BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI. Application No. 06 of Manoj Mishra Vs. Union of India & Ors.

Similar documents
2016 the District Magistrate of Gautam Buddha Nagar, Additional SP and CEOs of NOIDA Development Authority

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI. Manoj MisraVs. Delhi Development Authority &Ors.

in accordance with law.

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

appearing for the parties vide our order dated 25 th May,

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI Original Application No. 148 of Mahesh Chandra Saxena Vs. SDMC and Ors.

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI. Application No. 91 of 2012

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI. ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 411 Of Versus

Vide our judgement dated 07 th May, 2016 the

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI. Original Application No. 06 of 2017 (Earlier O.A. No. 136/2015)

$~30-33 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM Nos , 24626/2017 in + W.P.(C) 8917/2015. versus

HON BLE DR. JUSTICE JAWAD RAHIM, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P. WANGDI, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON BLE DR. NAGIN NANDA, EXPERT MEMBER

+ W.P.(C) 7127/2015, CM APPL. No /2015

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI ********** M.A. NOS. 482, 530 & 541 OF 2016 ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI. M.A. No. 841/2013 to M.A. No. 863/2013 In Original Application No.

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI REHABILITATION MINISTRY EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE. versus

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 34/2016

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH, BHOPAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.6 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.318 OF 2006.

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Small Industries Development Bank of India ( SIDBI)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RECRUITMENT MATTER. W.P.(C) No. 8347/2010. Date of Decision: Versus

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH BHOPAL. Original Application No. 129/2013 (CZ)

$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: Versus

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL EASTERN ZONE BENCH, KOLKATA THE CHAIRMAN POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF 2019 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos of 2012)

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI M.A. NO. 762 OF 2014 IN M.A. NO. 44 OF 2013 IN O.A. NO. 36 OF 2012.

% W.P.(C) No. 5513/2004

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus. % Date of Decision: 9 th February, J U D G M E N T

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)

Original Application No. 88/2015 (CZ) Babulal Jajoo Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Mr. Vivek Madhok & Mr. J.P. Gupta, Advocates. Versus MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA & ANR.

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgement delivered on: 12 th January, W.P.(C) 7068/2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION. CM No of 2005 in W.P. (C) No of 1987

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH BHOPAL

Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Mr. Nitish Jain & Mr. Jatin Sethi, Advs. Versus

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL SOUTHERN ZONE, CHENNAI. Application No.53 of 2016 (SZ) & M.A. No. 55 of 2016

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 22 OF 2015 (M.A. NO. 789, 790 & 791 OF 2015, 851 & 852 OF 2015)

WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 233O OF 2006

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 788 of 2018

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH (DELHI)

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: 16 th February, Versus

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

PRADEEP KUMAR MASKARA & ORS. Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO OF 2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION ACT. LPA No.658 of 2011 & CM No /2011 VERSUS

Through: Mr. Kartik Prasad with Ms. Reeja Varghese, Adv. versus

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH, BHOPAL. Original Application No. 27/2014 (CZ)

CONTEMPT APPLICATION No. 09 OF Ram Gopal Sharma. Applicant. Versus. Sh Sanjay Mitra IAS (WB:82), Defence Secretary, 101-A, South

CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2016 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NO.9550 of 2015 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTHORITY SAVITRI MOHAN & ORS...

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: WP(C) No. 416 of 2011 and CM Nos /2011. Versus

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + CCP(O) No. 120/2005 in OMP No. 342/2004. NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY INDIA (NHAI)... Petitioner.

Bar & Bench (

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

W.P.(C) No.5740 of 2001 P R E S E N T HON BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR. W.P. No.750/2017. Bar Association Lahar, Dist. Bhind -Versus- State Bar Council of M.

$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: July 24, W.P.(C) 7444/2018, C.M. APPL. No /2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI LAND REFORMS ACT, 1954 Date of Reserve : Date of Decision :

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: 15 th January, W.P.(C) No.3687/1995

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Versus. 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? No

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI. Original Application No. 57/2014 (M.A No. 116 of 2014) Versus

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + W.P. (C.) No /2009 & CM. No.15749/2009. Date of Decision :

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment Reserved on: August 02, 2016 % Judgment Delivered on: August 08, W.P.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PUBLIC PREMISES (EVICTION OF UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPANTS) ACT, Date of decision: 8th February, 2012

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 483 OF 2019 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. Crl. M.C. No. 377/2010 & Crl. M.A. 1296/2010. Reserved on:18th May, 2011

Corrected IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF State of Himachal Pradesh and others.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) OF 2015 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 13 OF 2003

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. Execution Application No. 154 of Tuesday, the 21 st day August, 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT: EXEMPTION FROM PAYING TOLL OR FEE. Judgment delivered on : WP(C) No /2006.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.7886/2011 DATE OF DECISION : 15th July, 2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 925/2015 Reserved on: Date of Decision: versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ALLOTMENT MATTER Date of decision: 17th January, 2013 W.P.(C) 2730/2003 & CM No.4607/2013 (for stay)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8700 OF Sree Balaji Nagar Residential Association W I T H

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + FAO(OS) No.534/2010 & CM Nos /2010. versus. % Date of Hearing : August 25, 2010

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision:11 th December, Through: Mr Rajat Aneja, Advocate. Versus AND. CM (M)No.

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL EASTERN ZONE BENCH, KOLKATA. O.A. No. 06/2016/EZ & MA 946/2016/EZ SUBHASH DATTA VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL Nos OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) Nos.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT. Crl. M.C. No. 2183/2011. Reserved on: 18th January, 2012

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + Writ Petition (Civil) No. 2174/2011

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI. Satish Kumar Vs. Union of India & Ors. and Mahavir Singh Vs. Union of India & Ors.

A.F.R. Judgment delivered on

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Date of Judgment: RSA No.53/2011 & CM. Nos /2011. Versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 506 of 2013 With W.P.(S) No. 509 of 2013 With W.P.(S) No. 512 of 2013

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH BHOPAL. Original Application No. 16/2014 (CZ) (THC)

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. Writ Petition (C) No.606 of 2016

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI. Company Appeal (AT) No. 104 of 2018

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.5903 OF Smt. Sudama Devi & Ors..Appellant(s) VERSUS

An Interlocutory Application has been filed by the. writ petitioners for early disposal of this writ petition, which has been. admitted.

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE IA No.13139/2011 in CS(OS) 1163/2011 Date of Decision : July 05, 2012

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + W.P.(C) 3694/2010 & CM No.7394/2010 (for interim relief) Versus

Transcription:

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI Application No. 06 of 2012 Manoj Mishra Vs. Union of India & Ors. CORAM : HON BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMAR, CHAIRPERSON HON BLE MR. JUSTICE P. JYOTHIMANI, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON BLE DR. D. K. AGRAWAL, EXPERT MEMBER HON BLE DR. G. K. PANDEY, EXPERT MEMBER HON BLE Prof. A.R. YOUSUF, EXPERT MEMBER Present: Appellant: None appeared Respondent No. 1: Ms. Neelam Rathore, Advocate Respondent No. 2: Mr. Vivek Kumar Tandon, Advocate Respondent No. 3: Mr. Sangram Patnaik Advocate Respondent No. 4: Mr. Narender Pal Singh, Advocate Respondent No. 5: Mr. Vivek Kumar Tandon, Advocate Respondent Nos. 6 & 7: Mr. Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad, Advocate Respondent No. 8: Ms. Mansi Gupta, Advocate Date and Remarks Item No. 4 January 31, 2013 Orders of the Tribunal Heard the parties at great length. This Tribunal had passed an order on 19 th December, 2012 issuing certain interim directions. This order was assailed by State of Uttar Pradesh preferring a Civil Appeal before the Hon ble Supreme Court of India which was dismissed in limine vide order dated 18 th January, 2013. Copy of the order has been placed on record. Learned counsel appearing for various Authorities are ad idem that huge debris are lying on the river bank of Yamuna as well as near water bodies adjacent to river Yamuna. The debris are so huge that they are bound to affect the course of the river Yamuna and in any case shall lead to serious pollution of river Yamuna particularly during the raining seasons. In terms of the previous order the State of Uttar Pradesh contended that it is difficult for the State of Uttar Pradesh to find out the site where the debris should be dumped by transportation and that the throwing of debris on the rivers is primarily attributable to DDA or other person. On the contrary the learned counsel appearing for DDA and Government of Delhi submits that they are not throwing debris at the site in question on the contrary are making efforts to remove the debris. However, nothing has been placed on record, which would show that some effective and constructive steps have been taken by these

public authorities to remove the debris from the site in question. It is matter of common knowledge and in fact is hardly disputed before us that debris are being thrown on the river bank and it is a serious threat to the change of course as well as water pollution of river Yamuna. In these circumstance, we are of the considered view that certain directions need to be issued forthwith in order to ensure that pollution of Yamuna is prevented and the debris from the site are removed. Another aspect that we may notice here is that even municipal solid wastes are being thrown on the river bank of Yamuna and its water course. This also requires immediate preventive and precautionary directions. Thus, we order and issue the following directions: 1. The State of Uttar Pradesh, DDA, Government of NCT Delhi and East Delhi Municipal Corporation shall forthwith start removing debris from the river bank of Yamuna and the water body mentioned in the Petition. 2. It is stated that the above Corporation has already issued a notification (at page 19 of the Reply filed by the Respondent Nos. 2 and 5) where various dumping sites have been identified. One such site is stated to be at Gazipur which is exclusively meant for dumping of municipal solid wastes. Thus, for the present these authority shall ensure that municipal solid wastes are removed from the river bank and said water bodies and dumped at the above site. 3. The construction and other materials shall be removed to other identified sites. 4. In the event no sites have been identified by any authority we hereby direct all the Corporations and the DDA, State of Uttar Pradesh and the NCT of Delhi to notify within two weeks from today the sites for dumping of debris. 5. In the event of no site being available, as temporary measure all the above public Authorities/ Corporations and State of Uttar Pradesh shall start removing debris and bring them to the end of highest flood level of river Yamuna. The stored debris shall be

converted into a wall at that end point. In our considered opinion it would prevent unauthorized entry, flood and prevent pollution of river Yamuna. 6. The lifting of debris shall start forthwith and all these authorities shall cooperate and work in tandem with each other to achieve the above object and ensure compliance of these directions. 7. We hereby direct the Vice Chairman of DDA to hold a meeting within one week from today inviting the Commissioner of the Corporation, Secretary of Department of Environment, NCT Delhi, Secretary of Department of Irrigation, State of Uttar Pradesh and Chief Engineer, Mr. Gupta and ensure the complete implementation of the above directions. This Committee shall frame one time guidelines for ensuring the implementation of the above order. 8. Since it is an admitted position that even private parties are throwing debris on the river bank, on the basis of the principle of Polluter Pays it would be in the interest of justice that these authorities are directed to recover amounts spent for removal of debris which are thrown by the private persons, from them. Persons" will include a company, partnership, sole proprietorship and individuals. All these authorities should exercise their statutory powers and not only preventing all persons throwing debris on the river bank but even require them to pay for the purposes of removal of debris which are thrown by them. This shall be in the discretion of the authorities and would be implemented upon compliance with the principle of natural justice. 9. The petitioner have also pointed out that the debris can safely be removed and taken to reprocessing of construction material and manufacturing of tiles which have been established by the DDA at Bawana. Let the debris be also transported and removed to such factotry at Bawana and utilized for a better purpose rather than polluting river Yamuna. 10. Further we hereby issue an injunction restraining anybody, any person, authority from throwing any

debris of any kind including solid wastes on the river bank of Yamuna or the water body near river Yamuna. 11. This order shall be duly communicated by all the Authorities present before us to all persons primarily the builders who are involved in huge construction in and around NCT of Delhi, if the parties so choose they can even give a public Notice. 12. We make it clear that the above order and directions issued by the Tribunal should be carried out by all concerned in its true spirit and substance. Any disobedience of these directions shall be viewed seriously by the Tribunal. The person disobeying these directions shall be liable to be proceeded against in terms of Section 19 (4) read with Section 26 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure. We hereby appoint the following Lawyers present in Court, as Local Commissioners. They shall visit the site(s) without notice to anybody between office working hours. They shall report to the Tribunal if work of removal of debris was going on and/or anybody was throwing debris on the river bank. Our appreciation of these Advocates who have agreed to be appointed a Local Commissioners without any remuneration and in public interest. 1. Mr. Tandon 2. Mr. Satyabrata Panda 3. Mr. Anirudh Deshmukh 4. Mr. Abhimanue Shrestha 5. Mr. Amer Mushtaq. These Commissioners shall submit a report before the Tribunal before the next of date of hearing. Copy of the order be given Dasti to all the learned counsel appearing in this case as well as to the Local Commissioner who are present in Court. Stand over for 28 th February, 2013,.,CP

(Swatanter Kumar).,JM (P. Jyothimani) (Dr. D. K. Agrawal) (Dr. G. K. Pandey) (Prof. A.R. Yousuf)