Legislation and Regulation

Similar documents
Legislation & Regulation (Section 4) Fall 2013 Professor Stephenson Wed-Fri 8:20-9:40, [WCC 1015] SYLLABUS

The Regulatory State: Introduction to Legislation, Statutory Interpretation, and Administration Spring 2013 Professor Jodi Short

Legislation & Regulation (Section 2) Fall 2012 Professor Stephenson Wed-Fri 8:20-9:40, WCC 1010 SYLLABUS

Legislative Process Spring 2009 Professor Carolyn Shapiro SYLLABUS

CONTENTS. Acknowledgments CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1

SEMINAR: ANTONIN SCALIA JUDGE, SCHOLAR, WRITER, CONSTITUTIONALIST. Law (Spring 2018) Monday 2:00 3:50 p.m.

Administrative Law Notes 1

Statutory Interpretation and Regulatory Practice 2017 Review Questions and Answers

Administrative Law Prof. Kumar, Fall Assistant: Robin Huff Office: MPS 201R

Disciplining Delegation after Whitman v. American Trucking Ass ns

Administrative Law Prof. Kumar, Spring Assistant: Melissa Fleet: Office: MPS 201D

Administrative Law (Law 116 Sec. 002)

Contents. Administrative Agencies and Administrative Law 1

Loose Canons: Statutory Construction and the New Nondelegation Doctrine. David M. Driesen, Associate Professor

Chevron Deference: A Primer

2006] THE SUPREME COURT LEADING CASES 361

CHEVRON S GENERALITY PRINCIPLES

CHEVRON S REGRETS: THE PERSISTENT VITALITY OF THE NONDELEGATION DOCTRINE

Administrative Law LAW Syllabus Spring Professor Jennifer L. Mascott

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW B LAW 5501, Section 0622 (4 credits) Professor Berta E. Hernández-Truyol. Fall 2017 SYLLABUS

Textualism and the Executive Branch

COMMENT. Deference to Agency Statutory Interpretations First Advanced in Litigation? The Chevron Two-Step and the Skidmore Shuffle

In the Supreme Court of the United States

THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT: AN INTRODUCTION. Gillian Metzger, Columbia Law School 1

C.A. No C.A. No APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW UNION

NOTES RATIONALIZING HARD LOOK REVIEW AFTER THE FACT

Articles PURPOSIVISM IN THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH: HOW AGENCIES INTERPRET STATUTES. Kevin M. Stack

ENYC-GE Fall 2015 Instructor: Michelle D. Land ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY SYLLABUS

Pol Sci 3325 Topics in Politics: Constitutional Politics in the United States

Short-Circuiting the New Major Questions Doctrine

Computers: Students may use laptops in class. They will NOT be able to access their notes when they use the laptop for their final exam.

LAW 524, LEGISLATION: LAW & POLITICS (FALL 2018) Mon. & Wed., 2:50-4:20, Rm. 215; Prof. Anthony Johnstone, Rm. 312 (x6711)

ConLaw I: Structure of Government LAW 121 (002) Prof. Greve Fall Welcome

ESSAY. Presidential Influence over Agency Rulemaking Through Regulatory Review. Peter Ketcham-Colwill* ABSTRACT

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Syllabus Spring 2017 Section A Professor Renee Knake

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW

In The Supreme Court of the United States

OSH-Related Cases Applying the Chevron Doctrine 2017 CONN MACIEL CAREY LLP ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

RULEMAKING th Annual Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice Institute. May 18, 2017

Constitutional Law I Fall 2015

Brief for Cato Institute et al. as Amici Curiae Supporting Petitioners, City of Arlington Texas et al. v. Federal Communications Commission et al.

INTRODUCTION TO LAW AND LEGAL PROCESS SPRING Prof. Vince Buccola

The Law of Not Now : When Agencies Defer Decisions

The Constitutional Foundations of Chenery

Chevron and Agency Norm-Entrepreneurship

Deference to Agency Statutory Interpretations First Advanced in Litigation? The Chevron Two-Step and the Skidmore Shuffle

Administrative Law's Political Dynamics

STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } }

The Major Questions Doctrine Outside Chevron s Domain

Mastering Administrative Law

Justice Scalia, the Nondelegation Doctrine, and Constitutional Argument

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

THE POLITICS of ADMINISTRATIVE LAW. V / V Spring Broadway, Rm Broadway, Rm 726

Foreword: Chevron at 30: Looking Back and Looking Forward

The Lost World of Administrative Law

On Hunting Elephants in Mouseholes

Chevron and Legislative History

U.S. Constitutional Law and Politics I Fall 2017

Interpreting Appropriate and Necessary Reasonably under the Clean Air Act: Michigan v. Environmental Protection Agency

Agency Coordinators Outside of the Executive Branch

This is a graduate level course; as such, be sure that you have met the perquisites for enrollment.

No IN THE. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Spurious Interpretation Redux: Mead and the Shrinking Domain of Statutory Ambiguity

INSIDE AGENCY STATUTORY INTERPRETATION

Administrative Law Symposium: Question & Answer with Professors Elliott, Strauss, and Sunstein

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 04/22/2011 Page 3 of 11

HARVARD JOHN M. OLIN CENTER FOR LAW, ECONOMICS, AND BUSINESS

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Detailed Recommendations for Regulatory Review Executive Order

1 See, e.g., Am. Textile Mfrs. Inst., Inc. v. Donovan, 452 U.S. 490 (1981); Cass R. Sunstein,

DRAFT Seminar on the Presidency GOVT 605 Schar School of Policy and Government, GMU Fall, 2018

In the Supreme Court of the United States

NOTE CWA AND ESA: NINE IS A PARTY, TEN IS A CROWD NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS V. DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, 127 S. CT (2007).

The Jurisprudence of Justice John Paul Stevens: The Chevron Doctrine

FINAL AGENCY ACTION IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT

THE TWO FACES OF CHEVRON

Major Questions About the "Major Questions" Doctrine

ADMINISTRATIVE COLLUSION: HOW DELEGATION DIMINISHES

DISCLOSING POLITICAL OVERSIGHT OF AGENCY DECISION MAKING

Office hours: My office is Room 432, 715 Broadway; Telephone: My office hours are Tuesdays, 1:30-3:00, or by appointment.

RECLAIMING THE LEGAL FICTION OF

Of Dialogue--And Democracy--In Administrative Law

No IN THE. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

In Defense of the Short Cut

A In Defense of the Hard Look: Judicial Activism and Administrative Law

PRESIDENTIAL CONTROL ACROSS POLICYMAKING TOOLS

Winner, Best Appellate Brief in the 2017 Native American Law Student Association Moot Court Competition

CHEVRON IN THE CIRCUIT COURTS

ARTICLES ADMINISTRATIVE COLLUSION: HOW DELEGATION DIMINISHES THE COLLECTIVE CONGRESS NEOMI RAO*

2007] THE SUPREME COURT LEADING CASES 405

THE NONDELEGATION CANON S NEGLECTED HISTORY AND UNDERESTIMATED LEGACY

-- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use:

Presidential Inaction and the Separation of Powers

Leg Reg Outline 9/03-04 Textualists=Positivists-follow the letter of the law, to do otherwise leads to unpredictability. Judges start doing what they

ARTICLE LAW ENFORCEMENT AS POLITICAL QUESTION

Supreme Court of the United States

LAW REVIEW AND OTHER SCHOLARLY PUBLICATIONS

Administrative Agencies: A Comparison of New Hampshire and Federal Agencies History, Structure and Rulemaking Requirements

THE NEVER-ENDING ASSAULT ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE

Transcription:

Legislation and Regulation Professor Bagley Winter Term 2018 Welcome to Legislation and Regulation. The class will meet on Tuesdays and Thursdays from 1:00-2:15 and on Wednesday from 1:20-2:35 in 1225 South Hall. Computers and tablets are not permitted. My office is in 3238 South Hall, and my office hours will be every Thursday from 2:30 to 4:30. Before 3:30, I will give priority to you; after 3:30, I will give priority to students enrolled in my upper-level Administrative Law course. I encourage you to come to office hours in the earlier window. You can also reach me at nbagley@umich.edu. The readings will come principally from LISA SCHULTZ BRESSMAN ET AL., THE REGULATORY STATE (2d ed. 2013). Readings outside the casebook (CB) will be posted on the course s Canvas website. Canvas also contains two important appendices omitted from this edition of the casebook: the U.S. Constitution and the selected provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act. Every student should be prepared to discuss all of the assigned reading for each class meeting. Each discrete subsection on the syllabus below corresponds with the reading for a given class. On January 11, for example, we ll do the reading under Intro; for the 16th, I.A; for the 17th, I.B; and so on and so forth. If you are unprepared for a particular class, please email me before class begins. I am assigning four exercises over the course of the semester. The exercises are similar to questions you re likely to see on the exam, and we ll go over them in some detail in class. Your responses will be due at 10pm on the evening before the class for which the exercises are assigned I will send along a Box email address to which you can send them. I will be canceling class on Tuesday, January 30. I will schedule a review session during the reading period to make up for it. 1

Introduction: Why Regulate? CB 1-4. CB 81-97 (Roche v. Buick Motor). Part I: Legislation and Statutory Interpretation. A. The Legislative Process. CB 125-36. CB 211-22. Excerpt from JERRY L. MASHAW, GREED, CHAOS, AND GOVERNANCE (1997). Excerpt from William N. Eskridge, Vetogates, Chevron, Preemption, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1441 (2008). B. An Example: Auto Safety CB 137-72. As you read the 1966 Motor Vehicle Safety Act, use your judgment to identify the crucial provisions of the statutory text. C. Introduction to Statutory Interpretation. i. CB 401-08. Excerpt from Riggs v. Palmer, 22 N.E. 188 (N.Y. 1889). Exercise #1: Vehicles in the Park CB 225-37 (Holy Trinity). D. Textualism. i. Attitude Toward the Text. CB 417-21. Excerpt from King v. Burwell, 576 U.S. (2015). Excerpt from United States v. Marshall, 908 F.2d 1312 (7th Cir. 1990) (en banc). Ordinary Meaning. CB 237-50 (Nix, Muscarello). i Semantic Canons of Construction, Part I. CB 250-69. iv. Semantic Canons of Construction, Part II. CB 270-84. Exercise #2: Nunchuks and Shotguns. v. Semantic Canons of Construction, Part III. CB 284-92. Excerpt from TVA v. Hill, 437 U.S. 153 (1978). 2

vi. Substantive Canons, Part I. CB 330-34 (Locke). Excerpt from Green v. Bock Laundry Machine Company, 490 U.S. 504 (1989). v Substantive Canons, Part II. CB 292-310 (Santos, Zadvydas). CB 335-40. E. Legislative Intent and Purpose. i. The Debate Over Legislative History. CB 341-45 CB 421-29 (Scalia). Excerpt from Blanchard v. Bergeron, 489 U.S. 87 (1989). Excerpt from In re Sinclair, 870 F.2d 1340 (7th Cir. 1989). Legislative History in Application. CB 345-73 (Moore and Montana Wilderness) F. Changed Circumstances. CB 413-416 (Posner). Excerpt from In re Erickson, 815 F.2d 1090 (7th Cir. 1987). Exercise #3: Women Jurors. G. Dynamic Interpretation. CB 429-36 (Aleinikoff). CB 374-86 (Bob Jones). H. Stare Decisis and Statutory Precedent. Excerpt from Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992). Excerpt from Flood v. Kuhn, 407 U.S. 258 (1972). CB 387-401 (Leegin). Part II: Agency Administration of Statutes. A. The Administrative State: An Introduction CB 1-11 OSHA Materials. B. The Relationship Between Agencies and Congress. i. Nondelegation Doctrine, Part I. CB 183-86. Excerpt from A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, 295 U.S. 496 (1935). Excerpt from the Benzene case, 488 U.S. 607 (1980). 3

i Nondelegation Doctrine, Part II. Excerpt from Whitman v. American Trucking Ass ns, Inc., 531 U.S. 457 (2001). CB 186-200. Legislative Control over Agencies. CB 703-10 (congressional control) CB 723-41 (Chadha). C. The Relationship Between Agencies and the President. i. Appointment and Removal, Part I. CB 11-20 (Myers). CB 49-53. CB 57-58 CB 75-79 i iv. Appointment and Removal, Part II. CB 20-37 (Humphrey s Executor, Morrison v. Olson). Appointment and Removal, Part III. CB 37-48 (PCAOB). Alternative Tools of Presidential Control: OIRA. Excerpt from Nicholas Bagley & Richard L. Revesz, Centralized Oversight of the Administrative State, 106 COLUM. L. REV. 1260 (2006). Excerpt from Cass R. Sunstein, The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs: Myths and Realities, 126 HARV. L. REV. 1838 (2013). Excerpt from Lisa Heinzerling, Inside EPA, 31 PACE ENVTL. L. REV. 325 (2014). v. Alternative Tools of Presidential Control, Cost-Benefit Analysis. CB 576-92 Exercise #4: Arsenic Rule D. The Administrative Procedures Act: An Intro to Rulemaking and Adjudication. Administrative Procedure Act (APA) 551, 553, 554, 556, 557. CB 474-78. CB 610-11. CB 843-55. 4

Part III: Judicial Oversight of the Administrative Process. A. Judicial Review of Agency Policy. i. The Legal Framework. APA 706. Additional excerpt of United States Nova Scotia Food Products, 568 F.2d 240 (2d Cir. 1977). Excerpt of Williamson v. Lee Optical, 348 US 483 (1955). Excerpt from Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402 (1971). CB 855-59. i Airbags Case Study. CB 489-96 (skim). CB 810-23 (State Farm). Chenery. Excerpt from SEC v. Chenery Corp., 318 U.S. 80 (1943) (Chenery I). Excerpt from SEC v. Chenery Corp., 332 U.S. 194 (1947) (Chenery II). B. Judicial Review of Agency Fact-finding. CB 872-83 (Allentown Mack). C. Judicial Review of Agency Inaction. CB 896-908 (Heckler v. Chaney). Excerpt from Massachusetts v. EPA, 549 U.S. 497 (2007). APA 701 & 706. D. Judicial Review of Questions of Law. i. The Chevron Framework, Part I. CB 753-58 (Skidmore). CB 531-43 (Chevron). i The Chevron Framework, Part II. CB 758-69 (MCI). The Chevron Framework, Part III. CB 769-85 (Brown & Williamson). Exercise #5: TBA. iv. Chevron Step Zero, Part I. CB 785-798 (Mead, Barnhart). v. Chevron Step Zero, Part II. CB 798-801 (Barnhart). 5

E. (TIME PERMITTING) Availability of Judicial Review. i. Standing, Part I. Excerpt from Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555 (1992). Excerpt from Friends of the Earth v. Laidlaw Envtl. Servs., 528 U.S. 167 (2000). Standing, Part II. CB 883-96 (Massachusetts v. EPA). 6