Case 3:17-cv JCS Document 1 Filed 06/15/17 Page 1 of 8

Similar documents
Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/07/17 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Attorney for Plaintiff TIPSY ELVES LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv WGY Document 1 Filed 10/17/13 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:17-cv VEC Document 1 Filed 02/15/17 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, RESTITUTION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, RESTITUTION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/20/17 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:19-cv PKC Document 1 Filed 01/14/19 Page 1 of 5

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/18/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/03/17 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 06/05/16 Page 1 of 7

USDC IN/ND case 1:18-cv TLS-SLC document 1 filed 11/29/18 page 1 of 6. Defendant. COMPLAINT

USDC IN/ND case 4:18-cv JVB-JEM document 1 filed 11/01/18 page 1 of 7

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/05/17 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION

USDC IN/ND case 4:18-cv JVB-JEM document 1 filed 09/16/18 page 1 of 7

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:18-cv JAD-CWH Document 1 Filed 12/21/18 Page 1 of 17

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:18-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 06/11/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LANHAM ACT AND TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO.: 1. BREACH OF IMPLIED CONTRACT 2. TRESPASS TO CHATTEL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 COMPLAINT

Case 1:16-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND PARTIES

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:1

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv MEJ Document 1 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:18-cv Doc #: 1 Filed 03/07/18 Page 1 of 13 Page ID #: 1

Case 2:12-cv JCM-VCF Document 1 Filed 11/13/12 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/15/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/02/17 Page 1 of 21 PageID: 1

Case 1:18-cv BLW Document 1 Filed 01/17/18 Page 1 of 10

COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LANHAM ACT AND TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 3:14-cv RS-EMT Document 1 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:15-cv SVW-AS Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:1

Case 3:12-cv B Document 1 Filed 07/17/12 Page 1 of 16 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No: COMPLAINT

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:16-cv AKH Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 21. Case No.

Case 1:18-cv TWP-DML Document 1 Filed 01/06/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 02/18/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/31/17 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:1

Case 2:14-cv PMW Document 4 Filed 01/05/15 Page 1 of 20

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Civil Case No. : 5:16-cv-872 NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 1:16-cv LTS Document 2 Filed 11/22/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA C O M P L A I N T. COMES NOW, Plaintiff, JUAN ANTONIO CASTRO RIOS, (hereinafter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff Case No.: 1:17-cv-6236 COMPLAINT

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

other things, the United States Patent Laws, 35 U. S. C. section 10, et seq.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, The Green Pet Shop Enterprises, LLC ( Green Pet Shop or. Plaintiff ), by and through its attorneys, THE RANDO LAW FIRM P.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/18/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO. Case No.

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 23 Page ID #:1

KINSELLA WEITZMAN ISER KUMP & ALDISERT LLP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-cv-3055

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Courthouse News Service

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 09/24/15 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN JOSEPH BENGIS, an individual,

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

PlainSite. Legal Document. California Central District Court Case No. 2:16-cv WBS, Inc. v. Stephen Pearcy et al. Document 2.

Case 0:10-cv MJD-FLN Document 1 Filed 04/06/10 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Court File No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

Transcription:

Case :-cv-00-jcs Document Filed 0// Page of C. YONG JEONG, ESQ. (SBN ) jeong@jeonglikens.com AMY CHOE, ESQ. (SBN 0) amy.choe@jeonglikens.com JOHN R. BALDIVIA, ESQ. (SBN ) john.baldivia@jeonglikens.com JEONG & LIKENS, L.C. 0 W. TH Street, Suite 0 Los Angeles, California 00 Tel. --00 Fax. --00 Attorneys for Plaintiff, LARRY PHILPOT 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 LARRY PHILPOT, an Individual, Plaintiff, vs. FACBOOK, INC., a Delaware Corporation; and DOES -0, inclusive, Defendants. Case Number: :-cv- PLAINTIFF S COMPLAINT FOR:. COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT. VICARIOUS COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT. CONTRIBUTORY COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT Jury Trial Demanded Plaintiff LARRY PHILPOT ( Plaintiff or PHILPOT ) by and through its undersigned attorneys, hereby prays to this honorable Court for relief and remedy based on the following: INTRODUCTION Plaintiff is a well-known photographer who specializes exclusively in concert photography, and has photographed thousands of musical artists including Chuck Berry, the Lumineers, REO Speedwagon, Hall and Oates, John Mellencamp, Ted Nugent, Sir Paul McCartney, Mumford and Sons, Buddy Guy, and countless other top tier artists. Plaintiff owns these photographs exclusively earns a living licensing his photographs to businesses and musicians for use by print

Case :-cv-00-jcs Document Filed 0// Page of and electronic publications. Plaintiff s business is predicated on his ownership of these photographs and he spends a considerable amount of time and resources creating top-quality, marketable and aesthetically-appealing photographs. Some examples of Plaintiff s customers include Forbes, AOL, AXS-TV, Berkshire Hathaway, KISS, John Mellencamp, and Willie Nelson. No party is authorized to reproduce, distribute, perform, display, transmit, or prepare derivative works of Plaintiff s photographs without express permission from Plaintiff. This action is brought to recover damages for direct, vicarious and contributory copyright infringement arising out of the misappropriation of Plaintiff s exclusive photographs by the Defendants, and each of them. 0 0 JURISDICTION AND VENUE. This action arises under the Copyright Act of, Title U.S.C. 0 et seq.. This Court has federal question jurisdiction under U.S.C., (a) and (b).. Venue in this judicial district is proper under U.S.C. (c) and 00(a) in that this is the judicial district in which a substantial part of the acts and omissions giving rise to the claims occurred. PARTIES. Larry Philpot ( Plaintiff ) is an Individual and resident of the state of Indiana.. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Defendant FACEBOOK, INC. ( FACEBOOK ), is, and at all times herein mentioned was, a limited partnership organized and existing under the laws of Delaware and doing business in California.. Defendant FACEBOOK, and Defendants DOES -0, inclusive, may be collectively referred to as Defendants.. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that some of Defendants DOES through, inclusive, are owners of online websites, which DOE Defendants have reproduced, distributed, performed, displayed, or transmitted Plaintiff s copyrighted photographs (as hereinafter defined) without Plaintiff s knowledge or consent or have contributed to said infringement. The true names, whether corporate, individual or otherwise,

Case :-cv-00-jcs Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 and capacities of defendants sued herein as Does through are presently unknown to Plaintiff at this time, and therefore, Plaintiff sues said defendants by such fictitious names. Plaintiff will seek leave to amend this complaint to allege their true names and capacities when the same have been ascertained. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and based thereon alleges, that each of defendants designated as a DOE is responsible in some manner for the events alleged herein and the damages caused thereby.. Defendants DOES through 0, inclusive, are other parties not yet identified who have infringed Plaintiff s copyrights, have contributed to the infringement of Plaintiff s copyrights, or have engaged in one or more of the wrongful practices alleged herein. The true names, whether corporate, individual or otherwise, and capacities of defendants sued herein as DOES through 0 are presently unknown to Plaintiff at this time, and therefore, Plaintiff sues said defendants by such fictitious names. Plaintiff will seek leave to amend this complaint to allege their true names and capacities when the same have been ascertained.. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereupon alleges that at all times relevant hereto each of Defendants acted in concert with each other, was the agent, affiliate, officer, director, manager, principal, alter-ego, and/or employee of the remaining defendants and was at all times acting within the scope of such agency, affiliation, alter-ego relationship and/or employment; and actively participated in or subsequently ratified and adopted, or both, each and all of the acts or conduct alleged, with full knowledge of all the facts and circumstances, including without limitation to full knowledge of each and every wrongful conduct and Plaintiff s damages caused therefrom. CLAIMS RELATED TO DESIGN 0. Plaintiff is the owner and author of four collections of photographs under titles 00 Musician Photos, All unpublished photos 00 to May 0, Concert photographs through August, 0, and Unpublished Photographs through.... Plaintiff applied for a copyright from the United States Copyright Office for the collections of photographs listed above. A true and correct copy of each certificate of registration is

Case :-cv-00-jcs Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 attached hereto as Exhibits A through D. True and correct copies of the photographs which are the subject of this complaint are attached hereto as Exhibits E through H ( Subject Photographs ).. Plaintiff was granted Registration No. VAu -- effective on September, 0 for the Subject Photographs registered under title 00 Musician Photos (Exhibit E).. Plaintiff was granted Registration No. VAu -- effective on August, 0 for the Subject Photographs registered under title All unpublished photos 00 to May 0 (Exhibit F).. Plaintiff was granted Registration No. VAu -- effective on May, 0 for the Subject Photographs registered under title Concert photographs through August, 0 (Exhibit G).. Plaintiff was granted Registration No. VAu -- effective on December, 0 for the Subject Photographs registered under title Unpublished Photographs through.. (Exhibit H).. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Defendant FACEBOOK violated Plaintiff s rights under U.S.C. 0 by improperly using Subject Photographs without Plaintiff s consent for FACEBOOK s community pages, redirect links which point to FACEBOOK s community pages, redirect links which point to third-party online music services, and/or display on FACEBOOK s open source community. True and correct copies of such community pages, redirect links, and open source communities are attached hereto as Exhibit I.. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Defendant FACEBOOK generates revenue as a result of the improper use of Subject Photographs, including but not limited to, collecting advertising revenue on community pages and/or royalty payments for implementation of the redirect links which incorporate Plaintiff s Subject Photographs.. At various times Defendant FACEBOOK owned and controlled an online website facebook.com and hhvm.com. Plaintiff s investigation revealed that the Subject Photographs

Case :-cv-00-jcs Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 were being distributed, publicly displayed, and publicly digitally performed under the direction of the Defendants, and each of them.. None of the aforementioned acts by Defendants involving the Subject Photographs were authorized by Plaintiff, and all were in violation of Plaintiff s intellectual property rights. FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF (For Copyright Infringement Against All Defendants) 0. Plaintiff repeats, re-alleges and incorporates herein by reference as though fully set forth the allegations contained in Paragraphs through, inclusive, of this Complaint.. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Defendants, and each of them, accessed the Subject Photographs through authorized or unauthorized reproductions of the Subject Photographs in the possession of Wikimedia and/or DOE Defendants.. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Defendants, and each of them, infringed Plaintiff s copyright by distributing, publicly displaying, and publicly digitally performing the Subject Photographs through online websites, including without limitation, Facebook.com.. Due to Defendants acts of infringement, Plaintiff has suffered substantial damages to its business in an amount to be established at trial.. Due to Defendants acts of infringement, Plaintiff has suffered general and special damages to its business in an amount to be established at trial.. Due to Defendants acts of copyright infringement as alleged herein, Defendants, and each of them, have obtained direct and indirect profits they would not otherwise have realized but for their infringement of the Subject Photographs. As such, Plaintiff is entitled to disgorgement of Defendants profits directly and indirectly attributable to Defendants infringement of the Subject Photographs in an amount to be established at trial.. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Defendants, and each of them, have committed acts of infringement alleged herein with actual or constructive knowledge of Plaintiff s rights such that Plaintiff is entitled to a finding of willful infringement.

Case :-cv-00-jcs Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF (For Vicarious Copyright Infringement Against All Defendants). Plaintiff repeats, re-alleges and incorporates herein by reference as though fully set forth the allegations contained in Paragraphs through inclusive, of this Complaint.. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Defendants, and each of them, are vicariously liable for the infringement alleged herein because they had the right and ability to supervise the infringing conduct and because they had a direct financial interest in the infringing product.. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that the Defendants had direct financial interest in the infringer s activity by profiting from featuring the Subject Photographs on Facebook.com, while declining to exercise their right and/or obligation to stop or limit the infringement of the Subject Photographs. 0. By reason of the Defendants, and each of their, acts of vicarious infringement as alleged above, Plaintiff has suffered and will continue to suffer substantial damages to its business in an amount to established at trial, as well as additional general and special damages in an amount to be established at trial.. Due to Defendants acts of vicarious copyright infringement as alleged herein, Defendants, and each of them, have obtained direct and indirect profits they would have not otherwise realized but for their infringement of the Subject Photographs. As such, Plaintiff is entitled to disgorgement of Defendants profits directly and indirectly attributable to Defendants infringement of the Subject Photographs, an amount to be established at trial.. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Defendants, and each of them, have committed acts of infringement alleged herein with actual or constructive knowledge of Plaintiff s rights such that Plaintiff is entitled to a finding of willful infringement. THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIF (For Contributory Copyright Infringement Against All Defendants)

Case :-cv-00-jcs Document Filed 0// Page of 0. Plaintiff repeats, re-alleges and incorporates herein by reference as though fully set forth the allegations contained in Paragraphs through inclusive, of this Complaint.. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Defendants, and each of them, knowingly induced, participated in, aided and abetted in and resultantly profited from the illegal distribution, public display, or public digital performance of the Subject Photographs as alleged herein above.. By reason of the Defendants, and each of their, acts of contributory copyright infringement as alleged above, Plaintiff has suffered and will continue to suffer substantial damages to its business in an amount to established at trial, as well as additional general and special damages in an amount to be established at trial.. Due to Defendants acts of contributory copyright infringement as alleged herein, Defendants, and each of them, have obtained direct and indirect profits they would have not otherwise realized bur for their infringement of the Subject Photographs. As such, Plaintiff is entitled to disgorgement of Defendants profits directly and indirectly attributable to Defendants infringement of the Subject Photographs, in an amount to be established at trial.. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Defendants, and each of them, have committed acts of infringement alleged herein with actual or constructive knowledge of Plaintiff s rights such that Plaintiff is entitled to a finding of willful infringement. 0 PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against all Defendants as follows: Against All Defendants With respect to Each Claim for Relief:. That Defendants, their agents and servants be enjoined from infringing Plaintiff s copyrights in any manner;. That Plaintiff be awarded all profits of Defendants plus all losses of Plaintiff, the exact sum to be proven at time of trial, or, if elected before final judgment, statutory damages as available under the Copyright Act, U.S.C. 0 et seq.;

Case :-cv-00-jcs Document Filed 0// Page of. That Plaintiff be awarded its attorneys fees as available under the Copyright Act, U.S.C. 0 et seq.;. That Plaintiff be awarded pre-judgment interest as allowed by law;. That Plaintiff be awarded costs of litigation; and. That Plaintiff be awarded such further legal and equitable relief as the Court deems proper. 0 DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury in this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure and the Seventh Amendment of the Constitution. 0 Dated: June, 0 Respectfully submitted, /s/ C. Yong Jeong C. Yong Jeong, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff, LARRY PHILPOT