Guns don t just go off

Similar documents
The defendant has been charged with second degree murder. 1. Under the law and the evidence in this case, it is your duty to return

The defendant has been charged with second degree murder. 1

MURDER, PASSION/PROVOCATION AND AGGRAVATED/RECKLESS MANSLAUGHTER 1 N.J.S.A. 2C:11-3a(1) and (2); 2C:11-4a, b(1) and b(2)

VOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER INCLUDING SELF-DEFENSE (IN THE HEAT OF

Florida Jury Instructions. 7.2 MURDER FIRST DEGREE (1)(a), Fla. Stat.

Question With what crime or crimes should Dan be charged? Discuss. 2. What defense or defenses might Dan assert? Discuss.

CRIMINAL LAW ESSAY SERIES ESSAY QUESTION #2 MODEL ANSWER. 1. With what crime or crimes should Dan be charged? Discuss.

COURT OF APPEALS GUERNSEY COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2011

S18A1394. FAVORS v. THE STATE. a jury found him guilty of malice murder and other crimes in connection with

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

OFFICER INVOLVED SHOOTING TRIAL REVIEW AND EVALUATION

AGGRAVATED ASSAULT - SIGNIFICANT BODILY INJURY N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1b(7) 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

The court process CONSUMER GUIDE. How the criminal justice system works. FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON

The jury panel is selected by lot from all the names of registered voters or from persons having a valid driver s license.

692 Part VI.b Excuse Defenses

Of Mice and Men John Steinbeck. Quarter 3 Summative Assessment Mock Trial

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF ALASKA

APPENDIX B. 7.7 MANSLAUGHTER , Fla. Stat.

MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY. EFFECTIVE DATE: 7 January 1999 PAGE 1 OF 9

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE October 27, 2009 Session

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE

SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

CRIM EXAM NOTES. Table of Contents. Weeks 1-4

Circuit Court for Baltimore City Case No IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS

PRESS RELEASE ### OFFICE OF THE STATE'S ATTORNEY MAD IS 0 N C 0 U NT Y, I LL I N 0 IS. Thomas D. Gibbons State's Attorney

Fall, Criminal Litigation 9/4/17. Criminal Litigation: Arraignment to Appeal. How Do We Get A Case?

CASE NO. 1D Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Glen P. Gifford, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

CHAPTER 14. Criminal Law and Juvenile Law

Introduction to Criminal Law

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 109,900 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, CLIFTON S. KLINE, Appellant.

214 Part III Homicide and Related Issues

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed November 12, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Don C.

Homicide. Motor Vehicle Offenses Resulting in Death. First Degree Murder. Second Degree Murder. For example. Involuntary Manslaughter

Question 2. Dawn lives in an apartment with her dog Fluffy and her boyfriend Bill. A year ago Bill began buying and selling illegal drugs.

Texting While Driving Mock Trial. State v. Young. Prepared by. Regan Metteauer, Law Intern TMCEC. September 2012

Supreme Court of Florida

S08A1636. SANFORD v. THE STATE. A jury found Alvin Dexter Sanford guilty of malice murder, felony murder,

The defendant has been charged with first degree murder.

S07A1352. LEWIS v. THE STATE. Defendant Jeffrey Daniel Lewis was convicted of the felony murder of

APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Sauk County: PATRICK J. TAGGART, Judge. Affirmed.

Case 1:11-cr KBM Document 149 Filed 12/13/12 Page 1 of 10 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs July 8, 2014

THE BASICS OF JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN A CRIMINAL CASE

OUTLINE OF CRIMINAL COURT PROCESS

California Bar Examination

Legal Definitions: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z A

Felony Cases. Police Investigation. Associate Circuit Court. Felony Versus Misdemeanor

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF COBB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA. Defendant. STATE S REQUESTS TO CHARGE

Case 1:13-cr GAO Document 1232 Filed 04/02/15 Page 1 of 47 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

Section 20 Mistake as to a Justification 631. Chapter 4. Offenses Against the Person Article 1. Homicide Section Murder in the First Degree

Decided: May 30, S17A0357. THE STATE v. OGUNSUYI. Olubumi Ogunsuyi was indicted for malice murder and related crimes in

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2009

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

INTRODUCTION OF EXHIBITS AT TRIAL THE BASICS

v No Wayne Circuit Court

BUSINESS LAW. Chapter 8 Criminal Law and Cyber Crimes

COMMONWEALTH OF PA : No. CR : vs. : : Petition for Habeas Corpus SHAWN RHINEHART, : RE: Counts 6 and 7 Defendant OPINION AND ORDER

acquittal: Judgment that a criminal defendant has not been proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

Answer A to Question 2

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Learning Station #5 LEVEL ONE-13

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D

1 California Criminal Law (4th), Crimes Against the Person

CHARACTERS IN THE COURTROOM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA. Present: Judges Humphreys, McClanahan and Senior Judge Bumgardner Argued at Richmond, Virginia

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF OHIO ROBERT HENDERSON

vs. vs. vs. IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL TRIALS DIVISION


THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

S16A1842. GREEN v. THE STATE. Appellant Willie Moses Green was indicted and tried for malice murder

WHERE EVERYONE DESERVES A

v No Ingham Circuit Court

QUESTION What charges can reasonably be brought against Steve? Discuss. 2. What charges can reasonably be brought against Will? Discuss.

Impeachment with prior convictions This is an opinion poll about what the law should be, not what it is.

PRETRIAL INSTRUCTIONS. CACI No. 100

Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević G10, room 6/I, Tue 14:15-15:15. Session 3, 16 Oct 2018

The HIDDEN COST Of Proving Your Innocence

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

JURY INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION-CRIMINAL

I. Limits of Criminal law a. Due process b. Principle of legality c. Void for vagueness II. Mental State a. Traditional law i.

MODEL CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTIONS COMMITTEE REPORTER S ONLINE UPDATE. Updated September 3, Introduction

Criminal Law - The Use of Transferred Intent in Attempted Murder, a Specific Intent Crime: State v. Gillette

4. RELEVANCE. A. The Relevance Rule

Transcription:

Guns don t just go off

Fulton County District Attorney s Office Atlanta Judicial Circuit Clint Rucker Seleta Griffin Adam Abbate Cara Convery

The Defense of Accidental Discharge What does Accidental Discharge mean to YOU? How does the law define Accidental Discharge? How do you defeat the Accidental Discharge defense at trial? Insert sound clip

STARTS WITH THE INVESTIGATION Work closely with your Police Department Thoroughly process the scene Photograph and Video Record the scene Scans of the scene for 3D recreation of the scene Measurements of the scene Blood splatter Luminol Testing GSR (objects, hands, clothing) Muzzle to target test

STARTS WITH THE INVESTIGATION Begin thinking about how to recreate conditions To put jurors at crime scene Insert case law use for jurors in car with gun**

Scan of scene

Scan of scene

Scan of car

INVESTIGATION CONTINUES Collect evidence Financial records Phones (records, texts, content)** Emails Detailed Witness statements Who, what, when, where, and why Record Re-interview Witnesses to interview (bring your investigator every time!) Change up the interview locations, scene, office, home

MOTIVE Determine the motive Victimology Relationship between all involved parties Dynamics of relationship Prior history Infidelity or Financial Pre-post death status Children and other marriages

MOTIVE motive allows admission of evidence outside the actual shooting WATCH FOR: defense injecting good character into the case early Opening statements Questions to witnesses

MOTIVE Clip of ACP soul mate portion of opening

FORENSICS What story do the forensics tell you? How does the science of what happened tell the story? Trajectory *critical in accidental discharge claim* Bullets Gun itself Injury to victim Condition of the scene

DEATH BY MOTIONS Motions for bond Modifications Revocations Motions in limine Motions to suppress Mid trial briefing Mid trial motions to suppress Motions for directed verdict

404B

DEATH BY MOTIONS Everything becomes a story Preparation pretrial and mid trial Jury charge conference Misdemeanor Invol v. Felony Invol

PRESENTING TO THE JURY

PREPARATION IS EVERYTHING 24/7 Knowing all your witnesses and the defense Understanding the timeline Practice runs of EVERY critical stage of the trial Opening, direct outlines, closing points, demonstrative executions, cross examination points, researching defense experts and sometimes you own

WE ARE ABOUT TO GO INTO BATTLE!!!

Insert meme of lawyer with bad fact

VOIR DIRE Educate Identify potential bias/leaning WATCH FOR: exposure to the media Issues to look for with potential jurors Listen carefully to defense attempts to rehab Learned a lot about their approach to the evidence Nick name your jurors

VOIR DIRE Video of rehabilitation attempt Clip of bill rankin podcast re: jury selection?

OPENING STATEMENT Outline roadmap Tell the story Storybook life Start strong AND end strong Practice, practice, practic Use of demonstratives Identify weaknesses before defense can highlight *take the sting out*

STATE S CASE 70 witnesses called Introduce theme/theory Establish a timeline

DON T LEAVE MEAT ON THE BONE!!! CR @ 4:24 AM THERE S NO SUCH THING AS A 15 MINUTE WITNESS!!!

NO CELL PHONES ON THE TABLE!!! CARA GET OFF THE TWITTERS!!!

STATE S CASE INSERT IMAGE OF ALL OUR WITNESSES

FORENSIC S STATE S CASE ZACHARY WEITZEL ASSISTANT MANAGER FIREARMS SECTION GBI

THIS REVOLVER

DEFENSE CASE Prepare cross examination as a team Categories of questions Use in your favor Utilize state experts to be EXTRA prepared for cross of defense expert *ask for Court s permission to have experts observe testimony of defense expert* Case cite

DEFENSE CASE Inflict a few critical injuries on your opponent Don t need to destroy everything they say Anticipate tactical moves and prepare accordingly Sudden defense rest

CLOSING Divide and conquer Why we are team split your closing Law Facts Weave in argument throughout Remember your theme and the tone of your opening statement Start strong AND end strong

CLOSING Watch your time! CARL! and time man Abbate Use of demonstratives and critical images from the trial Review testimony **if media case think about using images online**

THE LAW

Intentional vs. Accident

1.41.10. INTENT Intent is an essential element of any crime and must be proved by the State beyond a reasonable doubt. Intent may be shown in many ways, provided you, the jury, believe that it existed from the proven facts before you. It may be inferred from the proven circumstances or by acts and conduct, or it may be, in your discretion, inferred when it is the natural and necessary consequence of the act. Whether or not you draw such an inference is a matter solely within your discretion. Criminal intent does not mean an intention to violate the law or to violate a penal statute but means simply

INTENT Consider conduct: Before During After

1.41.30. ACCIDENT No person shall be found guilty of any crime committed by misfortune or accident in which there was no criminal scheme, undertaking, or intention (or criminal negligence). An accident is an event that takes place without one's foresight or expectation, that takes place, or begins to exist, without design. If you find from the evidence in this case that the incident that is the subject matter of this case occurred as a result of misfortune or accident and not as a result of a criminal undertaking or criminal negligence, then it would be your duty to acquit the defendant. When the issue of accident is raised, the burden is on the State to negate or disprove it beyond a reasonable doubt. Any evidence as to misfortune or accident should be considered by you in connection with all of the other evidence in the case. If in doing so, you should entertain a reasonable doubt as to the guilt of the accused, it would be your duty to acquit. On the other hand, should you believe from the evidence as a whole that the defendant is

ACCIDENT Misfortune or accident in which there was NO criminal scheme, intention or criminal negligence Happens without foresight or expectation Malfunctioning Gun Example: Exploding tire

HOW DO WE KNOW THE SHOOTING IS INTENTIONAL The science The gun The motive The conduct before The conduct after The defendants own words The crisis management OPENING, IN QUESTIONS, IN CLOSING

FELONY MURDER A homicide is committed in the carrying out of a felony when it is committed while engaged in the performance of any act required for the full execution of the felony. You must also find that the underlying felony was itself inherently dangerous to human life, either because it was dangerous per se or because, by its circumstances it created a

FELONY MURDER A person also commits the crime of felony murder when, in the commission of a felony, that person causes the death of another human being with or without malice. NO MALICE REQUIRED Intent to commit the underlying felony is all that is required. AGGRAVATED ASSAULT is the underlying felony in this count.

FELONY MURDER If you find that the defendant committed the homicide at the time he was engaged in the commission of the felony of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, then you would be authorized to find the defendant guilty of murder, whether the homicide was intended or not.

INVOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER A person commits involuntary manslaughter when he unintentionally causes the death of another by the commission of the crime of reckless conduct. A person commits the crime of reckless conduct when he causes bodily harm to another by consciously disregarding a substantial and unjustifiable risk that his act or omission will cause harm and this disregard constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of care which a reasonable person would exercise in the it ti

INVOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER The shooter does not have any intent to kill Example: texting and driving Reckless but NOT intentional This killing is not Involuntary Manslaughter You have evidence of Defendant s INTENT Verdict Form: NOT GUILTY

INVOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER Why misdemeanor involuntary manslaughter does not apply: Cook v. State, 249 Ga. 709, 712 (1982) ( defendant who handles a gun in such a way as to accidentally cause the death of another human being, albeit without any intention to do so, has necessarily committed the misdemeanor of reckless conduct, [OCGA 16 5 60(b) ], and is not, therefore, engaged in the commission of a lawful act and is not entitled to a charge under [OCGA 16 5 3(b) ] ) State v. Springer, 297 Ga. 376, 379 (2015) ( Reckless conduct is an act of criminal negligence, rather than an intentional act, that causes bodily harm or endangers the bodily safety of another )

Juror Questions DELIBERATIONS Tip: don t lock your knees Possible Deadlock Can jurors get in the car? Gentry v. State, 236 Ga. App. 820, 824 (1999), Dixon v. State, 303 Ga. App. 517 The Allen Charge Law on pattern Federal Pattern We gave a hybrid

Dynamite Charge You have now been deliberating for a considerable period, and it is time for me to talk to you about the desirability of agreement, if possible. This is an important case to everyone involved. The trial has been costly in terms of time, effort, money, and emotional strain to both the defense and the prosecution. If you fail to agree on a verdict, the case will be left open and may have to be tried again. There is no reason to believe that the case can be tried again by either side any better or more exhaustively than it has been tried before you. It is the law that a unanimous verdict is required for any count of conviction. If a substantial majority of you are in favor of a conviction, those of you who disagree should reconsider whether your doubt is a reasonable one since it appears to make no effective impression upon the minds of the others. On the other hand, if a majority or even a smaller number of you are in favor of an acquittal the rest of you should ask

Dynamite Charge Each of you should listen to the arguments of the other jurors with a disposition to be convinced by them. If you differ in your view of the evidence, the difference of opinion should cause you all to scrutinize the evidence more closely and to reexamine the grounds of your opinions. Your duty is to decide the issues that have been submitted to you if you can conscientiously do so. In conferring, you should lay aside all mere pride of opinion and should bear in mind that the jury room is no place for taking up and maintaining, in a spirit of controversy, either side of a cause. You should bear in mind at all times that, as jurors, you should not be advocates for either side. Of course, if the evidence fails to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, Defendant must have your unanimous verdict of Not Guilty.

THANK YOU!