Case 3:06-cv JAP-TJB Document 1 Filed 03/27/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Similar documents
NATURE OF THE ACTION. This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the

Case 3:06-cv JAP-TJB Document 5 Filed 05/18/2006 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 4:07-cv JLH Document 1 Filed 06/29/2007 ( Page 1 of 6

Case 3:04-cv JSW Document 168 Filed 10/20/2005 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ~,~,~,,.c~...,... ~~"~ ~ " FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLI~ SEP -9 ;i ~ [~: 0~ CBA~OTTE OIVlSlON

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/29/16 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:18-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 07/20/17 Page 1 of 8

Case 3:04-cv RLA Document 1-1 Filed 09/30/2004 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

Case 1:11-cv LG-JCG Document 2 Filed 11/17/11 Page 1 of 7

This is an action under the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII CV

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA DAVENPORT DIVISION. Nature Of The Action

Case 2:09-cv BSJ-RLE Document 67 Filed 10/28/11 Page 1 of 6

Case 7:17-cv KMK Document 1 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 1-2 Filed: 06/03/09 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

) I ClV a S - BUN. 18 This is an action under Title VII ofthe Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Civil

Case 4:04-cv LLP Document 1 Filed 12/28/2004 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA.

Case 3:11-cv CRW-TJS Document 1 Filed 04/06/11 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv MPK Document 1 Filed 04/22/14 Page 1 of 6

)

)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

5:06cv1684 JUDGE HICKS MAG. JUDGE HORNSBY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case 9:06-cv RHC Document 1 Filed 02/28/2006 Page 1 of 7

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS eu,:".' IJ~:'LD~~?~:~~URT EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

-CIVIL RIGHTS EMPLOYMENT

Case 2:05-cv JES-SPC Document 47 Filed 04/24/2006 Page 1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintitl, Defendants. COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND

Case 1:13-cv Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, Defendant. AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND NATURE OF ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HA WAIl. Case No.: NATURE OF THE ACTION AND JURISDICTION

IN TI-[E UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. ..-ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION n/k/a DISH, LTD.,

Case 6:10-cv TC Document 1 Filed 09/24/10 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

Case 4:05-cv CLS Document 1 Filed 05/26/2005 Page 1 of 6

COMPLAINT (Jury Trial Demand)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 1:13-cv LEK-KSC Document 1 Filed 12/18/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR~A I FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINO~ STRA~ E EASTERN DIVISION 0~U ) ) tl0v 1 0 7_604 ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY PASSAIC COUNTY, LAW DIVISION CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO.: COMPLAINT & JURY DEMAND

ORIGINAL COMPLAINT OF THE UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION TO THE HONORABLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

Case 1:14-cv KAM-JO Document 8 Filed 07/02/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 36

FILED. , #, Case 5:05-cv WRF Document 29 Filed 06/06/2006Page 1 of 9 JUN COMMISSION, Plaintiff, ALICIA MANSEL, Civil Action No.

PLAINTIFF AVA SMITH- THOMPSON S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT SARA LEE CORPORATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT PIERCE DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 13

1/29/2019 8:49 AM 19CV04626

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case: 1:06-cv JRA Doc #: 28 Filed: 05/08/09 1 of 9. PageID #: 220

Case 1:06-cv LTB-CBS Document 1 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case5:11-cv EJD Document28 Filed09/09/11 Page1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION


IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLIll~ STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DIVISION CONSENT DECREE THE LITIGATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DIVISION OF OHIO EASTERN DISTRICT

Case 8:04-cv SCB-TBM Document 32 Filed 10/07/2005 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv KMW Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2013 Page 1 of 22

2. One of the defendant in the case is Parker & Gould (P&G). What is exactly P&G?

Case 2:16-cv GMN-VCF Document 1 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. -v- Civil No. 3:12-cv-4176

Case 2:17-cv EJF Document 2 Filed 10/02/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bob Watson Chevrolet

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 2:07-cv JFB-WDW Document 15-2 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 1 of 10 CIVIL ACTION INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Case 4:15-cv RLY-DML Document 1 Filed 07/17/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case 3:12-cv M Document 6 Filed 11/07/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID 18

EEOC. v. Fox News. Cornell University ILR School. Judge William H. Pauly

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Studley Products, Inc. and Wildwood Industries, Inc., Defendants.

Case 1:08-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/16/2008 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 119 Filed: 03/08/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:708

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

Case 5:14-cv DAE Document 4 Filed 11/10/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Transcription:

Case 3:06-cv-01453-JAP-TJB Document 1 Filed 03/27/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff CIVIL ACTION NO. v. COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. Defendant. NATURE OF THE ACTION This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 to correct unlawful employment practices on the basis of religion, and to provide appropriate relief to Ronnis Mason ( Mason who was adversely affected by such practices. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 451, 1331, 1337, 1343 and 1345. This action is authorized and instituted pursuant to Section 706(f(1 and (3 of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(f(1 and (3. 2. The employment practices alleged to be unlawful were committed within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. PARTIES 3. Plaintiff, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the Commission, is the agency of the United States of America charged with the administration, interpretation, and

Case 3:06-cv-01453-JAP-TJB Document 1 Filed 03/27/2006 Page 2 of 5 enforcement of Title VII, and is expressly authorized to bring this action by Section 706(f(1 and (3 of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(f(1 and (3. 4. At all relevant times, Defendant, United Parcel Service ( UPS, has continuously been a New York corporation doing business in the State of New Jersey, and has continuously had at least 15 employees. 5. At all relevant times, UPS has continuously been an employer engaged in an industry affecting commerce within the meaning of Sections 701(b, (g and (h of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e(b, (g and (h. STATEMENT OF CLAIMS 6. More than thirty days prior to the institution of this lawsuit, Mason filed a charge with the Commission alleging violations of Title VII by UPS. All conditions precedent to the institution of this lawsuit have been fulfilled. 7. Mason is a Rastafarian. As a Rastafarian, he believes that he must wear a beard to observe his religion. 8. In or around November 18, 2004, Mason applied for a seasonal driver helper position with UPS at its facility in Secaucus, New Jersey. 9. As part of the application process, UPS explained its appearance guidelines applicable for the entire company, which, among other things, prohibited beards and goatees. 10. After learning this, Mason interviewed for the position of driver helper. UPS explained the appearance guidelines again, and that he could not work as a driver helper unless he shaved his beard. Mason told UPS that he could not shave his beard because of his religion. UPS then told Mason that he could apply for an inside position that would not have contact with the public if he wanted to keep his beard.

Case 3:06-cv-01453-JAP-TJB Document 1 Filed 03/27/2006 Page 3 of 5 11. The inside positions suggested by UPS to Mason paid less than the driver helper position. 12. UPS refused to consider Mason for the higher paying driver helper position because he refused to shave his beard. UPS refused to hire Mason in a position requiring public contact because he wears a beard in observance of his religion and thereby UPS refused to accommodate Mason and his sincerely held religious beliefs. 13. As a result, UPS has engaged in unlawful employment practices in violation of Section 703 (a of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-(a and (b against Mason. 14. The unlawful employment practices complained of above were intentional. 15. The unlawful employment practices complained of above were done with malice or with reckless indifference to the federally protected rights of Mason. PRAYER FOR RELIEF Wherefore, the Commission respectfully requests that this Court: A. Grant a permanent injunction enjoining UPS, its officers, successors, assigns, and all persons in active concert or participation with it, from engaging in any employment practices which discriminate on the basis of religion; B. Order UPS to allow men whose religion requires them to wear a beard to serve in public contact positions; C. Order UPS to institute and carry out policies, practices, and programs which provide equal employment opportunities for employees engaging in protected activity, and which eradicate the effects of UPS s past and present unlawful employment practices; D. Order UPS to make Mason whole for the unlawful employment practices described above, by providing appropriate backpay with prejudgment interest, in amounts to be

Case 3:06-cv-01453-JAP-TJB Document 1 Filed 03/27/2006 Page 4 of 5 determined at trial, and other affirmative relief necessary to eradicate the effects of UPS s unlawful employment practices. E. Order UPS to make Mason whole for the unlawful employment practices described above by providing compensation for non-pecuniary losses, including pain, suffering and humiliation in amounts to be determined at trial. F. Order UPS to pay Mason for the unlawful employment practices described above, by providing compensation for past and future pecuniary losses in amounts to be determined at trial. G. Grant such further relief as the Court deems necessary and proper. H. Award the Commission its costs in this action.

Case 3:06-cv-01453-JAP-TJB Document 1 Filed 03/27/2006 Page 5 of 5 JURY TRIAL DEMAND The Commission requests a jury trial on all questions of fact raised by its complaint. Dated: March 27, 2006 New York, New York Respectfully submitted, James L. Lee Deputy General Counsel Gwendolyn Y. Reams Associate General Counsel EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 1801 L Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20507 S/ Elizabeth Grossman Elizabeth Grossman Regional Attorney S/ Judy Keenan Judy Keenan Acting Supervisory Trial Attorney S/ Michael Ranis Michael Ranis (3757 Senior Trial Attorney EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION New York District Office 33 Whitehall St., 5 th Floor NY, NY 10004-2112 (212 336-3696 Michael.Ranis@eeoc.gov