BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON CP 1501

Similar documents
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON CP 1511

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON

ENTERED JUN This is an electronic copy. Attachments may not appear. BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON

ENTERED FEB This is an electronic copy. Appendices may not appear. BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON CP 734 CP 14 UM 549 UM 668

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON

PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON STAFF REPORT PUBLIC MEETING DATE: April 5, 2016

ORDER NO OF OREGON UM 1058 COMMISSION AUTHORITY PREEMPTED

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON

PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF NEVADA. LCB File No. R December 19, 2007

Assembly Bill No. 518 Committee on Commerce and Labor

ENTERED 01/29/07 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON ARB 780 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DISPOSITION: ADOPTION OF INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT DENIED

STATE OF ALASKA THE ALASKA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON UM This order memorializes our decision, made and effective at our July 5, 2016 Regular Public

Interconnecting with Rural ILECs

RULES OF TENNESSEE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION CHAPTER REGULATIONS FOR LOCAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS PROVIDERS TABLE OF CONTENTS

STATE OF ALASKA THE ALASKA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION. ation of Reform of Intrastate ) R-97-5 Interexchange Access Charge ) Rules ) ORDER NO.

47 USC 332. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

1a APPENDIX 1. Section 3 of the Communications Act [47 U.S.C. 153] provides in pertinent part:

In The Supreme Court of the United States

* Electronic Copy * MS Public Service Commission * 9/26/2017 * MS Public Service Commission * Electronic

Federal Communications Commission DA Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ORDER

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) REPORT AND ORDER. Adopted: September 5, 2017 Released: September 8, 2017

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PUBLIC UTILITY COMIVHSSION OF OREGON AMD REPORT PUBLIC MEETING DATE: November 22, 2016

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *

Before The Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

CHAPTER House Bill No. 1377

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C COMMENTS OF XO COMMUNICATIONS, LLC

PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON STAFF REPORT PUBLIC MEETING DATE: October 11, 2016

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 654

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON

Mississippi Public Service Commission

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON

This is an electronic copy. Format and font may vary from the official version. Attachments may not appear. BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION

As Introduced. 132nd General Assembly Regular Session H. B. No

Title 25: INTERNAL SECURITY AND PUBLIC SAFETY

BEFORE THE MINNESOTA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

DT FRANCE TELECOM CORPORATE SOLUTIONS LLC. Petition for Authority to Provide Non-Facilities Based CLEC Services

ORDINANCE NO. 690 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF WASHINGTON, KANSAS:

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Chapter 14 Sharing and/or Resale of Telephone Service.

DT NEON Connect, Inc. Petition for Authority to Provide Local Telecommunications Services. Order Nisi Granting Authorization

Regulatory Commission of Alaska. December 27, 2017

T A R I F F S C H E D U L E S. Applicable To CENTURYTEL OF EASTERN OREGON, INC. (formerly Telephone Utilities of Eastern Oregon)

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMl\USSION Washington D.C

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554

STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION AT RICHMOND, MARCH 5, 2002

Telecommunications Law Update

STATE OF ALASKA THE ALASKA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

MAY BEFORE THE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF OKLAHOMA COURT

SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL NO. 72

Consumer Complaints DIGEST CONTENTS CONSUMER COMPLAINTS

TITLE DIVISION OF PUBLIC UTILITIES AND CARRIERS

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 2626

BEFORE THE WASHINGTON UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE NEVADA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY LCB FILE NO. R091-18I

Willard receives federal Universal Service Fund ( USF ) support as a cost company, not a price cap company.

ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

2 BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

December 10, Ms. Mary Jo Kunkle Executive Secretary Michigan Public Service Commission 6545 Mercantile Way P.O. Box Lansing, MI 48909

Texas Regulatory AT&T Texas 816 Congress Avenue Suite 1100 Austin, TX

April 4, Re: MPSC Case No. U-13792, Interconnection Agreement Between AT&T Michigan and Range Corporation d/b/a Range Telecommunications

OPTIMUM GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Legislative Update. Board of Directors - Officers -

STATE OF CONNECTICUT

Attached are the revised comments of the Minnesota Department of Commerce (Department) in the following matter:

Agenda Date: 12/12/16 Agenda Item: 4B TELECOMMUNICATIONS ORDER OF APPROVAL

Annual Meeting a Hit!

1 HB By Representative Millican. 4 RFD: Boards, Agencies and Commissions. 5 First Read: 07-FEB-12 6 PFD: 02/02/2012.

Re: MPSC Case No. U-14592, Interconnection Agreement Between SBC Michigan and PhoneCo, L.P.

1 HB By Representative Millican. 4 RFD: Boards, Agencies and Commissions. 5 First Read: 07-FEB-12 6 PFD: 02/02/2012.

REVISOR FULL-TEXT SIDE-BY-SIDE

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

United States Court of Appeals

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON

Notice of Rulemaking Hearing

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2007 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 1755

2017, by Dayton Solar I LLC, Starvation Solar I LLC, Tygh Valley Solar I LLC, Wasco

Intrastate Telecommunication Services Tariff Schedules. for. MCI Communications Services, Inc.

DT GRANITE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, LLC d/b/a Hale & Father Telecommunications. Petition for Authority to Provide Local Telecommunications Services

June 30, 2011 in Courtroom B 2101 N. Lincoln Blvd., Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Before Maribeth D. Snapp, Administrative Law Judge

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. v. MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER Civil File No (MJD/SRN)

Dear Ms. Dortch: Sincerely,. Filed via ECFS. September 29, 2011

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC CENTURYLINK'S COMMENTS IN OPPOSITION

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER ON REVIEW

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) )

No Charter Advanced Services (MN), LLC, et al.,

FCC BROADBAND JURISDICTION: THE PSTN TRANSITION IN AN ERA OF CONGRESSIONAL PARALYSIS. Russell Lukas April 4, 2013

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION

CARRIER-TO-CARRIER AGREEMENT CHECKLIST

(764936)

Transcription:

r1,.., if Q f) ENTERED APR 0 6 l.{l1 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON CP 1501 In the Matter of GC PIVOTAL, LLC Application for a Certificate of Authority to Provide Teleco=unications Service in Oregon and Classification as a Competitive Provider. ORDER DISPOSITION: APPLICATION GRANTED Note: By issuing this certificate, the Commission makes no endorsement or certification regarding the certificate holder's rates or service. The Application On February 24, 2011, GC Pivotal, LLC (Applicant) filed an application for certification to provide teleco=unications service in Oregon as a competitive provider. Applicant proposes to provide intraexchange non-switched, private line service (dedicated transmission service) within all exchanges of the teleco=unications utilities and cooperative corporations listed in Appendices A and B to this order. Applicant also proposes to provide interexchange non-switched, private line service (dedicated transmission service) statewide in Oregon. Applicant did not request authority to offer switched service. Applicant will operate strictly as a reseller of intraexchange and interexchange service. Applicant may purchase network elements and finished services for resale only from other certified carriers. Applicant indicates that it will not construct its own facilities and operate as a facilities-based provider. Applicant will not directly provide operator services as defined in OAR 860-032-0001 or be an 'operator service provider' as defmed in ORS 759.690(1)(d). The Co=ission served notice of the application on March2, 2011. No protests or requests to be made parties of the proceeding were filed. Based on the record in this matter, the Commission makes the following:

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Applicable Law Two statutory provisions apply to this application. First, ORS 759.020 governs Applicant's request to provide teleco=unications as a competitive provider. Under ORS 759.020(5), the Commission shall classify Applicant as a competitive provider if Applicant demonstrates that its services are subject to competition, or that its customers or those proposed to become customers have reasonably available alternatives. In making this determination, the Commission must consider the extent to which services are available from alternative providers that are functionally equivalent or substitutable at comparable rates, terms and conditions, existing economic or regulatory barriers to entry, and any other factors deemed relevant. Second, ORS 759.050 governs Applicant's request to provide local exchange (intraexchange) telecommunications service. Under ORS 759.050(2)(a), the Commission may authorize Applicant to provide local exchange service within the local exchange of a telecommunications utility if the Commission determines such authorization would be in the public interest. In making this determination, the Commission must consider the extent to which services are available from alternative providers, the effect on rates for local exchange service customers, the effect on competition and availability of innovative teleco=unications service in the requested service area, and any other facts the Commission considers relevant. See Order No. 96-021. Designation as a Competitive Provider Applicant has met the requirements for classification as a competitive teleco=unications service provider. Applicant's customers or those proposed to become customers have reasonably available alternatives. The incumbent telecommunications utilities and cooperative corporations listed in the appendices provide the same or similar local exchange services in the local service area requested by Applicant. AT&T, Sprint Co=unications, Qwest Corporation, Frontier Communications Northwest Inc., and others provide interexchange telecommunications service in the service area requested by Applicant. Subscribers to Applicant's services can buy comparable services at comparable rates from other vendors. Economic and regulatory barriers to entry are relatively low. Public Interest With regard to the general.tactual conclusions relevant to this proceeding, the Commission adopts the Commission's findings in Order No. 93-1850 and Order No. 96-021. Based on a review of those findings, as well as information contained in the application, the Commission concludes that it is in the public interest to grant the application of GC Pivotal, LLC, to provide local exchange telecommunications service as 2

1li 106 a competitive telecommunications provider in exchanges of the telecommunications utilities and cooperative corporations listed in the appendices, as described in the application. Further, it is in the public interest to grant statewide interexchange authority as described in the application. This finding will have no bearing on any determination the Commission may be called upon to make under sections 251 or 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 USC 251, 252) with regard to the telecommunications utilities and cooperative corporations in this docket. Conditions of the Certificate In Order No. 96-021, the Commission interpreted ORS 759.050 and established conditions applicable to competitive local exchange carriers. Also, other conditions are listed in administrative rules, including among others OAR 860-032-0007. Applicant, as a competitive provider, shall comply with the conditions adopted in Order No. 96-021, as well as all applicable laws, Commission rules, and orders related to provision of telecommunications service in Oregon. Per ORS 759.050(2)(c) and Order No. 96-021, Applicant shall comply with the following conditions. 1. Applicant shall pay an annual fee to the Commission pursuant to ORS 756.310 and 756.320 and OAR 860-032-0095. The minimum annual fee is $100. Applicant is required to pay the fee for the preceding calendar year by April 1. 2. Pursuant to Oregon Laws 1987, chapter 290, sections 2-8, and to OAR chapter 860, division 033, Applicant shall ensure that the Residential Service Protection Fund surcharge is remitted to the Commission. This surcharge is assessed against each retail subscriber at a rate that is set annually by the Commission. 3. Applicant shall make quarterly contributions to the Oregon Universal Service fund based on a Commission approved schedule and surcharge percentage assessed on all retail intrastate telecommunications services sold in Oregon, pursuant to ORS 759.425. If Applicant bills the surcharge to its end-users, Applicant shall show the charges as a separate line item on the bill with the words "Oregon Universal Service Surcharge %".* The current surcharge percent that the company would enter on this line is found at http://www.oregonusf.gov/ousrate.htm. The company must use the most current surcharge rate. 3

1 i ' ' n (; '"'J '! Competitive Zones All exchanges of the telecommunications utilities and cooperative corporations listed in the appendices to this order are designated competitive zones for dedicated transmission service pursuant to ORS 759.050(2)(b). Pricing Flexibility - Dedicated Transmission Service The telecommunications utilities listed in Appendix A are granted pricing flexibility for dedicated transmission service in their respective exchanges by this order. See Order No. 93-1850, docket UM 381. ORDER IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The application of GC Pivotal, LLC is granted with conditions described in this order. 2. Applicant is designated as a competitive telecommunications provider for intraexchange service in the local exchanges of the telecommunications utilities and cooperative corporations listed in Appendices A and B. In addition, Applicant is designated as a competitive telecommunications provider for interexchange service statewide in Oregon. 3. The local exchanges of the telecommunications utilities and cooperative corporations listed in Appendices A and B are designated as competitive zones for dedicated transmission service. 4. Any obligation regarding interconnection between Applicant and the telecommunications utilities and cooperative corporations listed in Appendices A and B shall be governed by the provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the Act). 5. No finding contained in this order shall have any bearing on any detennination the Commission may be called upon to make under sections 251 or 252 of the Act with regard to the telecommunications utilities and cooperative corporations listed in the appendices to this order. 4

<? '\ j j' 6. The teleco=unications utilities listed in Appendix A shall receive pricing flexibility for dedicated transmission service on an exchangeby-exchange basis, as set forth in this order. Made, entered, and effective A _ P _ R _ 0 _ 6 _ Z _ 0 _ 1 A party may request rehearing or reconsideration of this order under ORS 756.561. A request for rehearing or reconsideration must be filed with the Commission within 60 days of the date of service of this order. The request must comply with the requirements in OAR 860-001-0720. A copy of the request must also be served on each party to the proceedings as provided in OAR 860-001-0180(2). A party may appeal this order by filing a petition for review with the Court of Appeals in compliance with ORS 183.480 through 183.484. 5

-11 1 "f_ (\' ' " \.,:..' c APPENDIX A CP 1501 EXCHANGES ENCOMPASS ED BY THE APPLICATION: ALL EXCHANGES OF THETELECO CATIONS UTILITIES LISTED BELOW Telecommunications Utilities Not Exempt Pursuant to ORS 759.040 CenturyTel of Eastern Oregon, Inc. dba Century Link CenturyTel of Oregon, Inc. dba Century Link Qwest Corporation United Telephone Company of the Northwest dba Century Link Frontier Communications Northwest Inc. Telecommunications Utilities Exempt Pursuant to ORS 759.040 Asotin Telephone Company Cascade Utilities, Inc. Citizens Telecommunications Company of Oregon Eagle Telephone System, Inc. Helix Telephone Company Home Telephone Company Monroe Telephone Company Mt. Angel Telephone Company Nehalem Telecommunications, Inc. North-State Telephone Company Oregon Telephone Corporation Oregon-Idaho Utilities, Inc. People's Telephone Company Pine Telephone System, Inc. Roome Telecommunications, Inc. Trans-Cascades Telephone Company. APPENDIX A PAGE 1 OF 1

APPENDIX B CP 1501 EXCHANGES ENCOMPASSED BY THE APPLICATION: ALL EXCHANGES OF THE COOPERATIVE CORPORATIONS LISTED BELOW Beaver Creek Cooperative Telephone Company Canby Telephone Association Clear Creek Mutual Telephone Colton Telephone Company Gervais Telephone Company Molalla Telephone Company Monitor Cooperative Telephone Co. Pioneer Telephone Cooperative Scio Mutual Telephone Association St. Paul Cooperative Telephone Association Stayton Cooperative Telephone Co. APPENDIX B PAGE I OF 1