C ÝS- C~PRT.QF TNE CITY OF STAUNTON. STAO0-Fô,A

Similar documents
CASE NO. CL JAMES DANIEL GRIFFITH VSB DOCKET NOS.:

BEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF VSB DOCKET NO KATHRYNE LOUISE WARD

--*L.-S?,4ìžmfw,15]bb, CÉeíiudgL TB- l i VIRGINIA: IN THE MATTER OF AGREED D SPOSITION MEMORANDUM ORDER

represented by counsel. The Virginia State Bar appeared through its Assistant Bar Counsel, Elizabeth K.

VSB CLERK'S OFFICE BEFORE THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD

BEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD ORDER OF SUSPENSION

IN THE MATTER OF VSB Docket Nos HENRY A. WHITEHURST ORDER

VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE THIRD DISTRICT, SECTION II SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR

VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD OPINION AND ORDER

VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD. IN THE MATTER OF VSB Docket No SAM GARRISON ORDER OF REVOCATION

BEFORE THE FIFTH DISTRICT, SECTION III SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR

VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF SHELLY RENEE COLLETTE VSB DOCKET NO.: ORDER OF SUSPENSION

BEFORE THE FIFTH DISTRICT SECTION I SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR SUBCOMMITTEE DETERMINATION (PUBLIC REPRIMAND WITH TERMS)

BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR IN THE MATTER OF SHERRI ANN THAXTON. VSB DOCKET NO AMENDED MEMORANDUM ORDER

eihj oj, 9lid'urumd on.m.tmdtuj tiie 16 t1t day oj, Up'til, 2018.

BEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD. IN THE MATTER OF VSB Docket No Martin F. McMahon AMENDED ORDER OF SUSPENSION

TVSB ). Virginia (1950) as amended, consisting ofthe Honorable Joel C. Cunningham, Retired Judge of

BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR. VSB Docket No , , , ORDER OF REVOCATION

BEFORE THE FIFTH DISTRICT-SECTION III SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR SUBCOMMITTEE DETERMINATION PUBLIC REPRIMAND, WITH TERMS

BEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF VSB DOCKET: ELLIOT M. SCHLOSSER ORDER

RECEIVED DEC Respondent. impaneled pursuant to Section ofthe Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, consisting

BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR. IN THE MATTER OF JOHN COURY MACDONALD, ESQUIRE VSB Docket Number ORDER

Trust accounting. A. Required records; maintenance and reporting. (1) Types of records. Every attorney subject to these rules shall maintain

Case KRH Doc 1952 Filed 04/05/16 Entered 04/05/16 22:00:50 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 10

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

MEMORANDUM ORDER. This matter came on March 11, 201 0, to be heard on the Agreed Disposition of the

BEFORE THE FIRST DISTRICT SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR. IN THE MATTER OF Kevin Peter Shea VSB Docket No

RECEIVED. Dec 8, 2017 VIRGINIA STATE BAR CLERK'S OFFICE BEFORE THE FOURTH DISTRICT, SECTION I SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

TITLE 2 PROCEDURAL RULE BOARD OF ARCHITECTS SERIES 2 DISCIPLINARY AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURES FOR ARCHITECTS

disciplinary actions

DISCIPLINARY PROCESS of the VIRGINIA STATE BAR

BEFORE THE FIFTH DISTRICT COMMITTEE SECTION I OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR SUBCOMMITTEE DETERMINATION (PUBLIC REPRIMAND WITH TERMS)

Bar within 60 days of the effective day of the Revocation or Suspension that such notices have been timely

BEFORE THE SIXTH DISTRICT SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR

Case KRH Doc 3860 Filed 05/18/17 Entered 05/18/17 13:22:39 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 21

ofthe State Bar of Texas appeared by attorney and announced ready. Respondent, Bryan P. Cartall,

OF THE SUPREME COURT OFTENNES. ' IN RE: ROBERT PHILIP RAYBURN, DOCKET NO (C)*JV BPR No.16557, An

TITLE 27 PROCEDURAL RULE BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN COUNSELING SERIES 12 CONTESTED CASE HEARING PROCEDURE FOR MARRIAGE AND FAMILY THERAPIST

v. Case No [VSB Docket No.: ] ROBERT W. HAAS,

BEFORE THE FIFTH DISTRICT-SECTION II SUBCOMMITTEE OF TIIE Vffi.GINIA ST ATE BAR SUBCOMMITTEE DETERMINATION (PUBLIC REPRIMAND WITHOUT TERMS)

9:30 a.m. MOTION CALL, CASE MANAGEMENT, STATUS DATES 10:00 a.m. 2:30 p.m. MATTERS SET BY THE COURT

BEFORE THE FOURTH DISTRICT SUBCOMMITTEE SECTION II OF THE VIRGINIA ST ATE BAR

Rule 1.8 Service Methods. (a) Except as provided in Rule 4.2 and Rule 8.9, any pleading or document required under these rules to be served on an

Rules for Qualified & Court-Appointed Parenting Coordinators

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA AT RICHMOND IN THE MATTER OF SUPREME COURT RULES, PART 6, IV, PARAGRAPH 13 PETITION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) [TFB Nos ,980(07B); v ,684(07B)]

BEFORE THE FIFTH DISTRICT- SECTION II SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR 1/:AY 8

AUTO CONNECTION, LLC LONNIE PRATHER

RECEIVERSHIP APPEAL PROCEDURE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ARLINGTON COUNTY. ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT JUDGMENT

em" oj fjlicfummd on fjuday, tfre 30tli day, oj (9clolkJt, 2015.

ARIAS U.S. RULES FOR THE RESOLUTION OF U.S. INSURANCE AND REINSURANCE DISPUTES

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland. Administrative and Procedural Guidelines

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) No. SC Complainant, The Florida Bar File v. No ,577(17J) REPORT OF REFEREE

Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated July 29, 2011, it is hereby

I. CMP Disciplinary Policy & Procedures. A. Objectives

Effective January 1, 2016

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION STANDING ORDER

District of Columbia Court of Appeals Board on Professional Responsibility. Board Rules

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF RICHMOND

BEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD BRENT LAVELLE BARBOUR VSB DOCKET NO.: ORDER OF REVOCATION

BEFORE THE DISTRICT 6 GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE EVIDENTIARY PANEL 6-1 STATE BAR OF TEXAS JUDGMENT OF FULLY PROBATED SUSPENSION. Parties and Appearance

TITLE 8 LEGISLATIVE RULE BOARD OF HEARING-AID DEALERS SERIES 2 CONTESTED CASE HEARING PROCEDURE

S17Y1329. IN THE MATTER OF RICKY W. MORRIS, JR. seeking the disbarment of Ricky W. Morris, Jr. (State Bar No ), based

Case 3:14-cv JAG Document 21 Filed 07/17/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 110

DSCC Uniform Administrative Procedures Policy

Rule 8200 Enforcement Proceedings Introduction Definitions PART A - GENERAL Hearings

CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION CALENDAR 94, COURTROOM CL12 CHICAGO, IL (312)

RECEIVED OEC VSB CLERK'S OFFICE 'VIRGBTIA: Esquire. reasonably be perceived to affect his or her ability to be impartial. Respondent's Proffer.

BYLAWS THE FOUNDATION OF THE SOUTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION OF BLOOD BANKS. Date of Adoption: March 18, Amended: March 9, Amended :July 8, 2011

Henrico Circuit Court

WINCHESTER CIRCUIT COURT FREDERICK-WINCHESTER JUDICIAL CENTER 5 NORTH KENT STREET WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA (540)

BYE LAW 1 INTERPRETATION

BY-LAWS OF MINNESOTA QUARTER HORSE RACING ASSOCIATION ARTICLE I - MEMBERS

APPENDIX RULE MEMBERSHIP CLASSIFICATIONS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT

LLEZELLE DUGGER CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE

EXHIBIT F-1 (I) FORM OF DESIGN-BUILD LETTER OF CREDIT VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND, VA ATTN: [ ]

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF GEORGIA DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS ) ) ) ) ) ) PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL MASTER

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ANSWERS AND OBJECTIONS TO RESPONDENT S EXPERT AND WITNESS INTERROGATORIES GENERAL OBJECTIONS

BYLAWS OF KENT ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP, INC. a Delaware non-profit corporation ARTICLE I PURPOSES

ANSWER. Comes Respondent, George Ernest Faber, by George B. Collins and Kathryne Hayes, his

PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURES & PROTOCOL FOR JURY TRIALS & REFERRAL TO MEDIATION Revised March 2, 2018 (to correct web link only)

Courtroom Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Elizabeth A. Metzger Courtroom B, Okeechobee County Courthouse

Disciplinary Regulations

RULES OF COURT of the TWENTY-SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT. Revised Effective April 1, Table of Contents

Dominion. May 24, 2018

Consulate General of the Republic of the Philippines San Francisco

What to Do When the Office of Lawyer Regulation Calls

PREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU

3. On April 16, 2001, Chester appeared incourt pro se and pled not guilty to the

TITLE 9. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 63. OATH, ACKNOWLEDGMENT, AND OTHER PROOF ARTICLE 1: OATHS, CERTIFICATIONS, NOTARIZATIONS AND VERIFICATIONS

BEFORE THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ON GRIEVANCES AND DISCIPLINE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO CONSENT TO DISCIPLINE

BYLAWS OF THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES

EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT SEMINOLE COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION K

SUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY IAS PART 14 PART MATRIMONIAL RULES & PROCEDURES (revised 05/23/17)

PLAN OF ORGANIZATION REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FAIRFAX COUNTY

FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 10/13/ :12 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/13/2017

HANS J. LILJEBERG JUDGE

Transcription:

6 VIRGINIA: THIS ORDER WAS NOT RECEIVED INTO THIS OFFICE FOR PROCESSING UNTIL OCTOBER, Ž08. STAO0-Fô,A BEFORE THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ~~ IN THE MATrER OF CASE NO. CL800043-00 FRANKLIN CLEMMER COYNER VSB DOCKET NOS. 7-080-0792 and 7-080-I 0496 AGREED DISPOSITION MEMORANDUM ORDER FOR A PUBLIC REPRIMAND WITH TERMS This matter came to be heard on Friday, September 2,208, before a Circuit Court Three-Judge panel, upon the joint request of the parties for the Court to accept the Agreed Disposition endorsed by the parties and offered to the Court as provided by the Rules ofthe Supreme Court ofvirginia. The panel consisted ofthe Honorable Clifford Lynwood Athey, Jr., Chief Judge ofthe Twenty-sixth Judicial Circuit, Designated Chief Judge, the Honorable Jeanette A. Irby, Judge ofthe Twentieth Judicial Circuit, and the Honorable Richard S. Wallerstein, Chief Judge of the Fourteenth Judicial Circuit. Franklin Clemmer Coyner was present and was represented by counsel, Michael L. Rigsby. The Virginia State Bar appeared through its Assistant Bar Counsel, Paulo E. Franco, Jr. The Chief Judge polled the members of the panel as to whether any of them were aware of any personal or financial interest or bias which would preclude any of them from fairly hearing the matter to which each judge responded in the negative. Court Reporter, Lisa Wright, Chandler and Halasz, P.O. Box 9349, Richmond, Virginia 23227, telephone (804) 730-222, after being duly sworn, reported the hearing and transcribed the proceedings. WHEREFORE, upon consideration of the Agreed Disposition, Certification, Respondent's answer and demand, Respondent's disciplinary record, the arguments of the parties, and after due deliberation, It is ORDERED that the Circuit Court accepts the Agreed Disposition and the Respondent shall receive a Public Reprimand with Terms, as set forth in the Agreed Disposition, which is attached and incorporated in this Memorandum Order. It is further ORDERED that the sanction is effective September 2,208. The Clerk of the Disciplinary System shall assess costs pursuant to 3-9 E. ofthe Rules. A copy teste ofthis Order shall be mailed, to the Respondent, Franklin Clemmer Coyner, at his last address ofrecord with the Virginia State Bar, P,O. Box 2, Stuarts Draft, VA 24477-0002, with an attested copy to Michael L. Rigsby, Michael L. Rigsby, PC, P.O. Box 29328, Henrico, VA 23242, and to Paulo E. Franco, Jr., Assistant Bar Counsel, Virginia State Bar, East Main Street, Suite 700, Richmond, Virginia 2329-0026, and to the Clerk ofthe Disciplinary System, Virginia State Bar, East Main Street, Suite 700, Richmond, VA 2329-0026. ENTERED THIS 25~ DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 208 CIRCUIT C~PRT.QF TNE CITY OF STAUNTON C ÝS- Clifford-Lynwood Athey, Jr., ChiefJqdge Three-Judge Circuit Court TESTE ~<2 drjult Cóbrt, Staunton, VA L~

-' '.'.'*' ".'' 'V..'*W"'.'. V.'..' *V, I VV7 i v-rwv-tv # V-~VVU I *LUV l' VIRGNIA: ]N THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF STAUNTON VIRGINIA STATE BAR EX REL EIGHTH DISIRICT COMMITTEE VSB Docket No. 7-080-0792 8-080-0496 Complalnant, V. Case No. CL80043-00 FRANKLIN CLEMMBR COYNBR Respondent. AGREED DISPOSrrION (PUBLÏC REPRIMAND WITH TERMSÌ Pursuant to the Rules of the Supreme Court ofvirginia~ Part 6, Section IV, f 3-6.H, the Virginia State Bar Anrl Franklin Clemmer Coynor, Rospondcnt~ by their respective counsel,hereby enter into the following Agreed Disposition arising out ofthis matter. L STIPULATIONS OF FACT. During oaløndar years 206 ånd 207, Respondent maintained an IOLTA account ***853 for the receipt and disbuzsemont of client funds. 2, Respondent admits that his n:cords for the receipt and disbursement offunds for IOLTA account *** 853 during calendar years 206 and 207 are incomplete. SpcoiSoally, Respondent oannot demonsuate that he maintained a oash receipts and cash disbursementsjournal for IOLTA account ***853 that oontained Entries ibr recelptø, disbursements, and transfers; An identification ofthe olient matter; The date of the transactioni The name ofthe payor or payee; and The manner in which trust ñlnds were received, disbursed, or transferred from the IOLTA account ***853, for each trust account transaction.

- ' ' W '.,.,.,I, '.."''I,.."'.,,"... /lilli 'W''W.'f.'VV'W 'W'.W.'L...,r V. 3., Respondent did not maintain a separate ledger for each olient from whom he received funds in #ust during calendar years 206 and 207. $ 4. Respondent did not reconcile IOLTA account ***853 during calendar yoars 206 and 207. 5. During calendar years 206 and 207, Respondent acknowledged that deposited some client advance fees directly into operatíng account ****8999. 6. In the çourse oflhe Virgloia State Bar's investigation~ R=pondent stated that the m4iorityofincoming funds were being deposited into bis operating account whioh he alleged was for work he had already completed; however, he was not ablø to provide a complete aooounting due to the s ato ofhis finauoial records. 7. The bar's investigation found no evidence ofany clicots reporting missing money during the period in question. IÏ. > ATURB OF M[SCONDUCT Such conduct by Respondeht constitutes miscooduct in violation ofthc following provisions of the Rules ofprofessional Conduct: RULE I.5 (a)() RULE.5 (b)(3) RULE.5(c)(I) RULE.5(o)(2) RULE.5(c)(3) RULE.5(d)(3) RULE.5 (d)(4) BI, PROPOSED DISPOSmON Accordingly, Assistant Bar COUIlsel, Respondent and Respondent's counsel tender to the Court fjrits approval the Agreed Disposítionofa Publio Reprlmand With Terms as representing an appropriate sanction if this matter were to be heard through an evidentiary hearing. Thc tenns 2

, ''' '-*...V'0.L..'V r. 'V..W '.I.I WW U are as follows:. Respondent shall provide to the Virginia State Bar quarturly audits, prepared and submitted by a Virginia licensed Certified Publio Aocountant demonstrating that hi8 IOLTA trust account is in compliance with the requirements ofrule.5 ofthe Virginia Ruleß of Professional Conduct. Respondent shall provide suoh audits for a period oftwo years. 2. Such audits shall commence with the last quarter of oalcndar year 208. 3. Such audits shall be provlded to the office of Bar Counsel within 45 days althc end ofeach quatter. 4, Respondent shall take 4 hours ofcontlnulng legal eduoation in law office management withjn three (3) months ofthe date ofthe disposition ofthis oaso. Such hour8 shall be in additfon to, and not count towards~ Respondent's continuing legal educaüon requirements. 5, Respondent shall take the 4 additional hours within three (3) months from the date of the entry ofthe disposition ofthis oase, and shall report suoh hours to the Virginia State Bar's MCLB ompliance divtsìon indioating that such hours arc part of a sanotion issued by this Court 6. Respondent shall be on a period ofprobation for a period oftwo years from the date of the entry of any order of disposition. In the event that the Respondent be found guilty of any misconduct involving Rule,5 of the Virgloia Rules ofprofòssional Conduct during the probationary period, Respondent agreeà to an additional thirty (30) day suspension in addition to aoy other period ofsuspension for failure to oomplote any other term of this Public Reprimand with Tenns, Ifthe tenns are not met as set forth herein, Respondent agrees that the alternative disposition shall be a thirty (30) day suspension of Respondent, s license to practice law. Enforoement oftho Terms ofthts Publlc Reprìmand with Terms shall be as set fòrth in Pazt 6, Section IV, Paragraph 3.I8.0. Respondent agroeš that ifthe three-judge court desigoated to hear this matter accepts tbls Agreed Disposition~ thís matter becomes Final and Non-Appealable. Respondent also agrees that Ìn the event the three-judge oourt designated to hear this matter declines to acoopt this Joint recommendation: i) the same three-judge oourt shall hcar, preside over and oonoludø the hearing 3

'W'...' -Il- W V# V ofthis matter in accordance with ~he designa6on by the Supreme Court of Virginla; and ii) Respondent waives any ohallenge to tile composition oflhe three-judge court based onits consideration and/or rejection ofthis joint recommendation, If the Agreed Disposition is approved, the Clerk of the Disoiplinary System shall assess an administrative fee. THE VIRGNIA STATE BAR Paulo E. Franco, Jr. Assistant Bar Counsel \\.~~On# - Re*ondent ) Fran)din Clcmìher Coy~er ---- /l " Mlohaei Rigsby Counsel for Respondent 4'