) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Similar documents
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLfEAS p H. D H lit ui Item 4u.i CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS. Plaintiff, Index No.: /2006 Justice Carolyn E. Demarest

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

~~_,_ ~~-~ni~i#j~rj I

Case 2:16-cv ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161

Case 2:01-cv SRC-CLW Document Filed 05/15/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID: EXHIBIT C

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

Case 2:14-cv JAK-SS Document 86 Filed 03/23/15 Page 1 of 56 Page ID #:1281

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE. Gentiva Securities Litigation PO Box 3058 Portland, OR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

Case5:09-cv JW Document146-3 Filed08/25/11 Page1 of 13. Exhibit A-2

PROOF OF CLAIM FORM AND RELEASE INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

[PROPOSED] FINAL APPROVAL ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. 05-CV H(RBB) CLASS ACTION

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CENTRAL DIVISION. Special Title (Rule 1550(b)) PROCEEDING NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-DIMITROULEAS STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 06-cv-377-JL FINAL JUDGMENT

Case 2:04-cv AC-MKM Document 193 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Case No. 12-C-884-JPS CLASS ACTION PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

[~DJ FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

Case 2:07-cv RAJ Document 87 Filed 03/27/2009 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

Case 3:14-cv SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case: 1:08-cv Document #: 679 Filed: 02/16/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:29342

Proof of Claim and Release Form DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION: AUGUST 4, 2017

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

Case4:09-cv CW Document125 Filed04/28/11 Page1 of 26

Case 3:15-md CRB Document Filed 07/26/16 Page 1 of 5. Exhibit 5 Individual Release of Claims

01-CA4180. X0791 v.05 1

Case 2:15-cv LDD Document 54 Filed 12/12/16 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

Polycom, Inc. Settlement c/o Garden City Group, LLC PO Box 10281

AMENDED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE. This Amended Class Action Settlement Agreement and General Release ( Settlement

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CASE NO. 1:11-CV JGK PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Case KJC Doc 441 Filed 09/11/18 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. x : : : : : : : x STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

P.O. Box Dublin, OH Toll-Free: (877) Settlement Website:

Case 2:12-cv VEH Document 110 Filed 07/15/15 Page 1 of 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1

Case 1:08-cv BSJ-MHD Document 93 Filed 12/05/11 Page 1 of 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

Case 1:14-cv JPO Document 190 Filed 10/02/18 Page 1 of 42 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:11-cv VM Document 509 Filed 07/03/13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Your legal rights may be affected even if you do not act. Please read this Notice carefully. YOUR RIGHTS AND CHOICES

Case 3:10-cv ECR -WGC Document 97 Filed 03/27/12 Page 1 of 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA In re Harman International Industries Inc. Securities Litigation Case No.

Case 1:10-cv BMC-VVP Document 55 Filed 10/06/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 471 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:17-cv AT Document 77 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 12

STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT. into between Plaintiff ARcare, Inc. ( Plaintiff or ARcare ), on behalf of itself and a class of

Case 4:16-cv HSG Document 33-1 Filed 11/16/16 Page 16 of 66 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 1:12-cv KBF Document 328 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

* * * * * * * * * * * * * CIRCUIT COURT v. LINDA F. POWERS, et al., * MONTGOMERY COUNTY, Defendants. STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This class action settlement agreement (the Settlement Agreement or the Agreement )

Case 1:16-cv TSE-TCB Document 114 Filed 10/06/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 1372

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

x : : : : : : : x INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

GLS Dublin OH *P-GLS$F-POC/1*

Case 5:14-cv JPB-JES Document Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 57 PageID #: 4967

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

If You Bought an Airline Ticket between the U.S. and Asia, Australia, New Zealand, or the Pacific Islands,

Case 3:07-cv CRB Document Filed 08/31/18 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION MDL DOCKET NO: 3:12-MD-2384-GCM ALL MEMBER CASES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE RECITALS

A Federal Court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AND ORDER. into a Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement, dated March 11, 2016, as amended on June 13,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE CLASS FORWARD TO CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS/LEGAL COUNSEL

Case 2:13-cv RSM Document 90-1 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT (FOR MEMBERS OF SUBCLASS 2)

Case: 3:03-cv WHR Doc #: Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 1 of 31 PAGEID #: 1033 EXHIBIT 1

Nathan v. Matta et al. Shareholder Litigation c/o GCG PO Box Dublin, OH

Case 8:15-cv JLS-KES Document 43-4 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:440 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

JP Morgan RMBS Settlement c/o GCG P.O. Box Seattle, WA Toll-Free: (877)

Case 1:16-cv KPF Document 26 Filed 11/30/16 Page 1 of 11. : Plaintiff, : : Defendant.

Anticipated payment date: Ten (10) days after the Class Action Settlement becomes final and any appeals are exhausted.

COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Transcription:

Pahlavan v. British Airways PLC et al Doc. 1 1 1 1 1 1 Joseph W. Cotchett (; jcotchett@cpmlegal.com COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY San Francisco Airport Office Center 0 Malcolm Road, Suite 0 Burlingame, CA 0 T: (0-000 F: (0-0 Michael D. Hausfeld (pro hac vice; mhausfeld@cmht.com COHEN, MILSTEIN, HAUSFELD & TOLL P.L.L.C. 10 New York Avenue, N.W. Suite 00, West Tower Washington, DC 00 T: ( 0-00 F: ( 0- Co-Counsel for Plaintiffs and the Settlement Classes Charles E. Koob (0; ckoob@stblaw.com David E. Vann Jr. (pro hac vice; dvann@stblaw.com SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP Lexington Avenue New York, NY 0 T: ( -00 F: ( -0 Counsel for Defendant Virgin Atlantic Airways, Ltd. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION IN RE INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORTATION SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Document relates to: ALL ACTIONS Case No. M:0-cv-0-CRB MDL No. Honorable Charles R. Breyer [PROPOSED] ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT APPROVING SETTLEMENT BETWEEN CLASS PLAINTIFFS AND VIRGIN ATLANTIC AIRWAYS, LTD. CASE NO. M:0-CV--CRB Dockets.Justia.com

1 1 1 1 WHEREAS, a class action is pending before the Court entitled In re International Air Transportation Surcharge Antitrust Litigation, Master File 0--CRB (N.D. Cal., San Francisco division; WHEREAS, the Court has received and reviewed the settlement agreement entered into between Plaintiffs and Virgin Atlantic Airways, Ltd. ( Virgin Atlantic, dated February 1, 0 (the Settlement Agreement, and has considered the terms of the proposed settlement set forth therein (the Settlement ; WHEREAS, all defined terms contained herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Settlement Agreement, unless otherwise defined herein; WHEREAS, on Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval, the Court on April, 0 entered an Order Preliminarily Approving Class Action Settlements With British Airways and Virgin Atlantic Airways (the Preliminary Approval Order, in which the Court certified the Settlement Classes, preliminarily approved the Settlement, set September 1, 0 as the deadline for filing of objections to the Settlement, and scheduled a Final Approval Hearing for September, 0; WHEREAS, on Plaintiffs motion for approval of the proposed notice program, notifying Settlement Class Members of the Settlement and the Final Approval Hearing, the Court on April, 0 entered an Order Approving Notice Program and Forms (the Notice Approval Order ; WHEREAS, Settlement Class Counsel have submitted declarations to the Court confirming that the notice program has been implemented in substantial accordance with the Notice Approval Order; WHEREAS, the Court has considered all timely filed objections to the Settlement; and WHEREAS, the Court conducted a Final Approval Hearing on September, 0, and has considered the arguments presented, all papers filed and all proceedings had herein; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. As used in this Order the following terms (together with their cognate forms have the meanings specified below: - 1 - CASE NO. M:0-CV--CRB

1 1 1 1 (a Actions means this class action captioned In re International Air Transportation Surcharge Antitrust Litigation, M-0--CRB (N.D. Cal., San Francisco division, MDL No., and all actions relating to the same claims alleged in Plaintiffs First Consolidated Amended Complaint filed in this action, including those that were transferred to this Court by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation as part of MDL No. or that were originally filed in this Court, including but not limited to those actions listed in Appendix A hereto. (b (c British Airways means British Airways Plc. Effective Date means the earliest date on which all of the following events and conditions have occurred or have been met: (i Virgin Atlantic has not timely availed itself of any right to terminate the Settlement Agreement pursuant to paragraph 1. of the Settlement Agreement; (ii the Court has entered this Judgment, following notice to the Settlement Classes and the Final Approval Hearing, approving this Settlement Agreement under Rule (e of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and dismissing the Actions against Virgin Atlantic with prejudice as to all Settlement Class Members, and without costs except as specified in the Settlement Agreement; and (iii the time for appeal or to seek permission to appeal from this Judgment has expired or, if appealed, approval of the Settlement Agreement and this Judgment has been affirmed in its entirety by the court of last resort to which such appeal has been taken and such affirmance has become no longer subject to further appeal or review. Neither the provisions of Rule 0 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure nor the All Writs Act, U.S.C. 1, shall be taken into account in determining the above-stated times. - - CASE NO. M:0-CV--CRB

1 1 1 1 the Settlement. (d (e (f Judgment means this final order of judgment, dismissal, and approval of Person means an individual or an entity. Plaintiffs means Kambiz Pahlavan, Frederick Waters, Maureen Ann Waters, and Deborah Holley, who have been designated by the Court as class representatives for the Settlement Classes. (g Release Date means, with respect to U.S. Releasing Parties, the Effective Date; and, with respect to U.K. Releasing Parties, the date of receipt of a U.K. Refund Payment by each such U.K. Releasing Party. (h Released Claims means any and all claims, demands, actions, suits, and causes of action, whether class, individual, or otherwise in nature, that the Releasing Parties, or any one of them, ever had, now has, or hereafter can, shall, or may have, directly, representatively, derivatively, or in any other capacity, against the Released Parties, on account of, arising from, or in any way related to, the pricing of passenger air transportation by Virgin Atlantic or British Airways, including, without limitation, with respect to fuel surcharges or any other element of, component of, or surcharge upon, the price of passenger air transportation, and with respect to the facts, occurrences, transactions or other matters that were alleged or could have been alleged in the First Consolidated Amended Complaint in the above-captioned matter or in the complaints in any of the Actions arising out of the conspiracy between Virgin Atlantic and British Airways to fix the prices of passenger air transportation, whether such claims are based on federal, state, local, statutory, or common law, or any other law, code, rule, or regulation of any country or other jurisdiction worldwide, regardless of whether such claims are known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, asserted or unasserted, foreseen or unforeseen, actual or contingent, liquidated or unliquidated, regardless of legal theory, and regardless of the type or amount of relief or damages claimed. (i Released Parties means, jointly and severally, individually and collectively: Virgin Atlantic, its present and former parents, subsidiaries, divisions and affiliates, - - CASE NO. M:0-CV--CRB

1 1 1 1 each of their respective past and present officers, directors, employees and agents, and the predecessors, successors, heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns of each of the foregoing; and, subject to conclusion of a Court-approved settlement between British Airways and Plaintiffs and the Settlement Classes, British Airways, its present and former parents, subsidiaries, divisions and affiliates, each of their respective past and present officers, directors, employees and agents, and the predecessors, successors, heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns of each of the foregoing. (j Releasing Parties means, individually and collectively, the U.S. Releasing Parties and the U.K. Releasing Parties. (k the U.K. Settlement Class, as defined herein. (l Settlement Classes means, collectively, the U.S. Settlement Class and Settlement Class Members means, collectively, all members of the U.S. Settlement Class and the U.K. Settlement Class, as defined herein. (m U.K. Releasing Parties means, individually and collectively: Plaintiffs and all U.K. Settlement Class Members who, at any time, receive and accept a Refund Payment under the Settlement Agreement, on behalf of themselves and any Person claiming by or through them as an heir, administrator, devisee, predecessor, successor, parent, subsidiary, representative of any kind, shareholder, partner, director, owner of any kind, affiliate, assignee, agent, employee, contractor, attorney, or insurer. (n U.S. Releasing Parties means, individually and collectively: Plaintiffs and all U.S. Settlement Class Members who did not timely submit a Request for Exclusion in accordance with the Preliminary Approval Order, on behalf of themselves and any Person claiming by or through them as an heir, administrator, devisee, predecessor, successor, parent, subsidiary, representative of any kind, shareholder, partner, director, owner of any kind, affiliate, assignee, agent, employee, contractor, attorney, or insurer. (o U.S. Settlement Class means all Persons to whom, in the period beginning on August, 0 and ending on March, 0, Virgin Atlantic sold, in the United - - CASE NO. M:0-CV--CRB

1 1 1 1 States, at least one coupon for passenger air travel on a flight operated by Virgin Atlantic and as to which the long-haul fuel surcharge was paid and not refunded in whole as of the date of the Settlement Agreement ( U.S. Qualifying Coupon, but excluding the officers, directors, employees, counsel and agents of Virgin Atlantic, and all government entities. (p U.K. Settlement Class means all Persons to whom, in the period beginning on August, 0 and ending on March, 0, Virgin Atlantic sold, in the United Kingdom, at least one coupon for passenger air travel on a flight operated by Virgin Atlantic and as to which the long-haul fuel surcharge was paid and not refunded in whole as of the date of the Settlement Agreement ( U.K. Qualifying Coupon, but excluding the officers, directors, employees, counsel and agents of Virgin Atlantic, and all government entities. (q Virgin Atlantic means Virgin Atlantic Airways, Ltd.. This Court finds that it has jurisdiction over the Actions, each of the parties to the Settlement Agreement, and each of the Settlement Class Members.. The notice given to the Settlement Classes of the Settlement and the Final Approval Hearing, in substantial accordance with the terms of the Notice Approval Order, was the best notice practicable under the circumstances, including individual notice to those Settlement Class Members whose addresses could be identified through reasonable effort, and notice by various means of publication and internet advertising as set forth in the proposed notice program and approved by the Court in the Notice Approval Order. Said notice provided due and adequate notice of these proceedings, the Final Approval Hearing, and the Settlement, to all persons entitled to such notice, and said notice fully satisfied the requirements of Rule of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and due process.. The Settlement Agreement was the result of bona fide and arm s-length negotiations between Settlement Class Counsel and counsel for Virgin Atlantic.. On September, 0, the Court held a Final Approval Hearing to consider the fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy of the proposed Settlement. - - CASE NO. M:0-CV--CRB

1 1 1 1. The Court has given fair consideration to all objections to the Settlement that have been timely submitted by Settlement Class Members, and hereby overrules each such objection. Any Settlement Class Member who failed to timely object to the Settlement in the manner prescribed in the Preliminary Approval Order shall be deemed to have waived any objections to the Settlement and the Settlement Agreement and by operation of this Judgment shall be forever barred from making any such objections to the Settlement or the Settlement Agreement.. Pursuant to Rule of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court hereby approves the Settlement as set forth in the Settlement Agreement, finds that said Settlement is, in all respects, fair, reasonable, and adequate with respect to the Settlement Classes, and directs that the Settlement be consummated in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the Settlement Agreement.. The Actions are hereby dismissed with prejudice as to Virgin Atlantic, without costs (except as set forth in the Settlement Agreement and in any order of this Court on Settlement Class Counsel s motion for attorneys fees and reimbursement of litigation expenses.. Upon the Release Date, and in consideration of the Settlement Payments specified in paragraphs.1,.,. and. of the Settlement Agreement, and for other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which the Plaintiffs have acknowledged, each of the Releasing Parties shall be deemed to have, and by operation of this Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished, and discharged all Released Claims against the Released Parties, shall have covenanted not to sue any of the Released Parties with respect to all such Released Claims, and shall be permanently barred and enjoined from instituting, commencing, prosecuting or asserting any such Released Claim against any of the Released Parties.. Each Settlement Class Member who submits a claim pursuant to the Settlement will also be required, as a condition to obtaining a Refund Payment, to sign a written release (by electronic means or by physical signature, depending on how the claim is submitted expressly releasing all Released Claims of such Settlement Class Member. - - CASE NO. M:0-CV--CRB

1 1 1 1. With respect to any and all Released Claims, upon the Effective Date, Plaintiffs shall expressly waive, and, upon the Release Date, each of the Releasing Parties shall be deemed to have waived, and by operation of this Judgment shall have waived, the provisions, rights, and benefits of California Civil Code Section 1 and Section -- of the South Dakota Codified Laws (to the extent either or both of them apply to the Actions, each of which provides: A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR. 1. Plaintiffs shall further expressly waive, and each of the Releasing Parties shall be deemed to have waived, and by operation of this Judgment shall have waived, any and all provisions, rights, and benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States, or of the United Kingdom, or of the European Union, or any principle of common law or foreign law, that is similar, comparable, or equivalent in effect to California Civil Code Section 1 or that would otherwise act to limit the effectiveness or scope of the releases. Plaintiffs and the Releasing Parties have acknowledged that they may hereafter discover facts in addition to or different from those that any of them or their counsel now knows or believes to be true with respect to the subject matter of the Released Claims or otherwise, but upon the Effective Date each Plaintiff shall expressly have, and, upon the Release Date, each Releasing Party shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever settled and released any and all Released Claims, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, contingent or non-contingent, whether or not concealed or hidden, that now exist or heretofore have existed, upon any theory of law or equity now existing or coming into existence in the future, including, but not limited to, conduct that is negligent, reckless, intentional, with or without malice, or a breach of any duty, law, or rule, without regard to the subsequent discovery or existence of such different or additional facts. Plaintiffs have acknowledged, and the - - CASE NO. M:0-CV--CRB

1 1 1 1 Releasing Parties shall be deemed to have acknowledged, and by operation of this Judgment shall have acknowledged, that the foregoing waiver was separately bargained for and a key element of the Settlement of which this release is a part. 1. Any U.K. Settlement Class Member who does not receive and accept a U.K. Refund Payment shall not be deemed, directly or indirectly, to have released claims against Virgin Atlantic by reason of the Settlement Agreement or this Judgment. Any such U.K. Settlement Class Member who has not timely submitted a request for exclusion and who seeks to pursue separately any claim that is described in the definition of Released Claims herein, must first exhaust any and all rights and remedies in the United Kingdom before asserting any such claim elsewhere. in the United States. (CRB 1. Upon the Effective Date, and by operation of this Judgment, Virgin Atlantic will be deemed to have waived any claim for indemnity or contribution, however denominated, against British Airways, arising out of or related to the claims or allegations asserted by Plaintiffs in the Actions, whether arising under state, federal, or foreign law as claims, cross-claims, counterclaims, or third-party claims, and whether asserted in the Actions, in this Court, in any federal or state court, or in any other court, arbitration proceeding, administrative agency, or other forum in the United States, the United Kingdom, or elsewhere, and all such claims shall be deemed extinguished, discharged, satisfied and unenforceable, provided however, that such waiver by Virgin Atlantic is conditional upon this Court entering a judgment giving effect to a waiver by British Airways in favor of Virgin Atlantic on the same terms, and such judgment becoming final and effective. 1. This Judgment is a final judgment in the Actions as to all Released Claims. This Court finds, for purposes of Rule (b of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that there is no just reason for delay and expressly directs entry of judgment as set forth herein.. Neither this Judgment, the Settlement, the Settlement Agreement, nor any act performed or document executed pursuant to or in furtherance of the Settlement or the Settlement Agreement is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or evidence - - CASE NO. M:0-CV--CRB

1 1 1 1 of, Virgin Atlantic s conduct having caused any harm to consumers. Neither this Judgment, the Settlement, the Settlement Agreement, nor any act performed or document executed pursuant to or in furtherance of the Settlement or the Settlement Agreement, shall be admissible in any proceeding for any purpose, except to consummate or enforce the terms of the Settlement, and except that the Released Parties may file the Settlement Agreement or this Judgment in any action for any purpose, including, but not limited to, in support of a defense or counterclaim based on principles of res judicata, collateral estoppel, release, good faith settlement, judgment bar, or reduction, or any other theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or similar defense or counterclaim.. Without affecting the finality of this Judgment in any way, this Court retains jurisdiction over (a implementation of the Settlement; (b distribution of Refund Payments and the U.S. Cy Pres Payment pursuant to the Settlement Agreement; and (c all other proceedings related to the implementation and enforcement of the terms of the Settlement Agreement and/or the Settlement, and the administration of claims by Settlement Class Members. The time to appeal from this Judgment shall commence upon its entry.. In the event that the Effective Date does not occur, this Judgment shall be rendered null and void and shall be vacated, nunc pro tunc, except insofar as expressly provided to the contrary in the Settlement Agreement, and without prejudice to the status quo ante rights of Plaintiffs, Settlement Class Members, and Virgin Atlantic. IT IS SO ORDERED on this 1st day of, October 0. Hon. Charles R. Breyer United States District Judge - - CASE NO. M:0-CV--CRB