SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT

Similar documents
Case 1:14-cr MLW Document 1 Filed 07/15/14 Page 1 of 14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. The SPECIAL JULY 2013 GRAND JURY charges:

CRIMINAL NO. j(j)cr }03>l^D

Case 5:18-cr DDC Document 1 Filed 05/30/18 Page 1 of 5. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (Topeka Docket)

Colorado Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT BOWLING GREEN NO. 21 U.S.C. 846

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO. 10 -

2:18-cr DCN Date Filed 11/14/18 Entry Number 3 Page 1 of 7

Case 4:17-cr MSD-LRL Document 89 Filed 03/14/18 Page 1 of 27 PageID# 1321

I l'_ r: MKM::MKP/TH F. #2017R01840

Case 1:07-cr JR Document 2 Filed 03/01/2007 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Holding a Criminal Term

22 Beginning at a date unknown to the grand jury and continuing up. 23 to and including October 15, 2014, within the Southern District of

Case 2:19-cr RGD-RJK Document 3 Filed 02/07/19 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA EXTRA SESSION 1994 H 1 HOUSE BILL 144. February 14, 1994

religious movement that effectively ruled Afghanistan from the mid-1990s until the United States1 military intervention in

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. October 2013 Grand Jury. CR No. 18R c INTRODUCTORY ALLEGATIONS

SEALED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION

Mandated Use of Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PMPs) Map

Case 4:14-cr HLM-WEJ Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 1 of 7

RULE 1.1: COMPETENCE. As of January 23, American Bar Association CPR Policy Implementation Committee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. v. Crim. No. I N D I C T M E N T. The Grand Jury in and for the District of New Jersey,

Case 2:15-cr DN-DBP Document 1 Filed 08/26/15 Page 1 of 7

RULE 3.1: MERITORIOUS CLAIMS AND CONTENTIONS

Case 6:08-cr CJS Document 76 Filed 05/07/2008 Page 1 of 6 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. For the Western District of New York

(T. 21, U.S.C., 848(a), ARTURO BELTRAN-LEYVA, 848(b), 848(c), 853 (p), IGNACIO CORONEL VILLAREAL, 960(b)(1)(B)(ii) and 963;

RULE 4.2: COMMUNICATION WITH PERSON REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL

Promoting Second Chances: HR and Criminal Records

RULE 3.8(g) AND (h):

-v.- : SEALED INDICTMENT

Case 1:11-cr JDB Document 6 Filed 03/03/11 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Holding a Criminal Term

RULE 1.14: CLIENT WITH DIMINISHED CAPACITY

Now is the time to pay attention

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRI DALLAS DIVISION 5 CR NO. 3:02-CR-052-R INTRODUCTION

Case 7:14-cr RAJ Document 1 Filed 06/25/14 Page 1 of 5 SEALED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION

THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO ) ) ) ) ) )

Uniform Wage Garnishment Act

Case 1:15-cr CG-B Document 1 Filed 04/30/15 Page 1 of F="!L.f:D 11 ltv Or--.

) ) Count 1: 18 U.S.C. 1349

RULE 2.4: LAWYER SERVING

UNIFORM NOTICE OF REGULATION A TIER 2 OFFERING Pursuant to Section 18(b)(3), (b)(4), and/or (c)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. 18 u.s.c. 981, 982, 1001, 1014 I 1028A, 1343, 1503 I 1519, 1957 and 2; 28 u. s.c.

INTRODUCTION TO ALL COUNTS. At all times relevant to this Superseding Indictment, The Enterprise. 1. The members and associates of the Bonanno

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:19-cr RBK Document 1 Filed 03/13/19 Page 1 of 31 PageID: 1

Case 1:18-cr PLM ECF No. 1 filed 02/27/18 PageID.1 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION _

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OFHCALIFORNIA. June 2008 Grand Jury ) Case No. '10 CR W ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) (1),

Constitution in a Nutshell NAME. Per

Breakdown of the Types of Specific Criminal Convictions Associated with Criminal Aliens Placed in a Non-Custodial Setting in Fiscal Year 2015

CRAIN S CLEVELAND BUSINESS

Case 4:14-cr JPG Document 1 Filed 03/19/14 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

SEALED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION

EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COUNT 1 (Conspiracy) THE DEFENDANTS

Case 1:09-cr GBL Document 27 Filed 05/06/2009 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ) ) ) INDICTMENT

Bylaws of the Prescription Monitoring Information exchange Working Group

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

2016 NATIONAL CONVENTION

A contentious election: How the aftermath is impacting education

(Attempt to Provide Material Support to a Foreign Terrorist Organization) 1. On or about and between May 15, 2014 and January 12, 2015, both dates

INSTITUTE of PUBLIC POLICY

x : : : : : : : : : : x COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Commit Bribery) The United States Attorney charges:

2018 NATIONAL CONVENTION

Case 2:17-cr PLM ECF No. 15 filed 11/21/17 PageID.22 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:18-cr NGG Document 14 Filed 04/19/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 61. COUNT ONE (Sex Trafficking - Jane Does 1 and 2)

Case 1:15-cr WJM Document 18 Filed 05/19/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

Governing Board Roster

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

The Law Library: A Brief Guide

Election Cybersecurity, Voter Registration, and ERIC. David Becker Executive Director, CEIR

CA CALIFORNIA. Ala. Code 10-2B (2009) [Transferred, effective January 1, 2011, to 10A ] No monetary penalties listed.

Case 8:18-cr JLS Document 1 Filed 04/27/18 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:1

1. From at least in or about June 2006, up to and

Admitting Foreign Trained Lawyers. National Conference of Bar Examiners Washington, D.C., April 15, 2016

Migrant and Seasonal Head Start. Guadalupe Cuesta Director, National Migrant and Seasonal Head Start Collaboration Office

Calcutta & Darjeeling

Incarcerated Women and Girls

Reporting and Criminal Records

FSC-BENEFITED EXPORTS AND JOBS IN 1999: Estimates for Every Congressional District

1. At times material to this indictment:

Case 1:15-cr DPW Document 1 Filed 09/29/15 Page 1 of 8

SPECIAL EDITION 11/6/14

RIDE Program Overview

Case 2:17-cr PLM ECF No. 54 filed 12/05/17 PageID.113 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

x

50 State Survey of Bad Faith Law. Does your State encourage bad faith?

- -X - - -X. COUNT ONE (Attempt to Provide Material Support to a Foreign Terrorist Organization)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION INTRODUCTION. A. Background

Case 1:16-cr GPG Document 1 Filed 03/11/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Next Generation NACo Network BYLAWS Adopted by NACo Board of Directors Revised February, 2017

Case 1:13-cr RP-RAW Document 2 Filed 11/25/13 Page 1 of 6. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF row A

The Progressive Era. 1. reform movement that sought to return control of the government to the people

Case 2:17-cr AWA-DEM Document 1 Filed 04/19/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID# 1 nuo

If you have questions, please or call

By 1970 immigrants from the Americas, Africa, and Asia far outnumbered those from Europe. CANADIAN UNITED STATES CUBAN MEXICAN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:05-cr PAS Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/01/2005 Page 1 of 8 SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT

Chart #5 Consideration of Criminal Record in Licensing and Employment CHART #5 CONSIDERATION OF CRIMINAL RECORD IN LICENSING AND EMPLOYMENT

Transcription:

Case 2:16-cr-00631-DAK Document 32 Filed 05/31/17 Page 1 of 22 JOHN W. HUBER, United States Attorney (#7226) VERNON STEJSKAL, Assistant United States Attorney (#8434) MICHAEL GADD, Special Assistant United States Attorney (#13704) ZOllrMY31 Attorneys for the United States of America 111 South Main Street, Suite 1800 n lf<jct Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Telephone: (801) 524-5682 Email: Michael.Gadd@usdoj.gov IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. AARON MICHAEL SHAMO, DREW WILSON CRANDALL, ALEXANDRYA MARIE TONGE, KATHERINE LAUREN ANNE BUSTIN, MARIO ANTHONY NOBLE, and SEAN MICHAEL GYGI, Defendants. SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT Case No. 2:16-cr-00631-DAK VIOLATIONS: 21 U.S.C. 848, CONTINUING CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE;. 21 U.S.C. 846, CONSPIRACY TO DISTRIBUTE A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE; 21 U.S.C. 952, AIDING AND ABETTING THE IMPORTATION OF A CONTROLLED.SUBSTANCE; 21 U.S.C. 84l(a)(l), POSSESSION OF FENTANYL WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE; 21 U.S.C. 841(a)(l), MANUFACTURE OF ALPRAZOLAM; 21 u.s.c. 33l(k) & 333(b)(7), KNOWING AND INTENTIONAL ADULTERATION OF DRUGS WHILE HELD FOR SALE; 21 U.S.C. 843(b), USE OF THE U.S. MAIL IN FURTHERANCE OF A DRUG. TRAFFICKING OFFENSE; 18 U.S.C. 1956(h), CONSPIRACY TO

Case 2:16-cr-00631-DAK Document 32 Filed 05/31/17 Page 2 of 22 COMMIT MONEY LAUNDERlNG; 18 U.S.C. 1957(a), ENGAGING IN MONETARY TRANSACTIONS IN PROPERTY DERIVED FROM SPECIFIED UNLAWFUL ACTIVITY; 18 U.S.C. 1956(a)(l)(A)(i), MONEY LAUNDERING CONCEALMENT; Judge Dale. A Kimball The Grand Jury Charges: COUNT1 (21 U.S.C. 848, CONTINUING CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE) Beginning on a date.unknown to the Grand Jury, but at least by July 8, 2015, and continuing to at least November 22, 2016, in the Central Division of the District of Utah and elsewhere,. AARON MICHAEL SHAMO, defendant herein, did knowingly and intentionally engage in a continuing criminal enterprise in that he knowingly and intentionally violated Title 21, United States Code, Sections 841(a)(l), 846, and 952(a), which violations include, but are not limited to, The violation alleged in Count 2, Conspiracy to Distribute Fentanyl, which Count is re-alleged and incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth in this Count; The violation alleged in Count 3, Conspiracy to Distribute Alprazolam, which Count is re~alleged and incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth in this Count; 2

Case 2:16-cr-00631-DAK Document 32 Filed 05/31/17 Page 3 of 22 The violation alleged in Count 4, Aiding and Abetting the Importation of a Controlled Substance, which Count is re-alleged and incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth in this Count; The violation alleged in Count 5, Aiding and Abetting the Importation of a Controlled Substance, which Count is re-alleged and incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth in this Count; The violation alleged in Count 6, Aiding and Abetting the Importation of a Controlled Substance, which Count is re-alleged and incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth in this Count; The violation alleged in Count 7, Possession: of Fentanyl with Intent to Distribute, which Count is re-alleged and incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth in this Count; Aiding and abetting the violation alleged in Count 8, Possession of Fentanyl with Intent to Distribute, which Count is re-alleged and incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth in this Count; The violation alleged in Count 9, Manufacture of Alprazolain, which Count is realleged and incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth in this Count; The violation alleged in Count 12, Use of the U.S. Mail in Furtherance of a Drug Trafficking Offense, which Count is re-alleged and incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth in this Count; 3

Case 2:16-cr-00631-DAK Document 32 Filed 05/31/17 Page 4 of 22 Aiding and Abetting the Attempted Distribution of Fentanyl on or about November 20, 2016, to J.G., aka "trustworthymoney," through A.L., all in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Sections 84l(a)(l) and 846, and Title 18, United States Code, Section 2; Aiding and Abetting the Possession of Fentanyl with Intent to Distribute on the following dates to the following addressees, each in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 84l(a)(l) and Title 18, United States Code, Section 2: Date Addressee State Number Controlled Marldngs of Pills Substance 11/18/2016 N.A. CA 12 Fentanyl A215 11/18/2016 M.J. CA 11 Fentanyl M/30 11118/2016 A.B. co 20. Fentanyl M/30 11/18/2016 B.B. co 10 Fentanyl A215 11/18/2016 T.M. CT 60 Fentilnyl M/30 11/18/2016 J.R. CT 11 Fentanyl A215 11/20/2016 T.J. FL 200 Fentanyl A215 11/18/2016 P.F. IL 100 Fentanyl A215 11/18/2016 J.M. IL 22 Fentanyl M/30 11/18/2016 A.G. KY 20 Fentanyl A215 11/18/2016 F.O. LA 100 Fentanyl M/3.0 11/20/2016 C.D. MA 100 Fentanyl A215 11/18/2016 J.M. MD 27 Fentanyl A215 11/20/2016 N.M. ME 100 Fentanyl A215 4

Case 2:16-cr-00631-DAK Document 32 Filed 05/31/17 Page 5 of 22 11/20/2016 N.Y. MI 100 Fentanyl A215 11/18/2016 M.P. MN 16 Fentanyl A215 11/18/2016 A.B. MO 11 Fentanyl M/30 11/18/2016 A.M. MT 40 Fentanyl M/30 11/18/2016 D.G. MT 40 Fentanyl A215 11/18/2016 M.S. NC 100 Fentanyl. A215 11/18/2016 M.L. NC 100 Fentanyl A215 11/20/2016 J.R.. NC 100 Fentanyl A215 11/18/2016 L.P. NY 11 Fentanyl M/30 11/18/2016 J.G. NY 11 Fentanyl M/30 11/18/2016 B.S. OH 11 Fentanyl A215 11/18/2016 R.B. OH 150 Fentanyl A215 11/18/2016 K.M. TTS OK 11 Fentanyl M/30 TR 11/18/2016 c. PA 11 Fentanyl M/30 11/18/2016 R.P. PA 11 Fentanyl A215 11/18/2016 J.S. PA 11 Fentanyl A.215 11/18/2016 S.F. PA 11 Fentanyl A215 11/20/2016 A.H. PA 100 Fentanyl A215 11/18/2016 ICM. SC 11 Fentanyl M/30 11/18/2016 T.E. SC 12 Fentanyl M/30 11/18/2016 G.T. TX 11. Fentanyl M/30 11/20/2016 A.W. TX 13 Fentanyl M/30 11/20/2016 J.B. TX 100 Fentanyl M/30 5

Case 2:16-cr-00631-DAK Document 32 Filed 05/31/17 Page 6 of 22 11/18/2016 A.T. VA 12 Fentanyl M/30 11/20/2016 G.D. VA 150 Fentanyl A215 11/20/2016 A.H. VA 100. Fentanyl A215 Aiding and Abetting the Possession of Alprazolam with Intent to Distribute on the following dates to the following addressees, each in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 841(a)(l) and Title 18, United States Code, Section 2: Date Addressee State Number Controlled Marldngs of Pills Substance 11/20/2016 A.L. CA 100 Alprazolam GG249 11/18/2016 A.F. GA 200 Alprazolam GG249 11/20/2016 S.S. GA 100 Alprazolam GG249 11/20/2016 P.O. GA 100 Alprazolam GG249 11/18/2016 D.C. IL 100 Alprazolam GG249 11/20/2016 D.C.. IL 100 Alprazolam GG249 11/20/2016 J.B. LA 100 Alprazolam GG249 11/20/2016 J.S.. MI 200 Alprazolam GG249 11/20/2016 C.G. MS 100 Alprazolam GG249 11/18/2016. s.w. NC 100 Alprazolam GG249 11/18/2016 R.K. NC 100 Alprazolam GG249 11/18/2016 F.W. NC 100. Alprazolam GG249 11/20/2016 z.w. NY 100 Alprazolam GG249 11/18/2016 x.c. OH 100 Alprazolam GG249 11/18/2016 P.H~ PA 100 Alprazolath GG249 6

Case 2:16-cr-00631-DAK Document 32 Filed 05/31/17 Page 7 of 22 11/20/2016 N.H. SC 100 Alprazolam GG249 11/20/2016 D.L. SC 100 Alprazolam GG249 11/18/2016 R.T. TN 100 Alprazolam GG249. 11/20/2016 c.s. TN. 100. Alprazolam. GG249 11/18/2016 A.S. TX 100 Alprazolam GG249 Aiding and Abetting the Use of the U.S. Mail in Furtherance of a Drug Trafficking Offense on the following dates to the following addressees, each in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 843(b) and Title 18, United States Code, Section'2: Date Addressee State Number Controlled Markings of Pills Substance 11/22/2016 T.G. NC 50 Fentanyl M/30 11/22/2016 E.S. NC 100 Fentanyl A215 11/22/2016 E.J. NC 100 Fentanyl M/30 11/22/2016 B.F. ND 500 Fentanyl M/30 11/22/2016 D.P.. NY 100 Fentanyl M/30 11/22/2016 R.W. SC 50 Fentanyl M/30 11/22/2016 M.E. SD 500 Fentanyl A215 11/22/2016 G.V. VA 100 Fentanyl M/30 Aiding and Abetting the Distribution of Fentanyl on or about April 27, 2016, to D.M., ~11 in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 841(a)(l) and Title '7

Case 2:16-cr-00631-DAK Document 32 Filed 05/31/17 Page 8 of 22 18, United States Code, Section 2; Aiding and Abetting the Distribution of Fentanyl on or about June 14, 2016, to D.M., all in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 84l(a)(l) and Title 18,.United States Code, Section 2; and Aiding and Abetting the Distribution offentanyl on or about June 12, 2016, to J.A.., all in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 84l(a)(l) and Title 18, United States Code, Section 2; which violations were part of a continuing series of violations of the Controlled Substances Act, Title 21, United States Code, Section 801, et seq., undertaken by defendant, AARON MICHAEL SHAMO, in concert with at least five other persons with respect to whom AARON MICHAEL SHAMO occupied a position of organizer, supervisor, and any position of management, and from which such continuing series of violations the defendant obtained substantial income and resources. Furthermore, the defendant,. AARON MICHAEL SHAMO, was a principal administrator, organizer, supervisor and leader of the criminal enterprise, which involved possession with intent to distribute and distribution of more than 12,000 grams of a mixture and sul::>stance containing a detectable amount of Fentanyl (N-phenyl-N- [ 1- ( 2- phenylethyl) -4-piperidinyl ] propanamide ), a schedule II controlled substance within the meaning of 21 U.S.C. 812; all in violation of 21 U.S.C. 848(b)(l) and (2)(A) and punishable under 21 U.S.C. 848(b). 8

Case 2:16-cr-00631-DAK Document 32 Filed 05/31/17 Page 9 of 22 COUNT2 (21 U.S.C. 846 & 84l(a)(l), CONSPIRACY TO DISTRIBUTE FENTANYL) Beginning on a date unknown to the Grand Jury, but at least by February 3, 2016, and continuing to at least November 22, 2016, in the Central Division of the Distriet of Utah and elsewhere,. DREW WILSON CRANDALL, ALEXANDRYA MARIE TONGE, KATHERINE LAUREN ANNE BUSTIN, MARIO ANTHONY NOBLE, and SEAN MICHAEL GYGI,. defendants herein, did combine, conspire, confederate and agree with AARON MICHAEL SHAMO, with each other, and with other persons, both known and unknown to the Grand Jury, to knowingly and intentionally distribute four hundred grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of Fentanyl (N-phenyl-N- [ 1- ( 2-phenylethyl) -4-piperidinyl ] propanamide ), a Schedule II controlled substance within the meaning of 21 U.S.C. 812, all in violation of21 U.S.C. 846 and 841(a)(l) and punishable under 21 U.S.C. 84l(b)(l)(A). COUNT3 (21 U.S.C. 846 & 841(a)(l), CONSPIRACY TO DISTRIBUTE ALPRAZOLAM) Beginning on a date unknown to the Grand Jury, but at least by December 22, 2015, and continuing to at least November 22, 2016, in the Central Division of the District of Utah and elsewhere, DREW WILSON CRANDALL, ALEXANDRYA MARIE TONGE, KATHERINE LAUREN ANNE BUSTIN, MARIO ANTHONY NOBLE, and 9

Case 2:16-cr-00631-DAK Document 32 Filed 05/31/17 Page 10 of 22 SEAN MICHAEL GYGI,. defendants herein, did combine, conspire, confederate and agree with AARON MICHAEL SHAMO, with each other, and with other persons, both known and unknown to the Grand Jury, to lrnowingly and intentionally distribut.e a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of Alprazolam, a Schedule IV controlled substance within the meaning of21 U.S.C. 812, all in violation of21 U.S.C. 846 and 84l(a)(l) and punishable under 21 U.S.C. 84l(b)(2).., elsewhere, COUNT4 (21 U.S.C. 952, AIDING AND ABETTING THE IMPORTATION OF A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE) On or about June 23, 2016, in the Central Division of the District of Utah and AARON MICHAEL SHAMO, defendant herein, did intentionally and lrnowingly import from the country of China into the United States 40 grams or more of a mixture and substance containing a detectable amount offentanyl (N'."phenyl-N- [ 1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidinyl] propanamide), a Schedule II controlled substance within the meaning of 21 U.S.C. 812, and did aid and abet therein, all in violation of 21.U.S.C. 952(a), 960, and 18 U.S.C. 2, and punishable under 21U.S.C. 960(b)(2). 10

Case 2:16-cr-00631-DAK Document 32 Filed 05/31/17 Page 11 of 22 elsewhere, COUNTS (21 U.S.C. 952, AIDING AND ABETTING THE IMPORTATION OF A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE). On or about November 8, 2016, in the Central Division of the District of Utah and AARON MICHAEL SHAMO, defendant herein, did intentionally and knowingly import from the country of China into the United States a mixture and substance containing a detectable amount of Alprazolam, a Schedule IV controlled substance within the meaning of 21 U.S.C. 812; and did aid and abet therein, all in violation of 21U.S.C. 952(a), 960, and 18 U.S.C. 2, and punishable under 21 U.S.C. 960(b)(2). elsewhere, COUNT6 (21 U.S.C. 952, AIDING AND ABETTING THE IMPORTATION OF A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE) On or about November 17, 2016, in the Central Division of the District of Utah and AARON MICHAEL SHAMO, and SEAN MICHAEL GYGI, defendants herein, did intentionally and knowingly import from the country of China into the united States 40 grams or more of a mixture and substar;i.ce containing a detectable amount offentanyl (N-phenyl-N- [ 1- ( 2-phenylethyl )-4-piperidinyl] propanamide), a Schedule II controlled substance within the meaning of21 U.S.C. 812, and did aid and abet therein, all in violation of 21 U.S.C. 952(a), 960, and 18 U.S.C. 2, and punishable under 21 U.S.C. 960(b)(2). 11

Case 2:16-cr-00631-DAK Document 32 Filed 05/31/17 Page 12 of 22 COUNT7 (21 U.S.C. 84l(a)(l), POSSESSION OF FENTANYL WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE) On or about November 22, 2016, in the Central Division of the District of Utah,. AARON MICHAEL SHAMO, the defendant herein, did knowingly and intentionally possess with intent to distribute four hun.dted grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of Fentanyl (N-phenyl-N- [ 1- ( 2-phenylethyl) -4-piperidirtyl] propanamide), a Schedule II controlled substance within the meaning of21.u.s.c. 8i2; all in violation of 21 U.S.C.. 84l(a)(l) and punishable pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 841(b)(l)(A). COUNTS (21 U.S.C. 84l(a)(l), POSSESSION OF FENTANYL WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE) On or about November 22, 2016, in.the Central Division of the District of Utah, ALEXANDRYA MARIE TONGE, and KATHERINE LAUREN ANNE BUSTIN, defendants herein, did lmowingly and intentionally possess with intent to distribute four. hundred grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of Fentanyl (N-phenyl-N- [ 1- ( 2-phenylethyl) -4-piperidinyl ]. propali.amide), a Schedule II controlled substance within the meaning of21 U.S.C. 812; all in violation of 21 U.s.c: 84l(a)(l) an<:l punishable pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 84l(b)(l)(A). 12

Case 2:16-cr-00631-DAK Document 32 Filed 05/31/17 Page 13 of 22 COUNT9 (21 U.S.C. 841(a)(l), MANUFACTURE OF ALPRAZOLAM) On or about November 22, 2016, in the Central Division of the District of Utah, AARON MICHAEL SHAMO, the defendant herein, did knowingly and intentionally manufacture a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of Alprazolam, a Schedule IV controlled ~ubstance within the meaning; of 21 U.S.C. 812; all in violation of 21 U.S.C. 841(a)(l) and punishable pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 841(b)(2). COUNT 10 (21 U.S.C. 33l(k) & 333(b)(7), KNOWING AND.INTENTIONAL ADULTERATION OF DRUGS WHILE HELD FOR SALE Beginning on a date unknown to the Grand Jury, but at least by February 3, 2016, and continuing to at least November 22, 2016, in the Central Division of the District of Utah, AARON MICHAEL SHAMO, defendant herein, lmowingly and intentionally manufactured a drug and caused the manufacture of a drug-specifically, round blue tablets debossed with "A 215" on the bisected side-and offered those tablets for sale on the internet as "Oxycodorie 30 mg." Despite these representations, the.defendant did not use Oxycodone at all in the manufacturing process, but instead, substituted Fentatiyl, a much more potent synthetic opioid. These acts caused the drug to be adulterated as defined at 21 U.S.C. 35l(b) and 3 51 ( d), and the adulteration had a reasonable probability of causing serious adverse health consequences or death to humans. The manufacturing of these chugs was 13

Case 2:16-cr-00631-DAK Document 32 Filed 05/31/17 Page 14 of 22 performed after the component ingredients of the tablets had been shipped in interstate commerce, from outside of Utah to Utah, and while the drugs were held for sale. All this was in violation of21 U.S.C. 331(k) and 333(b)(7) and is punishable pursuant to 21 u.s.c. 333(b )(7). COUNT 11 (21 U.S.C. 33l(k) & 333(b)(7), KNOWING AND INTENTIONAL ADULTERATION OF DRUGS WHILE HELD FOR SALE) Beginning on a date unknown to the Grand Jury, but at least by June 18, 2016, and continuing to at.least November 22, 2016, in the Central Division of the District of Utah, AARON MICHAEL SHA.MO, defendant herein, knowingly and intentionally manufactured a drug and caused the manufacture of a drug-specifically, round blue tablets with "!Ml" on one side and a "30" above a bisect on the other-and offered those tablets for sale on the intemetas "Oxycodone 30 mg." Despite these representations, the defendant did not use Oxycodone at all in the manufacturing process, but instead, substituted Fentanyl, a much more potent synthetic opioid. These acts caus.ed the drug to be adulterated as defined at 21 U.S.C. 35l(b) and 35l(d), and the adulteration had a reasonable probability of causing serious adverse health consequences or death to humans. The manufacturing of these drugs was performed after the component ingredients of the tablets had been shipped in interstate commerce, from outside of Utah to Utah, and while the drugs were held for sale. All this was in violation of 21 U.S.C. 33 l(k) and 333(b )(7) and is punishable pursuant to 21 u.s.c. 333(b)(7). 14

Case 2:16-cr-00631-DAK Document 32 Filed 05/31/17 Page 15 of 22 COUNT 12 (21 U.S.C. 843(b), USE OF THE U.S. MAIL IN FURTHERANCE OF A DRUG TRAFFICKJNG OFFENSE) On or about September 12-23, 2016, in the Central Division of the District of Utah, AARON MICHAEL SHAMO, ALEXANDRYA MARIE TONGE, KATHERINE LAUREN ANNE BUSTIN, and SEAN MICHAEL GYGI, the defendants herein, did lmowingly and intentionally use a communication facility, the U.S. Mail, in facilitating the commission of any act constituting a felony under Title 21, United States Code, Section 841(a)(l), that is, distribution of a controlled substance; and did aid and abet therein, all in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 843 (b) and Title 18, United States Code, Section 843(b ). Specifically, a package containing Alprazolam tablets and which listed a false return address was sent through the U.S. Mail,.. but was returned by the postal service to the false return address in the date range listed above. T.M., who resided at the address listed on the false return address, received the package of Alprazolam tablets. COUNT 13 (18 U.S.C. 1956(h), CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT MONEY LAUNDERING) Beginning on a date unlmown to the Grand 1ury, but at least by December 22, 2015, and continuing to at least November 22, 2016, in the Central Division of the District of Uta~ and elsewhere, AARON MICHAEL SHAMO, DREW WILSON CRANDALL, ALEXANDRYA MARIE TONGE, and 15

Case 2:16-cr-00631-DAK Document 32 Filed 05/31/17 Page 16 of 22 KATHERINE LAUREN ANNE BUSTIN, defendants herein, did lmowingly combine, conspire, confederate and a~ree with each other and with other persons, both lmown and unlmown to the Grand Jury, to lmowingly conduct and attempt to conduct a financial transaction affecting interstate and foreign commerce, to wit, wire transfers, bank deposits, electronic funds transfers, automated clearing house payments, and the interstate movement of cash, which involved the proceeds of a specified unlawful activity, that is, the distribution of a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. 84l(a)(l), with the intent to promote, conceal, and disguise the carrying on of specified unlawful activity, that is, distribution of a controlled substance, and that while conducting and attempting to conduct such financial transactions lmew that the property involved in the financial transactions represented the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity in violation of 18.U.S.C. l956(a)(l)(a)(i) and (a)(l)(b)(i); all in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1956(h). count 14 (18 U.S.C. 1956(a)(l)(B)(i)~ MONEY LAUNDERING CONCEALMENT) On or about November 8, 2016, in the Central Division of the District of Utah, AARON MICHAEL SHA.MO, defendant herein, did knowingly conduct and attempt to conduct a financial transaction affecting interstate c.ommerce, to wit a hank deposit, which involved the proceeds of a specified unlawful activity, that is the distribution of a controlled substance, with the intent to conceal the nature, source, location, ownership, and control of the proceeds of the specified unlawful activity, to wit: distribµtion of a controlled substance in violation 16

Case 2:16-cr-00631-DAK Document 32 Filed 05/31/17 Page 17 of 22 of 21 U.S.C. 841(a)(l); and that while conducting and attempting to conduct such financial transaction knew that. the property involved in the financia} transaction represented the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity; all in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1956(a)(l)(B)(i). COUNT 15 (18 U.S.C. 1957(a), ENGAGING IN MONETARY TRANSACTIONS IN PROPERTY DERIVED FROM SPECIFIED UNLAWFUL ACTIVITY) On or about May 5, 2016, in the Central Division of the District of Utah, AARON MICHAEL SHAMO, defendant herein, did knowingly engage and attempt to.engage in a monetary transaction by, through, or to a financial institution, affecting interstate commerce, in criminally derived property of a value greater than $10,000, that is, issue a persona,} check, such property having been derived from a specified unlawful activity, that is, distribution of a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. 841(a)(l); all in violation of Title 18, United States Codes, Sections 1957(a). NOTICE OF INTENTION TO SEEK CRIMINAL FORFEITURE Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 853, upon conviction of any offense in violation of 21 U.S.C. 841, 846, 848, and/or 952, as set forth in this indictment, the defendant shall forfeit to the United States of America any property constituting, or derived from, any proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, as the result of such offenses and any property used, or intended to be used, in any manner or.part, to commit, or to facilitate the 17

Case 2:16-cr-00631-DAK Document 32 Filed 05/31/17 Page 18 of 22 commission of, the offenses. The property to be forfeited includes, but is not limited to, the following: CURRENCY. $1,227,773.00 in United States Currency $19,520.00 in United States Currency $429,600.00 in United States Currency AUTOMOBILES A 2011 Ford F-350 pickup, VIN#1FT8W3BT7BEC88017 A 2008 BMW 135i, VIN#WBAUC73508VF25535 MISCELLANEOUS The pill press seized from the garage at Aaron SHAMO's residence on Titian Way. Here is a photo: 18

Case 2:16-cr-00631-DAK Document 32 Filed 05/31/17 Page 19 of 22 The following dies/punches: Item Punch Embossing Comparison Comparison Tablet(s) Available Tablet(s) Items Item 20 GG249 (w/% YES 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, A1 c ores) 19 Item 20 GG24 9 (w/% YES 14; 15, 16, 17, 18, A2 cores) 19' Item 20 (Slug - not a tablet NO NOT APPLICABLE A3 punch) Item 20 2. (w/ % cqres) NO NOT AVAILABLE B1 Item 20 2 (w/ % cores) NO NOT AVAILABLE 82 Item 20 2 (w/ %.cores) NO NOT AVAILABLE B3 Item 20 2 (w/ % cores) NO NOT AVAILABLE B4 Item 20 XANAX (w/% NO NOT AVAILABLE B5 cores) Item 20 XA N AX (w/% NO NOT AVAILABLE B6 cores) Item 20 XA N AX (w/% NO NOT AVAILABLE B7 cores) Item 20 XA N AX (w/% NO NOT AVAILABLE B8 cores) Item 20 10/325 NO. NOT AVAILABLE B9 Item 20 XA N AX (w/%. NO NOT AVAILABLE B10 cores) Item 20 2 (w/ % cores) NO NOT AVAILABLE B11 Item 20 M523 NO NOT AVAILABLE B12 Item 20 M523 NO NOT AVAILABLE B13 Item 20 M523 NO NOT AVAILABLE B14 Item 20 M523 NO NOT AVAILABLE B15 Item 20 M523 NO NOT AVAILABLE 19

Case 2:16-cr-00631-DAK Document 32 Filed 05/31/17 Page 20 of 22 B16" Item 20 10/325 NO NOT AVAILABLE 817 Item 20 10/325 NO NOT AVAILABLE B18 Item 20 10/325.NO NOT AVAILABLE B19 Item 20 10/325 NO NOT AVAILABLE B20 Item 20 R039 (w/% NO NOT AVAILABLE B21 cores) Item 20 10 metal die with No Analyses No Analyses oval shaped Performed Performed throurih holes Item 21 M (enclosed in a YES 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13 A1 square) Item 21 M (enclosed in a YES 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13 A2. square) Item 21 M (enclosed_ in a YES 6,8,9, 10, 12, 13 A3 square) Item 21 M (enclosed in a YES 6,8,9, 10, 12, 13 A4 square) Item 21 M (enclosed in a YES 6, 8,.9, 10, 12, 13 A5 square) Item 21. M (enclosed in a YES 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13 A6 square) Item 21 M (enclosed in a YES 6,8,9, 10, 12, 13 A7 square) Item 21 M (enclosed in a YES 6,8,9, 10, 12, 13 AB square) Item 21 M (enclosed in a YES 6,8,9, 10, 12, 13 A9 square) Item 22 GG249 (w/% YES 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, A1 cores) 19 Item 22 GG249 (w/% YES 14, 15, 16, 17," 18, A2 cores) 19 Item 22 GG249 (w/% YES. 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, A3 cores) 19 Item 22 GG 2 4 9 (w/% YES 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20

Case 2:16-cr-00631-DAK Document 32 Filed 05/31/17 Page 21 of 22 A4 cores) 19 Item 22 GG 24 9 (w/% YES 14, 15, 16, 1.7, 18, AS cores) 19 Item 22 GG249 (w/% YES. 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, A6 cores) 19 ltem22 GG 24 9 (w/% YES 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, A? cores) 19 Item 22 GG249 (w/% YES 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, AB cores) 19 MONEY JUDGMENT. A MONEY JUDGMENT equal to the value of any proceyds obtained, directly or indirectly, as the result of such offenses and any property used, or intended to be used, in any manner or part, to commit, or to facilitate the commission of, the offenses. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 982(a)(l), upon conviction of any offense in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1956 and/or 1957, the defendants shall forfeit to the United States of America any property, real or personal, involved in such violations, and any property traceable to such property. The property to be forfeited includes, but is not limited to the following: A MONEY WDGMENT equal to the value of all property involved in the money laundering and any property traceable to such property. If more than one defendant is convicted of an offense, the defendants so convicted shall be jointly and severally liable for the forfeiture related to such offense. 21

Case 2:16-cr-00631-DAK Document 32 Filed 05/31/17 Page 22 of 22 SUBSTITUTE ASSETS If any of the property described above, as a result of any act or omission of the defendants: a. cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; b. has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party; c.. has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court; d. has been substantially diminished in value; or has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided without difficulty, the United States of America shall be entitled to forfeiture of substitute property pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 853(p), as incorporated by 28 U.S.C. 2461(c). ATRUEBILL: JOHN W. HUBER United States Attorney ND JURY DD, Special Assistant United States Attorney VERNON STEJSKAL, Assistant United States Attorney 22