IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, C.A. No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Courthouse News Service

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, The Green Pet Shop Enterprises, LLC ( Green Pet Shop or. Plaintiff ), by and through its attorneys, THE RANDO LAW FIRM P.C.

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) IQ BIOMETRIX S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case: 5:09-cv DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 2:15-cv MJP Document 21 Filed 02/11/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:11-cv ECR -PAL Document 1 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 2:06-cv SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff Case No.: 1:17-cv-6236 COMPLAINT

Case 8:17-cv EAK-JSS Document 114 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID 2433 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) Plaintiff,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:06-cv JJF Document 1 Filed 05/03/06 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 224 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 3:14-cv RS-EMT Document 1 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:15-cv CW Document 2 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 6:18-cv ADA Document 26 Filed 01/11/19 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/07/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 02/18/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:19-cv PKC Document 1 Filed 01/14/19 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

case 3:14-cv TLS-CAN document 1 filed 03/21/14 page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 07/26/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/08/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

Case 1:99-mc Document 417 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:12-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 05/29/12 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:99-mc Document 391 Filed 05/17/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No: COMPLAINT

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Courthouse News Service

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/26/16 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 1:99-mc Document 689 Filed 12/01/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Newthink, LLC ( Plaintiff ), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. 3:13-cv N

Case 2:11-cv RAJ -FBS Document 1 Filed 04/05/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 2:18-cv JJT Document 1 Filed 02/06/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Defendant.

Case: 1:17-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/15/17 1 of 12. PageID #: 1

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/25/16 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Transcription:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE TRIMED, INC., v. Plaintiff, C.A. No. ARTHREX, INC., JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiff, TriMed, Inc. ( TriMed ), by its undersigned attorneys, brings this action against Defendant Arthrex, Inc. ( Arthrex ), and hereby alleges as follows: THE PARTIES 1. Plaintiff TriMed is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California with a principal place of business in Valencia, California. 2. Defendant Arthrex is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware with its principal place of business in Naples, Florida. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 3. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the United States, United States Code, 35 U.S.C. 271 et seq. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a). 4. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Arthrex because Arthrex is incorporated in Delaware, and because, upon information and belief, Arthrex conducts regular and systematic business in Delaware. 1

5. Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. 1391 and 1400(b) because Arthrex is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware. TRIMED S PATENTS-IN-SUIT 6. TriMed is the lawful owner of United States Patent No. 8,177,822 entitled Contoured Bone Plate For Fracture Fixation Having Hook Members and Drill Guide For The Same, duly legally issued May 15, 2012, listing Robert J. Medoff as the inventor ( the 822 Patent ). A true copy of the 822 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 7. TriMed is the lawful owner of United States Patent No. 9,283,010 entitled Contoured Bone Plate For Fracture Fixation Having Hook Members and Holder/Impactor For Same, duly legally issued March 15, 2016, listing Robert J. Medoff and Alexander Y. Shin as the inventors ( the 010 Patent ). A true copy of the 010 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit B. COUNT I (Infringement of the 822 Patent) 8. Paragraphs 1-7 are incorporated as if fully set forth herein. 9. The 822 Patent generally relates to a bone plate for fixing fractures and a drill guide to facilitate drilling holes into the bone to align and secure the plate. 10. Arthrex has been directly infringing, actively inducing others to infringe, and/or contributing to the infringement of the 822 Patent by making, using, offering for sale, selling within the United States, and/or importing into the United States infringing products, including its Wrist Plating System which embody and/or practice one or more claims of the 822 Patent, without authority or license from TriMed, in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271. 11. Upon information and belief, Arthrex will continue to infringe the 822 Patent unless and until it is enjoined by this Court. 2

12. Arthrex s infringement of the 822 Patent is ongoing. Unless and until enjoined by order of this Court, Arthrex s infringement of TriMed s rights under the 822 Patent will continue to damage TriMed, causing TriMed irreparable harm as a direct and proximate result of Arthrex s conduct. 13. Andover has been damaged by Arthrex s infringement of the 822 Patent, and is entitled to recover from Arthrex the damages sustained as a result of Arthrex s wrongful acts in an amount to be proved at trial. willful. 14. Upon information and belief, Arthrex s infringement of the 822 Patent has been COUNT II (Infringement of the 010 Patent) 15. Arthrex has been directly infringing, actively inducing others to infringe, and/or contributing to the infringement of the 010 Patent by making, using, offering for sale, selling within the United States, and/or importing into the United States infringing products, including its Wrist Plating System, 5 th Metatarsal Fracture System, and Ankle Fracture Management System which embody and/or practice one or more claims of the 010 Patent, without authority or license from TriMed, in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271. 16. Upon information and belief, Arthrex will continue to infringe the 010 Patent unless and until it is enjoined by this Court. 17. Arthrex s infringement of the 010 Patent is ongoing. Unless and until enjoined by order of this Court, Arthrex s infringement of TriMed s rights under the 010 Patent will continue to damage TriMed, causing TriMed irreparable harm as a direct and proximate result of Arthrex s conduct. 3

18. Andover has been damaged by Arthrex s infringement of the 010 Patent, and is entitled to recover from Arthrex the damages sustained as a result of Arthrex s wrongful acts in an amount to be proved at trial. 19. Upon information and belief, Arthrex s infringement of the 010 Patent has been willful. REQUESTED RELIEF WHEREFORE, TriMed respectfully requests that this Court enter Judgment against Arthrex as follows: (a) declaring that Arthrex has directly infringed, induced infringement of, and/or contributed to the infringement of one or more claims of the 822 Patent; (b) permanently enjoining Arthrex and its subsidiaries, affiliates, officers, directors, agents, servants, employees, licenses, successors, and customers and those in active concert or participation with any of them, from making, using, importing, offering to sell, or selling any products or methods that infringe or contribute to the infringement of any claims of the 822 Patent, or from inducing others to infringe any claim of the 822 Patent; (c) awarding TriMed its lost profits, reasonable royalty and/or other damages in amounts sufficient to compensate it for Arthrex s infringement of the 822 Patent, together with prejudgment and post judgment and costs, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284; (d) trebling the damages awarded to TriMed by reasons of Arthrex s willful infringement of the 822 Patent; (e) declaring that Arthrex has directly infringed, induced infringement of, and/or contributed to the infringement of one or more claims of the 010 Patent; 4

(f) permanently enjoining Arthrex and its subsidiaries, affiliates, officers, directors, agents, servants, employees, licenses, successors, and customers and those in active concert or participation with any of them, from making, using, importing, offering to sell, or selling any products or methods that infringe or contribute to the infringement of any claims of the 010 Patent, or from inducing others to infringe any claim of the 010 Patent; (g) awarding TriMed its lost profits, reasonable royalty and/or other damages in amounts sufficient to compensate it for Arthrex s infringement of the 010 Patent, together with prejudgment and post judgment and costs, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284; (h) trebling the damages awarded to TriMed by reasons of Arthrex s willful infringement of the 010 Patent; (i) declaring this case to be exceptional under 35 U.S.C. 285 and awarding TriMed its attorney fees, expenses and costs incurred to this action; and (j) awarding TriMed s such further relief as the Court deems just and proper. JURY DEMAND Pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, TriMed demands a trial by jury on all issues triable as such. Dated: May 2, 2018 Of Counsel: Lee Grossman Mark Grossman GROSSMAN LAW OFFICES 225 W. Washington St., Suite 2200 Chicago, IL 60606 (312) 621-9000 lgrossman@grossmanlegal.com mgrossman@grossmanlegal.com /s/ Arthur G. Connolly, III Arthur G. Connolly, III (#2667) Ryan P. Newell (#4744) CONNOLLY GALLAGHER LLP The Brandywine Building 1000 West Street Wilmington, DE 19801 (302) 757-7300 aconnolly@connollygallagher.com rnewell@connollygallagher.com Attorneys for Plaintiff TriMed, Inc. 5