THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. Petition for Approval of

Similar documents
The State of New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission

DT GRANITE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, LLC d/b/a Hale & Father Telecommunications. Petition for Authority to Provide Local Telecommunications Services

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE D/B/A EVERSOURCE ENERGY

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION. Docket No. DG Liberty Utilities (EnergyNorth Natural Gas Corp.) d/b/a Liberty Utilities

DT SEGTEL, INC. Petition for Authority to Provide Local Telecommunications Services. Order Nisi Granting Authorization O R D E R N O.

VERIZON NEW HAMPSHIRE. Tariff Filing Introducing Enhanced ISDN PRI Hub Service. Order Extending Review Period and Establishing Hearing

DT NEON Connect, Inc. Petition for Authority to Provide Local Telecommunications Services. Order Nisi Granting Authorization

METROMEDIA FIBER NETWORK SERVICES, INC.

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

THE ST A TE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION. City of Concord's and Senator Dan Feltes' Prchcaring Memorandum of Law

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DG

DW HAMPSTEAD AREA WATER COMPANY. Petition for Rate Increase. and DW HAMPSTEAD AREA WATER COMPANY

DT Petition for Authority to Provide Local Telecommunications Services. Order Nisi Granting Authorization O R D E R N O. 23,960.

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DE PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Least Cost Integrated Resource Plan

PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE D/B/A EVERSOURCE ENERGY

DT FRANCE TELECOM CORPORATE SOLUTIONS LLC. Petition for Authority to Provide Non-Facilities Based CLEC Services

DM METRA INDUSTIRES INC. Show Cause Proceeding. Order Approving Settlement Agreement O R D E R N O. 24,190. July 9, 2003

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DE NORTHERN PASS TRANSMISSION LLC. Petition to Commence Business as a Public Utility

The New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission ("the Commission") opened

Appeal of Union Telephone Company d/b/a Union Communications, Supreme Court Docket No , Docket No

Energy Choice Consulting

DT Verizon New Hampshire Section 271 Inquiry Conversion of Statement of Generally Available Terms and Conditions to a Tariff

EVERSeURCE. ~Ri\1~ ~-~4~O. August 21, 2015

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DE ELECTRIC AND GAS UTILITY CUSTOMERS

DW HAMPSTEAD AREA WATER COMPANY, INC. Petition for Franchise Approval. Order Approving Stipulation and Granting Approval of a Utility Franchise

VERIZON NEW HAMPSHIRE /BULLSEYE TELECOM, INC.

VERIZON NEW HAMPSHIRE/RNK, INC.

DT VERIZON NEW HAMPSHIRE. Revisions to Verizon Performance Assurance Plan. Order Approving Revisions as Modified by Stipulation

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DE PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Case: HJB Doc #: 3116 Filed: 02/16/16 Desc: Main Document Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OPTIMUM GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,

Freedom Logistics, LLC d/b/a Freedom Energy Logistics

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Before the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission DT

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DT METROCAST CABLEVISION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

DOCKET NO. E-100, SUB 157. NOW COMES NC WARN Inc. ("NC WARN"), by and through undersigned

Case Document 3784 Filed in TXSB on 06/17/16 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

DT Petition for an Order Directing Verizon-NH to Comply With its Interconnection Agreement Obligation to Pay Reciprocal Compensation

VERIZON NEW HAMPSHIRE/BIDDEFORD INTERNET CORPORATION

BRUKER UNLINE EXCHANGE. Re: Aggregator Renewal Application for Broker Online Exchange, LLC - DM

According to Freedom Energy, the current utility practice of paying QFs for their energy

WILTON TELEPHONE COMPANY AND HOLLIS TELEPHONE COMPANY

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE HANNAFORD BROTHERS COMPANY. TOWN OF BEDFORD & a. Argued: January 10, 2013 Opinion Issued: April 25, 2013

MONTHLY METERED NATURAL GAS SUPPLIER SERVICE AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

c}(eori & rnscak LLF February 12, 2016 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING

EDGEWATER BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT RESOLUTION NO. BOA

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DE

TARIFF SCHEDULES for Natural Gas Storage Service of WILD GOOSE STORAGE, LLC West Liberty Road Gridley, California 95948

NATIONAL FUEL GAS DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION BUFFALO, NEW YORK RATES, RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE FURNISHING NATURAL GAS SERVICE

Ambit Northeast, LLC Pennsylvania National Fuel Gas - PA Service Area Residential Disclosure Statement and Terms of Service

NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON RULES PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE. The New Hampshire Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Rules

HAMPSTEAD PLANNING BOARD 11 Main Street, Hampstead New Hampshire

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEBANON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION FAMILY DIVISION PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF A CUSTODY ORDER

NATIONAL FUEL GAS DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION BUFFALO, NEW YORK RATES, RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE FURNISHING NATURAL GAS SERVICE

3. Retirement of Certain Coal-Fired Generating Units. DEC and PEC will retire coal-fired electrical generating units ( EGUs ), as follows:

Name. City: State: Zip Code: City: State: Zip Code: City: State: Zip Code: City: State: Zip Code:

Docket No. APPLICATION OF TEXAS-NEW MEXICO POWER COMPANY. NOW COMES Texas-New Mexico Power Company ( TNMP or Company ),

TOWN OF NEW HAMPTON, NH HAWKERS, PEDDLERS, AND VENDORS LICENSING ORDINANCE

VERIZON NEW HAMPSHIRE/PREFERRED CARRIER SERVICES, INC. d/b/a Phones for All and Telefonos Para Todos

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF REMOVAL

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON

BELL ATLANTIC/METROMEDIA FIBER NETWORK SERVICES, INC.

U ORIGINAL E4C. Energy Choice Consulting 2/ /? UTftJT;S. March 31, 2013

DEFINED TIMEFRAMES FOR RATE CASES (i.e., suspension period)

Case: SDB Doc#:29 Filed:02/28/18 Entered:02/28/18 16:52:49 Page:1 of 6

STATE RESIDENTIAL RIGHT-TO-REPAIR STATUTES

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Southern California Edison Company ) Docket No.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Case crm Document 3284 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) )

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Amended and Restated. Market-Based Sales Tariff. Virginia Electric and Power Company

Ch SPECIAL PROVISIONS 52 CHAPTER SPECIAL PROVISIONS

Environmental Management Chapter ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATIVE CODE

thejasminebrand.com thejasminebrand.com

BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : COMMENTS OF THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION

Ambit Northeast, LLC Illinois ComEd Service Area

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION P.O. BOX 3265, HARRISBURG, PA August 30, 2013

Case Doc 45 Filed 04/19/17 Entered 04/19/17 11:03:02 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 7

Control Number : Item Number : 10. Addendum StartPage : 0. ii..

STATE OF VERMONT PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. Order entered: 09/26/2018 ORDER OPENING INVESTIGATION AND NOTICE OF PREHEARING CONFERENCE

WAIVER OF APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM. I,, the Respondent in. give up my right to have this Court appoint a Guardian Ad Litem

BEFORE THE STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE ST A TE OF KANSAS

Pennsylvania Residential and Small Commercial Contract Summary and Terms of Service

STATE OF ILLINOIS ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION

Case: HJB Doc #: 3155 Filed: 02/23/16 Desc: Main Document Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE : :

BEFORE THE GUAM PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE REPORT. Introduction

.JUL 1. S on behalf ofits low income clients. THE Pt rns VL MA P1 131IC LTIUT\ (OMiISS1O REVIEW COMM15. Proposed Rulemaking to Amend

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. Town of Sandown P.O. Box 1756, 320 Main Street Sandown, New Hampshire and

Pennsylvania Residential Contract Summary and Terms of Service - ELECTRIC

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION

IOWA INDUSTRIAL ENERGY GROUP

NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE RITA MACPHERSON JAY S. WEINER. Submitted: September 16, 2008 Opinion Issued: October 30, 2008

Transcription:

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. Petition for Approval of Fourth Amendment to Special Contract With Foss Manufacturing Company, LLC Docket No. DG 10-

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. Docket No. 10- PETITION FOR APPROVAL OF FOURTH AMENDMENT TO SPECIAL CONTRACT WITH FOSS MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LLC NOW COMES Northern Utilities, Inc. ( Northern or the Company ) and, pursuant to N.H. RSA 378:18, respectfully petitions the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission ( the Commission ) for approval of a Fourth Amendment of Agreement which extends the term of the Special Contract between Northern and Foss Manufacturing Company, LLC ( Foss or the Customer ) for two (2) additional years. In support of this Petition, Northern states as follows: 1. Northern is a public utility primarily engaged in the delivery of natural gas services in certain cities and towns in southeastern New Hampshire and Maine. 2. Foss is a manufacturing company with operations in Hampton, New Hampshire where it employs over 300 people. Foss is Northern s second largest firm transportation customer; Foss purchases natural gas from a third party supplier. 3. Northern and Foss are parties to a Special Firm Transportation Agreement dated October 28, 1999 (Schedule NU- 1-1) which was conditionally approved by the Commission in Order No. 23,382. See Re Northern Utilities, Inc., DG 99-17 1, 85 NH PUC 6 (January 6, 2000). The condition imposed by the Commission in Order 1

No. 23,382 required the Company to revise the Special Contract term provision to require Commission approval for any extension period beyond five (5) years. See Re Northern Utilities, Inc., 84 NH PUC at 9. Northern complied with this condition by entering into an Amendment of Agreement with Foss dated January 11, 2000. See Schedule NU-1-2. 4. The special circumstances that led to the negotiation, execution and approval of the original Special Contract were that Foss had the capability to utilize alternate fuels. See Re Northern Utilities, Inc., 84 NH PUC at 8. The Special Contract was designed to retain Foss s load at a competitive price which would make the fuel switching option unattractive while at the same time enabling Northern to obtain contribution toward fixed costs to mitigate the effects on other customers of lost revenues and sales. 5. The original Special Contract expired on February 28, 2005. Because Foss wanted continued certainty regarding its gas transportation costs and because Northern wished to maintain a certain revenue stream from this Customer, Northern and Foss began negotiating an agreement to extend the terms and conditions of the original Special Contract for five (5) additional years. In order to insure continuation of service during the parties negotiations, Northern and Foss entered into a Letter Agreement dated March 8, 2005 which provided that Northern would continue to deliver natural gas according to the terms of the 2000 Special Contract but that the Customer would be obligated to pay the applicable tariff rate back to March 1, 2005 in the event that the Commission did not approve an extension of the Special Contract. See Letter Agreement (March 8, 2005) (Schedule NU-l -5). 2

6. Northern and Foss entered into a Second Amendment of Agreement with an effective date of March 1, 2005, the purpose of which was to extend the existing Special Contract for five (5) more years, i.e. until February 29, 2010. See Second Amendment of Agreement (Schedule NU- 1-3). 7. On April 1, 2005, Northern filed a Petition and supporting documents with the Commission seeking approval of the Second Amendment of Agreement. In investigating this filing, Commission Staff concluded that the rates contained in the original Special Contract should be increased. See Re Northern Utilities, Inc., 90 NH PUC 263, 264 (July 1, 2005). In response to Staff s concerns, Northern and Foss negotiated a Third Amendment of Agreement (Schedule NU- 1-4) for the purpose of increasing the transportation rates to be charged by Northern to Foss under the extended Special Contract. Id. On July 1, 2005, the Commission approved both the Second and Third Amendments of Agreement in Order No. 24,478. See Re Northern Utilities, Inc., 90 NH PUC at 266. 8. Northern recently notified Foss that the existing Special Contract will expire at the end of February, 2010 and that Foss would be subject to Northern s tariff rates as of March 1, 2010. In response, Foss requested that Northern make a filing with the Commission to extend the terms and conditions of the existing contract. See Letter from Paul Koroski to Mike Smith dated February 2, 2010 (Schedule NU-1-6). In support of its request, Foss stated that if it were required to pay tariff rates for gas transportation service, it would suffer adverse economic impacts to its operations and job security at Foss s Hampton facility. Id. 3

9. Northern and Foss have negotiated a Fourth Amendment of Agreement with an effective date of March 1, 2010 to extend their Special Contract until February 29, 2012. See Fourth Amendment of Agreement (Schedule NU-1-7). In addition, Northern and Foss have entered into a Letter Agreement similar to the one they executed in March of 2005 which obligates Foss to pay Northern s applicable tariff rates for service rendered from March 1, 2010 in the event that the Commission does not approve the Fourth Amendment of Agreement in form and substance acceptable to Northern and Foss, each in their sole discretion. See Schedule NU-1-8. 10. The following documents are submitted with this Petition: Prefiled Direct Testimony of Michael Smith; Special Firm Transportation Agreement (Schedule NU- 1-1); Amendment of Agreement (Schedule NU-1-2); Second Amendment of Agreement (Schedule NU-1-3); Third Amendment of Agreement (Schedule NU-1-4); Letter Agreement dated March 8, 2005 (Schedule NU-1-5); Letter from Paul Koroski to Mike Smith dated February 2, 2010 (Schedule NU-1-6); Fourth Amendment of Agreement (Schedule NU-1-7); Letter Agreement dated February 4, 2010 (Schedule NU-l-8); and Summary Results of Marginal Cost of Service Analysis (Schedule NU- 1-9). 11. The extension of the Foss Special Contract for two (2) additional years is in the public interest because it will provide benefits to Foss, Northern and Northern s customers. The annual revenues under the Special Contract extension will exceed the long-run marginal costs of serving this load, and retention of the load will keep the average system costs of transporting gas applicable to all of Northern s firm customers lower than it would have been if the Customer reduced its operations (due to layoffs) or 4

relocated. Because Foss is a transportation customer, this contract extension will not have an anti-competitive effect on the gas supply market. 12. Special circumstances exist which support the extension of the Special Contract for two (2) more years. As explained in Schedule NU- 1-6, the Customer faces competitive pressures from competitors located in areas such as North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia, where labor and utility costs are lower than Foss s. Thus Foss is under pressure to maintain its energy costs such that it remains competitive. Foss has undertaken several measures to reduce its energy costs and has recently made significant financial investments to improve its facilities and upgrade its equipment. Foss has indicated that if it were required to take transportation service under Northern s tariff rates, it would face adverse financial consequences which would result in layoffs at its Hampton facility. 13. In view of the foregoing, Foss s circumstances are special and render departure from Northern s general tariffs just and consistent with the public interest. WHEREFORE, Northern respectfully requests that the Commission: A. Find that the Fourth Amendment of Agreement is just and consistent with the public interest; B. Grant such further relief and make such findings or orders as may be necessary and consistent with the relief requested herein. 5

Respectfully submitted, NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. By its Attorneys, Orr&Reno,P.A. Dated: February 12, 2010 Susan S. Geiger On & Reno, P.A. One Eagle Square Concord, NH 03302-3550 603-223-9154 sgeiger(~on-reno.com 630487_I.DOC 6