DEPARTMENT RELATED PARLIAMENTARY STANDING COMMITTEE ON PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES, LAW AND JUSTICE FORTY NINTH REPORT

Similar documents
PARLIAMENT OF INDIA RAJYA SABHA

THE ADMINISTRATORS-GENERAL (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2011

Not included. Clause 17(1)(a): Lok Pal can inquire into complaints against the Prime Minister once he demits. Inclusion of the Prime Minister

Insolvency Professionals to act as Interim Resolution Professionals and Liquidators (Recommendation) (Second) Guidelines, 2018

PARLIAMENT OF INDIA RAJYA SABHA. The Delhi High Court (Amendment) Bill, 2014

PARTY WISE SEATS WON AND VOTES POLLED (%),LOK SABHA 2009

ELECTION NOTIFICATION

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, MANAGEMENT AND ALLIED SCIENCES (IJBMAS) A Peer Reviewed International Research Journal

National Consumer Helpline

Lunawat & Co. Chartered Accountants Website:

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS

PARLIAMENT OF INDIA RAJYA SABHA DEPARTMENT-RELATED PARLIAMENTARY STANDING COMMITTEE ON PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES, LAW AND JUSTICE

EXTRACT THE STATES REORGANISATION ACT, 1956 (ACT NO.37 OF 1956) PART III ZONES AND ZONAL COUNCILS

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS

810-DATA. POST: Roll No. Category: tage in Of. Offered. Of Univerobtained/ Degree/ sity gate marks Diploma/ lng marks. ned (in Certificate-

THE OMBUDSMAN SCHEME FOR NON-BANKING FINANCIAL COMPANIES, 2018

POLITICAL PARTICIPATION AND REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN IN STATE ASSEMBLIES

THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY PART-1 SECTION 1 PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY MINISTRY OF POWER. RESOLUTION Dated 29 th November, 2005

PARLIAMENT OF INDIA RAJYA SABHA

Table 1: Financial statement of MGNREG scheme

Issues related to Working Women s Hostels, Ujjwala, Swadhar Greh. Nandita Mishra EA, MoWCD

ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA

Notice for Election for various posts of IAPSM /

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.6 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.318 OF 2006.

THE ADVOCATES ACT, 1961

ACT XV OF 1920 AND THE INDEX. [As amended by Act No. 22 of 1956 and the Adaptation of Laws (No.4) Order 1957 and the Act.

Fact and Fiction: Governments Efforts to Combat Corruption

Estimates of Workers Commuting from Rural to Urban and Urban to Rural India: A Note

AS INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA

Electoral Bond Scheme Sale of Electoral Bonds at Authorised Branches of State Bank of India (SBI)

NOTIFICATIONS BY GOVERNMENT GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (ELECTIONS) DEPARTMENT

THE NATIONALISED BANKS (MANAGEMENT AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) SCHEME, 1970

INDIA JHPIEGO, INDIA PATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL, INDIA POPULATION FOUNDATION OF INDIA

THE ENVIRONMENT (PROTECTION) ACT, 1986

(i) The reward scheme shall be applicable for whistleblowers in the area of drugs, cosmetics and medical devices.

PARLIAMENT OF INDIA RAJYA SABHA. The Right to Information (Amendment) Bill, 2013

ILA CONSTITUTION. (Effective from January 5, 1987)

THE PREVENTION OF ILLICIT TRAFFIC IN NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES ACT, 1988 ACT NO. 46 OF 1988

THE NATIONALISED BANKS (MANAGEMENT AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) SCHEME, 1970

THE ADVOCATES ACT,1961 (Act no. 25 of 1961)

GENERAL ELECTIONS

AMERICAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION

CRIME SCENARIO IN INDIA

THE ORISSA (ALTERATION OF NAME) BILL, 2010

THE FAMILY COURTS ACT, 1984 ACT NO. 66 OF 1984

SECRETARIAT OF THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi NO. ECI/PN/28/2007 Date: 13 th June, 2007 PRESS NOTE

Perspective on Forced Migration in India: An Insight into Classed Vulnerability

MINIMUM WAGES ACT, 1948

SEVEN STEPS TO POLICE REFORM. 1. Introduction

INDIA ELECTORAL LAWS

Online Appendix: Conceptualization and Measurement of Party System Nationalization in Multilevel Electoral Systems

THE DELHI HIGH COURT (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2014

THE COMPANY SECRETARIES (NOMINATION OF MEMBERS TO THE COUNCIL) RULES, 2006

Bar & Bench ( ITEM NO.802 COURT NO.1 SECTION PIL-W/XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

THE SALARY, ALLOWANCES AND PENSION OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT ACT, 1954 AND THE RULES MADE THEREUNDER

Modules on WORLD. Download our App. By crackias.com At GOOGLE Play Store

Women in National Parliaments: An Overview

FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT AND REGIONAL DISPARITIES IN POST REFORM INDIA

16. COMMITTEE SECTION (JPC on WAKF)

Important Notifications

Exchange of Visits by Tribals

RULES & REGULATONS (Modified)

The turbulent rise of regional parties: A many-sided threat for Congress

APPAREL EXPORT PROMOTION COUNCIL ELECTION RULES For Election of Executive Committee Members

Rural Labour Migration in India: Magnitude and Characteristics

THE CENTRAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS (RESERVATION IN ADMISSION) AMENDMENT BILL, 2010

COMPANY LAW BOARD REGULATIONS, 1991

THE TAMIL NADU LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL BILL, 2010

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA (MINISTRY OF TRIBAL AFFAIRS) LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO TO BE ANSWERED ON FOREST RIGHT TITLES

RECENT CHANGING PATTERNS OF MIGRATION AND SPATIAL PATTERNS OF URBANIZATION IN WEST BENGAL: A DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS

THE READJUSTMENT OF REPRESENTATION OF SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES IN PARLIAMENTARY AND ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCIES BILL, 2013

Policy for Regional Development. V. J. Ravishankar Indian Institute of Public Administration 7 th December, 2006

MEMBERS' REFERENCE SERVICE LARRDIS LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI LEGISLATIVE NOTE. No.18/LN/Ref./July/2017

Directory of Organisations Central Social Welfare Board (State Branches)

THE READJUSTMENT OF REPRESENTATION OF SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES IN PARLIAMENTARY AND ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCIES (SECOND) BILL, 2013

Chapter II PROSECUTOR/PROSECUTING ATTORNEY

Chapter III PARLIAMENT OF INDIA: CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

Constitution of India Questions for CDS, CGL Tier-1, Railways and SSC 10+2 Exams

INDIAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS. IAP Election 2018 Notice Part I

Law. Environmental Law Judicial Remedies in Environmental Cases

10. COMMITTEE SECTION (H&FW)

POLITY- GK-Study Mate Rajya Sabha

Andhra, Telangana Easiest Places to Do Business in India: World Bank...

ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA

(2) Words and expressions used herein and not defined, but defined in the Act shall have the same meaning as defined in the Act.

India s economic liberalization program: An examination of its impact on the regional disparity problem

THE ADMINISTRATORS-GENERAL ACT, 1963

Urbanization Process and Recent Trends of Migration in India

Poverty alleviation programme in Maharashtra

THE LOKPAL AND LOKAYUKTAS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2016

SHRI AMIT SHAH (National President, BJP) Snapshot of Work 16 Months (Aug 2014 to Jan 2016*) Tenure

SECRETARIAT OF THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi NO.ECI/PN/52/2012 Date 12 th June, 2012 PRESS NOTE

CONSTITUTION (RULES & REGULATIONS) OF INDIAN INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERS 1. Definition In these articles unless the context otherwise requires:

LOK SABHA. SYNOPSIS OF DEBATES (Proceedings other than Questions & Answers) Tuesday, January 31, 2017 / Magha 11, 1938 (Saka) NATIONAL ANTHEM

Notice for Election for various post of IAPSM ( )

Status of Female Employment in India


THE PAYMENT OF WAGES (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2017

Law And Order Automation

Internal Migration for Education and Employment among Youth in India

Transcription:

PARLIAMENT OF INDIA RAJYA SABHA 49 DEPARTMENT RELATED PARLIAMENTARY STANDING COMMITTEE ON PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES, LAW AND JUSTICE FORTY NINTH REPORT ON THE ADMINISTRATORS-GENERAL (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2011 (PRESENTED TO HON'BLE CHAIRMAN, RAJYA SABHA ON 2 ND FEBRUARY, 2012) RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI FEBRUARY, 2012 / MAGHA, 1933 (SAKA) 1

CS (P & L) - PARLIAMENT OF INDIA RAJYA SABHA DEPARTMENT RELATED PARLIAMENTARY STANDING COMMITTEE ON PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES, LAW AND JUSTICE FORTY NINTH REPORT ON THE ADMINISTRATORS-GENERAL (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2011 (PRESENTED TO HON'BLE CHAIRMAN, RAJYA SABHA ON 2 ND FEBRUARY, 2012) RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI FEBRUARY, 2012 / MAGHA, 1933 (SAKA) 2

C O N T E N T S PAGES 1. COMPOSITION OF THE COMMITTEE (i) 2. INTRODUCTION (ii) 3. REPORT 1-7 *4. RELEVANT MINUTES OF THE MEETINGS OF THE COMMITTEE 5. ANNEXURE A. THE ADMINISTRATORS-GENERAL (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2011 8-12 * To be appended at printing stage. 3

COMPOSITION OF THE COMMITTEE (Constituted on 31 st August, 2011) 1. Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi Chairman RAJYA SABHA 2. Shri Shantaram Laxman Naik 3. Dr. Bhalchandra Mungekar 4. Shri Balavant alias Bal Apte 5. Shri Ram Jethmalani 6. Shri Sukhendu Sekhar Roy 7. Shri Ram Vilas Paswan 8. Shri O.T. Lepcha 9. Shri Parimal Nathwani 10. Shri Amar Singh LOK SABHA 11. Shri Kirti Azad 12. Shri N.S.V. Chitthan 13. Smt. Deepa Dasmunsi 14. Shri D.B. Chandre Gowda 15. Shri Shailendra Kumar 16. Smt. Chandresh Kumari 17. Shri Prasanta Kumar Majumdar 18. Shri Arjun Ram Meghwal 19. Shri Pinaki Misra 20. Kumari Meenakshi Natarajan 21. Shri Harin Pathak 22. Shri Lalu Prasad 23. Adv. A. Sampath 24. Shri S. Semmalai 25. Shri Vijay Bahadur Singh 26. Dr. Prabha Kishor Taviad 27. Shri Manish Tewari 28. Adv. P.T. Thomas (Idukki) 29. Shri Arun Subhash Chandra Yadav 30. Shri Madhusudan Yadav 31. Vacant * SECRETARIAT Shri Deepak Goyal, Joint Secretary Shri K.P. Singh, Director Shri K.N. Earendra Kumar, Joint Director Smt. Niangkhannem Guite, Assistant Director Smt. Catherine John L., Committee Officer * Existing since the constitution of the Committee on 31 st August, 2011. (i) 4

INTRODUCTION I, the Chairman of the Department Related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, Law and Justice, having been authorised by the Committee, do present its Forty Ninth Report on The Administrators-General (Amendment) Bill, 2011. 2. The Bill seeks to amend Sections 9, 10, 29 and 36 of the Administrator- General Act, 1963 which relates to the office and duties of the Administrator-General in administration of estates of any deceased person. 3. In pursuance of the rules relating to the Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committee, the Hon'ble Chairman, Rajya Sabha referred the Bill, as introduced* in the Rajya Sabha on the 18 th August, 2011 and pending therein, to this Committee on the 19 th August, 2011 for examination and report. 4. The Committee considered the Bill at its meeting held on 10 th January, 2012 and adopted the Report in its meeting held on the 24 th January, 2012. 5. While considering the Bill, the Committee took note of the following documents/information placed before it:- (i) Background note on the Bill furnished by the Legislative Department. (ii) The Administrators-General Act, 1963; (iii) Comments of the State Governments/UTs on the proposed amendment; and (iv) Presentation of Secretary, Legislative Department of the Bill. 6. For the facility of reference and convenience, the observations and recommendations of the Committee have been printed in bold letters in the body of the Report. New Delhi; DR. ABHISHEK MANU SINGHVI 24 th January, 2012 Chairman, Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, Law and Justice Rajya Sabha Parliamentary Bulletin Part-II (No.48728) dated the 19 th August, 2011. * Published in the Gazzette of India, Extraordinary Part-II, Section 2, dated the 18 th August, 2011 (ii) 5

REPORT The Administrators-General (Amendment) Bill, 2011 (Annexure- A) introduced in the Rajya Sabha on the 18 th August, 2011 seeks to increase the jurisdiction of the Administrators-General in relation to the administration of assets left by the deceased person (except the assets of certain specified nature) from the monetary limit of the present rupees two lakhs to rupees ten lakhs. 2. To attain this objective, the Bill seeks to amend the Administrators- General Act, 1963 by substituting the words "two lakhs" with the word "ten lakhs" in Sections 9, 10, 29 and 36 of the said Act. The Bill was referred by the Hon'ble Chairman to the Department Related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, Law and Justice on the 19 th August, 2011, for examination and report. 3. The Administrators-General Act, 1963 (45 of 1963) is an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to the office and duties of Administrator-General. Section 3 of the said Act provides for the State Government to appoint an Administrator-General for the State or for two or more states, vested with the right to apply for administration of estates of any deceased person exceeding Rs.2,00,000/- in value. The Administrator-General undertakes the proceeding for the letter of administration of estates only if he is satisfied that there is an apprehension of misappropriation, deterioration or waste of such assets and such proceedings are necessary for the protection of the assets. 3.1 Section 29 of the aforesaid Act empowers the Administrator- General to grant certificate to any person who is interested in the assets of a deceased person and who claims otherwise than as a creditor. Such 6

certificate can be granted only in cases where the assets left by the deceased person (excluding any sum of money deposited in a Government Savings Bank or any Provident Fund to which the Provident Fund Act 1925 applies) does not exceed in value in the whole, the monetary limit specified in that section. 3.2 The monetary limit specified in section 29 was originally only Rs.5,000 in 1963. On account of decrease in money value and escalation in the value of assets and also for protection of the interests of poor persons and legal heirs of the deceased persons, especially widows, minor children and other dependents from protracted and expensive litigation in Civil Courts, the monetary limit in the said section was enhanced to Rs.15,000 in 1972 to Rs.50,000 in 1983 and to Rs.2,00,000 in 1999. 4. The Statement of Objects and Reasons appended to the Bill elucidate the reasons and need for bringing forth the present amendment. It states as under:- "...The Administrators-General Act, 1963 is an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to the office and duties of Administrator-General. Section 29 of the said Act empowers the Administrator-General to grant certificate to any person, interested in the assets of a deceased person, claiming otherwise than as a creditor and such certificate can be granted only in cases where the assets left by the deceased person (except the assets of certain specified nature) do not exceed in value in the whole the monetary limit specified in that section. Originally, the monetary limit specified in the said section 29 was only Rs. 5,000. On account of considerable decrease in money value and to protect the interests of the poor persons and legal heirs especially widows, minor children and other dependents of the deceased persons from protracted and expensive litigation in civil courts, the monetary limit in the said section was enhanced to 7

Rs. 15,000 in 1972, to Rs. 50,000 in 1983 and to Rs. 2,00,000 in 1999." 4.1. It further states:- "Certain representations have been received by the Central Government requesting for enhancement of the monetary limit specified in section 29 of the Administrators-General Act, 1963 from Rs. 2,00,000 due to the escalation in the value of assets and on account of considerable decrease in money value. The Maharashtra State Legislature has amended the aforesaid Act in its application to that State by enhancing the monetary limit from Rs. 2,00,000 to Rs. 10,00,000. Similarly, the Uttar Pradesh State Legislature has also taken steps to amend the Act in its application to that State for enhancing the monetary limit from Rs. 2,00,000 to Rs. 10,00,000. 5. The background note dated 26 th August, 2011 submitted by the Legislative Department further states as under:- ". As the proposed legislation is relatable to a subject in the concurrent field namely, entry 11 of List III - Concurrent List of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution, the State Government and the Union territory Administrations have been consulted on the proposal. The Legislative Department vide their letter dated 28 th April, 2010 requested all the State Governments and the Union territory Administrations to furnish their views and comments on the proposed amendment. So far 24 out of 28 State Governments and all Union territory Administrations have furnished their views. 20 State Governments namely, Assam, Chattisgarh, Goa, Gujarat, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Orissa, Punjab, Rajasthan, Tripura, Uttarakhand and West Bengal and 5 Union territory Administrations namely Andaman and Nicobar, Chandigarh Administarion, Dara and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu and Delhi have supported the proposal. The Government of Arunachal Pradesh, Union territories of Lakshadweep and Puducherry have informed that they have no comments to offer. Government of Jammu and Kashmir and Sikkim have informed that they have no comments to offer. Governments of 8

Jammu and Kashmir and Sikkim have informed that the Administrators-General Act, 1963 is not in force in those States. State of Karnataka have informed that the escalation shall be between two lakhs and six lakhs so that estate of deceased person could be prevented from imminent danger of misappropriation, deterioration or waste. Nothing has been heard from the rest of State Governments. A statement showing views of the State Governments and Union territory Administrations is annexed to this note as Annexure - II. In view of the position stated above and having regard to the decrease in money value and escalation of prices of properties, it is considered necessary to increase the monetary limit of jurisdiction of the Administrator-General from the existing limit of Rs.2,00,000 to Rs.10,00,000 by suitably amending the references to the monetary limit specified in sections 9, 10, 29 and 36 of the said Act...." 6. The Committee in its meeting held on 10th January, 2012, considered the proposed amendment. All Members present in the meeting were in agreement with the Government's proposal. The Secretary, Legislative Department was also present in the meeting to assist the Committee and provide clarifications, if required. No dissents have been received. 7. While considering the Bill, the Committee took note of the following facts submitted by the Secretary, Legislative Department in his written presentation: (a) Section 3 of the Administrators-General Act provides that the State Government shall appoint an Administrator- General for the State but the same person can be appointed as Administrator-General for two or more States; Section 6 provides that, in so far as the Administrator General of any State, the High Court to be deemed a court of competent jurisdiction for the purpose of granting probate for letters of 9

Administration; Section 7 provides for the High Court to grant letters of Administration to the Administrator-General unless they are granted to the next-of-kin of the deceased; Section 8 provides that the Administrator-General is entitled to letters of Administration in preference to creditors, certain legatees and friends of the deceased; and Section 29 empowers the Administrator-General to grant certificate to any person, claiming assets of a deceased person otherwise than as a creditor and that such certificate can be granted only in cases where the assets left by the deceased person does not exceed in value in the whole the monetary limit specified in that Section. (b) (c) Valuation of assets under Section 29 does not include any sum of money in a Government Savings Bank or any Provident Fund Account to which the Provident Fund Act, 1925 applies. It also covers all savings schemes of the Post Offices like NSS, KVP, NSC, etc. floated through subordinate legislations or through notifications. Originally the Act enacted in 1963 specified only Rs.5,000/- monetary limit under Section 29. In 1972, as a result of representations made by the war widows association, Chandigarh on behalf of the widows in general and war widows in particular, the Act was amended to increase the monetary limit to Rs.15,000/-. The monetary limit to the said Section was further enhanced to Rs.50,000/-. In 1983, it was further enhanced to Rs.2,00,000 in 1999 on account of considerable decrease in money value and escalation in the value of assets and also for protection of the interests of poor 10

persons and legal heirs of the deceased persons especially widows, minor children and other dependents from protracted and expensive litigation in Civil Courts. (d) (e) (f) The Maharashtra and Uttar Pradesh State Legislatures have amended the Administrators-General Act in its application to those States by enhancing the monetary limit from Rs.2,00,000 to Rs.10,00,000. Since the subject matter of the proposal is relatable to a subject in the concurrent field namely, entry 11 of List III-Concurrent List of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution, the State Governments and Union Territory Administrations have been consulted on the proposal. 20 State Governments and 5 Union Territory Administrations have conveyed their support to the proposal. The representations received by the Central Government also requested for enhancement of the monetary limit specified in Section 29 of the Administrators-General Act, 1963 on account of escalation in the value of assets and considerable decrease in money value and to increase the monetary limit of jurisdiction of the Administrator-General from the existing limit of Rs.2,00,000 to Rs.10,00,000 by suitably amending the references of limit specified in Sections 9, 10, 29 and 36 of the said Act. In view of the above, the proposal to amend Section 29 of the Administrators-General Act, 1963 with a view to raise the monetary limit from Rs.2,00,000 to Rs.10,00,000 with consequential amendments in Sections 9,10 and 36 of the said Act has been mooted. 11

8. Having considered the justifications given in the Statement of Objects and Reasons of the Bill, the written submission made by the Legislative Department, and the Secretary of that Department, the Committee agrees with the proposal of the Ministry to enhance the monetary limit from Rs. 2,00,000/- at present to Rs. 10,00,000/- by suitably amending the reference to monetary limit in Sections 9, 10, 29 and 36 of the Administrators-General Act, 1963. Principally, this conclusion has been reached on the basis that the value of money has decreased over the years. Rs two lacs was prescribed in the year 1999. Over the past twelve years, the figure of Rs two lacs specified in Sections 9, 10, 29 and 36 of the said Act would have declined considerably. Passage of time has thus rendered the figure of two lacs unrealistic, ineffective and virtually infructous. Continuance of this unrealistic figure would render the remit or jurisdiction of the AG s office too burdensome and unrealistic. Hence the enhancement to Rs ten lacs. The Committee unanimously so recommends. - - - - - 12