Case 0:17-cr BB Document 125 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/23/2018 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT CO URT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Similar documents
Case 1:16-cr BB Document 101 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2017 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:18-cr MGC Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/19/2018 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

The Office of the United States A torney for the Southern District of Florida (hereinafter

Section 1B1.2(a) of the Sentencing Guidelines.

SOUTHEIWDISTQIGT 17 - F 0 FLORIDA or 2R-sc0u

Case 9:16-cr RLR Document 112 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/04/2017 Page 1 of 8 UM TED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CR-COHN/SELTZER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Southern District of Florida Miami Division

CR-BLOOM/VALLE

United States District Court

Case 3:10-cr FDW Document 3 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 7

1. The defendant understands her rights as follows:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. Eastern Division

violate the Anti-kickback Statute, Title 42, United States Code, Section 1320a-7b(b), w lich makes

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOLTTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT WYANDOT COUNTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO

Case 1:09-md JLK Document 4062 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/03/2015 Page 1 of 7

Re: United States v. Alfonso Portillo, 09 Cr (RPP)

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT.,Esq.

United States District Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS : CRIMINAL ACTION : NO. GUILTY PLEA COLLOQUY

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL NO. 1:04CV46 (1:01CR45 & 3:01CR11-3)

ENTRY ORDER SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO DECEMBER TERM, 2012

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

AT SEA TILE. The United States of America, by and through John McKay, United States Attorney 16

FlLED RECEIVED. Case 2:09-cr ROS Document 152 Filed 11/08/10 Page 1 of 8 ~LODGED COPY NOV Ct.ERK US DISTRICT COURT DISTR CT OF A.

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Jury Trial Demanded

Case 2:12-cr AWA-TEM Document 51 Filed 05/09/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 147 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THI

Case 1:17-cr RC Document 3 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 10. United States v. Michael T. Flynn

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

Case &:11 cr JMM Document 257 Filed 09/17/12 Page 1 of 12. INTHEUNITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURT FILED s EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 8.02

Delinquency Hearings

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Sentence Vacated; Case Remanded for Resentencing.

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

CR-MAR MATTHEW MAN

LIMITED OFFICIAL USE

8:15-cr JFB-FG3 Doc # 7 Filed: 04/10/15 Page 1 of 7 - Page ID # 19

OFr i c. OF The. CLERK

Case 2:18-cr JPS Filed 03/12/18 Page 1 of 16 Document 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA. ) No. 3:17-cr TMB ) ) ) ) ) PLEA AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. ANGEL MELENDEZ-ORSINI, a/k/a Gelo, a/k/a Cerebro, a/k/a Primo, Defendant, Appellant. No.

Case: 1:02-cr Document #: 92 Filed: 02/28/03 Page 1 of 19 PageID #:257

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. L Appellee Trial Court No.

FILED DEC Q--IL. DecemberJ, 2008

LED. the right to request a proceeding in accordance with sections and , Florida. Docketed by

No. 74 DB (Out of State) stating that he desires to resign from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in

CR-WILLIAMS/SIMONTON

UNI TED STATES DI STRI CT COURT EASTERN DI STRI CT OF MI SSOURI EASTERN DI VI SI ON

Case 1:12-cr DMM Document 119 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/10/2012 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 2:12-cr JES-UAM Document 41 Filed 07/01/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID 110

States Department of Justice, Cdminal Division, Fraud Section (colectively, <ethis Office'l and

FIRST AMENDMENT TO INTERLOCAL CONTRACT. Between DOUGLAS COUNTY, NEVADA. And CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CALIFORNIA

Case: Document: Filed: 09/04/2012 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Filed: September 04, 2012

United States District Court SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION DIVISION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT

2013 PA Super 132. BEFORE: MUSMANNO, PANELLA and STRASSBURGER*, JJ. OPINION BY MUSMANNO, J.: FILED: May 28, 2013

Origin. What Every Notary Should Know. Richard Alexander Gwinnett County Clerk of Superior Court. L aw re n c e v ille, G A Ju n e 2 0,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division PLEA AGREEMENT

Constitutional Law: Arizona Gun Rights

Case 9:14-cv RLR Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2014 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE TIORTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA. ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER S (Supersedes Administrative Order S )

Case 1:09-mj JMF Document 3 Filed 01/12/2009 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PLEA AGREEMENT

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Two of the Information charges the defendant with conspiring to travel in foreign

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 2:03-cr JDB Document 64 Filed 07/06/05 Page 1 of 13 PageID 105. WESTERN DIVISION INITIALS:.At-[;L..w:::;.. _ CR. NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 9:19-cr RKA Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/12/2019 Page 1 of 5

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 91 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY INTRODUCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CR-ZLOCH/ROSENBAUM CASE NO CR-ZLOCH/ROSENBAUM

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:16-cr FAM Document 98 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2016 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

COURTS: Provides for the Municipal and Traffic Court of New Orleans. Page 1 of 11

Case 4:11 cr JMM Document 260 Filed 09/17/12 Page U.S. 1 DISTRICT of 12 COURT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) No.

STATE OF OHIO NABIL N. JAFFAL

United States v. Biocompatibles, Inc. Criminal Case No.

COLORADO Restraining Order against defendant

LOCAL RULES OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs December 16, 2014

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE June 2000 Session

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********

TYPE OF OFFENSE(S) AND SECTION NUMBER(S) LIST OFFENSE(S), CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S) 3. CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S)

Case 3:06-cr AWT Document 4 Filed 11/22/06 Page 1 of 8

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS DECISION

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO ALACHUA COUNTY DRUG COURT

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs August 5, 2014

AGREEMENT ON FILM CO- PRODUCTIONS BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLI C OF SOUTH AFRI CA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE I TALI AN REPUBLI C

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 26, 2006

Rule 900. Scope; Notice In Death Penalty Cases.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. Attorney, and the defendant, Kurt W. Donsbach, with the advice and

Transcription:

Case 0:17-cr-60022-BB Document 125 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/23/2018 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT CO URT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 17-60022-CR-BLOOM UNITED STATES O F AM ERICA V. ESTEBAN SANTIAGO-RUIZ, Defendant. / PLEA AGREEMENT The United States of America and ESTEBAN SANTIAGO-RUIZ ( ereinafter referred to as Slthe defendanf') enter into the following agreement: l. The defendant offers and agrees to plead guilty to Counts 1 thr ugh 1 of the indictm ent, w hich charge the defendant w ith Violence at an Internatio al Airport Causing Death, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 37(a)(1) (Counts 1 through 5) and Violence at an lnternational Airport Causing Serious Bodil lnjury, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 37(a)(1) (Counts 6 throu 11), and agrees to the rest of the terms of this agreement in consideration for the go emment's agreem ent to not seek the death penalty in this case. In exchange for the defen ant's offer and agreement to plead guilty to Counts l-1 1, and the other tenns of this agr em ent, the U nited States agrees to dismiss the remaining counts of the indictment at e tim e of sentencing. 2. The defendant understands and acknow ledges that, w ith respec to each of Counts 1 tltrough 5, the statutory m aximum penalty is death. Given that the d ath penalty is not being sought by the government under the term s of this plea agreement, th maximum

Case 0:17-cr-60022-BB Document 125 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/23/2018 Page 2 of 5 W penalty which the Court may im pose as to each of Counts 1 through 5 is life impr sonm ent, folowed by a tenn of supelwised release of up to five years. The defendant u derstands and acknowledges that, with respcct to each of Counts 6 through 11, the statutory m aximum sentence is twenty years' imprisonm ent, fo lowed by a term of pervised release of up to three years. In addition to the term s of im prisonm ent and pervised release, the Court may impose a tine of up to $250,000 for each count of convic ion. The defendant further understands and acknowledges that, in addition to any sentenc imposed, the Court m ust order that the defendant pay restitution to the victim s of his offe ses. 3. The defendant agrees that he will disgorge and pay to the Court Clerk for the Southern District of Florida, for the purpose of distributing restitution to vict m s of the crimes, any m onies, in whatever form, paid to the defendant, or on his behalf to nother, in retul'n for writing, interviews, documentaries, movies, or other infonnation di closed by the defendant, including, but not lim ited to access to the defendant, photographs r draw ing of or by the defendant, or any other type of artifact or memorabilia. 4. The defendant further understands and acknowledges that, in add' ion to the sentence imposed under paragraph 2 of this agreement, a special assessment in t e am ount of $100 per count of conviction, totaling $1,100, wil be imposed on the defend nt, which wil be paid by the defendant at the time of sentencing. 5. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(C), e United States and the defendant agree that the fo lowing sentence is the appropriate dis osition of this case: As to each of Counts 1 tluvugh 5, the parties jointly agree that the ourt wil sentence the defendant to life im prisonm ent, with each term to be served conse utively to one another. As to each of Counts 6 through 1 1, the parties jointly agree tha the Court 2

Case 0:17-cr-60022-BB Document 125 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/23/2018 Page 3 of 5 w il sentence the defendant to twenty years' im prisonm ent, with each term to be served consecutively to one another and consecutively to the sentences imposed as t Counts 1 through 5. Thus, the United States and the defendant jointly agree that the ourt wil impose a total sentence of five consecutive life sentences, followed by 120 ye rs' (1,440 months') imprisomnent in this case. The United States and the defendant agr e that this is a substantively reasonable sentence in this case. 6. The defendant is aware that Title 28, United States Code, Sectio 1291 and Title 18, United States Code, Section 3742 afford the defendant the right to ppeal the sentence im posed in this case. Acknowledging this, in exchange for the un ertakings m ade by the United States in this plea agreem ent, the defendant hereby waive al1 rights conferred by Sections 1291 and 3742 to appeal any sentence imposed, incl ding any restitution order, or to appeal the m armer in w hich the sentence w as im posed, unless the sentence exceeds the maxim um pennited by statute. This appelate w aiver in ludes, but is not limited to, any right to appeal the Court's entry of judgment and the suf lciency of the evidence. The defendant further understands that nothing in this agree ent shal affect the government's right and/or duty to appeal as set forth in Title 18, Un ted States Code, Section 3742(b) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 1291. How ver, if the United States appeals the defendant's sentence pursuant to Sections 3742(b) an l29 1, the defendant shall be released from the above waiver of appelate rights. The defendant further hereby w aives a 1 rights conferred by Title 28, United States Code, Secti n 1291 to assert any claim that (1) the statutets) to which the defendant is pleading g ilty is/are unconstitutional; and/or (2) the admited conduct does not fal within the sc pe of the statutets) of conviction. By signing this agreement, the defendant acknowled es that he 3

Case 0:17-cr-60022-BB Document 125 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/23/2018 Page 4 of 5 * has discussed the appeal waiver set forth in this agreement with his atto y. The defendant further agrees, together with the United States, to request that the di rict court enter a specific finding that the defendant's waiver of his right to appeal the sent nce to be imposed in this case was knowing and voluntary. The defendant also agrees to forfeit to the United States, volu tarily and im m ediately, a1 of his right, title and interest to one W alther 9m m pistol, M del PPC, Serial No. A.17298, which constitutes a fireann that was involved in, or us d in, the com mission of the instant ofenses. 8. If the defendant's guilty plea is rejected, withdrawn, vacated, or r versed by any court at a later proceeding, this O fice will be free to prosecute the defen ant for al charges set forth in the lndictm ent; any charges that have been dism issed beca se of this plea agreem ent wil autom atically be reinstated; and al1 penalties for thos charges, including the death penalty, may be pursued by this Oft-ice. The defendant aives any objections, motions, or defenses based upon the Speedy Trial Act or the Sixth endment to the Constitution as to the delay occasioned by such later proeeedings. 4

Case 0:17-cr-60022-BB Document 125 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/23/2018 Page 5 of 5 9. This is the entire agreement and understanding between the Uni ed States and the defendant. There arc no other agreements, promises, represent tions, or understandings. BENJAMIN G. GREENBERG UNITED STAT S Y Date:5 f RICARDO A. DEL TORO ASSISTANT l D r ES ATTO EY Date: LAWREN E D. LW ECCHIO p # ASSISG N/ UNITED STATES ATTO EY., -..;)..... a.,' Date: 5 't t k1 ẹ.'< ' '.>%. y '.--.N, -- 'f -,-'-' ' C EN AT E FOR DEFENDANT. axr '? 6.'% / ' e',' '- 'R' #'*F - '.. *. ' z,p,za cf,-.f'3ï. ' s' -.' :. -.-),- Date: 5 z.s t $ -,,.-.--; -..-..-..,- ' t;y,.-. OR A. DOP O /AT ORNEY FOR DEFENDANT : *' k Date: 5 t t 1 ESTEBAN SANTIAGO-RU DEFENDANT 5