Oscar Willhelm Nilsson, by undersigned counsel, states as

Case 5:16-cv BKS-DEP Document 1 Filed 11/18/16 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:17-cv UU Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/22/2017 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

allege ("Plaintiffs"), on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, hereby 216(b) ("FLSA"). Accordingly, this Court has subject-matter

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 09/29/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civil No

Case 1:18-cv FAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/08/2018 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 1:17-cv DLH-CSM Document 1 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv SJF-GRB Document 1 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:15-cv GLR Document 1 Filed 12/23/15 Page 1 of 26

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/10/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 3:16-md VC Document Filed 05/29/17 Page 1 of 9. Exhibit 3

Case 5:18-cv Document 1 Filed 06/11/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Case No.: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

(collectively "Defendants") unpaid overtime wages, Plaintiff, CASE NO.:

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/08/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 0:17-cv BB Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2017 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION. v. Civil Action No.

Case 8:17-cv CEH-TBM Document 1 Filed 09/28/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv FAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2017 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 5:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/20/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Case 4:15-cv A Document 1 Filed 05/20/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID 1

Case 3:17-cv K Document 1 Filed 07/24/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 10/24/16 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 10/24/16 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:17-cv UU Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/27/2017 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/08/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1

Case3:15-cv Document1 Filed03/12/15 Page1 of 7

Case 2:17-cv CCC-MF Document 1 Filed 02/17/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : :

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 04/24/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:1

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 3:17-cv MO Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:16-cv RGA Document 1 Filed 02/17/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 2:16-cv BLW Document 1 Filed 08/12/16 Page 1 of 4

Plaintiff, similarly situated, files this Complaint against Defendant, KLOPP INVESTMENT. attorneys' fees and costs.

Case 8:17-cv RAL-TGW Document 1 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case: 4:16-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/25/16 Page: 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Charlottesville Division CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT. Preliminary Statement

Case 3:16-cv L Document 1 Filed 11/01/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1

Case 2:18-cv KM-CLW Document 1 Filed 03/16/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 1

Case 2:13-cv WJM-MF Document 1 Filed 08/01/13 Page 1 of 24 PageID: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COLLECTIVE ACTION COMPLAINT

Case 2:18-cv SJF-SIL Document 1 Filed 03/29/18 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1

For its Complaint against Defendant Adlife Marketing & Communications, Co.,

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/09/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO ROSWELL DIVISION

Case 5:18-cv HE Document 1 Filed 07/16/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

CASE 0:16-cv JNE-FLN Document 1 Filed 09/01/16 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Kurtis Skaar

Case 1:11-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 08/19/11 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:16-cv RC Document 1 Filed 06/22/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/02/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

Case 8:17-cv VMC-MAP Document 1 Filed 09/28/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:06-cv LTB-CBS Document 1 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case: 5:17-cv JMH Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/15/17 Page: 1 of 7 - Page ID#: 1

Case 3:17-cv DMS-RBB Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 20

Case 1:17-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/01/2017 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 1:18-cv KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/18/2018 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Case 9:12-cv RC Document 1 Filed 08/13/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Plaintiff(s), Defendant(s).

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/05/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1. - against - Complaint

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 3:18-cv AC Document 1 Filed 10/26/18 Page 1 of 17

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 04/10/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 1:18-cv JAL Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/18/2018 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/30/17 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.:

Case 4:17-cv JSW Document 1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 1 of 12

Case 2:17-cv ES-JAD Document 1 Filed 04/03/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 8:18-cv SCB-MAP Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1

Transcription:

Case 1:17-cv-00006-SPW-TJC Document 1 Filed 01/11/17 Page 1 of 12 John Heenan Colin Gerstner BISHOP, HEENAN & DAVIES 1631 Zimmerman Trail Billings, Montana 59102 Telephone: (406) 839-9091 jheenan@bhdlawyers.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION CHRISTIE KAUTSKY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL V. MY PILLOW, INC., Defendant. COME NOW Plaintiff and for her complaint respectfully show the Court as follows: TYPE OF ACTION 1. This is a putative class action brought pursuant to the Montana Consumer Protection Act (Montana CPA), 30-14-101 et seq. MCA. Plaintiff brings this action for herself individually and for all persons similarly situated.

Case 1:17-cv-00006-SPW-TJC Document 1 Filed 01/11/17 Page 2 of 12 11JRISDICTION AND VENUE 2. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1332 as the parties reside in different states and the amount in controversy exceeds $5,000,000. 3. Venue is proper in this division ofthe District ofmontana since the actions giving rise to the causes of action of the named Plaintiff occurred in Yellowstone County, Montana, and Plaintiff resides in Yellowstone County. PARTIES 4. Plaintiff is a natural person who resides in Yellowstone County, Montana. Members ofthe proposed class are Montana consumers who purchased a My Pillow, Inc. pillow under a buy one, get one free ("BOGO") offer. 5. Defendant My Pillow, Inc. is a Minnesota limited liability company transacting business and selling products in the State of Montana. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 6, This is a proposed class action. Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated persons currently seek declaratory and injunctive relief based on Defendant's acts and omissions. This includes relief for a Montana class based on violations of the Montana CPA. 7. These claims relate to two nationwide advertising campaigns by My Pillow, Inc. Both campaigns involved a business practice commonly referred to as 2

Case 1:17-cv-00006-SPW-TJC Document 1 Filed 01/11/17 Page 3 of 12 "false reference pricing." False reference pricing is the act of misrepresenting the regular price of a good that is purportedly offered at a "sale price" or as part of a buy one get one free offer. 8. In one campaign, My Pillow, Inc. offered a pillow for sale, and claimed to include a "free" pillow as part of the purchase. This is commonly known as, and is referred to by My Pillow as a "buy one get one free" or "BOGO" promotion. My Pillow, Inc.'s BOGO promotions were made in television advertisements seen throughout the United States, on the MyPillow.com website, on the internet website YouTube, and on other media, all of which were and are accessible throughout the United States, including Montana. 9. The My Pillow, Inc. BOGO Promotions were false and deceptive because My Pillow, Inc. did not provide one pillow "free." Instead, it inflated the regular price of the pillow being purchased as part of the promotion, resulting in the buyer purchasing two pillows at or near the combined regular price for two pillows. Stated alternatively, the pillow that was being sold as part of the BOGO promotion could be purchased for a substantially lower price without inclusion of the "free" pillow. Defendant attempted to mislead purchasers into buying two pillows instead of one under the guise that one of the two pillows was free, when it was not. 10. In another similar and related advertising campaign also involving false 3

Case 1:17-cv-00006-SPW-TJC Document 1 Filed 01/11/17 Page 4 of 12 reference pricing, My Pillow, Inc. offered a pillow for sale, and claimed to provide a 50% discount off its regular price. My Pillow, Inc.'s 50% Off offers were made in television advertisements seen throughout the United States, on the MyPillow.com website, on the internet website YouTube, and on other media, all ofwhich were and are accessible throughout the United States, including Montana (hereinafter "50% Off Promotion"). 11. The My Pillow, Inc. 50% Off Promotions were false and deceptive because My Pillow, Inc. was not providing a pillow for 50% off the regular price of the pillow. Instead, it inflated the price of the pillow to approximately twice the regular price, then offered an illusory 50% discount. 12. At various times during the class period, MyPillow, through its televised advertisements, web pages, and other media (collectively, "advertisements"), presented a BOGO Promotion related to its pillows. 13. MyPillow began its BOGO Promotion advertisement campaign in 2014 based in substantial part on extended televised advertisements ("infomercials"). 14. MyPillow's infornercials encouraged viewers to call in to a toll ftee number to place an order with an operator, or visit Defendant's website, www.mypillow.com to order its pillows. 4

Case 1:17-cv-00006-SPW-TJC Document 1 Filed 01/11/17 Page 5 of 12 15. On information and belief, MyPillow's infomercials were and are running a combined average of approximately 175 to 200 times per day networks, radio, and television channels. on local and national 16. The MyPillow BOGO Promotion was heavily advertised on various television stations, including Fox News. In order to receive a "free" pillow BOGO Promotion, the advertisements provided a promotion code. under the 17. The pillows could be purchased under the BOGO Promotion either by calling into the number provided in the advertisements and ordering though an operator, or purchased online through the www.mypillow.com website. 18. The advertisements stated "call or go online now to order MyPillow and Mike will give you a second pillow absolutely free. Use the promo code on your screen to get two MyPillows for the price of one." 19. To participate in the BOGO Promotion, Class Members, including Plaintiff, listened to the advertisements, and either ordered online, or phoned in and ordered through an operator. 20. Unbeknownst to Plaintiff and Class Members, they were not getting two pillows "for the price of one." Instead, MyPillow was inflating the regular price of the first pillow to approximately or exactly twice its regular price, thereby passing on the cost of the "free" pillow to the consumer. 5

Case 1:17-cv-00006-SPW-TJC Document 1 Filed 01/11/17 Page 6 of 12 21. For example, those obtaining two Standard Queen Premium pillows as part of the BOGO Promotion paid $99.97 plus shipping. One Standard Queen Premium pillow from MyPillow, however, could be purchased from the MyPillow website for a regular price of $49.99 plus shipping with a readily available "promo code, and from MyPillow on Amazon.com for $59.95 with free shipping without the use of a "promo code." 22. At various times during the class period, MyPillow, thmugh its televised advertisements, web pages, and other media (collectively, "advertisements"), presented a "50% Off" offer related to its pillows. 23. The 50% Off Promotion was similar to the BOGO Promotion in that both were widely advertised by MyPillow, the misconduct in both was based on false reference pricing, both used readily available "promotional codes", and with both contraly to the offer being promoted by MyPillow consumers were essentially purchasing a MyPillow at its regular price while being told they were getting a significant price reduction or a no cost item. 24. MyPillow began its 50% Off Promotion advertising campaign in approximately 2011 based in substantial part on extended televised advertisements ("infomercials"). My Pillow's infomercials encouraged viewers to call in to a toll free number to place an order with an operator, or visit Defendant's website, www.mypillow.com to order its pillows. 6

Case 1:17-cv-00006-SPW-TJC Document 1 Filed 01/11/17 Page 7 of 12 25. The MyPillow 50% Off Promotion was heavily advertised on various television stations, including Fox News. In order to receive a pillow under the 50% Off Promotion, the advertisements provided a promotion code. Various alphanumeric promotion codes applied. 26. The My Pillow promotion codes for the 50% Off Promotion are readily and freely available at no cost to the general public on the MyPillow website, in its commercials, and at various third party websites on the internet. 27. The pillows could be purchased under the 50% Off Promotion either by calling into the number provided in the advertisements and ordering though an operator, or purchased online through the www.mypillow.com website. 28. To participate in the 50% Off Promotion, Class Members listened to the advertisements, and either ordered online, or called in and ordered through an operator. 29. Unbeknownst to Class Members, they were not getting pillows for 50% off the regular price. Instead, MyPillow was inflating the regular price of the first pillow to approximately or exactly twice its regular price, then offering "50% Off" of the inflated price to the consumer, resulting in a final price that was at or near the regular price of the pillow. 30. For example, those obtaining a Queen Sized Premium pillow as part of the 50% Off Promotion were told that one Premium Queen Sized Premium pillow 7

Case 1:17-cv-00006-SPW-TJC Document 1 Filed 01/11/17 Page 8 of 12 was priced at $99.97, and that by applying the 50% off code, they received the pillow at half of its regular price. One Queen Sized Premium pillow from MyPillow, however, could be purchased from the MyPillow website for a regular price of $49.99 with a readily available "promo code, and from MyPillow on Amazon.com without a "promo code" for $59.95. When a Queen Sized Premium pillow was obtained as part of the 50% Off Promotion, the 50% Off claim was illusory and misleading. 31. MyPillow's advertisements regarding the 50% Off Promotion have been consistent throughout the class period. 32. Plaintiff, within the class period, saw the MyPillow advertisement on television, listened, understood and relied on the representation that if she purchased one premium pillow, then she would get another premium pillow "for free." 33. Based on this information, Plaintiff paid a total of $119, 92 to purchase one premium pillow and to get one premium pillow "for free." Her order, numbered 102162273, was placed on October 27, 2016. 34. Based on Defendant's representations made as part of the advertisement, she believed the true and regular price of the pillows was $99.97 each and that she was receiving one pillows free of charge. In reality, MyPillow was inflating the regular price of the first pillow to approximately or exactly twice its regular price, then offering "BOGO" of the inflated price to Plaintiff', resulting in a final price that 8

Case 1:17-cv-00006-SPW-TJC Document 1 Filed 01/11/17 Page 9 of 12 was at or near the regular price ofthe pillow. Thus, the "free" pillow was not actually free. The transaction was instead a disguised purchase of two pillows. CLASS ALLEGATIONS 35. Plaintiff brings this action for herself and on behalf of all similarly situated Montanans who participated in the BOGO Promotion and 50% off Promotion. 36. The Class of persons Plaintiff seeks to represent are defined as all persons who, at any time during the applicable class period, were Montana residents and purchased a pillow from Defendant as part of a buy one, get one free promotion or a 50% off promotion. 37. The legal claims of the proposed class are identical to those of Plaintiff. Because the claims of each member of the class arise from the purchase of a MyPillow under the deceptive BOGO promotion and 50% off promotion, the identical legal claims legal are present for Plaintiff and each member ofthe proposed class. There are question of law and fact that are common to the named Plaintiff and those of the proposed class. 38. The legal claims predominate over any minor factual differences between the Plaintiff or class members, if any. 9

Case 1:17-cv-00006-SPW-TJC Document 1 Filed 01/11/17 Page 10 of 12 39. The class members are consumers who may be unable to locate or afford counsel. Most are probably unaware that their legal rights have been violated. The amount of damages per consumer, while not insignificant, are generally small and thus a consumer class action is particularly well suited to address violations and for recovery by the class. 40. The named Plaintiff will adequately and fairly represent the interests of the class. 41. A class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the controversy. MONTANA CPA VIOLATION 42. Plaintiff incorporates the above facts. 43. Defendant violated the Montana CPA because its conduct: (a) constituted a false or misleading representation of fact concerning the reasons for, existence of, or amount ofprice reduction; (b) constituted a false or misleading statement about a promotion used to publicize a product; (c) constituted a false or misleading representation of fact concerning the offering price of or the person's cost for goods; and/or (d) constituted unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of its trade or commerce. 10

Case 1:17-cv-00006-SPW-TJC Document 1 Filed 01/11/17 Page 11 of 12 44. Plaintiff and the class suffered an ascertainable loss when they were charged and paid for a second pillow under Defendant's BOGO and/or 50% off promotions. 45. Plaintiff and each classrnember are entitled to recover $500.00 for Defendant's violation(s) of the Montana CPA. 46. Plaintiffs are entitled to their reasonable attorney's fees and costs under the Montana CPA. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for relief as follows: 1. This Court certify the class and appoint Plaintiff as Class representatives and their counsel as class counsel; 2. Each Plaintiff and each member of the class be awarded $500; 3. Plaintiff and the Class's costs and attorney fees; 4. Entry of a declaratory judgment; 5. Enjoin Defendant from continuing its unfair or deceptive business conduct as described herein. 6. Such other relief as this Court deems just. Plaintiff demands a trial by jury Dated this jj. day of January, 2017. JURY DEMAND on all claims, 11

Case 1:17-cv-00006-SPW-TJC Document 1 Filed 01/11/17 Page 12 of 12 By: Is/ John Heenan John Heenan BISHOP, HEENAN & DAVIES 1631 Zimmerman Trail Billing, Montana 59102 Attorneys for Plaintiff 12

JS 44 (Rev. 0 /16) Case 1:17-cv-00006-SPW-TJC CIVIL COVER Document SHEET 1-1 Filed 01/11/17 Page 1 of 2 The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.) I. (a) PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS Christie Kautsky (b) County of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff Yellowstone (EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) My Pillow, Inc. County of Residence of First Listed Defendant Carver County, MN (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY) NOTE: IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE THE LOCATION OF THE TRACT OF LAND INVOLVED. (c) Attorneys (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number) Attorneys (If Known) Bishop, Heenan & Davies 1631 Zimmerman Trail, Ste 1 Billings, MT 59102 406-839-9091 II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an X in One Box Only) III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an X in One Box for Plaintiff (For Diversity Cases Only) and One Box for Defendant) 1 U.S. Government 3 Federal Question PTF DEF PTF DEF Plaintiff (U.S. Government Not a Party) Citizen of This State 1 1 Incorporated or Principal Place 4 4 of Business In This State 2 U.S. Government 4 Diversity Citizen of Another State 2 2 Incorporated and Principal Place 5 5 Defendant (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III) of Business In Another State Citizen or Subject of a 3 3 Foreign Nation 6 6 Foreign Country IV. NATURE OF SUIT (Place an X in One Box Only) CONTRACT TORTS FORFEITURE/PENALTY BANKRUPTCY OTHER STATUTES 110 Insurance PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY 625 Drug Related Seizure 422 Appeal 28 USC 158 375 False Claims Act 120 Marine 310 Airplane 365 Personal Injury - of Property 21 USC 881 423 Withdrawal 376 Qui Tam (31 USC 130 Miller Act 315 Airplane Product Product Liability 690 Other 28 USC 157 3729(a)) 140 Negotiable Instrument Liability 367 Health Care/ 400 State Reapportionment 150 Recovery of Overpayment 320 Assault, Libel & Pharmaceutical PROPERTY RIGHTS 410 Antitrust & Enforcement of Judgment Slander Personal Injury 820 Copyrights 430 Banks and Banking 151 Medicare Act 330 Federal Employers Product Liability 830 Patent 450 Commerce 152 Recovery of Defaulted Liability 368 Asbestos Personal 840 Trademark 460 Deportation Student Loans 340 Marine Injury Product 470 Racketeer Influenced and (Excludes Veterans) 345 Marine Product Liability LABOR SOCIAL SECURITY Corrupt Organizations 153 Recovery of Overpayment Liability PERSONAL PROPERTY 710 Fair Labor Standards 861 HIA (1395ff) 480 Consumer Credit of Veteran s Benefits 350 Motor Vehicle 370 Other Fraud Act 862 Black Lung (923) 490 Cable/Sat TV 160 Stockholders Suits 355 Motor Vehicle 371 Truth in Lending 720 Labor/Management 863 DIWC/DIWW (405(g)) 850 Securities/Commodities/ 190 Other Contract Product Liability 380 Other Personal Relations 864 SSID Title XVI Exchange 195 Contract Product Liability 360 Other Personal Property Damage 740 Railway Labor Act 865 RSI (405(g)) 890 Other Statutory Actions 196 Franchise Injury 385 Property Damage 751 Family and Medical 891 Agricultural Acts 362 Personal Injury - Product Liability Leave Act 893 Environmental Matters Medical Malpractice 790 Other Labor Litigation 895 Freedom of Information REAL PROPERTY CIVIL RIGHTS PRISONER PETITIONS 791 Employee Retirement FEDERAL TAX SUITS Act 210 Land Condemnation 440 Other Civil Rights Habeas Corpus: Income Security Act 870 Taxes (U.S. Plaintiff 896 Arbitration 220 Foreclosure 441 Voting 463 Alien Detainee or Defendant) 899 Administrative Procedure 230 Rent Lease & Ejectment 442 Employment 510 Motions to Vacate 871 IRS Third Party Act/Review or Appeal of 240 Torts to Land 443 Housing/ Sentence 26 USC 7609 Agency Decision 245 Tort Product Liability Accommodations 530 General 950 Constitutionality of 290 All Other Real Property 445 Amer. w/disabilities - 535 Death Penalty IMMIGRATION State Statutes Employment Other: 462 Naturalization Application 446 Amer. w/disabilities - 540 Mandamus & Other 465 Other Immigration Other 550 Civil Rights Actions 448 Education 555 Prison Condition 560 Civil Detainee - Conditions of Confinement V. ORIGIN (Place an X in One Box Only) 1 Original 2 Removed from Proceeding State Court VI. CAUSE OF ACTION VII. REQUESTED IN COMPLAINT: VIII. RELATED CASE(S) IF ANY DATE 3 Remanded from 4 Reinstated or 5 Transferred from 6 Appellate Court Reopened Another District (specify) Cite the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing (Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity): 28 U.S.C. 1332 Brief description of cause: Violation of the Consumer Protection Act CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTION UNDER RULE 23, F.R.Cv.P. (See instructions): DEMAND $ JUDGE SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD Multidistrict Litigation - Transfer 8 Multidistrict Litigation - Direct File CHECK YES only if demanded in complaint: JURY DEMAND: Yes No DOCKET NUMBER FOR OFFICE USE ONLY RECEIPT # AMOUNT APPLYING IFP JUDGE MAG. JUDGE

JS 44 Reverse (Rev. 0 /16) Case 1:17-cv-00006-SPW-TJC Document 1-1 Filed 01/11/17 Page 2 of 2 INSTRUCTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS COMPLETING CIVIL COVER SHEET FORM JS 44 Authority For Civil Cover Sheet The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replaces nor supplements the filings and service of pleading or other papers as required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. Consequently, a civil cover sheet is submitted to the Clerk of Court for each civil complaint filed. The attorney filing a case should complete the form as follows: I.(a) (b) (c) II. III. IV. Plaintiffs-Defendants. Enter names (last, first, middle initial) of plaintiff and defendant. If the plaintiff or defendant is a government agency, use only the full name or standard abbreviations. If the plaintiff or defendant is an official within a government agency, identify first the agency and then the official, giving both name and title. County of Residence. For each civil case filed, except U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county where the first listed plaintiff resides at the time of filing. In U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county in which the first listed defendant resides at the time of filing. (NOTE: In land condemnation cases, the county of residence of the "defendant" is the location of the tract of land involved.) Attorneys. Enter the firm name, address, telephone number, and attorney of record. If there are several attorneys, list them on an attachment, noting in this section "(see attachment)". Jurisdiction. The basis of jurisdiction is set forth under Rule 8(a), F.R.Cv.P., which requires that jurisdictions be shown in pleadings. Place an "X" in one of the boxes. If there is more than one basis of jurisdiction, precedence is given in the order shown below. United States plaintiff. (1) Jurisdiction based on 28 U.S.C. 1345 and 1348. Suits by agencies and officers of the United States are included here. United States defendant. (2) When the plaintiff is suing the United States, its officers or agencies, place an "X" in this box. Federal question. (3) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1331, where jurisdiction arises under the Constitution of the United States, an amendment to the Constitution, an act of Congress or a treaty of the United States. In cases where the U.S. is a party, the U.S. plaintiff or defendant code takes precedence, and box 1 or 2 should be marked. Diversity of citizenship. (4) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1332, where parties are citizens of different states. When Box 4 is checked, the citizenship of the different parties must be checked. (See Section III below; NOTE: federal question actions take precedence over diversity cases.) Residence (citizenship) of Principal Parties. This section of the JS 44 is to be completed if diversity of citizenship was indicated above. Mark this section for each principal party. V. Origin. Place an "X" in one of the seven boxes. Original Proceedings. (1) Cases which originate in the United States district courts. Removed from State Court. (2) Proceedings initiated in state courts may be removed to the district courts under Title 28 U.S.C., Section 1441. When the petition for removal is granted, check this box. Remanded from Appellate Court. (3) Check this box for cases remanded to the district court for further action. Use the date of remand as the filing date. Reinstated or Reopened. (4) Check this box for cases reinstated or reopened in the district court. Use the reopening date as the filing date. Transferred from Another District. (5) For cases transferred under Title 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a). Do not use this for within district transfers or multidistrict litigation transfers. Multidistrict Litigation Transfer. (6) Check this box when a multidistrict case is transferred into the district under authority of Title 28 U.S.C. Section 1407. Multidistrict Litigation Direct File. (8) Check this box when a multidistrict case is filed in the same district as the Master MDL docket. PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE IS NOT AN ORIGIN CODE 7. Origin Code 7 was used for historical records and is no longer relevant due to changes in statue. VI. VII. VIII. Cause of Action. Report the civil statute directly related to the cause of action and give a brief description of the cause. Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity. Example: U.S. Civil Statute: 47 USC 553 Brief Description: Unauthorized reception of cable service Requested in Complaint. Class Action. Place an "X" in this box if you are filing a class action under Rule 23, F.R.Cv.P. Demand. In this space enter the actual dollar amount being demanded or indicate other demand, such as a preliminary injunction. Jury Demand. Check the appropriate box to indicate whether or not a jury is being demanded. Related Cases. This section of the JS 44 is used to reference related pending cases, if any. If there are related pending cases, insert the docket numbers and the corresponding judge names for such cases. Date and Attorney Signature. Date and sign the civil cover sheet.