Table of Contents. I State of play of antitrust damages in the EU and overview of the proposed reform

Similar documents
Private Actions for Infringement of Competition Laws in the EU: An Ongoing Project

ACTION FOR DAMAGES AND IMPOSITION OF FINES

CLASS ACTION DEVELOPMENTS IN EUROPE (April 2015) Stefaan Voet. Recommendation on Common Principles for Collective Redress Mechanisms

Actions for damages under national law: Achieving compensation through an appropriately balanced system

Trailblazing Competition Law: Private Enforcement in Europe on the move Christopher Rother, Managing Partner Hausfeld Rechtsanwälte

Damages Actions for Breach of the EC Antitrust Rules

Damages Directive 2014/104/EU:

Proving Competition Law Private Claims An EU Perspective

Quantifying Harm for Breaches of Antitrust Rules A European Union Perspective

Antitrust: policy paper on compensating consumer and business victims of competition breaches frequently asked questions (see also IP/08/515)

International Antitrust Litigation

Period of limitations in follow-on competition cases: when does a decision become final?

Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Private Enforcement of Competition Law Trials and Tribulations

PASSING-ON OF OVERCHARGES: WILL THE NATIONAL COURTS LEAD THE WAY FORWARD?

BULGARIA: PRIVATE DAMAGES DIRECTIVE IMPLEMENTED

Official Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES

Private enforcement of EU competition law

Private actions for breach of competition law

GERMAN COMPETITION LAW CHANGES: NEW RULES ON MERGER CONTROL, MARKET DOMINANCE, DAMAGES CLAIMS, AND CARTEL FINES

PE-CONS 80/14 DGG 3B EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 24 October 2014 (OR. en) 2013/0185 (COD) PE-CONS 80/14 RC 8 JUSTCIV 80 CODEC 961

EU Damages Directive Implementation

Antitrust: Commission introduces settlement procedure for cartels frequently asked questions (see also IP/08/1056)

Implementation of the Damages Directive across the EU

BINDING EFFECT OF DECISIONS ADOPTED BY NATIONAL COMPETITION AUTHORITIES

CONSULTATION ON COLLECTIVE REDRESS GREEK MINISTRY OF JUSTICE

Competition litigation in the European Union: recent developments

Private sector-led challenges to anti-competitive behaviour. Growth and fairness: private sector-led challenges to anti-competitive behaviour

The UK implements the EU Antitrust Damages Directive

Damages in Private Antitrust Actions in Europe

EU Antitrust Private Enforcement: DAMAGES ACTIONS

Comments on the proposal for a directive on representative actions for the protection of the collective interests of consumers

Self-Assessment of Agreements Under Article 81 EC: Is There a Need for More Commission Guidance?

European Commission staff working document - public consultation: Towards a coherent European Approach to Collective Redress

PlainSite. Legal Document. New York Southern District Court Case No. 1:09-cv Anwar et al v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited et al.

THE EU PRIVATE DAMAGES DIRECTIVE PRACTICAL INSIGHTS

Evidence, burden and standard of proof in competition cases. Sir Gerald Barling

Choice of Forum: Considerations from a Practitioner s Perspective

The economic analysis of interaction of fines and damages under European and American antitrust laws


A Multi-jurisdictional Survey on the Implementation of the EU Antitrust Damages Directive (2014/104/EU)

The Impact of the CDC Hydrogen Peroxide Judgment on Present and Future Arbitration Agreements

Executive summary and overview of the national report for Malta

Why is the Commission proposing to introduce a settlement procedure? Does the settlement procedure imply negotiations?

Private actions in competition law: effective redress for consumers and business

Rages, What are the Signs of Practical Progress?

Private Damages and Class Action in India

Civil Price-Fixing Cases In EU Vs. US: 10 Key Issues

OVERVIEW OF RECENT PRIVATE ANTITRUST LITIGATION ACTIVITY

International Convergence in competition policy and enforcement: a view from the EU. Carles ESTEVA MOSSO Director Policy and Strategy DG Competition

April 30, The Sections of Antitrust Law and International Law (the Sections ) of the American

I. Introduction 11. II. Part One. Comparative analysis 41. Section One. Role of the court at the initiation of the collective redress proceedings 43

Enlighten Latest developments in EU competition law and fundamental rights: an ongoing tale

The CPI Antitrust Journal May 2010 (2) Antitrust Forum- Shopping in England: Is Provimi Ltd v Aventis Correct? Brian Kennelly Blackstone Chambers

English - Or. English DIRECTORATE FOR FINANCIAL AND ENTERPRISE AFFAIRS COMPETITION COMMITTEE

Masterclass Cartel Investigations

Information Notice. Information Notice. Reference: ComReg 17/49

public consultation on a draft Regulation of the European Central Bank February 2014

ECN MODEL LENIENCY PROGRAMME

Public Procurement & Competition Policy

CONTENTS, SUMMERIES AND KEY WORDS

The Netherlands as efficient jurisdiction for cartel damages claim litigation. Louis Berger. Hans Bousie

THE PERMANENT REPRESENTATION OF DENMARK

DIRECTIVE 2014/57/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 16 April 2014 on criminal sanctions for market abuse (market abuse directive)

The Implementation and Impact of the EU Antitrust Damages Directive in the UK

Retroactive application of the Damages Directive

STANDARD OF PROOF IN CARTEL CASES

United States District Court

Non-Contractual Liability Arising out of Damage Caused to Another under the DCFR

Common law reasoning and institutions Civil and Criminal Procedure (England and Wales) Litigation U.S.

EU Competition Law Sanctions, Remedies & Procedure. Prof. Dr. juris Erling Hjelmeng 15 October 2013

General Overview of the EU Cartel Settlement Procedure. Jean-François Bellis (Partner, Van Bael & Bellis, Brussels)

Newsletter Competition law amendment may 2017

Competition Law Roundtable

Working Party No. 3 on Co-operation and Enforcement

2. PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROCEDURAL REGULATION ARTICLE

A French perspective on the quantification of antitrust harm. Frederic Jenny

Submission to the Commission for the European Communities by Claims Funding International plc

Bid-rigging in public and private procurement. - The Portuguese experience -

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE

Wyatt and Dashwood's European Union Law

RENFORCER LA COHERENCE DE L APPROCHE EUROPEENNE EN MATIERE DE RECOURS COLLECTIF : PROCHAINES ETAPES

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 4 April 2014 (OR. en) 2011/0297 (COD) PE-CONS 8/14 DROIPEN 1 EF 6 ECOFIN 21 CODEC 47

Final report Draft Implementing Technical Standards on penalties and measures under Directive 2009/65/EC (UCITS Directive)

ECN RECOMMENDATION ON COMMITMENT PROCEDURES

SCREEN CARTEL CASES SET THE BOUNDARY: TERRITORIAL LIMITS OF EU CARTEL DAMAGES CLAIMS

Challenges of Damages Directive transposition Croatian experience

OJ Ann. I(I) L. 156(I) 2004 No 3851,

General Principles of EC Law in a Process of Development

2 Travel v Cardiff Bus Making Commitments in Dominance Cases Less Attractive?

Notice of 16 May 2011 on the Method Relating to the Setting of Financial Penalties

Reform of Fines Proceedings in Germany: Critical Remarks from a Practitioner s View

US versus EU Antitrust Law

Public consultation on the ASSESSMENT OF THE PLANNED COHERENT EUROPEAN APPROACH TO COLLECTIVE REDRESS PUBLIC CONSULTATION PAPER

M R J U S TI C E RO TH

EU-China Trade Project (II) Leniency Policy and Practice

Redress Facilitation Orders As a Sanction Against Corporations

GDPR. EU General Data Protection Regulation. ebook Version 1.2

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation

Case T-351/02. v Commission of the European Communities

Transcription:

Table of Contents FOREWORD... 11 By Vice-President Joaquín A lmunia Introduction... 15 By Eric Morgan de Rivery and Jacques Derenne Keynote Speech.... 19 By Vice-President Joaquín A lmunia I State of play of antitrust damages in the EU and overview of the proposed reform Part I: ANTITRUST DAMAGES AT MEMBER STATES LEVEL... 29 By Barry Rodger Section (I): The research methodology project... 31 Section (II): Competition case-law across the EU... 33 Section (III): Remedies in competition litigation... 40 1. May 2004 Accession States and States with Limited Private Enforcement Experience.... 42 2. States with Developing Private Enforcement Experience... 43 3. States with Considerable Private Enforcement Experience... 45 Section (IV): Remedies and other data... 52 Section (V): Success in competition case-law.... 55 Part II: National Courts Perspective Binding effect of NCA decisions... 61 By Jacqueline Riffaut Silk Section (I): Introduction... 61 1. The principle of legal certainty... 62 bruylant 5

2. The obligation of sincere cooperation between, on the one hand, national courts, and on the other, the Commission and the EU courts... 62 3. Effectiveness and efficiency.... 63 Section (II): The need for convergence.... 64 1. The scope of the Proposal.... 64 2. The diversity of national rules applicable to damages actions throughout Europe... 66 Section (III): The binding effect rule and the legal elements of tort liability... 68 1. The fault... 68 1.1. The fault requirement: a decision.... 68 1.2. The fault requirement: an addressee... 71 2. The link of causation: effect and object... 73 3. Existence of harm... 74 Section (IV): How to ensure the effective implementation of the new rule?... 76 1. Access to decisions on public enforcement taken by NCAs in the EU.. 76 2. Should an infringement to the binding effect rule be sanctioned?.. 77 3. Would the claimant have a choice?... 77 4. Should control of the application of the binding effect rule be given to reviewing courts?... 78 II INITIATING A CLAIM Part I: PLURALITY IS THE KEY: COLLECTIVE REDRESS, CONSENSUAL SETTLEMENTS AND OTHER INCENTIVE DEVICES... 81 By Rafael A maro Section (I): EU legal tradition and US experience... 81 Section (II): Collective redress: Opt-in? Opt-out? Both? / Follow-on? Stand alone? Both? / Group actions? Representative actions? Both?... 84 1. Do opt-in systems work?... 84 2. Should group actions be limited to follow-on litigation?... 89 3. Are representative actions a good alternative to group actions?... 93 6 bruylant

Section (III): Consensual settlements: Business litigation? Consumer litigation? Both? /Opt-in? Opt-out? Both?... 94 1. Is there a need to protect settling infringers sued in further courts litigation?... 94 2. Are consensual settlements adapted to mass consumer litigation?. 96 3. Are opt-out consensual settlements the future of alternative dispute resolution?... 100 Section (IV): Incentive devices: Private funding? Public funding? Both?... 102 1. May group action systems work in E.U. Member States without punitive damages and contingency fees?.... 102 2. Is public funding a sustainable alternative to private funding?... 106 Part II: Collective redress: the group and the judicial supervision of the settlement.... 111 By Vincent Smith Section (I): Who is represented?... 112 Section (II): Supervising the method of settlement distribution... 114 1. Notice to the represented group.... 114 2. Ensuring that claimants fall within the class.... 115 3. Unclaimed settlement proceeds... 116 III Determining liability Part I: Quantification issues: estimating and calculating harm, presumption of harm in cartel cases... 121 By Pascale Déchamps Section (I): The new draft Directive from the European Commission and general approach to estimating damages.... 121 1. Estimating damages within the context of European law... 121 2. General approach to estimating damages... 122 3. Estimating harm from cartels and exclusionary conducts... 123 Section (II): How to construct the benchmark... 125 1. Classification of methods and models... 125 2. Cross-sectional analysis... 126 3. Before during after analysis... 127 bruylant 7

4. Difference-in-differences analysis... 129 5. Financial-analysis-based techniques... 131 6. Market-structure-based analysis, using the example of Cardiff Bus 132 Section (III): What about the presumption of harm in cartel cases?.. 134 1. What presumption?... 134 2. Is there any economic rationale for a presumption of X% overcharge in cartel cases?... 136 Section (IV): How to go from the benchmark to calculating harm? Applying interest... 137 Part II: Critical observations on the proposed presumption of harm: a diabolical presumption of platonic harm.... 141 By Thomas Rouhette Section (I): The distortion of fundamental principles of civil liability and procedure for a debatable purpose... 142 Section (II): The first of its kind?... 144 Section (III): The practical use of the presumption of harm?.... 145 Part III: Imputability issues in collection of damages: joint liability, parent-subsidiary relationship, etc.... 147 By Muriel Chagny Section (I): Imputability to the liable part(ies) and binding effect of Competition authorities decisions... 148 1. Imputability on the basis of competition decisions... 149 1.1. Possible imputability on the basis of decisions other than findings of infringement... 149 1.2. The differentiated imputability on the basis of an infringement decision... 150 2. Imputability of an undertaking s actions to legal persons.... 155 2.1. Imputability to the parent company in pursuit of a foundation. 156 2.2. Possible imputability to the subsidiary devoid of autonomy... 159 Section (II): Imputability between co-infringers and solidarity rules. 160 1. The principle: imputability shared among joint and several co-infringers... 160 1.1. The scope to be specified of shared imputability.... 161 1.2. The complex consequences of shared imputability... 162 8 bruylant

2. The exception: Limited imputability in favor of the leniency recipient... 165 2.1. A questionable measure of civil leniency... 166 2.2. Back to the general rule for the benefit of injured parties... 168 By Jacques Bourgeois IV Conclusion Section (I): Introduction... 169 Section (II): The aim(s) of the Directive... 170 Section (III): The effect of national competition authorities decisions on national courts of other Member States... 170 Section (IV): On determining liability... 171 Section (V): Tort Law Public law in disguise.... 172 Index.... 175 Annex... 177 The editors would like to thank Jessica Walch, avocat, and Alice Xavier, student, for their contributions to compiling and harmonizing various chapters of this book. bruylant 9