CASE # JSE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SPECIAL EXCEPTION STAFF CONTACT: MIKE TERTINGER

Similar documents
AMENDMENTS TO CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF GARFIELD ZONING ORDINANCE

ROCKY RIVER BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING APPEALS

ROCKY RIVER BOARD OF ZONING & BUILDING APPEALS

APPLICATION NUMBER A REQUEST FOR

TOWN OF NAPLES NAPLES MINIMUM LOT SIZE ORDINANCE. Naples Lot Size Ordinance for the Town of Naples, Maine Attested by Town Clerk

209/213 South Seventh Street Substandard Lot Variance

INDEXED. Nonconforming Lots" and subsection Review Process"; providing for severance;

City of Calistoga Staff Report

CITY OF EASTPOINTE BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR FENCE PERMIT

: FENCE STANDARDS:

Article 14: Nonconformities

ZONING RESOLUTION Web Version THE CITY OF NEW YORK. Article XI: Special Purpose Districts Chapter 3: Special Ocean Parkway District


ORDINANCE NO Ordinance No Page 1 of 7. Language to be added is underlined. Language to be deleted is struck through.

STATE OF VERMONT DECISION ON MOTION. LeGrand & Scata Variance Application

SECTION 824 "R-1-B" - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT

ADMINISTRATIVE DEVIATION APPLICATION AND REVIEW PROCESS

ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 112 (ZONING) OF THE 1976 CODE OF THE COUNTY OF FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA

ZONING HEARING BOARD APPLICATION

ANALYSIS. This ordinance amends Title 22 - Planning and Zoning of the Los Angeles

CHEBOYGAN COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

Accessory Buildings (Portion pulled from Town Code Updated 2015)

Item No Halifax and West Community Council May 17, 2016

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Quality Services for a Quality Community

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CONCORD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

MINUTES OF THE JOINT MEETING MINNEHAHA COUNTY & SIOUX FALLS PLANNING COMMISSIONS October 24, 2016

6.1 Planned Unit Development District

Article 11.0 Nonconformities

ARTICLE 7 AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE

Please note: Retaining walls less than five feet (5') in height do not require a building permit.

APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE

PRESENTED: January 15, 2008 FILE: / BYL 1984

CITY OF GRAHAM BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT February 19, 2013

VARIANCE APPLICATION Type A B C (circle one)

Board of Adjustment. November 19, 2013 immediately following the Planning Board meeting at 7:00pm Council Chambers, 201 S Main St.

BUILDING PERMIT ORDINANCE TOWN OF WOODSTOCK

Heritage Commercial Residential Zone (C4)

CHAPTER NONCONFORMITIES SECTION GENERALLY Intent and Purpose

I. ROUTINE BUSINESS. With the absence of a minister, the Council held a moment of silence.

MINUTES LINCOLN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. August 26, 2013

NONCONFORMING USES, BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES OR LOTS

BY-LAW NO NOW THEREFORE the Council of The Corporation of the City of Kingston hereby ENACTS as follows.

ARTICLE 1: Purpose and Administration

Sec Planned unit development business (PUD-B).

Part 3. Zoning. 153A-340. Grant of power. (a) For the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals, or the general welfare, a county may adopt zoning

Stream Protection Buffer Variance Request

3620 PARK RD. MULTI-FAMILY REZONING PETITION No RZ-1 SITE DEVELOPMENT DATA VICINITY MAP NTS TECHNICAL DATA SHEET CHARLOTTE SITE PARK RD.

DIVISION 21. OVERLAY DISTRICTS

FROM: General Manager, Planning and Development FILE: (Kwomais Point Park)

City Attorney's Synopsis

The following are the powers and jurisdictions of the various decision makers and administrative bodies.

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO. An ordinance amending Chapter 51A, Dallas Development Code: Ordinance No , as

APPEAL DEV APPLICABLE GARDEN CITY CODE

PERMIT COVER PAGE. Is contractor performing work? YES NO. If answered YES than Contractor must provide Proof of Insurance to the Borough

All applicants are to complete the following:

MEETING AGENDA MONDAY, DECEMBER 12, :00 A.M. INFORMAL BOARD ROOM JEAN OXLEY PUBLIC SERVICE CENTER 935 SECOND STREET SW, CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA

CITY OF SURREY BY-LAW NO A by-law to amend Surrey Zoning By-law, 1993, No , as amended....

ARTICLE VIII SIGN REGULATIONS

St. Mary s County Board of Appeals Annual Report

ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Waukee:

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION

MINUTES September 20, 2017 Plan Commission City of Batavia. Chair LaLonde; Vice-Chair Schneider; Commissioners Gosselin, Harms, Joseph, Peterson

BUILDING AND LAND USE REGULATIONS

CITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No (OMB)

SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT APPEAL BOARD AGENDA

Up Previous Next Main Collapse Search Print Title 23 ZONING

Kent Studebaker, Mayor Members of the City Council. Paul Espe, Associate Planner. Ordinance Annexing Property at 5022 Upper Drive (AN )

GENOA CHARTER TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS January 14, :30 P.M. AGENDA

Appanoose County Zoning Ordinance Index to Changes

o for a variance as stated on attached Form 3

ORDNANCE NO. An ordinance changing the zoning classification on the following property:

CITY OF NORTH RIDGEVILLE BOARD OF ZONING AND BUILDING APPEALS Procedure for filing an Appeal, Conditional Use, Variances or Home Occupation Approvals

O2-CD Zoning. B1-CD Zoning. O2-CD Zoning. RZ-1: Technical Data Sheet CHARLOTTE ETJ LIMITS 75' CLASS C RIGHT-IN / RIGHT-OUT, LEFT IN ACCESS POINT

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

2018 MEETING DATES AND FILING DEADLINES

Charlton Planning Board Zoning Bylaw/Zoning Map Changes

ALBEMARLE COUNTY CODE. Chapter 18. Zoning. Article IV. Procedure

BOARD OF APPEALS April 11, County Administration Building, 100 W. Washington St., Meeting Room 2000, Hagerstown, at 7:00 p.m.

5100. General lol. Exempt Signs loz. Temporary Sign Regulations Business Signs Off-Premises Signs los. Sign Permits

Receive FREE updates, excerpts of code references, technical articles, and more when you register your code book. Go to

WILLIAM M. HUGEL AND ANNAMARIE HUGEL

IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CASE NUMBER V ELLEN C. GRIFFIN SECOND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DATE HEARD: JANUARY 5, 2016 ORDERED BY:

(JULY 2000 EDITION, Pub. by City of LA) Rev. 9/13/

BOARD OF APPEALS January 10, 2018 AGENDA

H. CURTISS MARTIN, ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE ELIZABETH A. McCLANAHAN JUNE 6, 2013 CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, ET AL.

ARTICLE 7 AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE

CITY COUNCIL CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU HONOLULU, HAWAU

Upon motion by, seconded by, the following. Ordinance was duly enacted, voting in favor of enactment, voting against enactment.

EAST NOTTINGHAM TOWNSHIP ZONING ORDINANCE ARTICLE XXII ZONING HEARING BOARD

Miami Zoning Board. Time: 7:00 PM Monday, October 20, 2003 City Hall, 3500 Pan American Drive

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION Instructions for Completion

SPECIAL SECTIONS 500.

ORDINANCE NO. An ordinance amending Section of the Los Angeles Municipal Code by amending the zoning map.

PLANNING COMMISSION VERSION

IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CASE NUMBER V RONALD M. KLINE AND RACHEL A. KLINE SECOND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT

ARTICLE 7 AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE

` Board of Zoning Appeals 601 Lakeside Avenue, Room 516 Cleveland, Ohio

MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT HELD IN THE ADMINISTRATION OFFICE, 1024 HURLWOOD LANE, TUESDAY, May 20, 2014 AT 7:00 P.M.

Transcription:

CASE # JSE16-0006 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SPECIAL EXCEPTION STAFF CONTACT: MIKE TERTINGER OWNER/APPLICANT INFORMATION OWNER/APPLICANT: MAILING/PROPERTY ADDRESS: John & Penelope Marion 1400 Arrowhead Rd Mt. Vernon, IA 52314 REQUEST The applicant is requesting a special exception from the required corner side yard setback of fifty (50) feet in the AG (Agricultural) zoning district. The applicant is requesting to build a stationary carport on an existing angled driveway parking spot which will be forty-one (41) feet from the corner side property line. The carport will be approximately 12 x 16. OUTSTANDING ISSUES AND STANDARDS FOR APPROVAL The proposed stationary carport will be located northeast of the existing home in the angled driveway parking spot closest to the home. A demonstration of practical difficulty appears to have been shown in this case due to the location of the existing dwelling, garage, and driveway configuration in relation to the front and corner side yard setbacks that does not reasonably allow for an alternate carport placement. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of this application as it appears that a practical difficulty has been demonstrated

Planning & Development Linn County, Iowa www.linncounty.org/planning phone 319.892.5130 fax 319.892.5155 Jean Oxley Public Service Center 935 Second Street Southwest Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52404 PROPERTY INFORMATION: MAP DESIGNATION: AA (Agricultural Area) CURRENT ZONING: AG (Agricultural) SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING North Agricultural; AG South Agricultural; AG East Agricultural; AG West Agricultural, 1 single-family dwelling; AG PARCEL SIZE: 1.01 acres STAFF REPORT SPECIAL EXCEPTION CORNER SIDE YARD SETBACK JSE16-0006 Board of Adjustment Meeting: SEPTEMBER 28, 2016 FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. John & Penelope Marion are the owners of record of the subject property. 2. The Rural Land Use Map designation is AA (Agricultural Area). 3. The property is zoned AG (Agricultural). 4. The required corner side yard setback is fifty (50) feet in the AG (Agricultural) zoning district. 5. The carport is proposed to be located forty-one (41) feet from the corner side property line. 6. The property is 1.01 acres in size.

Case # JSE16-0006, Page 3 of 5 7. The property owner filed the special exception request with the Planning and Development Department on August 19 th, 2016. LEGAL PRINCIPLES: Article 4, Section 10, Subsection 3, of the Unified Development Code provides the following standards for the granting of a special exception. No variation in the application of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be made unless and until the Board of Adjustment shall be satisfied that all of the following criteria are met: (a) Strict compliance with the restrictions governing setback, frontage, height, or other bulk provisions of this Ordinance would result in a practical difficulty upon the owner of such property and only where such exception: i. Does not exceed 50 percent of the particular limitation or number in question, or; ii. Is from a yard requirement to permit an addition to an existing legal nonconforming building, and such addition extends no further into the required yard than the existing building; Analysis: The required corner yard setback in the AG (Agricultural) district is fifty (50) feet; the proposed carport is to be forty-one (41) feet from the property line. This would appear to meet the standard (i) above. Staff Conclusion: The proposal appears to meet the standards set forth in Article 4, Sec. 10, 3 (a). (b) The exception relates entirely to a permitted use (principal, conditional, or accessory) classified by applicable district regulations, or to a permitted sign or off-street parking or loading areas accessory to such a permitted use; Analysis: A carport is a detached accessory structure which is permitted use in the AG (Agricultural) zoning district. Staff conclusion: The special exception request appears to meet the requirement that it is related to a permitted use. (c) The practical difficulty is due to circumstances, unique to the property and prohibits the use of the subject property in a manner reasonably similar to that of other property in the same district. Such circumstances include but are not limited to topographical condition, surroundings, size, shape or other condition, location of public utilities or public improvements on or adjacent to the subject property, or other extraordinary or exceptional situation; Analysis: The purpose of the proposed carport is to add covered parking outside of the existing garage and over the existing driveway. The upper section of angled parking is forty-one (41) feet from the corner side property line at its closest point. The lower section of angled parking furthest from the dwelling, if used as an alternate location for a carport, would be encroaching on both the corner and front yard setbacks. Staff conclusion: The request appears to be a practical difficulty in that the proposed carport cannot be placed in another location due to the layout of the existing driveway, garage and dwelling, and without violating the fifty (50) foot front yard setback as well as corner side yard setback.

Case # JSE16-0006, Page 4 of 5 (d) A grant of the special exception applied for, or a lesser relaxation of the restrictions than applied for, is reasonably necessary due to practical difficulties related to the land in question and would do substantial justice to an applicant as well as to other property owners in the locality; Analysis: The existing angled parking spot is forty-one (41) feet from the corner side yard, and the required corner side yard setback is fifty (50) feet in the AG zoning district. The most reasonable driveway location for a carport cannot be accomplished such that it that would not violate the required setback standards without applying for a Special Exception Staff conclusion: The request appears to be reasonably necessary in order to provide substantial justice to the applicant in this case. (e) Such practical difficulties cannot be overcome by any feasible alternative means other than an exception; Analysis: As previously mentioned, in order to allow the construction of the carport that uses the existing driveway, a special exception has to be granted. Staff conclusion: The request appears to meet the standard. (f) Relief can be granted in a manner that will not alter the essential character of the locality. Analysis: The carport will be located on what is an already existing driveway parking spot. Its size and scale will not alter the essential character of the locality. Staff conclusion: The request appears to meet the standard. Staff concludes that all six criteria have been met. If the Board determines that one or more of the above criteria is not met, the Board must deny the special exception. ALTERNATIVES: The Board of Adjustment may consider the following alternatives: 1. Grant the requested special exception subject to conditions. 2. Grant relief less than or different from the requested special exception. 3. Deny the requested special exception. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends alternative 1; grant the proposed special exception request for the following reasons: 1. The proposal meets all of the legal principles. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ALL CONDITIONS, AS OUTLINED IN THIS STAFF REPORT, PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL OF THE CASE. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING A CONDITION, CONTACT THE DEPARTMENT UNDER WHICH THAT CONDITION IS LISTED. THE CONTACTS NAMES AND PHONE NUMBERS ARE LISTED BELOW. ITEMS IN THE COMMENTS SECTION ARE NOT A REQUIREMENT TO BE MET PRIOR

Case # JSE16-0006, Page 5 of 5 TO APPROVAL. THEY ARE INTENDED TO INCREASE YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND AWARENESS OF ISSUES THAT MAY POSSIBLY EXIST ON THE PROPERTY. LINN COUNTY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT - ZONING DIVISION MIKE TERTINGER, PLANNER, 892-5130 1. If the Board of Adjustment grants the special exception, the applicant shall obtain a zoning permit and all necessary building permits prior to the start of any construction on the property.