PSC 558: Comparative Parties and Elections Spring 2010 Mondays 2-4:40pm Harkness 329

Similar documents
Western European Politics

Comparative Electoral Politics Spring 2008 Professor Orit Kedar Tuesday, Thursday, 3-4:30 Room E51-061

Comparative Party Politics Political Science 196 Spring 2007

PSCI 370: Comparative Representation and Accountability Spring 2011 Zeynep Somer-Topcu Office: 301A Calhoun Hall

Political Representation POLS 251 Spring 2015

G : Comparative Political Behavior

Introduction to Comparative Politics

Political Science 333: Elections, American Style Spring 2006

PS9620 Politics of Industrialized Societies University of Missouri, Spring 2011

Political Science 3316F: Political Parties Fall 2012

University of Toronto Department of Political Science. POL 314H1F L0101 Public Opinion and Voting. Fall 2018 Monday 10-12

Who Speaks for the Poor? The Implications of Electoral Geography for the Political Representation of Low-Income Citizens

Iv. Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University. Fall Comparative Party politics and Party Systems

COLGATE UNIVERSITY. POSC 153A: INTRODUCTION TO COMPARATIVE POLITICS (Spring 2017)

COURSE SYLLABUS PSC 761: AMERICAN POLITICAL FRONTIERS

Comparative Political Systems (GOVT_ 040) July 6 th -Aug. 7 th, 2015

Political Parties and Democracy. Spring Prof. Mark Schneider.

NEW YORK UNIVERSITY Department of Politics V COMPARATIVE POLITICS Spring Michael Laver. Tel:

NEW YORK UNIVERSITY Department of Politics. V COMPARATIVE POLITICS Spring Michael Laver Tel:

COMPARATIVE POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS Political Science 7972

Comparative Political Research. M.A. course, Winter Instructor Zsolt Enyedi

American Political Parties Political Science 8219 Spring Monroe Office hours: Wed 2-4 pm

Political Science 261/261W Latin American Politics Wednesday 2:00-4:40 Harkness Hall 210

Ai, C. and E. Norton Interaction Terms in Logit and Probit Models. Economic Letters

Spring 2012 T, R 11:00-12:15 2SH 304. Pols 234 Western European Politics and Government

Who Responds? Voters, Parties, and Issue Attention

POLA 618: Public Opinion and Voting Behavior, Spring 2008

Field Seminar in Comparative Politics Boston University Political Science 751 Spring 2017

RESEARCH SEMINAR: DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA. Fall Political Science 320 Haverford College

POL 9600: Introduction to Comparative Politics

PhD in Political Science, European Studies and International Relations (PEI) Academic Year Course Comparative Political Institutions

Phone: (801) Fax: (801) Homepage:

Party Policy Strategies and Valence Issues: An Empirical Study of Ten Post-Communist European Party Systems

PSOC002 Democracy Term 1, Prof. Riccardo Pelizzo Raffles 3-19 Tel

American Voters and Elections

When do parties emphasise extreme positions? How strategic incentives for policy

COMPARATIVE POLITICS

Political Science 290F Comparative Electoral Systems Fall 2012 Wednesdays 3:10-6pm, Kerr 593

Fall 2014 TR 11:00-12:15 2TH 100. TR 8:30-9:30, 12:30-1:30 and by appnt. Ph

V Comparative Politics

Political Science 444 Comparative Political Economy in Democracies Stanford University Spring Quarter, 2008

POSC 4411: Politics, Economics, and Democracy Spring,

17.50: Introduction to Comparative Politics Thursday and Friday, 9:30 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. Building 2, Room 142

American Political Parties Political Science 219 Spring 2009

POL 9600: Introduction to Comparative Politics

This Syllabus cannot be copied without the express consent of the Instructor. Comparative Politics: Theory & Practice CPO 3010 Fall 2014

COMPARATIVE POLITICAL ECONOMY (PSC )

SOSC The World of Politics

Department of Political Studies Introduction to Electoral Systems Politics POLS 393 Winter

Power and Politics in America POL-UA 300 Spring 2017 Professor Christopher Dawes

Political Science. Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education National Research University "Higher School of Economics"

POLITICAL SCIENCE 260B. Proseminar in American Political Institutions Spring 2003

Study Abroad Programme

Instructor: Dr. Hanna Kleider Office: Candler Hall 304 Office hours: Thursday 10:45 12:45

Boundary Control Subnational Authoritarianism in Federal Democracies

EXPLAINING THE EFFECTIVE NUMBER OF PARTIES PARADOX IN POST-COMMUNIST EUROPE: PRESIDENTS MATTER. Matthew C. Falvey

GS Comparative Politics (Core) Department of Politics New York University -- Fall 2005

POL SCI Party Politics in America. Fall 2018 Online Course

Frances McCall Rosenbluth. Yale University Hamden, CT New Haven, CT

Guidelines for Comprehensive Exams in Comparative Politics Department of Political Science The Pennsylvania State University December 2005

POLI239: Introduction to European Government Spring 2014 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Department of Political Science

Spring 2011; 3/4 credits

PS489: Federalizing Europe? Structure and Behavior in Contemporary European Politics

Directed Research Seminar in Theories and Methods of Political Science, Part II (Spring Semester)

POL-GA Comparative Government and Institutions New York University Spring 2017

COMPARATIVE POLITICS

Prof. Jessica Fortin-Rittberger, Ph. D.

Prof. David Canon Fall Semester Wednesday, 1:20-3:15, 422 North Hall and by appointment

political participation

PS 7206 Comparative Political Institutions

Party Aggregation and Political Consolidation in. the American States

Advanced Topics in Comparative Politics

2003/12/9 2004/2/ /4/13

Days/Time/Classroom: MW/3:00-4:15 PM/BUSAD D201

Dr. Melody Ellis Valdini Spring Tuesday: 4-6:30 Office: 650-M URBN Room: CLY 101

James F. Adams Department of Political Science University of California at Davis One Shields Avenue Davis, CA

Political Economy 301 Introduction to Political Economy Tulane University Fall 2006

Executive-Legislative Politics

POLS G9208 Legislatures in Historical and Comparative Perspective

Problems in Contemporary Democratic Theory

Strategic Models of Politics

Comparing European Democracies Draft Syllabus

Lahore University of Management Sciences

Learn the basic theories of judicial decision-making, and discuss their application for comparative judicial research.

Lahore University of Management Sciences. POL 320 Comparative Politics Fall

Political Science 820 Proseminar in American Politics. Spring 2002 Tuesday 12:40-3: North Kedzie Hall

Strategic Manifesto Differentiation: Moving to the Center vs. Periphery

POL 230/WWS 325 Introduction to Comparative Politics Spring 2018

POSC 4411: Politics, Economics, and Democracy Spring, 2016

Political Institutions

University of Rochester Environmental Politics Professor Rothenberg Fall 2011

POS 6933 Presidents, Prime Ministers, and Legislatures Department of Political Science University of Florida Spring Semester 2005

Comparative Government and Politics POLS 568 Section 001/# Spring 2018

Comparative Government and Politics POLS 568 Section 001/# Spring 2016

Introduction to Comparative Politics or permission of the instructor.

Partisan Sorting and Niche Parties in Europe

POLITICAL SCIENCE 7125: FEDERALISM

Political Science 272: Theories of International Relations Spring 2010 Thurs.-Tues., 9:40-10:55.

Politics 114: POLITICAL CHANGE IN WESTERN EUROPE. Chris Howell Fall 2008

Politics G Spring, 2005 The Seminar This seminar is a basic survey of the academic literature on campaigns and elections, including specific

Transcription:

Professor Bonnie Meguid 306 Harkness Hall Email: bonnie.meguid@rochester.edu PSC 558: Comparative Parties and Elections Spring 2010 Mondays 2-4:40pm Harkness 329 How and why do political parties emerge? What determines party success and failure? What are the causes and consequences of adopting different electoral rules? Under what conditions does strategic voting occur? What role do the economy, ideology, and partisan identification play in shaping the choices voters make? The goal of this seminar is to examine the classic and contemporary literature on political parties, electoral systems, and voting in comparative politics. We consider multiple methodological approaches to these topics and compare the dynamics of parties, elections, and voting across of range of empirical contexts, including the United States, Western and Eastern Europe, India, Africa, and Latin America. COURSE REQUIREMENTS This course is a seminar. Students are thus expected to actively contribute to the discussion each and every week. This necessitates a careful reading of the material prior to the class. In preparing for class, students should think carefully about both the substantive and methodological aspects of each reading individually and in comparison with each other. Student responsibilities include leading discussion of one of the readings in each seminar, drawing the class into describing and comparing the readings substantively and methodologically. (There will be some flexibility about this depending on the size of the class and the readings for the week.) A one page handout of notes should be provided. Grades will be based on these presentations and general class discussion (33%); the take-home midterm, (33%); and a take-home final (33%), covering the 2 nd half of the course. **Barring extraordinary circumstances, late exams will be marked down a third of a grade (for ex. A to A-) for each 24 hour period after they are due. Thus, if a paper is turned in any time during the first 24 hours after it is due, it is penalized a third of a grade. Any paper not turned in within a week of the assigned due date will automatically receive a zero. REQUIRED READINGS In this course, we read a combination of books, book chapters and journal articles. Articles and book chapters will be available through Blackboard. The books for the course are listed below. One copy of each book will be on reserve in the library, but you will probably find it easier to purchase them. Aldrich, John. 1995. Why Parties? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Chhibber, Pradeep and Ken Kollman. 2004. The Formation of National Party Systems: Federalism and Party Competition in Canada, Great Britain, India, and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Cox, Gary. 1997. Making Votes Count. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers. Lijphart, Arend. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems. Oxford: Oxford UP. Meguid, Bonnie M. 2008. Party Competition between Unequals: Strategies and Electoral Fortunes in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- CLASS SCHEDULE NOTE: Because of the MLK Day University holiday, there is no class on Monday, January 18. January 25: What is a Party? Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers. Chapter 2. Schlesinger, J. 1984. On the Theory of Party Organization. Journal of Politics. 46(2): 369-400. Marx, Karl and Friedrich Engels. 1998(1888). The Communist Manifesto. Oxford: Oxford UP. February 1: Party Systems I Lipset, Seymour and Stein Rokkan. 1990. Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction. In Peter Mair (ed) The West European Party System. Oxford: Oxford UP. 91-138. Inglehart, Ronald. 1977. The Silent Revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Chapter 2. Aldrich, John. 1995. Why Parties? Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Chapters 1-5. Bates, Robert H. 1983. Modernization, Ethnic Competition and the Rationality of Politics in Contemporary Africa. In State versus Ethnic Claims: African Policy Dilemmas. Eds. Donald Rothchild and Victor Olorunsola. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. 152-171. 2

February 8: Party Systems II Sartori, Giovanni. 1990. A Typology of Party Systems, In Peter Mair (ed), The West European Party System. Oxford: Oxford UP: 316-349. Grofman, Bernard and Arend Lijphart. 1986. Electoral Laws and their Political Consequences. New York: Agathon Press. Chapters 1 (Riker) and 3 (Duverger). Neto, Octavio and Gary Cox. 1997. Electoral Institutions, Cleavage Structures and the Number of Parties. American Journal of Political Science. 41(1): 149-174. Boix, Carles. 1999. Setting the Rules of the Game. American Political Science Review 93(3). February 15: Party Positioning Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row. Chapters 7-8. Riker, William. 1982. Liberalism against Populism. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press. 197-232. Budge, Ian and Dennis Farlie. 1983. Party Competition- Selective Emphasis or Direct Confrontation? in Western European Party Systems: Continuity and Change. eds. Hans Daalder and Peter Mair. London: Sage Publications. 267-306. Miller, Gary and Norman Schofield. 2003. Activists and Partisan Realignment in the United States. American Political Science Review. 97(2): 245-260. February 22: Explaining Party Success and Failure I Przeworski, Adam and John Sprague. 1986. Paper Stones. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Introduction and Chapters 1-4. Kitschelt, Herbert. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. Chapter 4. Greene, Kenneth F. The Political Economy of Authoritarian Single-Party Dominance. Comparative Political Studies. Forthcoming. 3

March 1: Explaining Party Success and Failure II Meguid, Bonnie M. 2008. Party Competition between Unequals: Strategies and Electoral Fortunes in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. Chapters 1-4 plus 1 case study chapter (either ch 5, 6 or 7) Adams, James, et al. 2006. Are Niche Parties Fundamentally Different from Mainstream Parties? The Causes and the Electoral Consequences of Western European Parties Policy Shifts, 1976-1998. American Journal of Political Science. 50 (3): 513-29. Ezrow, Lawrence. On the Inverse Relationship between Votes and Proximity for Niche Parties. European Journal of Political Research. 47(2): 206-20. March 8: Spring Break NO CLASS March 15: New Parties and Political Challenges **Take-Home Midterm handed out in class. Due FRIDAY, March 19 by 5pm. Katz, Richard S. and Peter Mair. 1995. Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy. Party Politics 1(1): 5-18. Response by Koole, Ruud. 1996. Cadre, Catch-All or Cartel? Party Politics. 2(4): 507-523. Dalton, Russell and Martin Wattenberg (eds). 2000. Parties without Partisans. Oxford: Oxford UP. Chapters 3-6, 11. March 22: Voting I: Issue and Partisan Voting Rabinowitz, George and Elaine Macdonald. 1989. A Directional Theory of Issue Voting. American Political Science Review 83(1): 93-121. Iversen, Torben. 1994. Political Leadership and Representation in Western European Democracies: A Test of Three Models of Voting. American Journal of Political Science 38(1): 45-74 Petrocik, John R. 1996. Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study. American Journal of Political Science 40: 825-50 Miller, Warren E. and J. Merrill Shanks. 1996. The New American Voter. Cambridge: Harvard UP. Chapter 6. An additional Reading (tba) 4

March 29: Voting II: Economic and Retrospective Voting Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. Chapters 1-4, 6, 8-10 (p. 3-83, 106-129, 155-212). Lewis-Beck, Michael S. and Mary Stegmaier. 2000. Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science. 3: 183-219. Samuels, David. 2004. Presidentialism and Accountability for the Economy in Comparative Perspective. American Political Science Review 98(3): 425-436. Kayser, Mark Andreas and Christopher Wlezien. 2007. Performance Pressure: Patterns of Partisanship and the Economic Vote. Unpublished manuscript. April 5: Voting III: Strategic and Expressive Voting Cox, Gary. 1997. Making Votes Count. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chapters 1-7 Grofman, Bernard. 1985. The Neglected Role of the Status Quo in Models of Issue Voting. Journal of Politics 47(1): 230-237. Kedar, Orit. 2005. When Moderate Voters Prefer Extreme Parties: Policy Balancing in Parliamentary Elections. American Political Science Review 99(2): 185-199. Schuessler, Alexander A. 2000. Expressive Voting. Rationality and Society. 12(1) April 12: Turn-Out and Vote Buying Powell, G. Bingham, Jr. 1986. American Voter Turnout in Comparative Perspective. American Political Science Review 80(1): 17-43. Aldrich, John. 1993. Rational Choice and Turnout. American Journal of Political Science 37(1): 246-278. Bendor, Jonathan, Daniel Diermeier and Michael Ting. 2003. A Behavioral Model of Turnout. American Political Science Review 97(2): 261-280. Helmke, Gretchen and Bonnie M. Meguid. 2008. Endogenous Institutions: The Origins of Compulsory Voting Laws. Unpublished manuscript. Stokes, Susan. 2005. Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence 5

from Argentina. American Political Science Review 99(3): 315-326. April 19: Electoral Rules Lijphart, Arend. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems. Oxford: Oxford UP. Shugart, Matthew S. 1995. The Electoral Cycle and Institutional Sources of Divided Government. American Political Science Review 89(2): 327-343. Shugart, Matthew S. and Martin P. Wattenberg. 2001. Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds? Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chapters 1, 10, 20. April 26: Electoral Aggregation **Take-Home Final Exam handed out in class. Due MONDAY, May 3 by 5 pm. Cox, Gary. 1997. Making Votes Count. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chapters 10-11. Chhibber, Pradeep and Ken Kollman. 2004. The Formation of National Party Systems: Federalism and Party Competition in Canada, Great Britain, India, and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 6