Case 3:16-cv Document 1-1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 68 SUBPOENA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

Similar documents
ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ECONOMIC CRIMES SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM C/O:

Medicaid Fraud Control Unit Investigative Subpoena Duces Tecum

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Charlotte Division

YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to produce to Eric Wm. Hendon, Esq., Assistant Attorney

APPENDIX I SAMPLE INTERROGATORIES

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD REGION 2

ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ECONOMIC CRIME DIVISION FIRST INVESTIGATIVE SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM

January 24, Via Electronic Transmission

FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 02/07/ :50 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/07/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

December 12, Via facsimile transmission: Mitchell A. Leon President DesignWrite Inc. 175 Wall Street Princeton, NJ 08540

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/11/2013 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 41 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2013

CAUSE NO. 18-C STREETS TO SHEETS ANIMAL IN THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW RESCUE Plaintiff, v. NO. 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ECONOMIC CRIMES SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WITHOUT APPEARANCE POWDERZ, INC.

DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT S FIRST INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/15/ :09 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/15/2017

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. Case No.: 2012 CA

Defendants. X THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. WE COMMAND YOU, That all business and excuses being laid aside, you appear at

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/18/ :44 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 130 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/18/2015

Information or instructions: Combined discovery requests, admissions, production of documents and interrogatories

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Plaintiff, Defendant. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Acme Home & Garden, LLC demands answers

IN THE DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF CASS, NORTH DAKOTA

Sample. Index No: [Insert] RJI No: [Insert] PLAINTIFF S NOTICE TO PRODUCE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

ANTITRUST CIVIL INVESTIGATIVE DEMAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Case: JGR Doc#:231 Filed:02/23/17 Entered:02/23/17 16:06:19 Page1 of 2 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case Doc 225 Filed 10/05/18 Entered 10/05/18 14:02:08 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 9

DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS/ ST. JOHN PLAINTIFF'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT WAHEED HAMED

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. Docket No CV Sanjeev Lath

Plaintiff, DEFENDANT'S INTERROGATORIES, REQUEST. Defendant. City of Bloomington ( Bloomington ) and demands that Plaintiff Tony Webster ( Webster )

Case 3:16-cv DPJ-FKB Document 43 Filed 04/13/17 Page 1 of 2

31 U.S.C. Section 3733 Civil investigative demands

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 195 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/08/2017

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Debtor.

CODE OF PROCEDURE FOR RESOLVING EMPLOYMENT DISPUTES

PAYMENT DEDUCTION AUTHORIZATION AND AGREEMENT

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to CPLR 3101, 3120, et. seq., Defendant

In the Superior Court Allen County, Indiana Cause No.. 02D PL-499

Case 3:16-md VC Document Filed 01/09/19 Page 1 of 18 EXHIBIT A

CODE OF PROCEDURE FOR RESOLVING BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS DISPUTES

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE LOS ANGELES. SECTION 1: The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority

Rhode Island False Claims Act

Investigations and Enforcement

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 211 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 11

Attorney s BriefCase Beyond the Basics Depositions in Family Law Matters

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES

ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ECONOMIC CRIMES SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/08/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/08/2017

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION TRUSTEE S FIRST DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO SOLAR INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGIES GMHB

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 194 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/08/2017

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 12/22/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 132 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/22/2017

U.S. Department of Justice

CIVIL RIGHTS INVESTIGATIVE SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WITHOUT DEPOSITION STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

LA CHARGERS 2018 TRAINING CAMP WIN 2018 SEASON TICKETS SWEEPSTAKES OFFICIAL RULES

Case 1:99-cv ECH Document 295 Filed 03/19/2008 Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

FILED: ORANGE COUNTY CLERK 03/17/ :37 PM

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Dated: Dated: DEFINITIONS

Chapter 5 DISCOVERY. 5.1 Vocabulary Introduction and Discovery Deadlines Chart The Deposition 6

Federal Trade Commission v. Global Marketing Group, Inc., et al. CASE No. 8:06 CV-2272-T-30TGW

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

DSCC Uniform Administrative Procedures Policy

CHAPTER 200. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION; GENERAL PROVISIONS

TITLE 1 GENERAL CITY PROVISIONS.

RULES OF PROCEDURE BEFORE THE COWLITZ COUNTY HEARINGS EXAMINER

December 12, Via Electronic Transmission

LA CHARGERS ULTIMATE OFFICE PARTY SWEEPSTAKES OFFICIAL RULES

EXHIBIT J To THE DECLARATION OF HOLLY GAUDREAU IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR EXPEDITED

INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS CONCERNING SUBPOENAS AND SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM

ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE

Board of Education Utica Community Schools

RELIBIT LABS MUTUAL NON DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT

KING COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY PUBLIC RECORDS DISCLOSURE POLICY

Case 1:19-cv Document 3 Filed 01/16/19 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No.

Administrative Code. Summary of Policy

CANADIAN SOCIETY OF CORPORATE SECRETARIES

NC General Statutes - Chapter 52C 1

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/11/2014 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 61 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/11/2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division CASE NO CIV-SIMONTON

FUNDBOX INC. A YEAR OF MUST-HAVE BOOKS FOR ENTREPRENEURS SWEEPSTAKES OFFICIAL RULES

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Plaintiff. v. Case No.

You acknowledge that urgent alerts may not be timely received and that your wireless carrier does not guarantee that alerts will be delivered.

BYLAWS MILLSTONE CROSSING HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC

PCAOB Release No September 29, 2003 Page 2

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

POLICY TITLE: Public Access to District Records Policy No.: Page 1 of 6

BYLAWS OF THE GREENE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY As approved on December 11, 2012

DEPARTMENTAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Miami-Dade Aviation Department DSOP No (Amendment 2) Effective: July 7, 2003

Land Trust Agreement. Certification and Explanation. Schedule of Beneficial Interests

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION Landlord and Tenant Branch

HAWAII ADMINISTRATIVE RULES TITLE 12 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS SUBTITLE 7 BOARDS CHAPTER 47

CODE OF PROCEDURE FOR RESOLVING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DISPUTES

Department of Labor Relations TABLE OF CONTENTS. Connecticut State Labor Relations Act. Article I. Description of Organization and Definitions

SOLID ROCK CHURCH, INC. ofcourt File No. 71-C ELK RIVER, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota Non-Profit Corporation,

Transcription:

FORM NLRB-32 Case 3:16-cv-00987 Document 1-1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 68 SUBPOENA To Custodian of Records, 1455 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94103 As requested by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD CARMEN LEON, on behalf of the General Counsel whose address is 901 Market Street, Suite 400, San Francisco, CA 94103-1738 (Street) (City) (State) (ZIP) YOU ARE HEREBY REQUIRED AND DIRECTED TO APPEAR BEFORE the Regional Director or his/her designee at 901 Market Street, Suite 400 in the City of San Francisco, CA of the National Labor Relations Board on Tuesday, January 26, 2016 by 5:00 p.m. or any adjourned or rescheduled date to provide answers to the attached interrogatories in connection to the Board's investigation in: 20-CA-160717, et al (Case Name and Number) If you do not intend to comply with the subpoena, within 5 days (excluding intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays) after the date the subpoena is received, you must petition in writing to revoke the subpoena. Unless filed through the Board's E-Filing system, the petition to revoke must be received on or before the official closing time of the receiving office on the last day for filing. If filed through the Board's E-Filing system, it may be filed up to 11:59 pm in the local time zone of the receiving office on the last day for filing. Prior to a hearing, the petition to revoke should be filed with the Regional Director; during a hearing, it should be filed with the Hearing Officer or Administrative Law Judge conducting the hearing. See Board's Rules and Regulations, 29 C.F.R Section 102.31(b) (unfair labor practice proceedings) and/or 29 C.F.R. Section 102.66(c) (representation proceedings) and 29 C.F.R Section 102.111(a)(1) and 102.111(b)(3) (time computation). Failure to follow these rules may result in the loss of any ability to raise objections to the subpoena in court. Under the seal of the National Labor Relations Board, and by direction of the A-1 -PRRW1T Board, this Subpoena is Issued at San Francisco, CA Dated: December 31, 2015 Chairman. National Labor Relations Board NOTICE TO WITNESS. Witness fees for attendance, subsistence, and mileage under this subpoena are payable by the party at whose request the witness is subpoenaed. A witness appearing at the request of the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board shall submit this subpoena with the voucher when claiming reimbursement. PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT Solicitation of the information on this form is authorized by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), 29 U.S.C. 151 et seq. The principal use of the information is to assist the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) in processing representation and/or unfair labor practice proceedings and related proceedings or litigation. The routine uses for the information are fully set forth in the Federal Register, 71 Fed. Reg. 74942-43 (Dec. 13, 2006). The NLRB will further explain these uses upon request. Disclosure of this information to the NLRB is mandatory in that failure to supply the inform'ation may cause the NLRB to seek enforcement of the subpoena in federal court.

Case 3:16-cv-00987 Document 1-1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 2 of 68 Case 20-CA-160717 A-1-PRRW1T RETURN OF SERVICE I certify that, being a person over 18 years of age, I duly served a copy of this subpoena (Check method used.) [j] Ej LI 111 by person by certified mail by registered mail by telegraph by leaving copy at principal office or place of business at on the named person on (Month, day, and year) (Name of person making service) (Official title, if any) CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE I certify that named person was in attendance as a witness at on (Month, day or days, and year) (Name of person certifying) (Official title)

Case 3:16-cv-00987 Document 1-1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 3 of 68 Pursuant to 11 of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. 161, you are hereby directed to provide full and complete written responses to the interrogatories set forth below. DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS 1) Written answers to the interrogatories set forth below must be provided by no later than the date indicated on the face of the subpoena. 2) All answers to the interrogatories shall be provided under penalty of perjury, and the answers provided shall be accompanied by a sworn verification so stating. 3) Whenever used in this subpoena, "Charged Party" or "Uber" refers to Uber Technologies, Inc., its employees, agents, representatives, accountants, attorneys, trustees, successors and assigns, and the employees, agents, representatives, accountants, attorneys, trustees, successors and assigns of any entity that it owns, controls or manages, or subsidiaries including, but not limited to Rasier, LLC, Rasier-CA, LLC, and Rasier-PA, LLC. 4) As used herein, the term "person" means any natural person, corporation, partnership, proprietorship, association, organization, trust, joint venture, or group of natural persons or other organizations. 5) Whenever used in this subpoena, the singular shall be deemed to include the plural, and vice versa; the present tense shall be deemed to include the past tense, and vice versa; reference to parties shall be deemed to include any and all of their officers, agents and representatives; the masculine shall be deemed to include the feminine, and vice versa; the disjunctive "or" shall be deemed to include the conjunctive "and," and vice versa; and each of the words "each," "any," "every," and "all" shall be deemed to include each of the other words. 6) When used in this subpoena, the word "document" or "documents" means any existing printed, typewritten, handwritten, or otherwise recorded material of whatever character, including, but not limited to text, webpage, letters, correspondence, memoranda, telegrams, mailgrams, minutes, notes, statements, affidavits, agreements, summaries, records of telephone conversations, telephone bills, recordings of personal conversations, interviews or meetings, transcripts, diaries, reports, charts, contracts, calendars, interoffice communications, books, records, tax records, bookkeeping and/or accounting work papers, canceled checks, accounts, accounts receivable records, ledgers, journals, purchase orders, invoices, bills of lading, billing slips, delivery records, receiving records, photographs, microfilm, audio or video tapes, voice mail messages, material existing on computer software or hardware, computer tapes or disks and electronic mail, and all data contained thereon that may be retrieved, including electronically stored information (ESI), material stored on hard disks, and any carbon, photographic or other duplicate copy of such material in the possession of, control of, or available to the subpoenaed party or any attorney, agent, representative or other person acting in cooperation with, in concert with, or on behalf of the Charged Party. - 1 -

Case 3:16-cv-00987 Document 1-1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 4 of 68 7) If any information responsive to any interrogatory herein is withheld from production on the asserted ground that it is privileged, identify and describe: a) the subject matter of the information; b) where that information is maintained; c) the identity of the persons who maintain that information. 8) In answering these interrogatories, furnish all information, however obtained, including hearsay that is available to you and information known by or in possession of yourself, your agents and your attorney, or appearing in your records, and identify with specificity the sources of all information provided in your answers. 9) If you cannot answer the following interrogatories in full after exercising due diligence to secure the full information to do so, so state and answer to the extent possible, specifying your inability to answer the remainder, stating whatever information or knowledge you have concerning the unanswered portion and detailing what you did in attempting to secure the unknown information. 10) In response to any interrogatory not expressly asking for documents, state whether there are any documents which reflect or relate to any of the information requested in that interrogatory, and identify the custodian of the documents. 11) Any interrogatory which cannot be answered in full shall be answered as completely as possible, and any incomplete answer shall be accompanied by reasons for the incompleteness of the answer as well as by a statement of whatever knowledge, information, or belief is possessed by the Charged Party with respect to each unanswered or incomplete interrogatory. 12) Should you claim that any of the following interrogatories is beyond the scope of permissible discovery or privilege, such claim shall specify in detail all the grounds on which the claim rests. 13) When addresses and telephone numbers are requested, both business and home addresses and telephone numbers are required. 14) Whenever used in this subpoena, "Charged Party employee" shall refer to any person who performs services for the Charged Party including but not limited to any agent, employee, representative, customer service representative, or Uber Help Community Support Representative. 15) Whenever used in this subpoena "Charged Party's software app" shall refer to the Charged Party' technology platform. 16) All interrogatories should respond to the time period beginning August 1, 2013, through the present unless otherwise noted. - 2 -

Case 3:16-cv-00987 Document 1-1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 5 of 68 17) Whenever used in this subpoena, "Driver" shall also refer to "driver ID" or driver identification. 18) Whenever used in this subpoena, "client" shall refer to passengers being transported by drivers who are utilizing Charged Party's software application including Charged Party's own definition of "user" as found in their Software License and Online Services Agreement. 19) Whenever used in this subpoena, "position" shall refer to the Charged Party employee's status or job title within the Charged Party's organization, and if not within the Charged Party's organization, state the employing entity and position therein. 20) Whenever referred to in this subpoena, "arbitration provision" shall refer to the arbitration provision contained within the Software License and Online Service Agreements or any other arbitration provision applied to drivers. - 3 -

INTERROGATORIES 1. State the name, address and telephone number of each person responsible, in whole or in part, for providing the answers to these interrogatories. 2. State the name, address and telephone number of each person responsible, in whole or in part, for producing the documents provided in response to NLRB Subpoena Duces Tecum No. B-1-PRL733. 3. State the Business Model on which the Charged Party's software app is based. 4. State what the minimum requirements are before an individual is given a driver ID and is allowed to perform transportation services using the Charged Party's software app. 5. State the different types of categories of Uber drivers, including but not limited to Uber X, Uber Black, Uber Taxi, Uber SUV, and Uber Lux, the difference between the different services, and drivers. Application and Onboarding of Drivers 6. State in detail the application process administered or provided by the Charged Party for prospective drivers. 7. State the position of any Charged Party employee who reviews driver applications. 8. Explain how Charged Party decides whether to accept a prospective driver's application and the process by which an Uber driver is issued driver identification, and state the position of Charged Party employee(s) responsible for these duties. 9. Explain the process by which a prospective driver is informed that he or she has been accepted as an Uber driver, and state the position of the Charged Party employee(s) responsible for this duty. 10. State in detail any interview procedures administered or provided by the Charged Party for prospective drivers, including the position of any Charged Party employee who conducts the interview. 11. State in detail the onboarding or orientation process for drivers, including but not limited to Uber X and Uber Black drivers. 12. State the identity and position of the person(s) who compose the onboarding scripts. 13. State what a driver ID is. Trainings for Drivers Case 3:16-cv-00987 Document 1-1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 6 of 68-4 -

Case 3:16-cv-00987 Document 1-1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 7 of 68 14. State the identity and position of the person(s) or Charged Party employees who create trainings given or administered to, or tailored for, drivers. 15. State how driver training subjects are determined. 16. State how trainings are administered or made available to drivers. 17. State the criteria used to determine whether a driver needs training. 18. State the different types of trainings that have been made available to drivers. 19. State the identity and position of the person who creates or composes the "city knowledge test." 20. State how the training(s) on knowledge of the city are administered to drivers. 21. State how the results of completing the training are used by the Charged Party. 22. State in detail how the trainings are issued or administered to the drivers, what circumstances cause the trainings to be required, and how the drivers complete the training. 23. State the manner or method in which alerts, trainings, or any messages are sent to drivers, and the manner or method in which drivers can accept the alerts, messages, or demonstrate assent or acceptance. Policies 24. State the identity and position of the person(s) or employees who creates the policies responsive to Subpoena Number B-1-PRL733 document request number 9. 25. State the process by which the policies in response to Subpoena Number document request number 9 are determined. 26. With respect to Subpoena Number B-1-PRL733 document request number 9, state the manner or method in which the policies and procedures are made known to drivers. 27. With respect to Subpoena Number B-1-PRL733 document request number 9, state the manner or method in which driver may demonstrate acceptance or recognition of the policies or procedures. 28. With respect to Subpoena Number B-1-PRL733 document request number 9, state whether any policies are made known to clients. - 5 -

Subpoena No. A-1-PRRW I T 29. With respect to Subpoena Number B-1-PRL733 document request number 9, state the manner or method in which the policies are made known to clients. 30. State the Charged Party's policy on "Integrity" including, but not limited to "You should also never solicit Uber clients for your own business," and how the policy is enforced. 31. State what the consequences are for a driver whom the Charged Party discovers has solicited a Charged Party client for his/her own business. 32. State what the "Quality Framework" is, including: a. the identity and position of the person who created it; b. how it was created; c. why it was created; d. how it is defined; e. the identity and position of the person who reviews the categories, f. how it is applied, and g. how it has been applied to drivers. 33. State how drivers are informed of potential clients while using the Charged Party's software app. 34. State how drivers determine what clients to pick up, transport, and drop off while using the Charged Party's software app. 35. State whether drivers can provide transportation services to clients who are not referred to them by the Charged Party's software app while the driver is actively logged onto the Charged Party's software app. 36. Describe the extent to which a driver is allowed to refuse to transport clients obtained through the Charged Party's software app, and the consequences to the driver for refusing, if any. Driver Ratings Case 3:16-cv-00987 Document 1-1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 8 of 68 37. State what driver ratings are. 38. State what driver ratings are used for. 39. State who is responsible for the collection of driver ratings and the name of the position(s). 40. Explain how driver ratings are collected. 41. Explain how driver ratings are analyzed and state the name employees responsible for this duty and their position. - 6 -

42. Explain the different ways drivers are rated. 43. State what information, criteria, formula or algorithm driver ratings are based on. 44. Explain how ratings are calculated. 45. State in detail how acceptance rates are calculated, including the raw data used to calculate the acceptance rate. 46. Identify and describe the information or data that is used, other than the number of client acceptances, to make acceptance rate calculations. 47. State what it is to deactivate a driver. 48. State whether the Charged Party can deactivate a driver. 49. State the different reasons for which a driver may be deactivated. 50. State the process for deactivating a driver. 51. State the position of the Charged Party employee that determines whether to deactivate a driver. 52. State the position of the Charged Party employee that informs drivers that they have been deactivated or will be deactivated. 53. State how the Charged Party communicates to drivers that they are deactivated. 54. State how many drivers have been deactivated. Fares/fees/payment Case 3:16-cv-00987 Document 1-1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 9 of 68 55. State how fares, whether recommended by the Charged Party or otherwise, are determined. 56. State the identity and position of the person(s) responsible for the setting of fares. 57. State whether drivers can set their own pricing or fares for rides. 58. State how drivers determine how much to charge a client for a ride. 59. State how a client makes a fare payment. 60. State who receives the client's fare payment. 61. State whether drivers may collect cash as payment for providing rides, and if so, how many drivers collect cash. - 7 -

Case 3:16-cv-00987 Document 1-1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 10 of 68 62. Describe what a fare promotion is. 63. State whether the Charged Party offers discount pricing. 64. State the different fare promotions the Charged Party offers to clients for transportation services. 65. State the different types of discount prices the Charged Party offers to clients for transportation services. 66. State how promotions or discount prices are factored into fares, fees and payment calculations. 67. State what surges are with regard to the Charged Party's software app. 68. With respect to interrogatory number 67, state how surges work. 69. With respect to interrogatory number 67, state to whom surges are announced. 70. With respect to interrogatory number 67, state how surges are generated. 71. With respect to interrogatory number 67, state how long surges last. 72. With respect to interrogatory number 67, state what data is used to determine surges. 73. With respect to interrogatory number 67, state how surges factor into pricing, fees, or payment to drivers. 74. With respect to interrogatory number 67, state how surges factor into fares charged to clients. 75. With respect to interrogatory number 67, state what prompts surge pricing texts to be sent to drivers. 76. With respect to interrogatory number 75, state what data is collected from drivers in response to these texts, and how this data is used. 77. State how the Charged Party reports driver earnings, including tips, to the Internal Revenue Service, including but not limited to, W-2 or 1099 forms. 78. State how drivers are paid for the transportation services they provide to clients. 79. State how payments to drivers are calculated. 80. State what the drivers' weekly summaries are. - 8 -

Case 3:16-cv-00987 Document 1-1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 11 of 68 81. With respect to interrogatory number 80, state what information drivers' weekly summaries contain. 82. With respect to interrogatory number 80, state how the information within the drivers' weekly summaries is compiled. 83. State whether algorithms are used to determine fares, including but not limited to surge pricing. 84. State what type of data underpins the algorithm that determines pricing, including but not limited to surge pricing, and whether and how a driver has control over the data or algorithm. 85. State how the algorithm is used to determine fares and whether and how it affects payments made to drivers. 86. State the identity of the persons who can explain how an algorithm is used to determine prices, including but not limited to surge pricing. Feed back by Drivers 87. State the methods by which drivers can inform the Charged Party about issues concerning clients, including any ratings drivers can give to the clients. 88. State how and to whom the drivers can submit issues concerning clients or passengers to the Charged Party, including but not limited to partnerssfauber.com. 89. With respect to interrogatory number 88, state how the information is collected. 90. With respect to interrogatory number 88, state the identity and position of those person(s) responsible for the review of this information. 91. With respect to interrogatory number 88, state how the Charged Party uses the information obtained. 92. With respect to interrogatory number 88, state how that information is used. 93. State the position of the Charged Party employee who responds to driver complaints and their status with respect to the Charged Party's organizational structure or corporate hierarchy. 94. State the position of the Charged Party employee who responds to client complaints and their status with respect to the Charged Party's organizational structure or corporate hierarchy. Monitoring or Tracking of Drivers - 9 -

Case 3:16-cv-00987 Document 1-1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 12 of 68 Subpoena No. A-1-PRRWIT 95. Describe the method by which drivers are monitored or tracked, including but not limited to their movements, activities, behavior, and hours worked. 96. State how frequently drivers are monitored or tracked. 97. State the duration of driver monitoring or tracking. 98. State what data is collected by monitoring or tracking drivers. 99. State how the data from monitoring or tracking drivers is recorded and how long it is maintained. 100. State how the data from monitoring or tracking drivers is used, including but not limited to determining prices, ratings, and hiring or invitations to become drivers. 101. State the identity and position of the person and/or software that is responsible for the collection, analysis, or review of the information collected by driver monitoring or tracking. 102. State the way the monitoring or tracking information is used, including but not limited to, the creation of drive ratings and/or surges. Arbitration Provision General 103. State the case names and numbers in which the Charged Party has filed a motion to compel arbitration or any other motion to enforce the Charged Party's arbitration provision in matters involving drivers. 104. State whether any drivers have failed to sign, acknowledge receipt of, or otherwise assent to, the Charged Party's arbitration provision. 105. State the consequences to drivers who fail to sign or accept acknowledgment or receipt of the arbitration provision. 106. State the identity of drivers who have failed to sign the arbitration provision. 107. State the names of all of the cases and case numbers in which counsel retained by the Charged Party has represented drivers, including but not limited to, counsel representing drivers for traffic infractions for airport service brought by the Los Angeles District Attorney. - 10 -