UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case5:11-cv LHK Document1777 Filed08/15/12 Page1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

E-FILED on 10/15/10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case3:10-cv WHA Document1210 Filed06/20/12 Page1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

EX PARTE MOTION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR HEARING ON CHARLES H. MOORE S JOINDER TO MOTION OF THE CREDITORS

CASE NO. 16-CV RS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION)

Interval Licensing LLC v. ebay, Inc. et al Doc. 84 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8

Software Rights Archive, LLC v. Google Inc. et al Doc. 218 Att. 7. Exhibit 6. Dockets.Justia.com

Case3:12-cv VC Document70 Filed06/23/15 Page1 of 3

Case 5:11-cv LHK Document 3322 Filed 12/03/15 Page 1 of 7

Case 4:08-cv SBA Document 180 Filed 03/03/2009 Page 1 of 5

Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Funambol, Inc. Doc. 52

Case3:12-cv VC Document77 Filed06/25/15 Page1 of 5

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case5:12-cv HRL Document9 Filed08/09/12 Page1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case4:11-cv YGR Document22 Filed02/16/12 Page1 of 5

Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff.

Case 2:07-cv JBF-TEM Document 45 Filed 02/11/2008 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 3:18-cv RS Document 30 Filed 06/18/18 Page 1 of 6

Case5:11-cv LHK Document902 Filed05/07/12 Page1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case3:13-cv MMC Document95 Filed09/17/14 Page1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Attorneys for Defendants TerraForm Global, Inc. and Peter Blackmore UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION, LOS ANGELES

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 152 Filed 02/01/2007 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case3:12-mc CRB Document45 Filed01/02/13 Page1 of 6

Case 8:14-cv DOC-AN Document 85 Filed 09/11/14 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:2663

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 104 Filed 12/22/2006 Page 1 of 7

Case 4:09-cv CW Document 579 Filed 06/01/16 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:15-cv JST Document 90 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 10

Benjamin v. Google Inc. Doc. 45

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ORACLE USA, INC., et al.,

Case 3:13-cv SC Document 39 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case5:10-cv JW Document72 Filed03/11/11 Page1 of 5

Case 2:15-cv WCB Document 510 Filed 10/10/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 25541

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:13-cv WHO Document 90 Filed 09/20/17 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:14-cv L-NLS Document 60 Filed 11/18/15 Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 374 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 1 of 5

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 8:15-cv DOC-KES Document 184 Filed 04/03/19 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:4371

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case bjh Doc 109 Filed 05/02/17 Entered 05/02/17 14:28:07 Page 1 of 6

Case 3:13-cv EMC Document 276 Filed 09/16/16 Page 1 of 6

Case 4:11-cv SBA Document 93 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO. The Motion of Plaintiff Leonard Labow in the above-entitled action, for an

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case rfn Doc 19 Filed 07/15/16 Entered 07/15/16 14:42:41 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case5:08-cv PSG Document519 Filed08/22/13 Page1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Hells Angels Motorcycle Corporation v. Alexander McQueen Trading Limited et al Doc. 16

Case4:07-cv PJH Document728-1 Filed08/05/10 Page1 of 5

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Judge:

If you received a call offering a SolarCity product between November 6, 2011 and October 16, 2017, a class action settlement may affect your rights.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv GBD Document 60 Filed 05/15/18 Page 1 of 4 TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, DIVISION 5

Case 2:15-cv WCB Document 505 Filed 10/09/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 25355

Case Document 104 Filed in TXSB on 12/02/16 Page 1 of 3

Case3:09-cv RS Document78 Filed05/03/11 Page1 of 7

Case3:13-cv SC Document99 Filed06/05/15 Page2 of 7 1 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Arville Winans and Wilma Fritz in this action entitled Arville 2 Winans

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case bjh11 Doc 338 Filed 01/11/19 Entered 01/11/19 16:18:50 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case5:11-cv LHK Document Filed12/02/13 Page1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

> [ ORDER ESTABLISHING

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 543 Filed 01/15/2009 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S REPLY TO THE COUNTERCLAIMS OF GOOGLE INC.

Case 2:06-cv AB-JC Document 797 Filed 10/13/17 Page 1 of 4 Page ID #:25126

Case4:07-cv PJH Document1062 Filed04/20/11 Page1 of 5

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT AIR FRANCE-KLM WITHOUT PREJUDICE [F.R.C.P. 4141(a)(1)(A)(ii)]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Petitioners, Real Parties in Interest.

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 160 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 1 of 5

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 597 Filed 04/09/2009 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. Plaintiffs,

Rupa Marya v. Warner Chappell Music Inc Doc. 332 Att. 1

Case5:10-cv RMW Document207 Filed03/11/14 Page1 of 7

Transcription:

Google Inc. et al v. Egger et al Doc. 1 [SEE SIGNATURE PAGE FOR COUNSEL] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 1 1 1 1 1 GOOGLE INC., AOL LLC, YAHOO! INC., IAC SEARCH & MEDIA, INC., and LYCOS, INC., v. Plaintiffs, L. DANIEL EGGER, SOFTWARE RIGHTS ARCHIVE, LLC, and SITE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendants. Case No. C-0-0-RMW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING FOR DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS, TRANSFER, OR STAY Date: February, 00 Time: :00 AM Courtroom:, th Floor Judge: Honorable Ronald M. Whyte 0 1 STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE Plaintiffs Google Inc., AOL LLC, Yahoo! Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., and Lycos Inc., and Defendants L. Daniel Egger, Software Rights Archive, LLC, and Site Technologies, Inc. hereby stipulate and request this Court to continue the scheduled hearing on Defendants Motion to Dismiss, Transfer, or Stay (Dkt. No. ) from Friday, January, 00, at :0 a.m. to Friday, February, 00, at :00 a.m. in Courtroom, th Floor, 0 South 1st Street, San Jose, California, 1. STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE - Case No. C-0-0-RMW 1 sf- Dockets.Justia.com

Plaintiffs have not yet filed their opposition papers to Defendants Motion to Dismiss, Transfer, or Stay. Pursuant to the continued hearing date, Plaintiffs opposition papers will be due February, 00, and Defendants reply papers will be due February 1, 00. 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Dated: December, 00 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Juanita R. Brooks Juanita R. Brooks (SBN, brooks@fr.com) Jason W. Wolff (SBN, wolff@fr.com) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 0 El Camino Real San Diego, CA Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () -0 Thomas B. Walsh, IV (admitted pro hac vice) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 000 Bank One Center Main Street Dallas, TX 01 Telephone: (1)-00 Facsimile: (1) -01 Email: walsh@fr.com Jerry T. Yen (SBN, yen@fr.com) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 00 Arguello Street, Suite 00 Redwood City, CA 0 Telephone: (0) -00 Facsimile: (0) -01 Attorneys for Plaintiffs GOOGLE INC. and AOL LLC STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE - Case No. C-0-0-RMW sf-

1 1 1 By: /s/ Richard. S.J. Hung Michael A. Jacobs (CA Bar No. 1) Richard S.J. Hung (CA Bar No. ) MORRISON & FOERSTER Market Street San Francisco, CA Telephone: 1--000 Facsimile: 1-- Email: mjacobs@mofo.com Attorneys for Plaintiff YAHOO! INC. By: /s/ Jennifer A. Kash Claude M. Stern (CA Bar No. ) Jennifer A. Kash (CA Bar No. 0) QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 0 Redwood Shores, CA 0 Telephone: (0) 01-000 Facsimile: (0) 01-0 Email: claudestern@quinnemanuel.com Email:jenniferkash@quinnemanuel.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs IAC SEARCH & MEDIA, INC. and LYCOS, INC. 1 1 0 1 STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE - Case No. C-0-0-RMW sf-

1 1 1 1 1 By: /s/ Lee Kaplan Jay D. Ellwanger (jellwanger@dpelaw.com) Dinovo Price Ellwanger LLP P.O. Box 00 Austin, Texas 0 Telephone: (1) 1-00 Facsimile: (1) - Thomas F. Smegal, Jr. (tomsmegal@smegallaw.com) Law Offices of Thomas F. Smegal, Jr. One Sansome Street, th floor San Francisco, CA Telephone: (1) - Facsimile: (1) -0 Lee Landa Kaplan (lkaplan@skv.com) (pro hac vice) Smyser Kaplan & Veselka, L.L.P. 00 Louisiana St., Suite 00, Houston, TX 00 Telephone: (1) 1-00 Facsimile: (1) 1-0 Attorneys for Defendants L. DANIEL EGGER, SOFTWARE RIGHTS ARCHIVE, LLC, and SITE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 0 1 STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE - Case No. C-0-0-RMW sf-

DECLARATION OF CONSENT Pursuant to General Order No., Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the above-listed counsel for Plaintiffs Google Inc., AOL LLC, IAC Search & Media, Inc., and Lycos, Inc. and Defendants L. Daniel Egger, Software Rights Archive, LLC, and Site Technologies, Inc. 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Dated: December, 00 /s/ Richard S. J. Hung Richard S. J. Hung STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE - Case No. C-0-0-RMW sf-

[PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Hearing for Defendants Motion to Dismiss, Transfer, or Stay (Dkt. No. ) is continued from Friday, January, 00, at :0 a.m. to Friday, February, 00, at :00 a.m. in Courtroom, th Floor, 0 South 1st Street, San Jose, California, 1. Plaintiffs opposition papers are due February, 00 and Defendants reply papers are due February 1, 00. 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Dated: Hon. Ronald M. Whyte United States District Judge STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE - Case No. C-0-0-RMW sf-