Initial Report on the Post Expiration Domain Name Recovery Policy Development Process Executive Summary

Similar documents
Introduction to the Revised GNSO Policy Development Process. By Marika Konings

ICANN Policy Update - Dakar

Insert title here (75 characters maximum) PRE-ICANN60 POLICY OPEN HOUSE

Final Issue Report on IGO-INGO Access to the UDRP & URS Date: 25 May 2014

GNSO Council Open Mee0ng 7 December 2010

DRAFT WORKING GROUP CHARTER

Welcome to Pre-ICANN62 Policy Webinar PRE-ICANN63 POLICY OPEN HOUSE 11 OCTOBER 2018

At-Large Advisory Committee Statement.

DRAFT WORKING GROUP CHARTER

IGO/INGO Identifiers Protection Policy Implementation. Meeting with the IRT ICANN October 2015

(a) A number of Constituencies, where applicable, organized within the Stakeholder Groups as described in Section 11.5;

New gtld Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Face-to- Face Session (Work Track 5) ICANN60 1 November 2017

The Governmental Advisory Committee

Role of Governments in Internet Governance. MEAC-SIG Cairo 2018

Summary of Changes to Registry Agreement for New gtlds. (Proposed Final version against v.4)

Workshop on the Current State of the UDRP

FRL Registry BV. Terms & Conditions for the registration and usage of.frl domain names

Proposed Next Steps Readiness for post-transition Bylaws 15 May 2018

For GNSO Consideration: Uniform Rapid Suspension System (URS) October 2009

ICANN s Contractual Compliance Program. Tuesday, 25 October 2011

Standing Selection Mailing list archives: Committee Mailing List:

Issues Report IDN ccpdp 02 April Bart Boswinkel Issue Manager

Final GNSO Issue Report on the Protection of International Organization Names in New gtlds

Joint SO/AC Working Group (WG) Charter

Background on ICANN s Role Concerning the UDRP & Courts. Tim Cole Chief Registrar Liaison ICANN

REGISTRY AGREEMENT ARTICLE 1. DELEGATION AND OPERATION OF TOP LEVEL DOMAIN; REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES

21 December GNSO Council Review of the Hyderabad GAC Communiqué. From: James Bladel, GNSO Chair To: Steve Crocker, ICANN Board

GNSO Report. Dr Bruce Tonkin Chair, GNSO Council ICANN Board Public Forum Marrakech, June 28, 2006

Exhibit A. Registration Agreement

This document contains the registry agreement associated with the Applicant Guidebook for New gtlds.

11:00 Los Angeles; 14:00 Washington; 19:00 London; 23:00 Islamabad; (Thursday 28 June) 03:00 Tokyo; 04:00 Hobart

.FARMERS DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES

"We", "us" and "our" refers to Register Matrix, trading as registermatrix.com.

This English translation is provided for information purposes only. The official version of this document is available in German.

IP MANAGEMENT IN NIGERIA: TRADEMARKS & DESIGNS

From: Rafik Dammak Date: Friday, October 19, 2018 To: Cherine Chalaby Subject: NCSG Comment on UAM

.NIKE DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES

.BOSTIK DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES

Summary of Changes to Base Agreement for New gtlds Draft for Discussion

REGISTRATION ELIGIBILITY DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY

.VIG DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES

RIPE NCC Update. Andrew de la Haye COO. Andrew de la Haye April 2016 ARIN 37

.BOOKING DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES

Background to and Status of Work on Protections for Names and Acronyms of the Red Cross movement and International Governmental Organizations (IGOs)

August The Board looks forward to the community discussion of this report.

. 淡马锡 REGISTRATION POLICIES

Attachment 3..Brand TLD Designation Application

Qatar Chemical Company Ltd Yun Jae Kim

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXTENSION OF THE ABANDONED VEHICLE ABATEMENT PROGRAM UNTIL 2022

UNIFORM RAPID SUSPENSION SYSTEM ( URS ) 11 JANUARY 2012

Exhibit A. Registration Agreement

REGISTRY AGREEMENT ARTICLE 1. DELEGATION AND OPERATION OF TOP LEVEL DOMAIN; REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES

The Who, What, Why, How and When of the Rejection Action Process

At-Large Improvements Work Team D

MEMORANDUM. Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers. Thomas Nygren and Pontus Stenbeck, Hamilton Advokatbyrå

Extended Validation SSL Certificate Request


Top Level Design LLC January 22, 2015

Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policies

ANNEX 1: Registry Reserved Names. Capitalized terms have the meaning as specified in Article 1 of the.vistaprint Domain Name Registration Policies.

THE SUPPLEMENTAL RULES (IN EFFECT AS OF 31 JULY 2015)

The Uniform Rapid Suspension Policy and Rules Summary

Summary of Changes to New gtld Registry Agreement. (Proposed Draft 5 February 2013)

The FORUM s Supplemental Rules to ICANN s Registrar Transfer Dispute Resolution Policy (TDRP)

If you are registering the domain for a third party, you further agree that they have read and agree to the Nominet T&Cs as well.

Terms and Conditions

Eligibility Requirements Dispute Resolution for Domain Names ( ERDRP )

an introduction to domain names

Business Day: means a working day as defined by the Provider in its Supplemental Rules.

TUCOWS.INFO domain APPLICATION SERVICE TERMS OF USE

CoCCA Registrar Agreement, Page 1 of 5

Form of Registration Agreement

COMPANIES AMENDMENT ACT 2000 BERMUDA 2000 : 29 COMPANIES AMENDMENT ACT 2000

Plaintiff SCOTT STEPHENS (hereinafter Plaintiff ) through his attorney respectfully alleges: INTRODUCTION

Business Day: means a working day as defined by the Provider in its Supplemental Rules.

WIPO LIST OF NEUTRALS BIOGRAPHICAL DATA. Telephone: Facsimile:

Agenda. New gtld Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Avri Doria and Jeff Neuman. Introduction and Timeline Eleeza Agopian

WILSONVILLE YOUTH SPORTS, INC. An Oregon Corporation BYLAWS. ARTICLE I Purpose

Fertilizers, Farm Feeds and Agricultural Remedies Act 36 of 1947 section 23(1)

ANNEX A TO THE APPLICATION FORM FOR REMISSION OR DEFERRAL OF COURT FEES. ADGM Guidelines on Remission and Deferral of Court Fees

.IN REGISTRAR ACCREDITATION AGREEMENT

Application and Agreement.name WHOIS Extensive Search Database

Synergy Wholesale Reseller Agreement Version 1.7

PART 3A PROCEEDINGS AND APPEALS

(i) the data provided in the domain name registration application is true, correct, up to date and complete,

Revised ICANN Procedure For Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law

Submission of Adopted GNSO Council Review of the Johannesburg GAC Communiqué

Case 1:11-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/06/2011 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

BYLAWS FOR INTERNET CORPORATION FOR ASSIGNED NAMES AND NUMBERS A California Nonprofit Public-Benefit Corporation

GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS AMENDMENT BILL

American Bible Society DotBible Community Dispute Resolution Policy

Working Group Charter

SRA Compensation Fund Rules 2011

Dominion Registries - Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy

Council Telephone Conference 11 th December 2008

Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy

BPA Approved Operator Scheme Code of Practice Control and enforcement of parking on private land and unregulated public car parks

.CREDITUNION SUNRISE DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY

.Brand TLD Designation Application

Independence and Accountability: The Future of ICANN. Comments of the Center for Democracy & Technology. submitted to

Transcription:

Initial Report on the Post Expiration Domain Name Recovery Policy Development Process Executive Summary STATUS OF THIS DOCUMT ThisistheExecutiveSummaryoftheInitialReportonthePost ExpirationDomainNameRecoveryPDP, preparedbyicannstaffforsubmissiontothegnsocouncilon31may2010.afinalreportwillbeprepared followingpubliccomment. Author: Marika Konings Page 1 of 8

Table of Content GLOSSARY 3 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 Author: Marika Konings Page 2 of 8

Glossary Auto Renew Grace Period Auto RenewGracePeriodisaspecifiednumberofcalendardaysfollowinganauto renewal.an auto renewaloccursifadomainnameregistrationisnotrenewedbyaregistrar(onbehalfofa ResellerorRegistrant)bytheexpirationdate;inthiscircumstancetheregistrationwillbe automaticallyrenewedbytheregistrythefirstdayaftertheexpirationdate.thewhoisrecordis updatedtoshowexpirationdateone yearinthefutureeventhoughtheregistranthasnotactually paidfortherenewal,andthereforemaynotbelegallyentitledtotheadditionalregistrationyear.in mostcasestheregistrar saccountisassessedtheregistryrenewalfeeatthattime,butsome registriesmaynotassessafeeontheregistraruntilaftertheauto renewgraceperiodends.the currentlengthoftheauto RenewGracePeriodis45days,andisneverterminatedearlybya registry,butaregistrarcanopttodeletethedomainnamepriortothen. Manyregistrarsandresellersoptionallyofferanauto renewalservicewheretheregistrant's accountorcreditcardischarged(withoutanyactiontakenbytheregistrant)torenewthedomain closetoorattheexpirationdate.becausethisoptionalofferinghasasimilarnametothe(registry) auto renewalpolicy,aregistrantissometimesconfusedandareaderofthisdocumentmustbe carefultokeepthesetwounrelatedtopicssegregated. EDDP ExpiredDomainDeletionPolicy TheEDDPisanICANNconsensuspolicythatrevisedthedomainregistrationexpirationprovisionsin ICANN sregistraraccreditationagreementindecember2004.forfurtherdetails,pleasesee http://www.icann.org/en/registrars/eddp.htm. RAE RegistrantAtthetimeofExpiration Inordertofacilitatediscussionsandnomenclature,thePEDNRWGintroducedtheterm Registrant AtthetimeofExpiration (RAE)todistinguishbetweenthepersonorentitythatislistedinWHOISas theregisterednameholderatthetimeofexpirationandthepersonorentitythatislistedin WHOISastheRegisteredNameHolderfollowingexpiration,whichmightbedifferentfollowing Author: Marika Konings Page 3 of 8

expiration.manyregistrationagreementsallowtheregistrartoalterthewhoisdatatoindicate thattheregistraritself,anaffiliate,orathirdpartyistheregistrantatthistime,buttheprevalence ofthispracticewasnotstudied. RGP Redemption Grace Period TheRedemptionGracePeriod(RGP)isanoptionalserviceofferedbysomeregistriesandregistrars.. AlthoughtheimplementationdetailsmayvaryindifferentgTLDs,whenadeleteddomainname entersthergp,itwillnotbeincludedintheroot tldzonefile(i.e.,thenameserversforthedomain willnotbelisted,thusthedomainnamewillnotresolve nowebtrafficore mailswillreachthe domainoranydestination).thedomainnamewillbesoidentifiedinwhoisandheldinthergpfor 30calendardaysoruntilrestored.AttheconclusionoftheRGP(andabriefpending deleteperiod), thedomainnamewillbereturnedtothepoolofdomainnamesavailableforregistration.allnonsponsoredgtldregistriesapartfrom.proand.nameofferthergp.evenwhereofferedbya registry,registrarsarenotrequiredtoprovidetheredemptionservicetoregistrants. Registrar WithrespecttogTLDs,aRegistrarisanentitythathasenteredintotheRegistrarAccreditation Agreement(RAA)withICANNandcanthereforeregisterdomainsonbehalfofgTLDs( Registrar Services ). Reseller AResellerisanentitythatcontractswithaRegistrartoprovideRegistrarServices.AReselleris requiredtohonourthesametermasregistrarsrelatedtoregistrationagreementtermsandnotices thatmustbeprovided. Author: Marika Konings Page 4 of 8

1. Executive Summary 1.1 Background At the ICANN Meeting in Cairo in November 2008, the At Large Advisory Committee (ALAC), voted to request an Issues Report on the subject of registrants being able to recover domain namesaftertheirformalexpirationdate. TheALACrequestwassubmittedtoICANNpolicystaffandtheGNSOCouncilon20November 2008. TheIssuesReportonPost ExpirationDomainNameRecoverywassubmittedtotheGNSO Councilon5December2008. TheGNSOCouncilinitiatedaPDPon7May2009andtaskedaWorkingGrouptoanswerthe followingcharterquestions: 1. Whetheradequateopportunityexistsforregistrantstoredeemtheirexpireddomain names; 2. Whetherexpiration relatedprovisionsintypicalregistrationagreementsareclearand conspicuousenough; 3. Whetheradequatenoticeexiststoalertregistrantsofupcomingexpirations; 4. Whetheradditionalmeasuresneedtobeimplementedtoindicatethatonceadomainname enterstheauto RenewGracePeriod,ithasexpired(e.g.,holdstatus,anoticeonthesite withalinktoinformationonhowtorenew,orotheroptionstobedetermined); 5. WhethertoallowthetransferofadomainnameduringtheRGP. The Post Expiration Domain Name Recovery (PEDNR) PDP Working Group started its deliberationsinjuly2009. 1.3 Issue Background Section3.2providesanoverviewofthecurrentpre andpost expirationprocessasdescribedin thepost ExpirationDomainNameRecoveryIssuesReport. Author: Marika Konings Page 5 of 8

1.3 Deliberations of the PEDNR WG ThePEDNRWorkingGroupstarteditsdeliberationsinJuly2009whereitwasdecidedto continuetheworkprimarilythroughfirstbi weeklyandthenweeklyconferencecalls,in additiontoe mailexchanges. Section7providesanoverviewofthedeliberationsoftheWorkingGroupconductedbothby conferencecallaswellase mailthreads.itshouldbenotedthattheworkinggroupwillnot makeafinaldecisiononwhichsolution(s),ifany,torecommendtothegnsocouncilbeforea thoroughreviewofthecommentsreceivedduringthepubliccommentperiodontheinitial Report. Noevidenceestablishingtheprevalenceofunintentionaldomainnamelosswaspresented, despiterequestsforthisresearchbysomemembersofthewg. Asinstructedinitscharter,thePEDNRWGstarteditsdeliberationsbyreviewingcurrent registrarpracticesregardingdomainnameexpiration,renewal,andpost expirationrecovery.in ordertogatherfurtherinformation,itwasdecidedtoconductaregistrarsurvey.section5 providesanoverviewofthemainquestionsandoutcomesofthesurvey. ThePEDNRWGCharterinstructstheWorkingGroupto pursuetheavailabilityoffurther informationfromicanncompliancestafftounderstandhowcurrentraaprovisionsand consensuspoliciesregardingdeletion,auto renewal,andrecoveryofdomainnamesfollowing expirationareenforced.tofacilitatethisprocess,icanncompliancestaffhasparticipated activelyinthedeliberationsoftheworkinggroupandhasprovidedtheinformationoutlinedin section6oncomplaintsreceivedandexpireddomaindeletionpolicyaudits. 1.4 Potential options for consideration InordertoassesstheviewsoftheWGmembersanddeterminewheretheremightbe agreementorconsensusonapossibleapproachforward,asurveywasconductedamongstthe WGmembership.Basedontheinitialresults,adraftingteam(asubsetoftheWG)was convenedtorefinethesurvey,includingaselectionofpossibleremedies.section8describes therefinedsurvey,theoptionsconsidered,andthepollresults. TheWGisencouragingtheICANNCommunitytoprovideinputonthedifferentquestionsand optionsoutlinedinthissectionsothatthesecanbetakenintoaccountduringthesecondphase Author: Marika Konings Page 6 of 8

ofthepdpduringwhichthewghopestoreachconsensusonaproposedwayforwardforeach ofthecharterquestions. Factoringintheoutcomesofthesurvey,theWGwillformulateasetofrecommendationsfor considerationbythegnso. Thefollowingquestionswereaddressedinthesurvey(forfurtherdetailsandcontext,please seesection8). Overarching Issues 1. ShouldtheRAEhavetheabilitytorecoverhis/herdomainnameregistrationfollowing expirationforacertainamountoftime?[charterquestion1] 2. WhatshouldthisminimumtimeframebeduringwhichtheRAEhastheabilitytorecoverthe domainnameregistration?[charterquestion1] Period Prior to Expiration 3. ThecurrentprovisionsintheRAAonlymakereferenceofasecondnotice 3.7.5Atthe conclusionoftheregistrationperiod,failurebyoronbehalfoftheregisterednameholderto consentthattheregistrationberenewedwithinthetimespecifiedinasecondnoticeor remindershall,intheabsenceofextenuatingcircumstances,resultincancellationofthe registrationbytheendoftheauto renewgraceperiod(althoughregistrarmaychoosetocancel thenameearlier). Isthisprovisionsufficientlyclear?[CharterQuestion3] 4. Shouldfurtherdetailsbeprovidedonwhenthesenoticesaresent?Ifyes,whatfurtherdetails wouldfacilitatetransparencyandinformation,whileatthesametimenotrestrictingregistrars fromtakingadditionalmeasurestoalertregistrants?[charterquestion3] 5. Shouldfurtherdetailsbeprovidedonhowthesenoticesaresent?Ifyes,whatfurtherdetails wouldfacilitatetransparencyandcommunications,whileatthesametimenotrestricting registrarsfromtakingadditionalmeasurestoalertregistrants?[charterquestion3] 6. Shouldadditionalmeasuresbeimplementedtoensurethatregistrantsareawarethatiftheir contactinformationisnotuptodate,theymostlikelywillnotreceivenotices/reminders?if yes,whatkindofmeasuresshouldbeexplored?[charterquestion3] Post Expiration Author: Marika Konings Page 7 of 8

7. ShouldWHOISstatusmessagesrelatedtoexpirationbeclarified/changedtoavoidconfusion overwhenadomainnameregistrationexpires/hasbeenrenewedbytheregistry?[charter Question3] 8. Arenoticespost expirationrequired?[charterquestion3] 9. HowshouldanHTTP(port80)requestusingtheexpireddomainnameresolve?[Charter Question4] 10. Howshoulde maildirectedatanaddresswithintheexpireddomainbehaveafterexpiration [CharterQuestion4] 11. Whatshouldhappenwithnon web,non e mailservicespostexpiration(i.e.shouldicann specifywhathappenstoallipports,orjustthosespecifictowebande mailservices)?[charter Question4] 12. ShouldaRAEhavetheabilitytorequestanInter RegistrarTransferafterexpiration? Contractual Conditions 13. Areyouoftheopinionthatregistrantsunderstandandareabletofindrenewalandexpiration relatedinformationeasily?howcansuchunderstandingbeimproved?[charterquestion2] 14. Shouldthefeetobechargedforrenewalofadomainnameafterexpirationbeexplicitlystated? 15. Shouldinformationonwheretofindthecostforrecoveryafterexpirationbeintheregistration agreement?[charterquestion1] Redemption Grace Period 16. ShouldtheRedemptionGracePeriodbeadoptedasaconsensuspolicyforgTLDRegistries? [CharterQuestion1] 17. ShouldregistrarsberequiredtooffertheRedemptionGracePolicyforregistriesthatofferit? [CharterQuestion1] 18. ShouldatransferofadomainnameduringtheRGPbeallowed?[CharterQuestion5] Author: Marika Konings Page 8 of 8